Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Also, 34 mpg in "around town" driving is truly exceptional for the Elantra. What does "around town" mean? How much driving on highways and suburban roads with few stops, for instance?
Fuel: 2108.05 Gallons
Cost: $4141.11
mpg figure
In the figure, Yellow: per fill, Blue: per 10 fill, Pink: accumulative.
At the beginning, I got very low MPG, because of the short one way drive(1.5Miles).
Recently, I am getting 31.5 mpg in average for 80% highway(75MPH), 20% local
2002 model does not have CVVT, so, I guess the later model with CVVT may have better mileage.
I think it's interesting that we both calculate a 10-fill average.
The spike in mileage shortly after April 27 was when I was picking my son up at college, an 1800 mile round trip.
Also, how accurate have you found it to be?
I've got about 3800 miles on my car, and the number it's telling me (32.6) isn't really matching with my manual gas pump computation (29ish).
I have found the trip computer matches manual calculations pretty closely when I am very careful with the manual calculations. By that I mean I fill the tank to the first click and STOP. Then when I refuel, I do the same thing, at the very same pump. And I use a pump that has a fairly slow flow. One gas station near me that I use a lot (low sulfur gas + cheap soft cloth washes with gas purchase) has a really fast flow, so it is very hard to fill the tank. Because of the variations in pumps, I prefer to measure my fuel economy using the computer vs. manually. I think overall it is more consistent and accurate.
Round trip - 161.3 miles one way. Parents drove all the time I was there, so the car was only used up and back. Since I am still in the break in period(started the trip with 778 miles on the car), I didn't go above 65 MPH. Cruise Control set at 65, and averaged around 55 MPH up and back because of very little traffic. Also has AC on set to #1.
Filled up right before I left. When I arrived, I filled up again with 3.57 gallons. I'm guessing the tank wasn't exaclty filled the whole way. but it kept on ticking off every 5 cents from $9.00 to $10.00. So this works out to 45.1 MPG.
Given the above, I decided to fill up at the original place as soon as I got back to guarantee I would get an accurate total for the entire round trip. 4.42 fallons this time for 36.5 MPG
So combined, same original pump top off to top off I went 322.6 miles and used 7.99 total gallons for a total of 40.38 MPG
I too have experienced an increase in mileage after an oil change. Ruth
This is it. Amsoil is done! The oil exceeded a year in service, with 14,000 miles on the ticker, and no filter change! Well, if the year hadn't ended, we would have had to change the filter now -- it finally reached our insolubles cap, 2,000 miles after Mobil 1. The main thing that stands out on this, our final Amsoil sample, is the ridiculous viscosity. This 5W30 oil has now thickened out to a 15W40 -- argue whether it matters if you like, but we believe engine builders spec an oil for a reason, and this oil is far, far thicker now than intended for the LS1. Switching to our flush Mobil 1 netted a nearly instant 10% improvement in fuel economy, and the engine runs a heckuva lot smoother too. To Amsoil's credit, wear metals remain in check, but we will soon see whether that was really thanks to the oil or just to engine break-in. We'll start posting detailed analysis in the coming weeks.
Full lab test story at,
http://neptune.spacebears.com/cars/stories/oil-life.html
The RPM at that spd is near 3,000. Anything over that brings on eng growl and vibration.
On the plus side, the car used no oil.
I used syn oil in my trip to Houston and back.
In my '01 GLS 5-speed, I regularly got upper 30s (regular oil) if I kept it under 70, with a sweet spot at 55-60 mph where it would do over 40 mpg.
Are you kidding me? Over 70 MPH in an Elantra 5-speed produces revs in excess of 3K. At that speed I can barely hear myself think or as C & D described it in the new Elantra, "Maddening."
In 50/50 driving with the A/C on continuously (this is sunny FL), I average around 25-26 MPG. HYW speeds average 70MPH and City about 35-40MPH. A few of my friends report about the same average with their Elantras.
Someday I'll have to try that "average of 70mph" thing and see how that improves my gas milage. But highway driving at around 80mph average gets about 31-32 mpg for me.
It's not enough to hinder conversation, but you can tell the car is working hard and not geared to run all day at 75.
By the way, what RPM does an automatic run at 70mph?
I am trying to recall the rpms for the automatic at 70 mph; I don't have it up there very often. But there's about a 10% difference from the 5-speed. For example, at 60 mph my five-speed would run about 2500 rpm and the automatic runs at about 2250.
I wonder why your gas mileage is so crummy compared to a stick if your eng is not working so hard.
You should be running 2400 RPM at 70...lol
So far I've blamed the slight vibration on the eng as it starts to growl above 3000 RPM.
But I'll see if anything improves with any tire work.
I currently have 14000 miles on it.
I'll run a check to see if I feel vibration above 3000 rpm in 3rd and 4th gear. Which would rule out tire balance.
On the plus side, it went out on the trip back after 600 miles in Tenn.
Plus, a check eng light is covered free in the 5 yr 60,000 mile warranty, unlike the GM 3yr 36,000 mile plan.
I'll try to take a picture for you if you don't believe me - when the road ahead of me is completely empty.
(And no, I don't have to use the viewfinder to get the picture. I've gotten pretty good at blind pictures with my point and shoot.)
I've had my tires/wheels Hunter balanced 2 times, replaced all 4 rims and 2 tires, turned rotors, and still have awful vibration. Hyundai refuses to fix the problem. Unfortunately, from what i've learn from users on elantraxd.com is that this is a design problem that plagues many (but not all) 2001-2006 Elantras. Some have suggested it is a drive shaft issue while others have claimed is a flaw in the front end. Either way, for many people (like myself), there really is no "fix" per se as the problem will keep reacurring.
At any rate, this is something that should be in the Elantra 2001-2006 Problems discussion.
1. 01 Elantra GLS did have the vibration around 65 to 70 mph. It was slight and sometimes annoying. I had the car until 35K miles and traded it in for a Suzuki Aerio SX. Anyway, I just learned to live with it and never had it balanced
2. In January of 05 I bought an 05 Elantra GT. As I recall I noticed a very small vibration similiar to my 01 GLS but it less intrusive (ever so slight). I went to 17" rims after about 1500 miles and have not ever experience the vibration again. Current ODO is 32K miles
3. In July of 05 I bought a Kia Spectra EX (shares near identical platform to 01-06 Elantra). This car does not exhibit any vibration what so ever with stock alloys. Have never balanced or rotated the tires yet. Current ODO is 23K miles.
It could be a design issue that is compensated by having a very balanced set of rims/tires or it could be a large set of crappy rims and tires that is causing this whole issue.
I have owned a lot of cars and the 01-06 Elantra generation is the first I have ever experienced this.
Its seems this is either a design issue or manufacturing quality issue. However, I just can't see that the result of unproper balancing of the wheels for that many Elantra's sold in NA could be the primary factor.
You may be surprised. If you did a regular +2 wheel upgrade (increased the rim size by 2", and decreased the tire's side wall height by 2"), your 17" wheel/tire combo may not weigh any more than your original 15" wheel/tire combo. Of course, that depends a lot of the design of the new wheels that you picked out. I know this sounds crazy, but a friend of mine recently did a +2 upgrade on a car, and the wheel/tire package weight was barely any different from his original tire/wheel package.
But (to stay on topic), have you noticed any change in fuel mileage with the larger wheels/tires?
I haven't noticed any decrease in mileage. If anything maybe the car is slightly more sluggish at take off. My mileage hasn't been that great with or without the new rims. I have an 05 auto GT with sunroof. My mileage is around 25 to 28 mpg with about 80% highway. This is comparable to my 01 GLS when I had that car.
2nd tank: 27 mpg with average speed of 28 mph.
I little worse than I had expected (I expect 30). The car is 650 miles now. Maybe after a few thousand miles, it'll get better?
That would be expected...with the decrease in rubber (sidewall), and the increase in metal (rim), metal flexes less than rubber. However, it would be over rough (washboard) surfaces that the ride quality would deteriorate.
When my '01 Elantra 5-speed was new in October 2000, I initally got around 24-25 mpg around town. After about a year I was getting upper 20s around town. So the fact you are getting upper 20s right now bodes well for the future I think.
I will second that. The last highway trip I took in my '02, the car had 68,000 miles on it, and I got 39mpg on the interstate, going through the mountains. I never saw mileage like that when the car was new. I currently get 31mpg just commuting to work - 25 miles 1-way, stop and go, 2 lane back roads, with 83,000 miles on it.