Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
just read some nice news on the 335xi, in this months automoble magazine, it states that the STI & EVO are great awd sedans for boy racers, and that the 335xi is more an all around better awd sedan, especially for some who would not want to be looked at as a BOY RACER.
safe & fun driving!
UJ
Regards,
OW
It's ironic that you're calling EVO and STI owners immature...
Loved the Recaro seats. Hated the trunk—which is TINY! It's much smaller than the Lancer trunk because they stuck the battery and other space-consuming stuff back there.
Why did they do that? To achieve a 50/50 weight distribution so I was told. Maybe so, but it definitely hurts the usefulness of the vehicle if you plan to take trips. The 5-door STI has it all over the EVO in that respect.
Bob
Too bad it didn't end up looking like that sharp concept.
Not from what I've heard. Lancer Sportback, yes. Ralliart, probably. EVO, no. That could change, however.
Bob
Sure looked cool.
was not trying to be immature, OW and myself where told on another sight that these 2 sedans are beter off then the xi,( sorry if i offended you, but just relaying what i read.) i as an xi owner beg to differ, as the writer of automobile mag does also !
atx, in case you dont know my son rides a vw r32, and i respect all rides, especially AWD automobiles.
another phrase from the article reads,
so why do mitsubishi and subaru continue racing for awd superiority? 2 reasons; first, both the evo and the sti spring from front wheel drive genes, and AWD IS A NOTCH HIGHER IN THE PERFORMANCE PECKINIG ORDER. second, no one drives exclusively on smooth, dry pavement; when the road is rough or slippery, awd is more likely than alternative to get you HOME SAFE.
safe & fun driving to all, in whatever car you choose to drive!
UJ
It might have 60 less hp than the others, but it still manages a 5.4 second 0-60 time. Comes with a lowered, more STI-like suspension than the GT Limited and includes 6-speed.
Plus its priced right around the EVO X and STI though its slightly more 'mature'. Its good enough build quality for entry-level luxury. Certainly worth what you pay for it.
I can say from experience they have absolutely phenominal grip in any driving condition with good tires.
This is a very good candidate that I will consider.
The Evo is another but I do not want "wings" on my next car and I want the new DSG tranny which is only on the MR version with the Wing.
Regards,
OW
The STI has indeed matured, in fact too much for some folks. That's one of the criticisms of the new model, that it lacks the spunky character of the 2007 and prior model.
At $35 grand the STI is well beyond that. The 2007 and prior were so in your face that you could stretch and include those as well. The new one, not so much, IMHO.
At $35 grand the STI is well beyond that. The 2007 and prior were so in your face that you could stretch and include those as well. The new one, not so much, IMHO.
True, the $35K range is a bit above Boy Racer price, but it still retains the image. So would you count the WRX as Boy Racer? That would be the initial entry into the AWD circuit wouldn't it? And it's not over-the-top expensive.
Down in that range I'd go for the Legacy GT 5-speed. I think it is still more refined than the Impreza line. The Legacy Limited has soft plastic dash, really nice leather, etc. The Impreza has made up some ground, but I can't get around hard plastic dashes.
Of all the cars, I liked the size and overall feel of the Audi's, but after warranted, they became difficult to keep factory repaired, and I tend to sell at around 40K miles.
The current Mazdaspeed6 offers a nice compromise in size (larger than the 3 series but plenty of room for 4 adults. It needed upgrades in sound and some improvements in breathing (added a CAT-back exhaust and forced air induction, along with several small factory adjustments to the clutch etc) and is a truly fast and satisfying ride. It does not have the panache of the others, but it gets the job done as well. All things considered, I'll likely keep this one longer than the others I've had,
I am bummed because I waited too long and missed the last '07 MS6 at the dealer here. Oh well, I probably would've been annoyed by the 93 octane requirement anyway.
I don't have demographic data but I'd be willing to bet that the STI owners is a lot more mature. Older, higher income, more well educated.
It's for the adult hooligan, more so than the boy racer.
If you are a 16 years boy racer and show up at a Subaru dealer and ask for an STI test drive, they will pretty much laugh in your face.
As well they should in my opinion. I think there should be a 100hp limit on anything sold to people under 18, and a 200hp limit for under 21. And this is not being hypocritical, because I drove like an @$$ when I was that age too. Its likely that we all did and we all lost at least 1 friend to testosterone-induced driving under age 25. I lost 3. Anyway, back on topic.
The STI is good, don't get me wrong. I think most any Subaru is a good value. I'm just looking at criteria for the best all-round sedan. I would easily call the STI the best hatch.
That's why my mind keeps turning back to the Legacy GT/Spec-B. They can really tear up some track and be halfway refined all at once. And they don't quite come with the sticker shock of a 335xi sedan.
They upgraded to a 6 speed manual and a Torsen rear diff, and this is after it beat all those lux cars in the Road & Track test.
It's likely Subaru will give that model more power to further distinguish it from the regular Legacy GT.
There's no reason why they can't. I think it would sell better if it came with the STI's engine. Maybe they are afraid it would take away from STI sales?
Exactly my consideration. I agree the HP limit for kids as well.
Regards,
OW
Enough to set it apart from the GT, without stomping on the STI.
The spec.B ain't cheap, so 280hp would be a welcome improvement.
Have some questions on using staggered wheel / tire packages versus non-staggered on AWD sedans.
If I am reading the information on their web sites correctly, for the Infiniti G35x / G35xS, and the BWM 528Xi, they only offer non-staggered wheel / tire packages on those AWD sedans, while their RWD versions offer a staggered package as an option / part of an optional package.
But the 328Xi, 335Xi, and 535Xi, offer a staggered wheel / tire package as an option, the same as their RWD counterparts.
Is there anything unique about the 328Xi, 335Xi, and 535Xi that allows use of either staggered or non-staggered set-ups with AWD? Is there any difference in the AWD set up / parameters between a staggered or non-staggered set-up from the factory? A corollary to this is if one got a non-staggered wheel / tire package from the factory, is there any reason you cannot later convert to a staggered set-up assuming you have the right fitment, size, offset, etc.?
Conversely, for the G35 and 528 AWD sedans, is there any reason you cannot use a staggered set-up assuming you have proper fitment?
Thanks
Bruce
I think it's safe to say if the stagger was offered as an option, it's OK but I am not qualified to comment on adding a staggered wheel/tire arrangement to the 2 cars you mentioned.
Regards,
OW
In spite of the fact that BMW recommends against rotating tires (especially staggered ones for obvious reasons), I found that tire noise could be dramatically reduced and tire life could be nominally increased by rotating the tires on my BMWs.
Best Regards,
Shipo
If we think about an extreme case, where you have small tires up front and much bigger tires in the rear, the front axle would be spinning a lot faster than the rear axle, and that would confuse the AWD system, which might try to "correct" for that difference.
I'm sure that's why tires are not staggered on the AWD models.
Even if the circumference is the same, you would still have to account for things like tire wear and sidewall deflection.
Given the better AWD systems are designed to react very quickly to differences in axle speeds, the tire circumference has to be very close, i.e. the tolerances are much smaller vs. cars with only one axle being powered.
I have always rotated my tires but still do not understand BMW's direction regarding this.
Regards,
OW
Exactly. Some manufacturers of AWD vehicles state that if your tires are over 25%-50% worn you should allways replace them in sets of four because of the difference in circumference. Ditto for the tires on an axle equipped with a LSD.
Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport; 2020 C43; 2021 Sahara 4xe 1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica Wife's: 2015 X1 xDrive28i Son's: 2009 328i; 2018 330i xDrive
But they are. consider the following:
2008 328xi Sedan offers a $300 upgrade to the Sport Package. Said upgrade includes:
- - 17 x 8.0 front, 17 x 8.5 rear; 225/45R-17 front, 255/40R-17 rear run-flat performance tires.
2008 328xi Sport Wagon offers a $300 upgrade to the Sport Package. Said upgrade includes:
- - 17 x 8.0 front, 17 x 8.5 rear; 225/45R-17 front, 255/40R-17 rear run-flat performance tires.
2008 328xi Coupe offers a $600 upgrade to the Sport package. Said upgrade includes:
- - 18 x 8.0 front, 18 x 8.5 rear; 225/40R-18 front, 255/35R-18 rear run-flat performance tires.
2008 335xi Sedan offers a $600 upgrade to the Sport package. Said upgrade includes:
- - 18 x 8.0 front, 18 x 8.5 rear; 225/40R-18 front, 255/35R-18 rear run-flat performance tires.
2008 335xi Coupe offers a $600 upgrade to the Sport package. Said upgrade includes:
- - 18 x 8.0 front, 18 x 8.5 rear; 225/40R-18 front, 255/35R-18 rear run-flat performance tires.
2008 535xi Sedan offers a $600 upgrade to the Sport package. Said upgrade includes:
- - 18 x 8.0 front, 18 x 9.0 rear; 245/40R-18 front, 275/35R-18 rear run-flat performance tires
So, it would seem that every AWD version of the 3-Series and 5-Series save the 528xi can be had with staggered rubber. Go figure.
Best Regards,
Shipo
I'm thinking that BMWs AWD system may get tweaked when staggered tires are fitted. Either that or the tires have an identical circumference. Otherwise the system would detect the difference in wheel rpm and interpret it as slippage.
Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport; 2020 C43; 2021 Sahara 4xe 1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica Wife's: 2015 X1 xDrive28i Son's: 2009 328i; 2018 330i xDrive
I'll get my handy-dandy circumference calculator out and report back in a few minutes.
Best Regards,
Shipo
The 328xi Sedan and Sport Wagon:
- - 225/45 R17 -- 24.97" (Front)
- - 255/40 R17 -- 25.03" (Rear)
- - Difference ------ 0.06"
The 328xi Coupe, 335xi Sedan and 335xi Coupe:
- - 225/40 R18 -- 25.09" (Front)
- - 255/35 R18 -- 25.03" (Rear)
- - Difference ------ 0.06"
The 535xi Sedan:
- - 245/40 R18 -- 25.72" (Front)
- - 275/35 R18 -- 25.59" (Rear)
- - Difference ------ 0.13"
I'm thinking that as the worst (from a difference perspective) of the above cars is thirteen-hundredths of an inch, they can be considered virtually identical as far as their overall diameter is concerned.
Best Regards,
Shipo
BTW, what's the difference in performance between 17" and 18" wheels on the 3 series from your point of view?
Regards,
OW
Best Regards,
Shipo
Regards,
OW
My personal take on it is that anything beyond 17" is simply bling. ;-)
Best Regards,
Shipo
I know that Subaru specifies the circumference (2*pi*r = pi*diam) must be within 0.25".
So that 535xi is outside of Subaru's tolerances. The difference in circumference would be 0.13" * 3.14 = 0.41". Well over the 0.25" Subaru would allow.
The interesting thing is this probably means BMW's AWD system allows for more wheelslip before it would react, i.e. it seems to have looser tolerances for rotational differences from axle to axle.
I'd think you could find variances larger than that on new tires of the same model..
You sure the 0.25 inches isn't diameter?
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
That's Subaru's specification, at least.
People complain when they blow out one tire (beyond repair), because if you have more than 10,000 miles on your other 3, you need a new set, or you have to shave the new tires to match the others, or find a used tire with similar wear.
Most people just buy 4 new tires.
If 17" is an ideal size, does that mean, in your opinion, that if I upgraded from the standard 17" wheels on my 535Xi to the optional 18" wheels and appropriately sized tires (probably non staggered per your comments) that it will not improve the handling of my car?
Thanks
Bruce
Best Regards,
Shipo
A friend had a Z3 with big wheels and bent 3 rims. No kidding.
They're expensive to replace, and in some cases he even had to wait for a special order. Tires are also more expensive.
Finally, it adds to your unsprung weight, compared to a lighter 16" or 17" alloy of the same construction.
I just read where BMW is now offering an aftermarket performance suspension for the 335Xi:
http://accessories.bmwusa.com/ItemView.aspx?modelId=280&perf=true&categoryId=136- &productCategoryId=&menuId=0&subItemId=3
With a tighter, sportier feeling and lower suspension setting of 15mm in comparison with series-production vehicles, the inclusion of a BMW Performance control arm with stiffer bushings gives your 3 Series an almost instinctual feel for the road. With adjusted spring rates and bushings, roll is drastically reduced, creating cat-like quickness, increased responsiveness, and stunning agility. Flexing with the motion of your vehicle around even the tightest curves, a BMW Performance control arm means athletic handling, faster turn-ins, and a totally immediate and much more intense reaction to the tarmac. It delivers a perfect compromise between racing car performance and driving comfort.
$695.00
Each price is the suggested retail price and is subject to change. Price excludes installation and taxes
Bruce
Regards,
OW