Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
The problem is, it is intermittent. I am afraid if I take it to the dealer, they will say "unable to duplicate the problem." Any suggestions?
For emissions.
and if i take the front 2 off will it be able to pass smog if the back cat is brand new.
No, any alterations to the exhaust are illegal and any missing parts are an automatic fail.
and does anyone know which one of the 3 fails the most.
Usually the rear one.
I'm not so sure about that. If you were to replace the cats with high-flowing cats that still allowed the vehicle to pass emissions and no CELs then it would not be illegal. You cannot remove them however if the emissions would increase due to it.
-mike
Only approved replacment parts may be used, which some cat back systems and high flows are approved.
Removing a cat would be a violation.
Removing the pre-cats/mini-cats on his vehicle would be a violation.
If there is no DEQ inspection, then that may be a different story for them. Federal guidelines talk about alterations, removal and that, but their state may have other guidelines that they go by.
My question, is there any downside to these systems such as lower gas mileage? Would the intake need to be modified in any way?
2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible
The engine in question is a 3.8L with single exhaust. Don't know if it's restricted but stock it's rated at 263hp.
The Magnaflow site has some dyno charts to "prove" the horsepower and torque gains.
2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible
-mike
I suppose if your stock muffler is restrictive you could gain maybe...what...1-2HP...but you won't feel it.
Nothing wrong if you are just buying "sound". Sound is nice. I like sound.
As for the dyno tests, this is a whole can of worms. I am not implying duplicity...sometimes it's just human error. You might find this interesting:
http://www.turbomagazine.com/tech/0402tur_dyno_tricks_problems/index.html
-mike
A lot of sensors have fits when you change the exhaust system without changing the programming.
If it were me, I'd leave it alone. Nothing good can come of it.
I live in a non-emission testing state which would make it more reasonable to use the dummy O2 sensors and remove the cats completely which makes for better exhaust then adding a catback as we know that the cats are way more restrictive than any muffler.
Despite the fact that they don't test, you are still federally mandated IIRC to have a cat on your car. A High-Flow cat would accomplish both sides of the coin while not giving the all-out best performance it would significantly increase it while keeping you compliant.
-mike
Motorsports and Modifications Host
At some point these components have to wear out. Does any one know what Chrysler used to get such longevity out of their system?
I'd like to replace it with something as good if I can.
2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible
If you're happy with the results from the oem system I'd go back and install the same. That way you'll get a system that will last at least another 12+ years. Twenty five years on two systems is impressive. :surprise:
I cannot see how they expect me to get access since it is between the engine and firewall?
Does anyone have any experience removing this manifold or whether it is actually necessary to remove to get the heads off?
Thanks for any advice.
Well that's what the book says:
"Remove the 6 nuts, crossover pipe and 2 gaskets."
Have you removed the intake manifold and stripped everything else off the top that you need to? Maybe that's how you gain access.
I never had to touch any of the exhaust components (pipes, muffler, cat, hangars) on my '94 Dodge Caravan. That was in something like 174,00o miles of driving over 11 years (got rid of it back in 2005).
So, I am trying to sort this exhaust business out. I do not need more horsepower than the truck comes with from the factory. What I am interested in is sound and mpg.
What is a 'tuned' exhaust? Does it do something that I can't by merely buying 2 mufflers and having my mechanic make true dual exhaust?
Am I gaining anything other than sound with true duals vs. single muffler? Does one flowmaster perform better than one factory muffler, or is it just the sound factor?
What if I bought a chip and left the exhaust as is? Would the chip compensate for the loss of back-pressure and re-tune the engine in a way that recovers mpg?
There are so many options and variables, I don't even know what to base a decision on. Again, what I want is best mpg, best setup for the longevity of the engine, and some sound. Oh yeah, and I don't want to spend more $ than I'm going to get back over the life of the truck. Simple right?
Thanks, Gabriel
You don't state what your mileage was before hacking the exhaust. Plus your neighbor's version of the 5.3 produces less hp than the '02. One thing I can pretty much guarantee is that there is virtually no hp gain nor significant mileage increase over stock with a catback "tuned" for your truck. Forget the flowmasters. They will crap out within 4-5 years forcing you do buy another. Plus they will get you less mpg than you're getting now.
Corsa and Borla make the best exhaust systems. They will outlive your truck. Install one of those and forget about it if what you're looking for is a loud but no resonance exhaust.
Am I gaining anything other than sound with true duals vs. single muffler? Does one flowmaster perform better than one factory muffler, or is it just the sound factor?
True duals will lose low end torque and lower mpg. Flowmasters will create more problems than you would want.
What if I bought a chip and left the exhaust as is? Would the chip compensate for the loss of back-pressure and re-tune the engine in a way that recovers mpg?
A chip may give you an increase in HP depending on which one you get. It will not increase mpg nor compensate for your sawzall job.
Oh yeah, and I don't want to spend more $ than I'm going to get back over the life of the truck. Simple right?
Yes and no. The cheapest route and perhaps the most effective at this point would be to install a Borla or Corsa muffler. Might not be tuned specifically for your truck but some of them will make your truck sound like it has a big block. Assuming that's what you want. Check out some of the online sellers for the muffler and if you have a mig welder you can do the install yourself. Wait. Sorry you're a carpenter not a welder. Well take it to a muffler shop and they can weld it on for you.
I'm surprised that your truck doesn't give you any problems since it lacks a muffler.
If you heard a loud metal hitting metal sound prior to the pop, it could have been internal engine parts (like from the valves or piston/crankshaft), and then a 'pop', which could have been a backfire/explosion from unburned gas which got dumped into the exhaust pipe where it ignited and exploded.
Shouldn't have been driving it with making a loud noise like that.
I noticed today that when i rev the car, it sounds very "ricey". I am thinking maybe the catalytic converter is falling apart, like some pieces of the "honey comb" inside the converter. Maybe this is causing my bad mileage? I would love to replace it in a heartbeat, but as you know it's not the cheapest thing to replace. But if the cat is the problem, it will be replaced ASAP. Below is a link to a video i made tonight with the exhaust sound on my 99' SL2. Below the link is a list of all the things i have done/replaced on the car in trying to fix this issue.
If you like, give it a watch, or listen and tell me what you think it could be. Also the exhaust pipe and muffler from behind the cat has been replaced back in april when i bought the car, due to a nice rust hole at the first bend behind after the cat. The car doesn't have any loss of power, just the ricey noise and bad gas mileage. Here is the link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxO3bKbJ-MM
Here what i have done:
Transmission was rebuilt at 78,000k due to reverse slam and burnt fluid, current mileage is 84,200k
Exhaust pipe after the Cat has been replaced.
ECTS and connector
AIT and connector
Thermostat, and radiator flush
Fuel filter
Injectors have been cleaned
Spark plugs replaced with NGK coppers and wires
Map sensor
PCV Valve
Front Oxygen Sensor, OEM not spliced.
Cold air intake
The car doesn't burn a drop of oil and is always up to date on oil changes. Any help would be great!
Without any codes to go by, I would replace the front O2 sensor (though I see that you already did that), though if that were bad it should set the CEL. It could also be a vacuum leak which lets more air into the intake. That might causes the ECU to dump more fuel into the engine in order to keep the air-fuel ratio without bounds. These are just guesses.
What throws no codes on an engine that sounds like it is running well, but could result in awful gas mileage?
(I'm thinkin' I'm thinkin' :confuse: )
Excessive fuel pressure from the FP regulator?
Leaking injectors?
Not shifting into high gear?
- underinflated tires
- my first thought when I heard that whinning, was a bearing going bad on air compressor, waterpump, or alternator
- and that is a really throaty exhaust tone....got any back pressure?
What is the color on the interior of the tail pipe? Is it a really rich black substance, showing as running too rich?
The inside of the taipipe does have a good amount of black substance, that it actually left a black line going down the exhaust pipe and onto the muffler, but the car is not blowing black smoke. I also removed the spark plugs and took some photos of each, as well as the exhaust pipe. Here are the photos:
http://img20.imageshack.us/gal.php?g=96655802.jpg">
Any chance its leaking gas when its rolling down the road? I worked for saturn in the early years. Only saturns that didn't burn oil were the ones in the shop getting the fuel pumps replaced or the one's at the scrap yard being scrapped. Hence not running.
Later years the Honda motors were nice but the rest was well what can I say GM parts.
Its a fuel system issue not an exhaust issue or break issue or tire issue. Given your car has no engine lights on would indicate that the car has more than just a fuel system issue given the GOV mandated engine management systems are failing to pick up an obvious fuel issue. When was the last time you had it smoged? Did it pass?
The fuel goes some place :-)
Is your kid or neighbor syphoning your tank? I'd consider that a very big possibility given its nearly impossible for that car to burn that much fuel without very obvious problems.
Get a locking gas cap! See if your milege improves - they cost like $8 :-)
Don't they just hook something up to the OBDII and scan for codes? And if nothing comes up then they pass the car? Thats what all the mechanics i talked to over here said, unless the car is older and doesn't have OBDII. Here are the pics again:
http://img20.imageshack.us/gal.php?g=96655802.jpg
Do you live in the city? I didn't know people owned cars there? HA HA Wife lived in NY for 7 yrs.
Shifty/anyone else - Don't you think if he's running that much excessive fuel through the engine, it would fry the cat in short order, and so set the CEL? Cat's are not tolerant of fuel-rich exhausts, IIRC.