Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I am sorry that the Pilot doesn't work for you. However we don't need your sympathy. I took a long time to research a vehicle that would work for me and all the parameters that I had, the Pilot was the best choice for my present life situation. Yes, the fuel ecomony is not the best, but I KNOW an Insight or an Oddessy is not going to haul 3 growing boys, and their friends, and their sports gear and camping/ski trips on a logging road with some light toy towing (the need for 4WD and ground clearance) and of course the Costco runs to feed these ventures. I did look into Yukons, and Envoys, and Hilanders, and Explorers but they either didn't have the seating/cargo capacity and/or the fuel ecomony was even worse. My 07 4WD EXL is now a little over 6000 miles and its taken me a bit to readjust my driving style and my fuel ecomony can range from 14-16 mpg for strict city driving (all under 40 mph) and 19 - 22 mpg for highway (depending if I am towing or not). As for shift points... I was concerned as well in the beginning. My Pilot would shift at 33 -35 rpms constantly and it was a tad jarring... now with a better foot and 6000 miles later I usually shift at 25 rpms and it is smooth. Talking to my Honda techs (I have known 2 for a bazillion years, one being my bro) the acceptable and typical range is 27 - 33 rpms. This is not to say that each and every Pilot will do this each and everytime. I know my cold engine in winter tachs high even when I only use my pinkie toe on the accelerator... and it takes at least 5 - 10 minutes for the engine to settle down on cold mornings. Is this a design flaw... perhaps. But for me... right now, the Pilot is my best option. Talk to me in 15 years and I will have an S2000... just enough room for me, my caddy and my clubs in the trunk! By then fuel economy should be in the 100's!!
I hope you can work out a deal where you can switch your lease. I can understand how having the right vehicle is very important. Perhaps a CRV or an Oddessy would work better. Good luck.
Cheers,
Tess
Is the shifting issue only that it shifts at higher RPM? Or is it also harsh.
When did the "Mr Toad’s Wild Ride" shifting begin?
Kip
Joe
I ask that because my next door neighbor's Ridgeline gets about 14 MPG towing his collapsible 3200+# camper at 65 mph. On rolling hills Georgia roads. Seems the camper would be considerably more "Drag" than your boat.
Kip
Been there and done that.
When I retired, I pledged to myself I would not drive on any surface streets inside 285 ever again. With the exception of going to the Airport.
And would not go through on 75 / 85 between the hours of 7am and 9am or 4:00pm-6:30pm.
Kip
Joe
2007 EXL 4WD
college road trip from NY to MD to DE - 375 miles, mostly highway @70mph, but some stop and go traffic on the highway and some short local trips in MD and DE
overall mpg is now 17.66 after 1.5 years and 20,000 miles
For more info & demo : http://www.gsp9700.com/
Locate the tire shop has this machine and try it. The $50 price can save nightmare.
My Pilot was rated @ 17/22 mpg. So combined fuel economy would be 19.5 mpg, not 17 mpg. :confuse:
Drive-by-Wire™ Throttle System
This system consists of an electronic position sensor connected to the accelerator pedal that sends a signal to the vehicle's electronic control unit (ECU). The ECU combines the accelerator-position signal from the driver with data such as engine rpm, coolant temperature and road speed, and then determines the optimum position for the throttle plate. It then sends a signal to the DBW driver unit that electronically operates a stepper motor on the throttle body. The stepper motor opens and closes the throttle to the exact position necessary for proper engine response.
2008 EPA fpr 4WD = 15/20
2009 EPA for 4WD = 16/22
I suppose that 2009 EPA ratings are higher than 2008 EPA ratings due to VCM technology being introduced in the 2009 4WD Pilot (making it the 2009 4WD Pilot more efficient than the 2008 4WD Pilot).
But as for the difference between the 2007 and 2008 EPA ratings (2007 is higher than 2008), I think it may be totallly due to change in EPA rating method. I believe that these two model year Pilots actually have the same efficiency even though the EPA ratings are different.
I've been pleased with the Pilot overall My only complaint would be that with 4 kids I wish I had a little more room for stuff on some trips. A minivan would have been my first choice, but I was overruled by the wife. I don't, however, regret getting the Pilot - or making my wife happy!
5/7/2008 294.1 17.326 16.97448921
5/13/2008 294.2 18.088 16.26492702
5/24/2008 327.1 18.223 17.9498436
Just thought I'd share.
Cheers,
T
Did anything change, concerning the gas? I mean other than the fact that you are using less of it. :shades:
Kip
David - In the Seattle area, we haven't gotten to Spring yet. I didn't realize that there are different types of gas for each season. It is a definate possibility however I bought the Pilot in July of 07 and I was getting really sucky mileage (12 - 14 mpg) all summer and fall of 07. The summer grade of gas was still available then... but then again... I was still training my foot the difference between my Acura and the Pilot. BIG difference!
Maybe the Honda gods are smilin' down on me!
Either way... I will still keep tabs on the mpg's and see what happens.
Cheers,
T
trmend1- I've used premium just a couple of times in the Pilot and the CR-V and noticed no difference in performance or mileage. Picked up a pamphlet at a Shell station concerning fuels. It said that for cars designed to run on "Regular" grade gas, using premium could actually result in poorer performance.
As the Pilot is tuned to run on regular, me and the pocket book are happy to feed it the "regular 89 octane" it is happiest with. Win-Win! :shades:
Kip
Then maybe your better gas mileage is indeed attributable to break-in rather than difference in seasonal gas.
I'm not sure why you used premium at all for your Pilot. Regular is not only what is called for, it is also less expensive. I don't think there's any benefit to using premium in a vehicle that calls for regular. It shouldn't improve efficiency. Just wasted money in my view. On the other hand, people who try to save money by putting regular in vehicles that call for premium are not actually saving money because their vehicles actually run less efficiently on regular. But my understanding is that premium will not make a car engineered to run on regular more efficient.
David
High mpgs were 27.53 (to NYC) and 26.98 (from NYC) and both of these were registered on the rolling hills of I-81 in Virginia and Tennessee. The Pilot probably liked the downhill rides, too bad we don't have those in Houston. Lowest mpg was 20.23 mpg probably due to city driving and traffic in the Brooklyn-Queens Expwy (BQE). Ok, just wanted to share this.
I also feel that the acceleration is kind of sluggish, it is very easy to get beyond 3000rpm when accelerating from 0. someone suggested the high shifting point might be related to the bad gas mileage.
the question now for me is: should I bring this issue to the mechanic? can the mechanic improve the bad gas mileage by adjusting something of the car? what should I tell them regarding the gas mileage?
thanks
I won't repeat the details here, but my take on it is that the 2007 Pilot is higher revving than its predecessors by design and that this is therefore not a defect to be repaired.
I also have a 2007 EX 4WD. . . Averaging about 17.5mpg overall. Not happy about it, but I do need one large vehicle for my family of 5 and carpooling, notwithstanding the cost of gas.
BTW, on the couple of occasions that I have had my current Pilot on a road trip that was mostly highway (non-mountain ranges), I averaged about 22-24 MPG. I have a pretty heavy foot as well. I will usually drive at or above the speed limit.
Were you hauling a lot of weight on that highway trip? Seems like you should be doing a little bit better just to hit the "average."
10% ethanol may not be a universal additive to RUG?
Tire pressures may be pumped up a few psi.
Oil viscosity may be a bit thinner.
But it usually boils down to the driver - "If you drive relaxed all year, you could improve your fuel economy by 30 or 40 percent as compared to driving aggressively."
We Test the Tips
We Test the Tips Part II
Before our long trip, we've only had 2 fill-ups here in Houston, the first one averaged 17+ mpg (post #815) and the second one averaged 19+ mpg w/c was 60% highway with the engine barely broken in. I'll post again when we get the chance to drive the Pilot 90-100% hwy on FLAT terrain w/c if I'm not mistaken is how you got your mileage (yours is 4WD so maybe a 1 mpg difference?)
Instead of throwing out meaningless insults at the other posters, you might try re reading their posts. Many of the folks tell how they achieved their mileage.
Personally, my best example of how too, and how not too achieve good mileage was a round trip from Atlanta to Myrtle Beach. Four people and luggage in the '03 4WD Pilot. 18+ MPG going to the beach, and right at 27 returning the next day, same load. BTW the return trip is up hill.
Best mileage was achieved on a round trip from Atlanta to Greenwood Indiana. The highway portion of the entire 1000+ mile trip was right at 28 mpg.
Both post explained exactly how this was done.
>"Oh, I know what the EPA says, and I'm not even complaining about the 17mpg because it's a great vehicle, but here in Illinois the average seems to be more in the 17 to 18 range. So what are the people doing that claim to be getting 25-27?? "
My overall average for local driving is 17-19 mpg. Average for highway is 23-25 mpg.
Some vehicles simply will not do that, and some drivers simply can not do that.
Terrain, fuel type, loads, speed, the drivers foot, and driving conditions all play a part.
Kip