Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Honda Accord Hybrid MPG-Real World Numbers
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
The following are steady state speed guesstimates (no Accel/Decel actions) from the FCD of the non-hybrid I4 based Accord’s NAVI at 65 - 70 mph. I very rarely go above 70 mph as that is almost foolish for those of us looking for absolute maximum FE Close in draft assist within a DWL envelope, 55 +, straight close in draft assist, 52 +, distance draft assist within a DWL envelope, 47 +, distance draft assist, 45 +, traffic side draft assist, 43 +, surf draft assist 42 +, naked 40 +. Add 2/4 + and subtract 4/6 - for a 5/10 + mph tail/head and or side wind respectively. Subtract 5 - 10 mpg with rain actually accumulating on surface pavement and drop another 5 - 10 with temps below 32 degrees F. For the Hybrid, add ~ 3 mpg all around.
Using an overly aggressive and heavily modified P&G - FAS and D-FAS where applicable technique(s) within a DWL envelope while climbing small overpasses and hills all the while traveling between 45 and 70 mph w/ a 5 - 7 mph tail wind in 65 to 74 degree temps can yield upwards of almost 100 mpg (99.3 max) as I saw at the ~ 20 mile point driving home the other day (Thursday afternoon) through the northern Chicago Interstate system (I-294/I-94) Pre-Rush. She ended up at 94.4 after another ~ 3 miles of suburban/city streets as I pulled into my drive which is about the best anyone might ever receive from this gen Accord no matter what they are doing other then a pure FAS down a mountain or other such gimmickry The Accord Hybrid cannot perform this feat due to an Auto tranny issue with an OD lockout after a FAS at speed unfortunately
The E/T is ICE-On time which yielded a touch under 30% by my calc’s.
Good Luck
Wayne R. Gerdes
Couple these bizarre numbers with the rumble/shudder I get when the gas engine engages seems to indicate something is really wrong. It also seems to me I'm very rarely using the electric engine and the ECO light does not come on or stay on as often as I expected. Unfortunately, these observations are in vacumm since I have no additional experience to compare.
This is my fifth Honda and I really want this car to work out. I 'm just unsure of what's going on. Can anyone enlighten me? Is their something I'm not getting? Is there something really wrong?
Good luck
Jaxflygirl,
For your HAH, you should get 29 - 37+ MPG in compliance with the EPA's MPG figures. The HAH's HP, torque, A/C, handling, solid body structure and amenities, etc. are best. No complaints. The '06 HAH must be more exciting.
thanks!
I averaged about 32 mpg on the first tank, and it seems to be getting better. I also drive about 25 miles eash way to work, with about 4 miles of that on the street, and this morning I got 35.6 mpg with some stop and go traffic. Around town I get anywhere from 22-26 mpg. I have found that letting the cruise control do its thing helps keep the green ECO light burning.
I have a couple of questions, is there any way to upgrade the NAVI system from the Orange disc to the new and improved White disc with the Zagat restaurant reviews? Has anyone figured out a way to bypass the NAVI Nag screen? And lastly has anyone had any success installing an after market amplifier to drive bigger speakers, or is it better to get a speaker with a higher sensitivity that matches the head unit?
Thank you all for the great information on this forum, it helped greatly in making my decision to buy the HAH.
Happy travels,
Tim
You also should check your tire pressure. I would say it should be between 32 and 34 psi for economy but not to rough a ride.
We have seen a drop off since this summer(I live in NJ) due to the cold lube temperature and longer warm up. I expect it to return after winter. When one has a relatively heavy vehicle and you are supposed to get about 35-40 MPG it doesn't take too much to disrupt that fuel sipping equation.
40 MPG is using fuel at about 2 shot glasses (3.2 oz) to go a mile and that is not much.
I just traded in my 1999 4x4 Chevy Suburban (12.5mpg) for my new 2005 HAH w/NAVI, about as drastic a change as one can make, especially since I am 6'6" tall and all told have had 3 Suburbans. So I had to change my overall thinking when buying this car, and with the gas prices so high here in Southern California, the change came fairly easy.
I have had my HAH for a week now and have 460 miles on it, and I love this car, although I may have a different opinion once the ski season starts!!! Any issues with driving in the snow?
I averaged about 32 mpg on my first tank, and it seems to be getting better. I also drive about 25 miles each way to work, with about 4 miles of that on the street, and this morning I got 35.6 mpg with some stop and go traffic. Around town I get anywhere from 22-26 mpg. I have found that letting the cruise control do its thing helps keep the green ECO light burning longer.
I do have a couple of questions:
- Is there any way to upgrade the NAVI system from the Orange disc to the new and improved White disc with the Zagat restaurant reviews?
- Has anyone figured out a way to bypass the NAVI Nag screen?
- And lastly has anyone had any success installing an after market amplifier to drive bigger speakers, or is it better to get a speaker with a higher sensitivity that closely matches the head unit?
Thank you all for the great information on this forum, it has helped greatly in making the decision to buy the HAH.
Happy travels,
Tim
Da*n lawyers. There is not anything in my life that hasn't been made less enjoyable by the ABA and their entire slew of tested and approved bottom feeders.
Tim
38 mpg at 65 mph under cruise
32/33 mpg at 80 mph under cruise
30 mpg city
My worst ever tank is 28 mpg.
Is this normal behavior?
Right now I am getting about 24MPG on a tankful.
The other thing I noticed was that the car's mpg indicator tends to be overstated and prior to the colder weather setting in, it would read higher immediately after filling the gas tank (33 to 36 mpg range). In the last month,the best reading I can get is between 27 and 28. I drive on the highway most of the time at 60 to 65 mph with the green "Econ" light illuminated. My actual mpg was 26.6 for both of the last fill-ups.
I am getting ready to go to the dealer for an oil change and was wondering if something needs to be checked. I am very disappointed with my mpg results so far. I have a 1992 240 GL "Tank" that gets 23 mpg. The mpg I am getting does not justify the premium price I paid.
Might I be doing something wrong? I've noticed that the blue 'assist' bar seldom comes on; should I be actively trying to get that to engage? If so, I don't know how to do that.
Any tips? Thanks.
Hi, I am stlmo57. When I 1st started driving my 05 HAH in mid-September, it was almost fun to see how high I could get the displayed mpg to read. Although I could sometimes get it to read as high as 36 mpg, the actual measured amount was much less and never more than 30(when I fill-up my car I literally fill it until the pump will no longer dispense and do the math myself).
Some things I noticed early on were:
1) I got a much higher reading on the dash displayed mpg immediately after filling up the tank.
2) The only time I had 3 passengers in the car, the dash displayed mpg dropped sharply 4 to 5 mpg.
3) In St. Louis, Mo, when the weather turned cold, I never saw 30 mpg displayed on the dash for over 30 days, even after a fill-up.
4)Today, Thursday December 22, in St Louis, Mo the temperature topped 57 degrees and magically, I was getting a dash reading of 31 mpg.
Have you noticed any of these items?
I've not manually computed my mpg, relying instead on the dash display; next time I fill up I will do the math myself as a check on the car's computation. Also, I live in New Hampshire, and we've had a very cold December, so I've not been able to compare results in cold weather vs. warm; at this point, it likely won't be until April that I'll be able to get a sense of the results in warmer weather. The only passengers I've carried in the car are my young children, so I've not detected any difference with passengers and without.
Reading the posts on this forum has given me some ideas of how to improve mileage -- including letting the car engine do the braking, increasing speed only gradually, and lowering my overall speed on the highway -- that I am going to try out and see if that helps at all. When I see some of the numbers people are quoting on this board, and other people remarking that "you must be an experienced hybrid driver," that suggests to me that there are specific techniques you can teach yourself to improve mileage.
I live in Kansas City and got my HAH in late May. I've made numerous long trips. During the warm weather, I would average about 36 mpg driving to Davenport, IA at over 70 mph. However, when I made the same trip in 14-degree weather at the beginning of December, the mileage was down around 29-30 mpg. Since the weather has warmed up during the last week, the mileage has again improved. I can only speculate that the density of the cold air affects the gas mileage, but I would never have guessed the effect would be that large. Perhaps there is an engineer or other science-brained person following the thread who can tell us if the air density of the cold air can acutally make that much difference.
Regarding the self-measured gas mileage vs the computer, I am also very interested in this. I've read material from the "auto advice" types which says that you can't get an accurate calculation of gas mileage by doing the calculation on 1 tank of gas...the calculation can be off because the car is at a slightly different angle than the last time you filled up (so you actually put in a different amount of gas), or various other variables. They suggest you calculate an average mpg over several tanks of gas. For instance, keep a record of how many miles you drive over several fill ups and compute the mileage from that. I did it it this summer (over 5 fill ups) and came up with an average of 33.6 mpg vs 35.0 that the computer told me. I think that is a big variance. I am going to do the test again, but would be interested to know what you, or others who read this, experience.
I am a creature of habit. With the exception of being out- of-town, I have filled-up my car at the same Quick Trip near my home for over 10 years. So this variable is fairly constant. After I purchased my 05 HAH, I set-up an Excel spread sheet that I tracked my mpg on. The spread sheet was also cumulative (divided total miles by total gallons out to two decimal places). The problem with doing it over multiple fill-ups, as in my case, was over the first five fill-ups I averaged 28.5 mpg. In reality, my mpg has walked down, ie., 31 mpg, 30 mpg, 29 mpg, 28 mpg, 27 mpg and 26 mpg. Thus an average of 28.5. These are not the actual numbers, I am just simplifying my example. But, I did experience this type of trend. Cold weather definitely does comes into play (2-4 mpg). I am taking my car in for an oil change tomorrow and I will ask the dealer to tell me what they think. Given that this is a Hybrid, and it commanded a $3,000 premium, anything under 30 mpg, is a disappointment.
As I stated in my initial post, I do approximately 90% highway and 10% city. On the highway I maintain a speed of approximately 62 mph with the "Eco" light illuminated.
Don't forget that gasoline formulas change with the seasons, and winter formulas generally achieve less mileage. This is true in my Accord EX 4-cyl. When I got the car in October, I was getting 30mpg regularly. Now I am down to an average of 26.6mpg (according to my log). It makes a difference depending on where you live, i.e. the Northeast uses a different fuel formula than does the Southeast. Hope y'all have a happy holiday!
thegrad
Also my local station has recently posted a sticker on the pumps that the fuel may be up to 10% renewable energy which, I suspect, means alcohol based. Alcohol has about quite a bit less BTU content than gasoline so that would also reduce MPGs. Check with the local gas station about any of this.
When the use of renewable fuel sources becomes prevelant, then all vehicles will get less mpg's but I feel a tradeoff that will make us give less $$ to OPEC is worth it.
In the meantime, I bought the Accord...kind of a sorry excuse for a hybrid, but a car with very nice styling and handling, generally suitable room in the back seat, and 10%-15% better gas mileage than an all-gas Accord. Yes, the additional vehicle cost was a rather large premium to pay for 10%-15% better gas mileage, but I look at that as what I'm willing to do for the environment and less use of oil. (I also realize that most people look at it more closely as a dollars and cents issue than I do.)
And now that it's 2006, don't forget to include the hybrid tax deduction on your income tax form.
thanks!
Don't forget that longer trips yield better overall mileage! Have you gone over 100 miles at a time in it yet? If you do, you will likely see a marked improvement, because the engine isn't spending fuel cranking the car or warming itself up to normal operating temperature. I'm no expert, but I know this will have SOME effect, however small.
thegrad
Aside from a recently started use of 10% ethanol(at about 1/2 the BTUs per gallon than petro) in pump fuel and the likely use of MTBE oxygenation additive (another energy killer) I still am not satisfied that the appreciable reduction in MPGs I see is entirely due to those.
Of course the most significant culprit is likely the cold weather.
Therefore I researched my local Honda parts department and there is a block heater available for around 80 clams plus 120 for installation.
I anticipate this would make a significant improvement in fuel economy by allowing the oils etc to be more fluid at startup and also allow the temperature enabled "Eco" mode to kick in sooner.
Does any one here have firsthand experience with this option?
E10 gasoline has ~ 97% of the Btu’s offered in non-Ethanol laced gasoline. Your FE hit will be on the order of 1 - 3% using E10 vs. Non-E10. Colder temperatures (below freezing) can take down combustion and driveline efficiencies by as much as 25% overall for those with shorter trips. In a nutshell, cold temperatures have a far more drastic effect on FE then does E10. A block heater will help in the warm up phase when you are receiving ~ ½ the warmed up FE for those first 1 - 3 miles but it will not help the driveline and combustion in-efficiency’s described above. I see an ~ 12% overall FE hit from 70 degrees F to below 32 degrees F with longer drives if that helps?
Good Luck
Wayne R. Gerdes
I fully agree with the thermal effects on driveline performance, even on long drives.
However since the HAH drivetrain is predominantly in the engine compartment I expect the heating of the engine coolant to make an improvement (not cure) on almost the entire driveline due to parasitic heating of the trans/differential by the warmed engine.
The wheels and bearings, front and rear, would be obviously excluded from any benefit.
As far as Honda making engine preheating a standard, it makes no sense considering a large portion of HAH owners do not live in areas that are subject to 32 degrees or less at night. Plus, plugging in the heater at night, seems a likely hassle for many owners.
My interest here is just to find out if anyone has tried this approach and to what success.
If this works, I think it is a modification that could bolster the HAH high mileage claims, and be a very "Green" thing to do.
If beneficial, it may result in Honda adding it to the "Options" list at purchase rather than making it a somewhat difficult item to find that many people don't know is available.
FYI: My old Toyota T100 offered that as an "option" (when new) so someone somewhere must consider it a reasonable accessory. And, except for "pre-start" bearing oil injection I feel that it would lengthen engine life better than most other modifications.
As has been previously stated, a block heater will help to remove some of the (½ the average FE over the first 1 - 3 miles) FE hit. It will not cure it by any stretch of the imagination.
As for a large portion of AH owners not subjected to less then 32 degrees F, about half the country (geographically) is subjected to these types of temperatures during mid-winter for months of the year. It is not just 32 degrees either. Below 70 degrees F, there is a hit. And 50, and 30, and 10, and so on and so on. The FE hit does not happen at discrete temps of course but is a steady decline as the Mercury plummets unfortunately for us all.
Here in Chicago, our average daily Hi/Lo temps in the winter months are as follows:
Dec.: 24/37
Jan.: 18/32
Feb.: 24/38
Mar.: 32/47
Chicago has a somewhat temperate climate given its proximity to Lake Michigan which acts as a huge buffer to the extremes. A city like Des Moines, IA., Rockford, IL., Madison, WI., Minneapolis, MN. Sioux Falls, SD., Bismarck, ND, many towns and cities in the upper elevations of the Rockies and Pacific Northwest, much of the upper North East, etc. are subjected to even lower average temperatures in the winter months.
As for the green thing to do, might I recommend a particular website where the hypermilers spend most of their time? You can do much more for the environment with your right foot, eyes, and brain then you will ever be able to achieve with an engine block heater. About all I can add is trust me on this and consider what is posted below to find out more
Good Luck
Wayne R. Gerdes
The why did Hoinda try to significantly change the 2006 HAH. And is doing so ran into some issues and the delivery delays? Did they cripple a healthy pig; abiet heavily discounted ?
Cheers,
MidCow
Good Luck,
MidCow
You never got a straight answer did you? Don't hold your breath.
Enjoy you Hondas Viet!
MidCow
Thanks for the answers drafting would make sense to get extremely high mileage. It works in pelotons of bicycles and flocks of Geese.
But think about it in a car. If you draft close enoguh to a semi tractor-trailor to gain real benefit, the you are putting yourself in a extremely dangerous situation. What if the semi driver doesn't know you are behind and has to emegency brake and you smash into the front and in spite of your SRS, you kill yourself. Then you can than discuss with St. Peter if you extreme hgih mileage was worth it.
Let say again so that it is perfectly clear. Drafting close behind other vehicles is extremely stupid and extremely dangerous. The jeopardy you put you life and the life of other vehicle occupants is just not worth the mileage gain.
Cruis'n,
MidCow
Your best FE comes from in town/suburban area driving and there is no chance for a D-FAS to help under those driving scenarios. Just another piece of info MidCow has no idea about. A D-FAS can extend glide distances but 18-wheelers are rarely traveling at the right speed or when you are in the proper position to use this technique to its fullest. I see this opportunity present itself about once every 40 - 50 miles or so You might want to look up who coined the term for good measure
Good Luck
Wayne R. Gerdes
I get 18mpg city, 27mpg highway and average 21-22mpg combined.
There is definitely a problem with your vehicle. Your mpg numbers are way out of whack with reality, and I would complain up the chain starting with the Honda regional manager for your area.
My advice is to keep up the preasure on Honda to come up with a fix. If your state has a lemon law you might look into the possibilty of getting the excess you paid for the hybrid version of the accord refunded. If enough owers start complaining, Honda will have to do something.
I am only getting 24MPG in 90%suburban, 10% highway driving and the tempertures have been mild lately. One of the problems I see is absence of regeneration during warm up and intermittantly after the green ECO light comes on. This looks like a flaw int the computoer programming.
I hope to see more posts on this subject.
Cliff
I just got, two months ago,a new 2005 HAH and I have consistentantly been getting 22mpg. Honda takes no responsibility and neither does the dealer.
What re really need is a hungry lawyer to start a class action to get results.
I never would have bought this car to get 22 mpg.
Please let me know if you hear about anyone getting any kind of satisfaction.
Thanks.
But it is not Hondas fault.
The EPA sets the "window sticker estimate" and those are the results the EPA got when they tested the car.
No one can be sued for it except the EPA, and you could not win if they put one owner up on the stand who gets EPA mpg.