Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
BMW 3-series vs Lexus IS
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
You have to read through the posts, where the BMW has been "bashed" a number of times and called a POS. Yes, both sides are guilty of it. Neither is a bad car, their missions in life, although they do overlap, are different.
Dead-on right. Different demographic, as you say.
Very true.
The quantity advantage of the 3 series is nothing to be bragged about. Toyota Corolla is the best selling car in the world. Does that make the Corolla a better car than a 330? Obviously no, since the demographics are different. Same goes to the IS. The targetted customer groups are close with the 3 vs. the IS, but still not identical.
The IS buyer puts longevity, ride, quietness in high regard with some lux and sport thrown in. I also drove the ES350 when I was test driving. That throws even more lux, but less sport, into the equation.
At least, that's the way I perceived them when I was test driving and comparing the two.
Nothing wrong with either. Just different approaches.
All that said, I think either car would serve their owners well even if someone wanted to drive them 150,000 miles. Personally, I'm lucky to keep my cars until they have 50,000 miles on them.
I will say that I've got a neighbor who has passed down an '87 325i, that he bought new, from himself, to his wife, to his son and daughter. They're still driving it with more than 200,000 miles on the clock. It still runs great (but could use a paint job).
It’s more like an M3 lite with more torque.
Will be interesting to see what Dinan does with it.
The IS crowd (for half a year or so) had the crown as the drag race king (within the category of course) and there was a flurry of posts heralding the new King. Most other qualities of the vehicles are subjective; such as styling.
I’ve had my C&D issue for almost 2 weeks now and haven’t see one post boasting on the 335i’s very impressive drag strip results. Not to say that is the sole mission of a BMW probably far from it and I would dissuade most people from purchasing a vehicle based on “stats” anyway but still – very impressive.
What is really staggering is the vehicles 0-100 at 12.1 sec. This is as fast as a 911 Carrera (3.6) (of course with so many 911 variations it's hard to pin anything down), and a whole second faster than the new G35 (I believe ties the IS ) which is no slouch either plus their EPA est of 29-30mpg on the highway.
The C&D article though not a full test ended off with “ Wow. ‘Nuff said.”.
Maybe people are waiting to test it themselves before posting?
You bet.
. . .or not. The IS is quiet & peaceful & used to win the drag race.
Not so much these days.
As they say...."there's always going to be someone richer, better looking and thinner than you". I'll add to that...."there's always going to be a car faster than yours".
After having gone through the recent "muscle car revival" with one of my previous cars being a new Mustang GT, I've kind of settled into having a quick car that does everything well, rather than a "fast car" that falls down in other areas.
Of course, the 335i qualifies as being a fast car that does many, many things well....at least from what I've read.
When my dealer gets some 335is in stock, I'm going to have to take one for a spin.
I went to my dealer today to wash my 330i and guess what...they had one 335i ( black ).
I was the first to drive it....went for approx 1/2 hr ride...salesman ( young kid ) was with me and we had some fun...the engine is a jewel ! very quiet until you step on it..
The car is very powerful...floored it a few times from 120 k/h and it seemed almost instantaneous up to 180 and pulling strong...had to back off or loose my license.
What was impressive was the tires (runflats) 18 "...I heard so many bad things but these Bridgestone Potenzas were good....did not feel hard and no vibrations or harmonics at any speed.
Love the active steering....feels like a go cart at lower speeds and firms up nicely at higher speeds...like driving on railroad tracks.
The looks are OK....perhaps I was expecting more....but this is personal.
I think BMW has a winner with this one...the only thing that pisses me off that in Canada the price starts at 51,400 and in USA it is approx 40 k's !
Webby
Yeah my disclaimer was “and I would dissuade most people from purchasing a vehicle based on “stats” anyway”
I’m not much of a “let’s burn the clutch at every light” kinda guy anymore anyway but won’t hesitate to lay the power on when coming through a turn
I’m not sure how international pricing is set but yes 40K USD is 44K CDN plus those CDN taxes on the higher amount. Maybe a European delivery?
I’ve notice other imports are expensive in Canada as well Acura, Infiniti but some domestics are pretty cheap Chrysler (maybe because they have a plant in Ontario).
Mustang anyone? Vette anyone? Would anyone buy the 'Stang or 'Vette if all they came with was an anemic 2.5L engine that put out 160 horse?
People do buy cars based on stats alone and there isn't anything wrong with it. Who am I to tell someone how to spend their money?
Some acceleration stats are “more” valid in my book than others. For MOST people 5-60 is more representative of what they will attempt. Unless they spend weekend after weekend slipping their clutch from various rpm’s to find the optimal or brake torque their automatics.
My main point is even if a vehicle has an impressive stat, it may not translate into how “you” like to drive for example a Honda S2000 revs up to approx 9K rpm with power way up there a VW TDI (1.9 for example) makes a lot of power down low but the 0-60 is not that impressive.
If my wife were testing these two cars, she would not go to 9K rpm so her conclusion would be the VW TDI is faster (or feels faster) then the S2000.
Other performance stats such as slalom well I’m not an expert so maybe it’s just me but I’ll have a wide margin just doing run after run in the same car.
Then of course the 335 is turbo charged so your real world results will be much better in Denver in a 335i than an IS350.
As an overall driving experience, I've yet to find handling/ride/steering/braking that equals what Audis and BMWs offer, however.
Truth told, if I could find even a wee bit of love for the G35s interior ('07 included), I'd probably would have opted for it and saved a few thou.
Almost pulled the trigger on an IS350. Space and the fact that you couldn't fold down the back seat was the eventual deal killer on that car. Plus, the exterior styling really didn't do much for me either.
While I am interested in the 335i because of the added power, I can't say I'm in any way, shape or form interested in going any faster than the 330i will go.
What was NOT mentioned, was Lexus' FAR superior fault tolerance vs. BMW. With Lexus, you get a machine that doesn't break from routine wear, whereas BMW falls far lower in that category. How much you going to enjoy going thru those cones (seriously, do we normally drive straight, or thru cones???) when your "Bimmer" is parked at the dealership 10 days per year?
It's clear to me that both of these guys recognize the Lexus is the winner, but are defaulting to the "safe" choice of BMW because of their yuppie 40-something heritage of wanting a status symbol instead of jumping onto the clear winning choice. Again, if Lexus weren't going to continue destroying the BMW from now until the next 10-20 years, I'd understand their bent better. But the [non-permissible content removed] are going to make superior cars until the Germans are left selling to yuppies only. Who the heck likes yuppies anyway??
The cow is now hamburger meat...the 335 is faster 0-60 and quarter mile.
a machine that doesn't break from routine wear, whereas BMW falls far lower in that category.
Old fogies (Lexus has an old demographic) drive slow..and as such do not put as much stress on a vehicle. I drive hard...trust me, I could break a Lexus.
I don't remember reliability stats of the old IS...but as I recall the “old” GS had more “problems” than other Lexus automobiles...probably because the owners attempted to “Drive” them.
It's clear to me that both of these guys recognize the Lexus is the winner, but are defaulting to the "safe" choice of BMW
I'd say Lexus is the safe choice...something I'd buy for my mother...the BMW has more of a specific mission (performance/luxury)
The mission is parked at shop often.
..while waiting for friends at the Lexus dealer who have to bring their cars in for service.
the difference between the most reliable car and the one on the 10th place is extremely small. I prefer to drive an amazing car like BMW and have lets say 1.5% chances to have a problem than to drive a pseudo-luxury maker like Lexus having only 1% chances to have a problem. You might consider also the possibility of getting a Lexus with problems which will put you in the position of having not only a car that gives no joy to the driver but an unreliable car too. Leave the insecurity aside and get in a man's car. Reliability reports are for...
I agree with your remarks about reliability. Most cars today are reliable, and every make has had or will have at some time issues with their cars. It is true that Lexus has mission for reliability...but there cars are still mechanical devices nonetheless.
So I would phrase your sentence as:
"Leave the insecurity aside and get the car you want."
"Leave the insecurity aside and get the car you want"
This is what people do... they buy there cars because they WANT them but many times they want them for the wrong reasons. What I suggested is for them not to get a lesser car(Lexus) for the wrong reasons(supposedly better reliability)but to choose a car based entirely on the driving experience.
So, no offence but I suggest from now on you phrase your own sentences. I really don't believe mine need any "improvement".
Couldn't disagree more. People buy a car for their right reasons. However I agree they buy a car for your wrong reasons.
So no offense at taken at all, we're having a discussion in a public forum.
But I think we're on the same side of the fence. We both agree to get the car that suits their needs most closey. We also agree that each of us has different priorities that effect our decisions.
Actually, smart guy, you spelled offense wrong. So, maybe your sentences do need a little work?
What do you think about the topic?
2007 - HP battle is back with BMW...actually, they are underrating the power and performance specs.
Let's wait for test results to appear.
Regards,
OW
The topic should have been expanded to include the G35 and A4.
It is difficult to know where I have been and where I have not been.
http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/WebX/.ef0a892/7229
If you have any questions, post in this forum. A bunch of helpful people will be there to guide you.
http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/WebX/.eea0957/3375
In addition, you can always start a new post with the title: Host Help :P. As edmunds boards have hosts assigned to each of the forums to help as needed.
Welcome!
Not ture.
Lexus is now available in Europe, China and Taiwan as well. As matter of fact in Taiwan Lexus is the number 1 selling luxury brand, ahead of both BMW and MB.
Oh yeah and the Bimmer's interior layout is plain ugly. Wish they could bring E46's interior back.
Toyota has been offering Lexus in Taiwan for at least over 5 years so its number one luxury brand status didn't happen overnight.
Would it ever overtake BMW in Japan? That's another story then...
Same for the European market. Lexus can only do better as well. How much better? Who knows.