Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Mazdaspeed3 vs. VW V GTI vs. Civic Si
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
If i were a pro, i'd steal something more expensive!
Ouch!
There was a disabled pick-up his room mate had parked in front of it to keep it safe, and the thiefs moved that to get to his!! The police told him the thiefs were probably eyeing him for a while. This was not a spur of the moment decision by any means.
In most cases, the cars would be stolen and driven right into a shipping container for easy transport to overseas black markets...
May your state roadways be overrun with VWs flying the colors of the University of Florida... :shades:
#959 of 993 Re: Honda Civic Si feels like the best quality of all three [600kgolfgt] by carfanatic007 Apr 01, 2007 (2:33 pm)
Reply | E-mail Msg
Replying to: 600kgolfgt (Apr 01, 2007 1:29 pm)
Hey, I gotta challenge for you. I live in Ohio. Lets take our cars to the track and settle this man to man. Stock to stock? What do you say! No street racing, only on a track. And no mods to your car. What about it?
... I wholeheartedly agree with your idea!
:P
... I wholeheartedly agree with your idea!
As a Scarlet Knight (Rutgers), congratulations on your school's successes, and I hope my Alma Mater can eventually
reach that goal... :shades:
First, we have to go through the growing pains of making the transition from playing the Ivy League schools (and as the 8th oldest institution of learning in the US - that has been since the beginning of time) to playing more schools at the NCAA Division I level. Believe me, it hasn't been easy!!! :confuse:
...I did note something interesting. It seemed as though the reviewers had some UNKIND things to say regarding the ride qualify of the GTI. I don't remember the exact verbiage (perhaps someone else can help me out) but I recall them remarking about the stiff ride in the GTI. Yet, no such comments regarding the Mazdaspeed3.
I know that, a few months ago, some regulars in here were making assumptions regarding the anticipated ride quality of the Mazdaspeed3 PARTICULARLY in comparison to the GTI; opinions to the effect that the Speed3 would be overly 'harsh' in comparison.
Yet, it seems as though the testers at C&D, after actually having extensive seat time in both the Speed3 and the GTI, felt the ride was better in the Speed3.
Has anyone in here had EXTENSIVE seat time in both of these examples (hopefully over a variety of surfaces) to say which had a better ride?
GTI's got the softer ride by far. Better is a function of what you prefer.
I read the article in depth and i don't really recall any negative comments on the ride quality of the gti, just that the rear commodations did not impress.
"I read the article in depth and i don't really recall any negative comments on the ride quality of the gti, just that the rear commodations did not impress."
Funny, I'd forgotten the comments on rear accomodations.
I dunno, eldaino; I could've sworn they had some comments regarding the ride quality of the GTI. I'll try to remember to take another look at my copy of C&D this evening.....
Check the issue rorr and let us know what it says! I can't remember either!
Yeah, that's the gist of what I had remembered as well. Personally, I found it surprising that they commented on the stiffness of the GTI and the 'pronounced bump' sensation; particularly given the conventional wisdom that the GTI has a softer, more grown-up ride than the rest of that segment.
I was also surprised that the Speed3 (over the same roads) DIDN'T get that sort of a comment on the ride.
The GTI has stiffer ride than the Rabbit. The lowered GTI in Europe is even worse, according to the complains from Brits' magazines.
Back in '04, I found the Mazda 3S w/ only 16"s already riding "concrete tire" like, plus the rebound motion was too quick to be relaxing. So I jumped into buying an '05 Focus 2.3 ST instead, & still found it... I plan to trade it in for an '07 Focus ST, which has its ride retuned better &, in '06, earned a RARE high ride rating from Consumer Reports' sporty-car tests! The '08 is domestic-ugly, while the next one is "007 handsome" -- a compact version of the next James Bond car.
I believe that a regular Mazda3 can ride less nervously if the shocks are replaced w/ Gabriels for slower movements.
Those of you who want a comfy ride should get the Rabbit, but better wait till the inefficient 5-cyl is replaced by the lag-free super/turbo-charged frugal 1.4.
I test drove many cars and I just don't like the feel, like I do with the Mazda 3 line.
The rabbit does feels softer, however, it felt like it was going to lose control on hard braking and cornering.
I agree with you about the inefficient 5-cyl engine. It also is more noisy than the Mazda 3 line with the 2.3L. Turbo just waste to much gas. The price on gas these days, forget turbo.
What really helps also, is having good tires and Minimum 17" rims. I have 4 cars with all different size tires and the cars that have 17" and higher, are a better ride and feel.
VW seems to get it better with their gearing and their 2.0T. Though I still feel like the 6th gear isn't nearly tall enough.
To me it feels like an Overdrive gear is there on the M3S, it is just not displayed on the shifter. But if you want that power, then you can use the Manual feature. That sure has ZOOM-ZOOM all over it. I sure feel the power.
Also the CAI that I bought uses a K&N washable air filter. Awesome!!
Ummmm, you may also be getting more mileage because the engine wasn't broken in yet before you added the CAI. Also, the gas formulations were changed over VERY recently resulting in better mileage. I've noticed nearly 3 mpg better mileage over the last couple of tanks and my car is 7 years and 147k miles old.......and I didn't add a CAI.
Are you aware of how BADLY every manufacturer would just LOVE to increase the fleet mileage of their vehicles by roughly 10% AND add hp at the same time? So, if a CAI REALLY does all that, why don't the manufacturer's put them in as standard equipment?
The dealers would like the extra $400 for the CAI, so for them to put these in every car, doesn't make sense for them, However, some cars already have them as stock. My friend bought the new Nissan SE-R and it had it. Also the Spec-V has them.
I would say in about 3 years, maybe they will be stock, who knows.
I lot of people complain about 5 cylinders, but its no turbo and really not so much loud as it is different sounding.
After almost 16k in my rabbit, i can assure that this engine combined with the six speed auto is virtually silent on the freeway and while driving in the city. Hard acceleration=more noise, but which engine is not without that?
I would hardly call the 2.5 insufficient. Next year the hp is getting bumped up to 170, and torque 177.
It pretty much destroys anything in its class, at least on paper. (now if it could only go on a diet! ) but i don't mind the weight...gives a great secure feeling.
Stallionaire i'm suprised at your ideas of 17's and higher giving a 'better' ride. Do you mean a sportier feeling? Because bigger rims means lower-profile tires=rougher ride, even though it usually lends to better handling.
SO you got the cooper huh blue guy? You liking it? What color? OH and congrats!
I agree with your ideas.
Let me be clear about the larger tire size. I feel that not only the larger tires are a sportier ride, but also for a stronger feel in the steering wheel, like the tires and hugged to the pavement, if that make any sense. I don't know how else to describe it. I feel that I have more control, stability and yes even a harsher ride with larger tires. Actually they sound kind of cool driving at high speeds.
I'm getting some 17's or 18's for my bunny soon, with more aggressive tires. That'll be fun.
That should be fun. Let me know what you get and how you like the ride.
Yes, I have to agree with you 100% there, why didn't they make the 6th gear really high/tall. Okay, its a "sports" car and has 5 close-ratio gears, fine! But to make the 6th gear so close to the ratio of the 5th, is ridiculous.
Only benefit..... you can go up the grapevine or any other mountain just fine in 6th and never need to shift as long as your going over 60 MPH.
Still I can live with it for a few years. When the wife gets pregnant, I'll sell it off and a family car like a 335i sedan or M3 sedan.
Build Quality -
Both cars seem pretty even when looking at the build quality. Fit and finish were excellent and the VW appears to have only a slight edge.
Ride Quality -
Both cars offer very good Ride quality. Some would say that the VW is more refined, and that may be true to an extent but I noticed that at moderate speeds on rough roads the VW felt less controlled and more bouncy. This is due to increased weight of the VW. The syspension on the 3 reacted a little faster and with less bounce. (Note: both cars were driven on the same roads, Delaers about 3/4 mile apart).
Road noise -
This is the one area where the rabbit had an edge over the 3. The interior noise is less in the VW as compared to the 3. Note: The 2007 Mazda 3 has additonal dampning material added and is considered much quieter that earlier years.
Driving Dynamics -
The steering response of the Mazda 3 felt much more positive than the VW and with far less body roll. I found the VW steering to require more effort to achieve the same result. The Braking of the 3 was far superior to the VW. Where the 3 has a nice even progression and control. The VW felt mushy and slower to respond.
Cornering / Handling -
There really is no comparison here. The Mazda 3 corners and responds to driver input so much better than the VW, and every other FWD C-segment car (Civic, Corolla, Sentra, Focus, etc). I have acutally driven all of them and can safely say that the Mazda 3 is the best handling 4 door C-segment car period. Note: The Mini Cooper is a subcompact W/ 2 doors and is not considered a C-segment car, thus it is excluded.
Interior -
Both cars have very good interiors. As far as materials quality is concerned I would give an edge to the VW, particualarly the GTI. When it comes to appearance I personally prefered the look of the 3. It has a clean modern vibe to it that suits the exterior of the car well.
Inerior Comfort / Space -
This is where I had a problem with the VW. While I liked the power of the GTI. I could not get comfortable in the seats. They are too tightly bolstered and would probably be fine for a 150lb person. For me at 5'10 and 200 lbs, well forget about it. The Rabbit has a nice seat that is more comforable and fit my proprtions better. The Mazda 3 on the other hand has an excellent seat and appears to have been designed with long haul comfort. Layout of controls is similar in both cars and I would call that an even draw. The amount of usable space in the 3 hatchback is considerably larger than the VW. There is probably another 16-20" of additional space behind the rear seats. So if you plan on using this area then the 3 gets a nod for space.
Note: The Mazda 3 is almost a foot longer than the VW and yet it is 350-400 lbs lighter.
Sound System / Nav -
If you want a pretty decent factory sound system the Bose Audio option on the 3 is the way to go. The sound is smooth and I found it the be fairly balanced considering the little subwoofer under the front seat. The VW on the other hand has a horrible head unit. I don't know what VW was thinking when it came to the stereo. It is very harsh and employs soft clipping that gets worse as the volume is increased. Also the speaker placemet is bad where the main drive units are placed in the middle of the front doors. Some other factors to consider: The only way to get audiophile sound in this car is to replace the head unit, yes it is that bad. So in my opinion getting the factory Nav in the GTI is a waste fo money. Where on the 3 you can keep the factory head unit and using a high quailty impedance adators add separate amplifiers and quality speakers. Another plus for the 3 is that the Navagation system is separate from the audio system.
Maintainence / Reliability -
This is what scares me about the VW. They have a bad reputaion for reliability of particular concern being electrical problems. Where VW uses a Bosch ECU and many other electrical componets. The Mazda 3 utilizes a Denso ECU and Hitachi electrical componets. Note: Toyota aslo uses Deno and Hitachi. The long term mainatince schedule for the the VW is also much greater than that of the Mazda, with the GTI being even worse. The GTi uses a timing belt that has to be replaced at 60k - 80k miles. I went further than that and did a fair amount of internet research. The VW Rabbit and GTI have had numerous problems, too may to tell and basically the main reason I recended my offer to the dealer. While the Mazda 3 is not perfect it has a far greater track record and very good waranty ratings.
Summary -
Everybody that their own unique requirements that they try to meet in making a car purchase decision. When comparing the 2007 Mazda 3 to the VW Rabbit the clear winner in
most catgories is the Mazda 3. I was looking for a cool comuter car (automatic) that both myself and my wife could drive. Since I already have a kick-[non-permissible content removed] sports car I didn't feel that I had make a purchasing decision based soley on performance but the car as whole. After almost a year of crawling over almost every new car out there to the point of annoying numerous sales people, (about 30 or more test drives). I came to my own conclusion that the 2007 Mazda 3 is best C-segment car currently available. It simply does so many things better than the competition... :shades:
Mazda3 s: $21k
The Honda Si and 3s had similar power. The Si might've been a little stronger, but it was very close.
Back seat space was about the same (To small for my 6'+ behind!)
Trunk was bigger in Civic.
Civic guages not as bad as I thought they'd be. I adjusted quickly. The interior is good, but the Mazda's is better.
The real difference between the two cars was their attitudes.
The Mazda was confident, with a good mix of feedback and refinement.
The Honda was WAY TOO LOUD! I was like "Why are you yelling at me?" Even the turn signals were loud! Zero sound-dampening. They didn't even try.
The Scion tC was Lexus-quiet in comparison. The Mazda was on the right side of the line.
Great seats in the Si, too! Mazda seats were good.
If the Honda knocked off about 75% of the racket, and offered a similar price, I'd go that way. But that was ridiculous, and more expensive. :sick: The Mazda just does everything well, and doesn't p&%$ you off, ever.
I'd test the MazdaSpeed, but I'm, not interested in the wagonoid style. I'm sure the MazdaSpeed is superior, if you go for wagonoids.
Good bye....for now.
DrFill
THe steering ratio is quicker in the 3 than the rabbit. But the steering feels smoother on the bunny. Not to say it isn't smooth on the 3, but its just more so on the bunny, having the advantage with an electro mechanical setup, and one of the best ones out there right now. Still no good ole rack and pinion, but you get my drift.
I agree that the 3 does have a quicker steering ratio. Funny how the ratio can be but yet feel different from the bunny and the 3. I just love the stiffer, rougher feel. It must be that sports car in my blood that I love so much.