Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
- 4 cylinder, 1.5 Liter, Automatic 5-spd, Regular Gasoline, CLKUP
- 4 cylinder, 1.5 Liter, Manual 5-spd, Regular Gasoline
- 4 cylinder, 1.5 Liter, Automatic (S5), Regular Gasoline, 2MODE CLKUP
Is the latter one the AT Sport, and what is 2MODE CLKUP vs. CLKUP ?
Thanks!
I believe you are correct the last one is the AT sport. Here is the key below. There is a link on the bottom of the page that explains the abbreviations.
CLKUP Computer-Controlled Continuously Variable Lockup
nLKUP User-Selectable Lockup with n (2 Through 9) Lockup Ranges
nMODE Multimode, User-Selectable Transmission. n = Number of Gear Range (2 Through 9)
Got no good answer for the mpg problem you guys are having. Maybe the AT just sucks. Part of why I swore off ever buying another automatic.
I agree!
Some Fits are getting remarkable mileage, but others seem really bad. The Fit offers a lot more versatility than the others. But from reading some of these post, it seems that Honda is not anxious about "Fixing" mileage problems, on those that are getting poor mileage. Some Pilot owners are complaining about the same thing.
To upgrade a Yaris to near the same safety as a Fit, the price will be about the same or more. But, the Yaris hatch back is lacking in the versatility of the Fit. Recon it depends on how the car is to be driven and used as to which would be the better buy.
From my viewpoint: IF the Fit and Yaris are both getting the mileage they should, the Fit is probably the better "only" car. Especially with the AT.
However for a "scoot around" second or 3rd car, where getting from point A to point B at the lowest cost possible is the criteria..The Yaris just might be the better choice. With a car that small, the entry level with hand crank windows are not a problem and the Yaris owners don't seem to be complaining as loudly about mileage. To get a Fit with good mileage seems to be a crap shoot. Those that get good mileage, get really good, but those with poor mileage are stuck with them.
Another option would be a Civic or Corolla.
Kip
these post are not encouraging.
I understand frustration with the Fit, but a Maxima isn't going to give you 30+ on the highway regularly. An Avalon maybe, but not a Maxima.
Date Gallons Miles MPG
26-Mar 6.128 195.3 31.870 car wash
2-Apr 9.846 313.8 31.871 car wash
7-Apr 7.615 285.6 37.505 BP
14-Apr 9.324 333.4 35.757 Shell
total 32.91 1128.1 34.275
The HTML rendering strips out the duplicate space bars
Date......Gallons.......Miles...........MPG
26-Mar......6.128.......195.3.........31.870
2-Apr........9.846........313.8........31.871
7-Apr........7.615........285.6........37.505
14-Apr......9.324........333.4........35.757
MPG so far..................34.275
2008 Honda Sport AT
I can't spell, I can't type and I have to use computers all the time...
Not necessarily. Our 03 Pilot started bucking ,shuttering and jumping when the tranny was attempting to shift into overdrive at 50mph. No problem when staying out of the OD Lockup mode at any speed.
Dealer found no error codes so treated it like a Torque converter problem. Honda Tech Support was no help. Finally an experienced service writer remembered a problem they had a couple of years ago when the 03 models were going over the 20K mark. He said he thought the problem was with the EGR (exhaust gas Recirculating valve). Not possible said Honda Tech support. That is an EPA item and would show up on the error listings.
Dealer technician checked the EGR valve to satisfy the service writer. BINGO! The valve failed the test. They replaced it and the problem went away.
Assume for a moment that the sensor that is supposed to tell the computer the engine is warm fails to do so. The engine continues to run rich as though it is still cold. None of the other sensors see a problem because they think they are dealing with a cold engine. Instant and continued poor mileage and No errors!
While I absolutely agree that driver can make a huge difference in MPG, and are probably the #1 reason for poor mileage. Other things can be wrong also.
It is entirely too easy for Mfg to pass the buck as driver error.
I'm seeing problems like these in the Pilot forum. One guy has an Oddessy and a Pilot. The Oddessy consistently delivers 4 MPG better than the Pilot on the same terrain with the same driver and load. Both are 2wd. That is a near 20% difference between the two cars. He says the Pilot averages 19.7 mpg or so on the road at 70 and the Oddessy about 24 mpg at 70.
Others Pilots, myself included, get 24-26 at the same speed. Mine is a 4WD.
Honda seems to be happy if the cars average 15-20 city/Road period, as that is what the EPA sticker says. If the car gets lower than that, they say it is the driver.
Kip
Of course this time it wasn't in the morning, but I'm afraid to run out of gas, and never have, so I filled up, but I tried the slow setting again and it cut off at 9.136 gallons, the least gas I've ever put in to fill it up, which seemed odd if I had drained the tank.
I let my fuel purchase record in fueleconomy.gov calculate it for me though, and I got a whopping 38.7 mpg! I'm really excited by this! I even used the a/c a few times during this tank, and drove the highway with the window down a bit. The usual usage: about 40% city, 60% highway - my commute is 25 miles/day round trip on the Interstate, top speed 70 mph. I coast to stops, I drive gently, no jackrabbit starts, and my tires are at about the recommended 32 psi, just inflated a bit more a couple days ago, but not enough to make this much of a difference.
Could it have been as the chain email suggested? The lowest chance for water vapor in the tank? Either way... whoo hoo!
***Whoops, edited to note that the chain email is a supposed urban legend and subject of Snopes.com article: Dawn Petrol - regardless, I got my best tank yet, and I'm shocked, and extremely pleased, no matter the reason for it.
On a particular trip:
Did the calculated MPG based on gas fill-up and the computer calculated MPG on the car are relatively similar (satisfactory MPG or poor MPG)?
Or
Did the calculated MPG based on gas fill-up differs significantly from the computer calculated MPG on the car ( poor calculated MPG but the car computer continues to display much better MPG than calculated)?
I don't know why some folks aren't getting as good as MPG as others, but then in most of these forums you'll have some folks getting really good mpg, some really poor mpg, and most in the middle. And the Fit forum doesn't seem any different in that respect.
One highway tip I have for the auto-sport owners is to use the sport mode on the highway and put it in 5th gear and cruise except on the big hills. If you leave it in Drive in the same highway conditions, the transmission will downshift quite often, but when I use the Sport mode and leave it in 5th it will go up the same hill just fine. So you'll get better MPG that way.
On my second tank of gas I got 26.5 MPG
Third tank I got 27.25 MPG
Can I expect it to continue to go up?
I'm new here and I'd love to know what you think of 30.5 MPG on a Fit Base Manual on the first 300 miles...is that any good?
Not to rain on your parade, but I wouldn't get too excited about the stats from your 2 gallon top-off. There is too much a margin of error there for it to be very meaningful.
When I say 34 mpg - that's over 4 tankfuls. (32.9 gallons yielding 1128 miles) You really have to look at your mileage and fuel consumption over several tankfuls as you will have a variance in how full your gas tank is from each fill-up.
This thread thread always draws me like iron to a magnet. I am floored by the reports of a Fit consistently getting mileage in the teens and low twenties.
I have a blue (no known affect on mileage) 2007 Sport AT5. I use the paddles to engine break on hills and to downshift instead of mashing the gas pedal. I'm relatively easy on the car while driving and have never fire walled the throttle. Winter gas mileage was consistently 29 MPG. Now that it is warming up, my mileage has increased to 31-32 MPG. Mileage last summer was about 32-34 (85% highway) even with the AC running.
Best mileage was 41 MPG on a round robin to Columbus OH.
Use the 2008 EPA ratings. There was a reason for the revision and as you can see the mileage is pretty much in line with normal driving habits.
Anyways, an IKEA store opened up in West Chester and I now have the perfect car to shop there.
but I'am hoping it is a sign of things to come most the time run it down to a 1/4 tank
so if you go by what I got over the last 4 tank running about 28mpg flat with 85-90% highway
If you fill up at a pump that clicks 0.3 gallons different from the last :
80 miles at 2 gallons = 40 MPG
80 miles at 2.3 gallons = 34.79 MPG
A 5.2 MPG discrepancy in your accuracy.
320 miles at 8 gallons = 40 MPG
320 miles at 8.3 gallons = 38.56 MPG
A 1.4 MPG discrepancy in your accuracy.
Just something I thought I'd share. You're results will be more consistently accurate if you use more fuel between fillups; preferably filling at the same pump.