Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
That was a really unique time for Chevy and Pontiac in particular, because in '57, 58, and 59, they WERE totally different cars! It used to be that GM would usually redesign the Buick/Olds/Cadillac cars a year earlier than the Chevy/Pontiac models, and 3-year design cycles were pretty common.
The '57 Buick/Olds/Cadillac models were on time, as the previous style ran from '54-56, but Chrysler rushed out its dramatic 1957 models a year early, having only used their previous body style for '55-56. As a result, I think a decision was made for GM to rush out the next body style, which meant that the '57 Buick/Olds/Cadillac body would only last through '58. A decision was also made to get Chevy and Pontiac on the same cycle as the other cars and for them to be more substantially similar underneath as a cost savings measure, so that meant that Chevy/Pontiac would only see their new '58 body for that one year, after having had the same body for '55-57.
Back in the '57-59 timeframe I think Ford actually got some pretty good mileage out of their platform. The '57-59 was the same body, but it was heavily revised for '58, and for '59 was given a Thunderbird-like squaring off, which made it look almost like a completely different car.
The '59 Chevy was a pretty awful looking car IMO, but I think it also proves that sometimes, the devil is in the details. It cleaned up quite nicely for '60-61, and the '62-64 Chevy is actually pretty much the same thing underneath.
But yeah, for '58 I'd say the Impala was probably GM's best looking car. The cheaper models weren't bad either, although the Bel Air hardtop's roofline wasn't as attractive IMO as the Impala's. I do like the Cadillacs too, although I think the '57's were better. And the only thing I don't really like about the '58 Pontiacs are the headlights, which kind of jut out too far, giving it a bit of a bug-eyed look.
Another thing that I thought was kinda odd, considering that GM was trying to make the cars more similar underneath, is that in '59-64, Chevies and Buicks used a wasp-waisted "X-frame", and had the gas tank mounted somewhat vertically, between the rear axle and a deep-well trunk floor, similar to the Crown Vics of today. Pontiacs and Oldsmobiles used a perimeter frame and in back had a somewhat shallower trunk floor, with a more conventional gas tank mounted horizontally under the trunk floor. I just thought that was strange since usually, Pontiacs and Chevies were more similar, as were Oldsmobiles and Buicks.
I'm sure there's still a demand for buggy whips in the leather community, and I hear that it's one of the tools of the trade for many dominatrices. :P
I remember we thought it was the funniest thing and laughed our you-know-whats off, but in the next issue of that newsletter, man I've never seen so many people write in and whine about being offended and shocked!
I wish I still had that newsletter, but unfortunatley that was three companies ago.
Last wedding we went to, invitation specifically stated that dress was casual and men did not have to wear suit/sport coats and ties. As I recall, only people dressed up were bridal party and their parents. So, as it is going, will probably not be needing suits too much for weddings in future.
I would agree that business dress in office has deteriorated badly. Men went from dress slacks, dress shirt and ties in early 90's to casual Fridays then to casual everyday then to everyday slobs. See guys coming in in summer in shorts, t-shirts, sandals no socks, and a "baseball cap". Some wear baseball caps at their desks. And, the cap lid has to be curled into a half-circle. These folks are internal and do not see customers.
I should add that a couple of the sloppy dressers also have poor taste (IMO) in vehicle choice and might be driving things that this board considers to be on a "worst" car list.
And oh, you should see what some of these young interns wear nowadays! I'd say it's borderline harrassment! But in a good way. :P
I will say, based solely on my experience, that womem's office dress has gotten a lot more casual. I can see more belly buttons at the office now that at the beach.
2021 Jeep Wrangler Sahara 4xe Granite Crystal over Saddle
2024 Audi Q5 Premium Plus Daytona Gray over Beige
2017 BMW X1 Jet Black over Mocha
Rocky
Oh, and let's not forget the $1000 worth of stereo improvements, with the thumpin' sub rattling every loose piece of trim and metal on the car as they drive down the road.
Saw a late 80s Seville like that quite recently - half the windows were broken out and had been covered with opaque plastic, the suspension was shot, this car was "walking dead", yet they had spent the obligatory 3 grand on rims and stereo. With that much money to blow, didn't it ever occur to them to maybe fix the windows? How about fixing the sagging suspension and the mechanicals a bit?
These cars are to me the worst cars in general. No one brand in particular, but among the crowd that does this sort of thing, it seems to be mostly the big-engined domestic cars that are the ones of choice.
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
> obligatory 3 grand on rims and stereo.
And they complain they are poor--ain't poor, they just have always made bad choices. They'll have a cell phone, money for cigs and other smokes and pharmaceuticals. But if they hit your car or damage you, they shouldn't be held responsible for anything in life; they're gone and can't get money from them.
If the car craps out, they sell the rims or get another one to fit.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
It was one of the "umpimp my ride" ads, and featured a guy talking about how he realized he had a sickness...he had spent $10k on a $2k car. :P
I love how for different "enthusiast" groups, there are different "gold-standard" mods that are de riguer for the crowds they run with...
For the above-mentioned group, it's the gigantic chrome bling-bling wheels. For the "fast and furious" types, it's the clear taillights. For the monster-pickup truck guys, it's aftermarket dual exhausts that stick out below the bumper...
I have since owned a V8 Chevy Malibu, fuel-injected, pancake engine Volkswagon fastback, numerous Hondas, and a 2005 Mustang GT, the last being my favorite.
I also have 3 Hondas and an Acura, all of which are lightyears better.
The other thing that was also common that drives me nuts is to see a car with custom parts abound. Now granted there are some "custom parts" out there that can enhance a car's appearance, but more often than not I see it taken way overboard. Think "Fast and Furious" gone over board.
The obligatory 4 inch, sometimes dual exhaust (on a 4 cyl), the overly large and non functional, unpainted, cracked and barley hanging on front spoiler. The unpainted tacked on side body fenders and door body cladding. The gaudy wing that sticks up beyond the roof the car that again is not painted and adds no performance value to the car. The primered "repairs" and the chromed tailights that you can barley tell are red when they light up. And the people that drive these things think they have to race everyone to every stoplight.
Oh and I forgot the tacked on hood scoops....
If I wanted to go the other way I could also mention the pickup trucks that I see... with the over cab visor and running lights, the grab handle just outside the cab, the overly large viser vents over the doors, the thing ( I have no idea what it is called) that is bolted to the cab of the truck and sticks out over the bed (Think Avalanchish but GM did it right. It is kind of a half-bed topper sort of. Supposed to improve areodynamics. The toneau cover and the wing mounted to the back of it. The bondoed over and primered tail lights because a new LED strip was installed just just below the tailgate. The chrome everywhere scheme including (in not shaved first) the tailgate handle, the door handles, the wheel wells, and door outlines. The overtly huge tires - not mudders, but more like wide racing tires. ANd don't forget the black out covers for the headlights and turnsignals in front and the light bar attatched to the roll bar in the bed and the fog lights bolted to the grill. ALong with the cab width rear view mirror in the cab. With flamed tint on the windows. Oh yeah and tubular rear bumper and tubular step plates under the doors. And the bed rails and chromed gas cap door (I think I already mentioned chromed anything that was possible to chrome). I have actually seen a vehicle almost as I have described and they had found a way through cutting, welding, bondoing, and duct taping everything I have just mentioned. They also had the tacked on hood scoops and redone interior that recovered everything from the dash to the door panels and headliner, along with the boomin stereo to rattle all thier handiwork.
Because consumers' descriptions and categorizations of their experiences vary, are not expressed in a consistent manner and are not adequately aggregated and analyzed by NHTSA-ODI, Edmunds recognized that there was a need to engage in a further review of the complaints and a deeper analysis of the complaints database. Edmunds did such a review and has re-categorized the complaints using new standard categories that Edmunds defined. Edmunds began with complaints submitted to NHTSA-ODI since January 1, 2005 for vehicles commencing with the 2005 model year. Edmunds continues to retrieve, review and categorize complaints data from NHTSA-ODI weekly, adding to an in-house database that now consists of more than 90,000 consumer vehicle complaints.
This month, Chrysler's 2.8 complaints per 100,000 vehicles sold is an all time low for this manufacturer in the history of our complaints reporting, which started in May 2010.
Those kinds of complaints translate into warranty claims and those can come back to bite you.