Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Did that fix the problem?
But. If the A/F mixture is "igniting" BEFORE the ignition spark how/why would RETARDING, delaying the ignition, be of any help.
Methinks you are referring to knock/ping due to a too early ignition spark which can be the case but these days rarely is.
I believe Toyota uses a pink antifreeze?
Thanks for any help, chuck
Ahhhhhh, just for those interested, I figured out what was wrong with my Outlander (nothing). As my dealership supposedly found and fixed that my transfercase was leaking, which I had doubts about it as transmission fluid is NOT neon green/yellow color. When the snow melted there were no drips found under my Outlander, then another big snow storm hit and the little yellow/green neon drips continued. So I went under the car and I didn't notice any leakage, then I googled it and apparently in my area they started using new salt mixed with sugar solutions to melt away the snow Apparently when the heat from the exaust (which is located in the middle) that has little snow residue (mixed with salt/sugar) left over gets on clean snow it will leave little neon/green spots (dripping water mixed with salt/sugar).And this would make sense because as I mentioned earlier, when there is no snow on the ground, I don't see any leakage on the pavement and all the fluid levels seem to be normal. This thing has been driving me nuts for the past few weeks but seems I finally figured it out.
It is also not well understood by most people that compression ignition, self ignition and detonation do not normally take place in a motor on which the mixture strength and ignition timing is properly adjusted. Self ignition is typically caused by prolonged running with either excessively lean air/fuel mixtures, or excessively advanced ignition timing. That's when the spark plug electrodes or carbon deposits heat to the point where they glow; which can ignite fuel without a spark. But since modern engines are equipped with automatic mixture strength regulation and automatic ignition timing optimization; the conditions which create detonation cannot and do not normally occur. Variations in fuel octane are compensated for with the detonation sensor controlling the amount of spark advance. Variations in mixture strength are compensated for with the fuel injection feedback loop control; which is driven by the signal from the exhaust oxygen sensor. These two systems keep the mixture strength and timing set optimally under the full range of possible operating conditions. That is why detonation is no longer an issue in modern engines; and variations in fuel octane can now be easily tolerated. So pinging after the spark takes place is the only abnormal combustion factor which still requires compensation. And that is now regulated nicely by the knock sensor controlling the amount of spark advance.
Just as long as the engine is under a fairly light load, simply cruising along at a relatively constant speed wherein the "standard 14.7:1 mixture ratio is used. Obviously engine knock/ping under those conditions, LOW cylinder "fill", would be somewhat unusual.
But open the throttle just a bit for acceleration and since the A/F mixture must be enriched to as high as 12:1 the engine control system switches from the use of the upstream oxygen sensor to the MAF/IAT sensors for controlling the mixture.
It is in this "mode", high engine load/loading, that knock/ping is most likely to occur and the A/F mixture can be more freely modified to satisfy varying engine operating parameters.
Whereas there can be NO A/F mixture variation under control of the upstream oxygen other than what is REQUIRED to keep the exhaust oxygen content to ZERO.
What a coincidence if Niagara Region (Ontario, Canada) is using the same salt on their roads as your region.
By the way, what part of the continent ARE you from?
Cheers.....on this sunny day!
Scotty
I hope nobody gets ripped off when taking it in for service thinking they got a leak.
Take care, chuck
Den
TSB = Technical Service Bulletin
Take your documentation with you that shows you had it in for them to fix these problems during the warranty period, perhaps they'd be willing to perform this work now.
D.
NV009-06 Upper/lower windshield Tick Noise
NV006-06 Moon Roof Rattle
BO-015-06 RH Interior A-pillar garnish loose
My 2007 V-6 Camry had the Rpm flare from day one. I purchased the car in July 2006. The first step the dealer ship took was to change out the valve body. After the flares were still there and other symptoms as well they changed out the Trans. Ever since the valve body change I notice my Gas MPG was never the same. I never get close to the 30 MPG on the Highway I should get. I never get past 25 MPG
My thought was at that time there was no computer fix seeing that the problem was new at that time and it can take a year sometimes to write the software to flash the computer so they did what they could to and switched out the valve and trans. Which never resolved the flare problem. The flare problem got resolved after my car was in for a complaint for the trans. At that time they told me there was no problem they could find but strangely enough I never had the flare problem again when I got the car back.. The car was running as good as it ever had for about two weeks and then it was shifting strange again like down shifting more severely but never flare again. It appeared they flashed my computer seeing they had disconnect the battery when I got my car back from service.
It was always in there best interest not to admit to another Trans fix so I wouldn't qualify for the lemon law.
Is it possible I have a modified valve body that should never have been swapped out in the first place and the computer fix which is out there now does not match up with the Modified Valve body they put in during 2006.
Thank you for your insight, chuck
That is a very good theory you came up with. However, I certainly have no way to know if it is, or is not really the source of the problem. And I expect the dealership will not talk about this; because it is a question that goes beyond their training about routine answers to routine problems. So it seems that the only way you could find out whether this is or is not the solution would be to pay out of your pocket to have a new valve body installed. Nevertheless; it might be illuminating to check with the dealership's parts department about whether the 2010 Camry (which still has the same motor as yours) uses the same valve body as the 2007 Camry...
I did some more checking; and found that the 2007-2010 Camrys all use the same Aisin E250E 5 speed automatic (2007 was the first year that transmission was used). However, the 2007-2010 Lexus RX350 uses the same motor as the Camry; but it uses a DIFFERENT TRANSMISSION: Aisin U151F 5 speed. That transmission uses the same oil pan gasket as yours; but the internals are different. This transmission is also used in the 2007-2010 Toyota RAV4 Sport, and the 2007-2010 Toyota Highlander, along with the same 3.5L 2GRFE motor as your Camry.
It may be that the reason the RX350, RAV4, Sienna and Highlander use a different transmission than the Camry is that they have 4 wheel drive; which might optimize with different gear ratios. They are also heavier vehicles than the Camry; which would also require using different gear ratios.
Oddly enough; some of these vehicles come equipped with a 4 speed automatic (Aisin U140F or U241E). That might be preferable in vehicles which are expected to receive more off road use, and thus don't need the complication of a 5 speed. Or; it might be intended for use in non-US markets (where EPA fuel efficiency regulations do not apply).
I expect that these other transmissions may be physically interchangeable with yours; but I don't know whether they are compatible with your Camry's computer. I expect they probably are not compatible. And that would leave the valve body as the only off the shelf option.
It may be that one of the aftermarket automatic transmission performance shops has worked out a reprogramming fix for this issue; though it is specialized enough that it might be more than they care to address. But you could try B & M (http://www.bmracing.com/PRODUCTS) and write them a note about this.
I was wondering when you mention Aisin E250E 5 speed automatic does that refer to the V-6 6 speed transmission which I have. (U660E transmission)
What I need is somebody from Toyota that would take the time and investigate that I may have this problem with my car. Hard to come by.
Thank you for all your insight and please don't hesitate to contact me with any more info that may be helpful for my car. chuck
I didn't realize that your Camry had the 6 speed. Most of them had a 5 speed automatic. The valve body would not be the same between the 5 speed and the 6 speed. My catalogs are not complete on this issue, and do not list the U660E transmission. I have noticed that the 2007 Lexus IS350 and GS350 both use a different Aisin 6 speed than yours. Theirs is a A760E or A760H. At least ons person who posts in the Toyota Nation forum (http://www.toyotanation.com/forum/archive/index.php/</t-322230.html) feels that the U660 trannys are inherently junk. If that is true (which I suspect it is) then if you could substitute an A760E or A760H in your car, that could make a big difference. But I have no information about compatibility issues.
You know; the one source who would be most likely to know the answer to these questions is TRD (Toyota Racing Development). But whether they would be willing to talk about this is another issue.
Sorry I can't be of more help. You might check the posts in the Toyota Nation forum listed above.
My 2007, cheapo Camry (CE-4cyl/automatic) ran for 94,000 kilometers (about 50K miles for my American friends) before I had a nice new set of Michelins installed last Fall to replace the factory ones.
Ever since the new tires were installed I've noticed an increasingly irritating noise coming from the right-rear corner of the car. It's bigger than a rattle.....but smaller than a clunk, in terms of loudness and severity. The sound comes every time the right side of the car passes over changes in road surface: from uneven pavement joints to manhole covers to traintrack crossings; even lumps of dirt or snow accumulations will set it off.
My guess is that it's something related to suspension......and possibly related to the relatively recent tire replacement.
My question is, do you think it's the age of the car alone that is now the cause (i.e. the right/rear shock/strut has simply given up the ghost?).....or do you suppose it's something less "mechanical" in nature that may have occurred during the tire installation? (e.g. displacement of a rubber grommet or bumper of some sort in the suspension that may have dropped out or shifted when the wheels were allowed to "drop" to their furthest/lowest point while dangling from the hoist?) (Or maybe there's even something inside the strut that doesn't like being fully 'extended' after spending its entire life with the full weight of the car sitting on it!?)
Remarkably (or not)....I have EXACTLY the same scenario on my 2004 BMW 325i.....albeit at a much lower mileage number...but on a 2/3 year older car. The sidewalls of the Continentals that came with it were badly cracked (too much sitting and not enough driving from the previous owner - I bought it in '07 with 4K miles on it - so I recently outfitted it with a new set of Bridgestones).
The Bimmer clunks/rattles in the same way, under the same road surface conditions as the Camry. It's almost spooky to hop from one car to the other and have the same noise problem.
I DID have an independent (trustworthy) mechanic crawl under and hoist up and bounce around the back end of the 325 a few days ago.....and he thinks it IS a shock mount bushing of some sort......but feels it "isn't bad enough" to replace "yet". (He took it for a two block test drive, but hasn't had the "pleasure" of an extended, half-day ride with all the clatter that accompanies it!)
Any thoughts...or anyone with similar experiences......and a cure?
Thanks,
Michael
I would look for obvious damage to control links and all around for damage if the lift had slipped or was put on the wrong component. If the noise was not there on the way to the tire shop, and was there on the trip home makes that visit suspect in some way. If i could see inside the strut design, it would be easier to have an opinion on an extension-related cause.
I am completely at a lost with my Camry. So here is the whole story and hopefully some can help me out! My car all of a sudden stopped working. I went to go and start it up and the lights were dim, the radio will not turn on, the ABS light and brake light are on... So this is what I did. I had the alternator replaced, and the battery replaced.. HOWEVER the car is still not holding charge. It is only running at 11Volts. Now I had the fuse box checked... everything is fine there. So now the car is stuck in my driveway, will not move out of park, and the ABS light and brake light is on? Does anyone have any suggestions or have even heard of this before?
Sounds like it might be in the ABS somewhere. Why woukld that be on if the key is off.
It could be so many things. Needs tons more info.
If u can use a digital mulitmeter, do this.
Read the instructions for measuring amps (current).
Turn off everything u can think of in the car. Very important...heater fans, radio, EVERYTHING you can. Turn key off. Close doors, trunk glove box etc. Anything with a light or motor or heating element etc. EVERYTHING. Remove the negative cable from your battery. Then click meter to the 10 amp setting. Make sure you put the red lead in the 10A red position. Then take the two leads on meter and insert them in series to the battery. Put the black lead on neg ter of batt and attach the red lead to the neg cable on the car. As you do this you will see and hear at least some small spark because there are live current draws even with the key off. (radio memory, ECM memory and numerous other things.)
I recommend doing this in the customer parking lot of your local Toy dealer in case something would have to be reflashed by the removal of the batt term cable. Keep in mind that all your radio settings etc will be probably lost unless Toy uses a small backup lithium button cell.
As soon as u attach the meter, quickly look at the display and have your wife mark down the numbers and the position of any decimal place. This 10 A setting on the meter is a duty cycle on MOST digi meters, so do leave it attached for more than mere seconds while you look at reading. Then unhook. They higher the number the less time to leave it hooked up. If you have to, let meter cool for 2 min and rehook to observe again.
It should be less than .5 amp. Confirm this number with a quick question to a mechanic there as that is just a guess. It maybe should be less than .25 amp also, i don't know the specs for your car.
For reference, if you were to put the parking lights on, the meter will show probably 3 amps. I don't know if u have LED's which is less power.
Can't imagine why you would have messed with the alternator, did it test bad?
First, I'd get the battery on a battery charger, and get it's voltage charged up. Then take your vehicle back where you had the alternator and battery replaced, and have them do a battery and alternator test under load. Many autoparts chains will do this free of charge. If either bad, have replaced under their warranty.
If they test okay, then you have a fully charged battery, that is proven to hold charge on it's own, with an alternator that is putting out the full rated voltage and current.
Monitor your voltage, if it drops, then as previous poster indicated you need to track down what is drawing the current while engine off. Suspect first any electrical add on's or modifications you have done to the vehicle.
I guess I have to have someone unbolt the strut and check for worn bushings or wear in the strut itself.
Keep in touch.
Just thought I'd chime in with my 2007 Camry; as with some previous posters here, my Camry is also burning oil, and am very disappointed. It currently has 66000 kms on the odometer at the moment, and it burns about a litre of oil every 3000-4000 kms. The dealer suggested I switch from 5w20 to 5w30, which I did, and it has done nothing for it. I've spoken to my dealership about it, and they asked me to bring it in so that they can top it off and start measuring the oil burning rate. They also mentioned that they'd be doing a compression test, which would take a couple of hours (to no charge to me).
Finally, the service manager told me that Toyota normally doesn't replace engines if they burn less than a litre every 2000 kms. or so, which I find absolutely ridiculous. I've owned 6 Toyotas over the past 10 years or so, and none of them burn oil. If my dealership doesn't fix this, this is going to be my last Toyota. So much for "bulletproof reliability".
I own a 2007 XLE V6 Camry purchased new. ----- I have this vehicle service at the selling Toyota Dealer every 3,000 miles, (oil & filter changes.) ----- {I DO NOT BELIEVE IN EXTENDED OIL AND FILTER CHANGES!} ------ I also use an oil additive BG / MOA, ---- (sold by the Toyota dealer), in every oil and filter change. ----- Periodically I also use a BG fuel injector additive in the gas. ----- My Camry has 63,000+ miles, and I never use oil between oil and filter changes. ---- The vehicle is driven for hours at 65mph on a regular basis! ------ (There is the possibility that the piston rings on your engine are frozen on the piston due to a "carbon build up!" ------ This could be cleaned in a couple of ways. ---- If you run fuel injector cleaner under pressure in the fuel system to clean the injectors, this cleaner would also remove carbon from the combustion chamber. ----- You could also run the BG / MOA additive in the engine oil, and the BG / Fuel injector cleaner in the gasoline on a regular basis. ----- (These products are a little pricey, but they do the job.) ----- Frozen piston rings would pressurize the crankcase, and the PCV system would suck up the wet oil fumes causing a loss of engine oil! ------ A PCV problem would also cause your engine to use oil. ------
Best regards. ---------- Dwayne :shades:
P.S. I started using mobil 1/ castrol/ pennzoil synthetic oils 5w-20 when it was around 32k miles. I only use toyota oil filter.
I've been concerned about this as well. Very good point... could anyone comment on this?
Thanks for all your comments and suggestions to my original post. I'm posting this information here so that it can possibly help you guys out there too. When I contacted the service manager at my dealership, they suggested running a compression test on the engine, opening it up to see if the rings were stuck and to notice if there were any abnormalities. They did a "dry" compression test, and all cylinders were at 150, give or take a few numbers (150, 152, 148, 150). Then they did a "wet" compression test, putting a bit of oil on top of each piston, and all cylinders registered an average of 180, which, I was told, was excellent. Then they checked the PCV valve, and they said there was a little bit of crud in there, but nothing noticeable, but they cleaned it anyway. He then confirmed that my car burns 750 ml (3/4 of a quart) for every 4300 kms (2671 miles). They topped it off, told me to keep an eye on it, and when I go back for my next oil change, they'll measure it again and send off the results to Toyota. They also fed me the line that "it's written in the owner's manual that burning a litre (a quart) of oil every 1500 kms (932) is considered "acceptable" according to Toyota, so I shouldn't expect an engine rebuild. I intend to appeal that as I sure don't consider that acceptable in my book, having owned 6 Toyotas already and never witnessed this.
Last thing Dwayne: I know you swear by additives, judging from your previous posts, but my dealership mentioned that they're more often than not snake oil, and they refused to sell me any. They also said that if I put some in my engine, that I can consider my warranty void. Just FYI.
Those of us who are knowledgable and experienced enough to be familiar with specific additives which have proved beneficial over the long run need not worry about Toyota covering their corporate behind with a legal caveat. The likelihood of a substantial mechanical failure in a properly maintained Toyota motor is small enough that the benefits of certain specific additives in increasing engine life outweigh the potential risk of punishment by Toyota; if a freak problem were to arise with the engine. In addition; the Toyota corporation is not unresponsive to appeals based on reason. If it can be demonstrated to them in an appeal that the particular additive which you (or your dealer) uses is not harmful, and is actually beneficial; I highly doubt that they will play the power game and go [non-permissible content removed] on you.
While everyone is entitled to their opinion, I would have to disagree with you about your reasoning on this oil burning issue. ------ If the cause of the oil burning is "frozen piston rings," (because of a carbon build up in the piston grooves), the engine will burn oil at 1,000 or 5,000 miles after the oil & filter change, since the cause of the oil burning IS NOT a break down of the oil, but rather the inability of the rings to follow the cylinder walls as the piston travels from TDC to BDC, thus allowing "blow by" to enter the crankcase. ---- The rings are locked in the piston grooves because of the carbon formed by the burning of the gasoline. ----- Using a top tier gasoline, and changing the brand of gasoline on a regular basis can work to eliminate these problems, because each brand of fuel uses different detergents in their fuel, which tend to break up these formations. ------ Chevron is one of the best fuels to use because of their additive package. ----- Some dealers have recognized the need for an extra additive, both in the fuel and in the engine oil to control this formation. ---- (Both my Toyota and my Chevrolet dealer sell & recommend the BG products for this purpose.) ----- Yes, it makes an extra profit for the dealership, but if these products are doing the job, than the cost justifies their use! ------ (Saturn Vehicles are noted for this oil burning problem, and the solution to the problem is to soak the pistons with an "penetrating oil chemical" through the spark plug hole overnight to free the rings.) ----- Yes, carbon formation can cause oil burning by increasing crankcase pressure and allowing the PCV system to draw wet oil fumes into the combustion chamber. --------- Best regards. ------------ Dwayne. :shades:
You are certainly not hurting your cars by frequent oil changes, but you are spending far more than you need for service. Just my opinion.
We purchased my wife's Solara convertible new in 2007 and have maintained it to factory specs. With just about 30K on the odometer, I had intended to have the Dealership begin servicing the cooling system and transmission using the BG product and shop procedures, followed up with similar servicing for the power brake and steering systems.
While speaking with the Service Manager to schedule this work, I was advised that "Toyota no longer recommends the use of BG additives in their vehicles......." After hearing this, I was both suspicious and concerned, as our Owner's Manual clearly indicates having the vehicle serviced at specific mileage intervals using BG products. FYI....our local Goodyear Dealer continues to offer this service, using professional BG equipment and trained technicians to operate it, all of which I have witnessed.
Question: I would appreciate reading responses from any other members who can share additional information on this topic.
Maintaining a vehicle is a very interesting process. ----- On one side, the manufacturer recommends what they consider to be an acceptable level of service, but in the real world, vehicles are used in many different styles, and under a different set of circumstances. ----- Throughout the automotive industry, we see a rash of engine oil sludge problems in a variety of name plates, and we see engines burning oil as they accumulate mileage. ----- Many times the owner of the vehicle has maintained the vehicle according to factory specifications, and in some nameplates, a battle then begins between the customer who wants the manufacturer to honor an extended warranty, and a manufacturer who wants to VOID the warranty claim because of the number of units out in the marketplace with the problem of the potential for the problem. ------- My two vehicles, (2007 V6 Camry & 2010 4 cylinder Malibu), recommend service intervals of 5,000 miles. If I adhere to these figures and my engine develops a problem, will Chevrolet or Toyota say the my driving habits are VERY STRESSFUL, and I should have serviced the vehicle sooner, therefore we are not going to honor your extended warranty. ------ (You might think that this has not happened in the automotive marketplace, but if you take the time to do the research on the net, you will see one or more of the automotive nameplates have taken that very position with their customers who have serviced their vehicles at the dealer. ----- (These customers cannot afford to repair their own vehicle, so as such, they cannot afford to take the manufacturer to court!) --- I have chosen to divided the "recommended service intervals" in half, and have all of the serviced performed at the selling dealer. Should I experience a problem there is no way that the dealer, or the vehicle manufacturer can claim that I did not service my vehicle under the terms and conditions of the owner's manual, and / or the requirements of the extended warranty. (EXAMPLE: ---- If I was to experience a "sludge condition" on one of my vehicles at 2,500 mile service, when the recommended service was 5,000 miles, and all of my service was done at the dealer, the manufacturer would have to replace the engine under the terms and conditions of the extended warranty.) By giving my vehicle this level of service, I am insuring that my vehicle will run at the most efficient level throughout its life, and I am protecting my warranty interests. ----- The alcohol in the gasoline today is putting added stress on the engines. (Alcohol is a cleaner, not a lubricant.) ----- The combustion chamber is a "hot / dry place!" ---- Valves, pistons and valve seats are operating under very negative conditions. Maintenance and fuel additives do have a place in the daily operating process. Not all additives are equal, and not all additives do the job. A dealer will not sell an additive to a customer that will destroy the vehicle. That is simply not good business. In the marine business we use additives in the fuel, because marine engines work very hard. A boat going down a river at 28mph has an engine that is doing 3,200 rpm. (Show me land based vehicle that has an engine that is doing 3,200rpm at 55mph!) ------- Best regards. ---------- Dwayne
Sorry :sick: , but that statement goes toward discrediting anything you might have to say.