Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Front Porch Philosopher
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Then, there's the whole general attitude of foreign vs. domestic. If you have a domestic vehicle and it breaks down, it's just expected (so say the import owners). An owner of a domestic would openly admit to a failure. If you have an import and it breaks down, then it's just a fluke (also so say the import owners). The import owner would never openly admit to a failure and just dismisses it as some sort of fluke. It's just two trains of thought.
It seems that import companies either see TSB's as a negative things, or they use a different system for distributing info.
good to see you here, actually, Nissan, Toyota and Honda use the same system, and yes a TSB is not necessarily a bad thing, it is basically a newsletter that gives updates and such, but the majority of them have to do with some "known issue" with the vehicles listed. There is stuff in there from a better way to change wiper blades to safety recalls, I think you really need to look at the number and type of recalls, I myself had a recall on my frontier when it came out, there was a clip for the AC line that could start rubbing the line, took 5 minutes to replace and saved my AC most likely, this are the kinds of recalls I don't mind. But you have to admit, especially lately all of the MAJOR recalls ford has had lately, (I will leave the firestone tires out, I don't blame ford unless they really covered it up.) Look at the reason you can't get a manual transmission Sport trac, look at the missed paint jobs on them and the leaky roofs, Look at the number of recalls on the escape and it hasn't really been out yet, and some serious stuff, steering wheels falling off, forgeting to put ABS in them, so how does this fit in with your theory about the owners complaining and domestic vs foreign owners? It really doesn't, these are inexcusable quality problems before they even get to a customers hands to complain about it. Why isn't Nissan or Honda or Toyota in the news with things similar to this, the media loves to jump on stuff like that.
with things similar to this?"
Well, Nissan, Honda, and Toyota iron out the pre-production bugs before putting the vehicles out on the lots.
It seems that Ford and Chrysler just gets the car/truck to market as quickly as possible and then corrects the problems as they arise. Just look at the Focus and the Escape. I do think that this is a stupid way of doing things.
I think GM does just about the same except that they don't bother to fix the problems. :^D
As a general rule, I never buy a vehicle if it is in its first year of production or major redesign.
Also, take a look at import line-ups to domestic line-ups. Domestics have more unique vehicles with less shared parts. Domestics also seem to "turn over" more frequently. Import line-ups are smaller and share many parts (engines, trannies, etc...) and they don't turn over as frequently. They just tweak a platform to fix problems. Domestics seem to wait until the major redesign to correct some of these problems.
GM's fix: move the seat back as far a possible because they can't get enough parts until november or december so the recall can begin.
At we all can agree that GM is bottom of the line in terms of reliability.
And people thought Ford handled the tire recall badly (which wasn't even their fault).
Ya, I know Vince, some Rangers have more torque than my Frontier. I really don't give a F about this fact. Find some other feature where the Ranger beats the Frontier. LOL Kitty.
For one, they don't rattle. For a < 20,000 vehicle (and a truck at that), their interiors are downright impressive in both ergonomics and build quality.
The Frontier's interior (at least for the pre-01's) is functional but rather boring and border looking cheap.
Secondly, Rangers ARE reliable. You can find all of the anti-Ford links that you like. I couldn't care less. They haven't got a thing to do with the truck sitting out on my driveway. You've got the same chances of walking home driving a Ranger that you do driving a Frontier.
Finally, tell me these "proven facts" about problems not being addressed and corrected in Rangers.
Oh wait, that's right. You can't. There aren't any.
This is the only thing that I ever hear import owners talking about when it comes to their trucks.
Don't you guys like any of the other aspects of your trucks? Or, do you just jump in, hit the gas, and start chanting "reliability, reliability, reliability."
I think that a few of you guys jump in and start chanting "Ford sucks, Ford sucks, Ford sucks." I've never really understood hatred of a certain brand and the need to bash it. Maybe buyer's remorse, insecurity, or immaturity? Hmmm...
I guess when I walk out and get in my truck I think quite differently. I admire its good looks and well engineered and built interior. I love to hear the exhaust note when I fire it up (thanks to the Gibson cat-back). I step on the gas and feel the mounds of torque press me into the seatback. I enjoy its leisurely cruising speeds and firm ride (my preference).
When I see some other brand of truck, I don't feel some dumb hatred. I admire it for what things it does best. For instance, I think Nissan has the ONLY quad cab that looks good on the market today. I don't wish its owner any ill will (like burning alive in his truck like I've seen people post on this board about Ranger owners).
Enjoy your weak 3.3 and 2.4's. Ford has 3 engines, but I guess you don't want to mention that huh? Nor do you want to mention a 3.0 is only about 300 dollars more than a 2.5, Nor will you then mention a 3.0 has 150HP and 192f/lbs of torque, is available in ANY Ford RAnger, Along with its 4.0 is Available in ANY Ford RAnger..
Rangers rule! The Frontier doesn't even make the top 30!! LOL as far as sales numbers.. Nor has ANY Nissan truck even broke the top 25 mark in sales, Why Cncman? If the Nissan is so superior why after over 15 years hasn't Nissan taken the number one spot in sales? Sales do matter as much as all of you want to try to say they don't. Sales make money! Something Nissan hasn't done for years! LOL...
Yes, I smoked one of your precious 4 door high tech 3.3 Frontiers with my older pushrod 4.0!
See you in the Cascades
Oh, I don't see Frontiers up there, they can't make it!! LOL....
Vince, do you go up to Nissan owners in person and tell them how stupid they are for buying a Nissan. You don't even have the guts to do it...
You are the retard that says Ford is better than everything which is simply not possible.
If the v-6 upgrade is so cheap, why do most consumers still buy the 4cyl?
In any case my 2.4cyl can grill the joke 2.5 any day. LOL.
The difference is Vince, You're more inclined to attack our frontiers, but we're more inclined to attack your stupidity!!!
Gooba, you are so lame! I really must have pissed
you off when I showed you just how weak, cheap and
where the Frontier stood in the compact truck food
chain, at the bottom! LOL... Also, a solid diff
is
better, ask any offroad shop. Just goes to prove
once again, you don't offroad. When the Ranger
switched in 97 there was quite a controversy.
And why don't you tell everyone here what the 0=60
times are for your 3.3 Supercharged bandaid? How
about 9.5-9.9!! LOL... Why can't Nissan make a
naturally aspirated engine to compete with
Ford/GM/Toyota? Can you imagine a Supercharged
SOHC
4.0 in a RAnger?? it would absolutely trounce
your weak 3.3 Supercharged! LOL....
Once again, Bad Vince, for being happy with your
Ranger...
Good gooba, cncman, mahi, for liking your Nissan.
Same old story, never ends, Ford bad, Nissan good.
I just pissed you guys off showing you why the
Ranger is NUMERO UNO, number one for those of you
who don't speak two languages..
Live with your choice and don't challange any 4.0
5spd Rangers with those weak 3.3's. And another
word of advise, Really, don't challange any new
SOHC 4.0 Rangers... LOL@!!
Mahi, your kidding yourself along with anyone who
knows about towing. A 4,000 lb boat with a truck
that has 170HP and 200ft/lbs of torque! LOL! Nice
story. Anyone can do the math, the two don't add
up. Add your truck weight, people weight, gear
weight...Yes, it may be able to barely pull it,
but
not as you wish or dream......
"laughing" how about grunting.... LOL!!!!
Ok, you Nissan whiners, just face it you bought
the compact truck lowest on the food chain!! LOL!
Enjoy your weak 3.3 and 2.4's. Ford has 3
engines, but I guess you don't want to mention
that
huh? Nor do you want to mention a 3.0 is only
about 300 dollars more than a 2.5, Nor will you
then mention a 3.0 has 150HP and 192f/lbs of
torque, is available in ANY Ford RAnger, Along
with
its 4.0 is Available in ANY Ford RAnger..
Rangers rule! The Frontier doesn't even make the
top 30!! LOL as far as sales numbers.. Nor has
ANY
Nissan truck even broke the top 25 mark in sales,
Why Cncman? If the Nissan is so superior why
after
over 15 years hasn't Nissan taken the number one
spot in sales? Sales do matter as much as all of
you want to try to say they don't. Sales make
money! Something Nissan hasn't done for years!
LOL...
Yes, I smoked one of your precious 4 door high
tech 3.3 Frontiers with my older pushrod 4.0!
See you in the Cascades
Oh, I don't see Frontiers up there, they can't
make it!! LOL....
Anybody see a pattern?
This topic is a corrected continuation of Topic 1932....
Frontier vs Ranger - III. Please continue these discussions here. Thanks!
Front Porch Philosopher
SUV, Pickups, & Aftermarket and Accessories Host