Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Grand Touring 4WD, most options - $40,000+ MSRP
Still no inside dimensions to compare to the Veracruz and Outlook/Acadia.
Just got this:
http://cx-9.prelaunch.carscomplete.com/prelaunch/dispatch.do
It is a build it page for the cx-9 showing different color combinations and options. It is a prelim build order site to see what consumers are thinking, but it does give some great ideas on colors and options. I just love the profile and the colors look great, especially the galaxy gray mica which reminds me of my TSX ext. color.
I do not like the fact that options seem to be all packaged together, like I just want a sunroof I do not need the Bose sound option, but we shall see. I also noticed that the grand touring potentionally will come standard with "Smart Card with Mazda Advanced Keyless Entry and Start System"...pretty cool stuff.
Anyhow enjoy,
B.
Seems a roundabout way to get the "survey" information to Mazda, but whatever works. :shades:
Hey, I'm putting tile down and I need something to do while the glue dries.
The one I've built is an AWD Touring in Stormy Blue Mica with Sand Leather with mats, splash guards and roof rack - anyone got $32,910 lying around? :shades:
......and I don't think you added the $595 destination charge in!!
I'm convinced the CX-9 is a real winner!
Jay
To those ends, we will be shutting down the general make/model discussions and work exclusively with specific issues. This requires us to populate the make/model subsections with relevant, interesting and timely topics. Rather than having the hosts simply create boilerplate topics for each make/model, we feel that you, the owner, the make/model enthusiast and the prospective buyer can best judge what those topics should be.
You can help by adding a discussion (it's easy!) or suggesting one here.
To add a discussion, click on the last link in the "You are here" line at the top of this page. That will take you to the topic page for this make/model. Review the list of topics and click on the "Add discussion" link when you've decided what topic you'd like to add. Follow the directions and you're done! Feel free to add more than one. Just avoid duplicating existing topics and try not to make it TOO specific!
Your help and continued participation in the Forums is greatly appreciated! Thanks.
Expect delivery to be closer to March. These orders will not be processed until November 1st, then production will start. It is usually 3 months from then.
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Need help navigating? kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Share your vehicle reviews
?.....Am I correct in assuming that the 18 inches would give a bit of a smoother ride?????/
I believe you're correct in assuming that the 20's will have a harsher ride.
This is what I hope is the case. What assurance do I have that what you say is true? ... i.e. your credentials
A lower section height will give you a rougher ride, there is less cushion!
How much is felt, depends on the vehicles suspension and the driver's sensitivity/acceptance.
You may or may not be happy with the larger wheels/tires.
I think it's mostly going to depend on how the vehicle is sprung and how well it is able to absorb rough road. Don't get me wrong! I think that the 18's will ride better than the 20's, but I don't think it will be as much difference as you think. It's all going to depend on a test drive though.
Smaller, stronger sidewalls do increase roughness a bit, but they also increase grip because of less bouncing and give in the tire. This is why you see road racing cars with smaller sidewalled tires.
You don't have to stick with the stock tires if you go to 20 in...you could always get new tires that are a little wider and maybe more sidewall. Being a SUV, i'd bet slightly bigger tires wouldn't rub on the fenders. But the 20 in wheels will likely give the CX-9 a more sporty attitude in cornering, if that's what people are interested in. But I'd bet most people would get the 20 in wheels simply for the more aggressive look!
Legroom 40.9/39.8/32.4
Shoulder room 59.4/58.7/56.85
* w/moonroof
I placed my first allocation earlier this month. The order won't be processed until November 1st. I would not expect the CX-9 to get here until late February to mid March.
16-18 weeks is typical order to delivery time frame here in the North East. If you are on the West Coast, you might get it a week or two before us.
The Mazdaspeed6 made it's debut in 2004 at the Paris Auto Show, and it didn't hit dealer lots until early December 2005. The CX-7 made it's debut in April 2005 as the MX-Crossport Concept, and we didn't see it for a whole other year and 2 months. We saw the CX-9 in April of this year, and it was basically just a shell. So, figure about a year from then is when we will see the CX-9.
Before you know it, the CX-9 will be here. There should be plenty around after a month or so after release. The initial allocations will be slim, but, plentiful after that, just like the CX-7.
Automobile Magazine
B.
Just need the Veracruz specs and pricing now.
I love that rear 3/4 view and profile view, I think they have a winner on their hands.
B.
link
I think my least favorite part is the direct view of the fron end, but that could be because it looks awkward when you look at it as if you are 3 feet tall.
B.
I've considered the MDX, even got a nice brochure, but it's not worth all that money, imo. For $40k, the CX-9 will have everything the MDX has, i.e. bluetooth, a nice NAV (in fact, the NAV in the CX-9 is touchscreen, while in the MDX it is not), rear seat DVD, all-wheel drive, etc. etc.
There's not way the MDX has $8k in upgraded plastics, suspension, etc. You're just paying a premium for the Acura brand, which is fine if you're an Acura fan. I'm just looking for some value for my money, and the CX-9 fits the bill, even if it will have slightly lower mpg.
Cargo volume: 101 vs. 87.
If you don't end up buying this year, I'm sure the CX-9 will end up with power upgrades. The engine currently makes 263hp without the aid of direct injection or variable valve timing. It really a rather simple engine. In theory, you could end up with 300+hp with very simple modifications on regular gas.
Regardless, 16/22 sucks, I mean the 5 year old Honda Pilot gets 17/22 on an arguably less aerodynmic body with one less tranny cog...this is a dissapointment any way you slice it. But I think the KBB is just guesstimating as those figures have not been completed by the EPA or published.
Later,
B.
I find it odd to offer such a high recommendation to a vehicle the even the writer states was still in the tuning process...
Let's suppose the final tuned product stinks with little or less zoom then in the prototype (not likely)but for the sake of argument I'd like to only see fully tested in full production vehicles given top honors;it makes the Edmunds honors more credible and make me as a consumer feel more confident about the recommendations.
The only real complaint I saw from either one of them was that because of the rather tight suspension and the 20" wheels, pot holes caused a little bit of suspension noise in the cabin.
2WD...18/24
AWD...16/22
http://www.mazda.com/publicity/release/2006/200610/061030.html
I am not saying the CX-9 does not deserve it however the vehicle just launched production two days ago.
Alot could change in a pre-production vehical and finished product.
The "Editors most wanted" award is premature is my opinion.