Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
2008 Pontiac G8
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Huh? How many sedans DON'T have the fuel tank in the trunk? Where else would you put it? There is certainly no room under the hood with the engine, nor under the floor of the passenger compartment. Under the trunk is all that's left. It is/was in the trunk of my Alfa, Bimmer, Accord, Lincoln, Mustang, Benz, etc.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '08 Charger R/T Daytona; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '08 Maser QP; '11 Mini Cooper S
“Holden introduced several safety initiatives in the design of the new Commodore, including relocating the fuel tank in front of the rear-axle line, instead of behind.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holden_VE_Commodore
http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/showthread.php?t=34203&page=13
http://www.drive.com.au/Editorial/ArticleDetail.aspx?articleID=18769
If your primary concern is the trunk size, capacity & access..
( vs GTO?)
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/holden-ve-commodore-ss-v-series/
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/holden-ve-commodore-ss-v-series/188030/full/
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/holden-ve-commodore-ss-v-series/188034/full/
The picture with the trunk floor raised shows that the spare tire well is under there . . .
I believe that the G8 will have a ‘saddle’ arrangement for the fuel tank – much like that in my Corvette. It is actually 2 tanks, one on each side of the driveshaft ( or torque tube ) and interconnected.
Capacity is quoted as 19+ US gallons.
- Ray
Not concerned about this . . .
http://www.thegmsource.com/index.php?categoryid=3&p17_sectionid=141&s=0a257d27ea- 11fee89936dbb416f7ea58
Most, actually. Under the rear seats is popular. Most cars are front-wheel drive, so there isn't a driveshaft to deal with. Plenty of space under the rear seat but ahead of the rear axle.
Rear wheel drive cars that also have independent rear suspension, like the G8, do have a driveshaft to deal with, but its not moving up and down with the axle. So they can use an under-seat "saddle tank" that bridges the driveshaft.
And then there's the Honda Fit, a tiny car that puts its tank under the FRONT seats. Does wonders for cargo volume in the back. Well protected too.
Twitter: @Edmunds_Test
The Fit's tank is entirely under the front seats? How is that possible? I mean, where do the rear passengers put their feet? And where is the filler neck?
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '08 Charger R/T Daytona; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '08 Maser QP; '11 Mini Cooper S
Any more questions?
I, too, like the Commodore front end much better than the G8 front. However, unlike the GTO, not only will you have to change the front fascia, but also the hood. The GTO could get the Monaro front parts for ~$1400 + paint and install - I expect this to be significantly more expensive for future G8 owners (like myself) who would like to make the swap...
--Robert
Looking at this . . .
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php/photo/19009/cat/1003
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php/photo/19009/size/big/cat- /1003
One might wonder exactly where there is room for those two 9 gallon tanks . . .
The C6 is relatively ( relative to the G8 ) short & low.
They are there.
- Ray
Trust me ( heh )
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '08 Charger R/T Daytona; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '08 Maser QP; '11 Mini Cooper S
http://www.topgear.com.au/product.php?product_id=292
It has a CAD drawing of the exact tank location on the VE Commodore. I'll try to remember to bring it to work with me tomorrow to scan in the illustration and answer this question once and for all.
--Robert
First thought that came to mind was: Is it under the back seat too? :P
“+” upshift is back and “-“ downshift is forward.
Like BMW – but the opposite of all the other sport sedans I have driven with this feature . . .
Odd & annoying – to me.
Oh, well . . .
I certainly do not mean to say ( or imply ) that this is right or wrong, just opposite what I am used to - and what every other manufacturer seems to be doing.
Even within GM, in their brand new 2008 CTS uses + \ upshift = press forward.
From the 2008 CTS Owners Manual:
“To enter the DSC mode, press the shift lever
forward to upshift or rearward to downshift.”
Again – this just seems very odd, to me.
- Ray
Wondering if production G8s will match the new CTS????
The Fit's tank is entirely under the front seats? How is that possible? I mean, where do the rear passengers put their feet? And where is the filler neck?
The undertrunk area of most cars has a spare tire well. Ahead of that is the suspension subframe. There's more space under a rear seat than you might think.
As for the Fit, scroll through this to see a graphic. Rear passengers have their toes near the tank, the filler neck is really long and the fuel door is in the usual location.
Twitter: @Edmunds_Test
As for the location of the tank in trunks, as I said, I've had the tank in the trunk in most of my cars that I know of, so I don't see what the big deal is. Some have been closer to the rear of the car than others, sure, but since I don't live in the world depicted by CHiPs, I don't worry one bit about it.
FYI. The closest one to the rear I can recall was my '66 Mustang.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '08 Charger R/T Daytona; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '08 Maser QP; '11 Mini Cooper S
How long has "under" been unlawful? I'll have to check my Accord (if so inclined) to see where exactly it is.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '08 Charger R/T Daytona; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '08 Maser QP; '11 Mini Cooper S
Passing FMVSS 302*, a rear impact test designed to check for fuel leakage after crashes, has proven impossible with such a tank, so this design has died out. If a carmaker wanted to put a racing style-fuel bladder in an under-trunk design, they could pass the test. But it would cost way too much.
*A 50-mph rear-end barrier test with no significant fuel leakage allowed after the test. They invert the car after the impact to make sure it didn't crack along the top.
Twitter: @Edmunds_Test
Twitter: @Edmunds_Test
Almost at the bottom of the page.
Part 2 at approx. 3:48 shows installation of the fuel tank.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '08 Charger R/T Daytona; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '08 Maser QP; '11 Mini Cooper S
No pricing yet.
One little complaint so far. The premium pack adds a 6-way power seat. 6-way? Really? On a car that, according to the ad in C&D, is being compared to BMW? I know it might be a nit, but for me, fitting comfortably in a car is not easy. I mean, who knows, it COULD be comfy for me. We'll see.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '08 Charger R/T Daytona; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '08 Maser QP; '11 Mini Cooper S
The base model — priced from $27,595 — features a 261 horsepower 3.6-liter V6 with 250 pound-feet of torque. A more powerful G8 GT — starting at $29,995 — delivers 362 horsepower and 391 pound-feet of torque thanks to a 6.0-liter V8.
The basic G8 features a five-speed automatic with manual mode, while the GT version is offered with either a six-speed automatic or six-speed manual gearbox.
Curb weight for the V6 model is 3,885 lbs, while the GT weighs just five pounds shy of 4,000. 18-inch wheels come standard, while 19-inch alloys can be ordered with the GT model.
The sedan rides on GM's new Zeta rear-wheel-drive platform, which underpins the 2009 Camaro and possibly the next-generation Impala, in addition to several other planned vehicles.
G8 deliveries are expected to begin in early 2008 — a relatively short lead time made possible by some very effective badge engineering.
I wonder if leftlanenews got the pricing right.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '08 Charger R/T Daytona; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '08 Maser QP; '11 Mini Cooper S
Autoweek, however, does not list the 6-speed manual, and rightly so (for now).
The G8 will have a base 256-hp, 3.6-liter variable valve-timed V-6 engine and five-speed automatic transmission. It will have driver shift control and sport mode availability. Standard features will include StabiliTrak electronic stability control, six airbags and OnStar.
The G8 GT will have a 6.0-liter V-8 mated to a six-speed automatic transmission. Other standard equipment will include limited slip differential and a premium 230-watt Blaupunkt 11-speaker sound system, according to a memo Pontiac sent to dealers this morning.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '08 Charger R/T Daytona; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '08 Maser QP; '11 Mini Cooper S
Ouch.
Twitter: @Edmunds_Test
I was surprised to read that he had only minor injuries after seeing the car and a description of the crash!
And there are, of course, spy photographers to elude and civilian vehicles "in your way" as you try to drive a preset pattern.
I've seen a lot of crews for other companies with laptops rigged up for the driver to fiddle with while driving that pattern.
Another factor besides Aussie jet lag to consider here is the fact that they drive on the "wrong" side of the road down there. Add a little fatigue with a trafficless two-lane and it's possible to imagine someone drifting onto the wrong side of the road.
Dan
Twitter: @Edmunds_Test
On topic: My rental car was a Dodge Charger 2.7-liter. Hope Pontiac doesn't do a similar decontenting of the G8!
I believe your statement is false.
Reference the regulation or law.
-mike
If there are any fuel leaks, the tank fails.
Invert the smashed car 180-degrees. If there are any leaks, the tank fails.
Fuel tanks behind the rear axle aren't used because they simply can't pass this test - unless a racing-type ballistic-material fuel bladder is inside the tank. This upgrade is way too expensive for passenger car use.
But if an automaker would ever pop for the cost (and customers were willing to pay for it), they could pass the test with an aft-mounted tank.
I believe the aftermath to the above-mentioned scrutiny included discussions of retrofitting such bladder-lined tanks into police cars to keep them on the road, but I never heard the final result.
Twitter: @Edmunds_Test
I first toured an assembly plant in 1967 as a cub scout (full size Chevy's in St. Louis, MO), and would like to see such a modern car built in such a modern plant.
Big companies can range all of the way from multiplying the worst in all of their employees to multiplying the best in all of their employees, and the new Zeta-platform cars are very strong evidence that GM is forcefully moving back to multiplying the positives.
"The Pontiac G8 with the 3.6L V6 engine is estimated to achieve 17 miles per gallon in the city and 24 miles per gallon on the highway. The G8 GT with the 6.0L engine will achieve an estimated 15 miles per gallon in the city and 23 miles per gallon on the highway.*
*MPG based on the EPA's new 2008 fuel economy standards "
15 MPG is going to be a tough sell, with gas ~$3.00/gal!
2) Is $100 a month enough to even waste time worrying about?
For someone driving 15,000 miles per year (all city, a real worst case):
15 MPG, gas @ $3 = $3,000 per year
25 MPG, gas @ $3 = $1,800 per year = $100 per month savings
That said, I see these numbers as about what I’d expected, though a bit lower than I’d hoped.
Looking at a couple of somewhat similar sized sport sedans with V8s:
The 2008 Audi A8 V8 6-speed automatic is EPA rated at 16 \ 23 – and was rated at 18 \ 25 under the EPA’s ‘old scheme’ for 2007.
The 2008 BMW 550 V8 with 6-speed automatic is EPA rated at 15 \ 23 – and was rated at 17 \ 25 for 2007.
At least the G8 does have a 19 gallon fuel tank.
Having thousands of miles of driving experience with GM’s DoD ( 2005 Grand Prix GXP, V8 5.3L, DoD – now called AFM ) in a V8, I am very curious to find out if this engine & trans combination will allow 4 cylinder operation at higher road speeds than the previous iteration.
In the case of my previous GM car – I believe that the DoD was specifically tuned \ calibrated to engage & provide benefit at speeds up to 60 MPH. Not coincidentally, the highest speed in the EPA test, through MY 2007.
My personal experience, was that if I maintained a cruising speed of 60 or below ( as in heavily patrolled rural areas ) I could maintain close to the EPA highway number. [ = 27, same as my 2007 C6 Coupe w/A6. ] But at anything over 65 MPH or so, DoD would not typically engage – and the MPG would suffer accordingly.
And the point in the fuel mileage vs MPH curve where above a certain MPH, under certain specific conditions, DoD will not engage – seems to result in a sharp drop in MPG. In fact, if such a chart exists at GM, I’d predict that it would show in a discontinuity (??) in the curve. Meaning a straight drop, where DoD disengages, then pick up a continuation of the downward sloping curve – at a substantially lower MPG level as speed continues to rise.
For example. One might expect a somewhat linear drop in MPG as speed rises across the range of typical US highway travel. (Yes, I know, not really linear and not over all speed ranges, etc)
But for purposes of illustration here - If I assume that at an absolutely steady speed of 60 MPH, my GXP could achieve 30 MPG, then at 65 it might be capable of 28 and at 70 it might be 26 and at ( theoretically ) 75 it might be 24 and at 80 it might be 22 MPG.
If DoD is actually operable up to about 70, in the real world, but will not engage starting at say 73.14159 MPH for instance, the numbers might then look like this:
MPH\MPG
60 – 30 (DoD on)
65 – 28 (DoD on)
70 – 26 (DoD on)
75 – 20 (No DoD - instead of 24 if DoD was in operation)
80 – 18 (No DoD - instead of 22 if DoD was in operation)
I am sorta making these numbers up, and I realize the drop is never a precisely linear slope, but I believe these are in the range of possibility \ reality for my GXP, under ideal conditions.
This would mean that exceeding the DoD engagement threshold would cost something like an additional 20 or more percent (24 with DoD vs. 20 at 75 MPH without DoD and 22 vs. 18 at 80, etc.) beyond the expected decrease as speed rises beyond whatever that critical speed actually is. My driving suggests that the threshold speed ( above this, DoD does not engage in ** my ** typical driving ) is between 70 and 75.
But that’s just me speculating.
YMMV.
The Corvette developers, based on my 14,500+ miles of driving thus far & in reading many Forum board posts, appear to have assigned more equal weight to MPG in real world driving. And ( obviously ) DoD is not an issue.
For the same example speeds as listed above, I’d estimate my Corvette at something like:
MPH\MPG
60 – 34
65 – 33
70 – 32
75 – 30
80 – 28 [ = still over EPA highway of 27 ]
-ish.
Just my $0.03 worth – adjusted for inflation.
- Ray
Still enjoying the drive – and not obsessing about MPG . . (?)
And 17 MPG from a V6 is just awful.
[[ BTW: I am WELL aware that each sedan I have mentioned here is substantially more expensive than the G8 V8, with the 535 starting at $50K or so – and I ** WILL ** be taking that into consideration at purchase decision time . . . ]]
The 535 is EPA rated at 17 \ 26 – and offers very nearly the same acceleration as the 550. With that 550 at 15 \ 23. The Edmunds 535 test reported 0 to 60 in 5.5 seconds ( A6 trans ) and the Quarter in 14.0 @ just over 100.
In this context, the G8 V8 with a rating of 15 \ 23 seems "OK" - to me. Not great. Not bad.
One other data point I find interesting is the 2007 ( no 2008 numbers available yet ) Honda Accord V6 ( not the Hybrid ) with ratings under the 2008 scheme of 18 \ 26. Compared to 17 \ 24 for the G8 V6. If the G8 in other respects appeals, I do not see 1 MPG in the City EPA rating as likely to be a ‘deal breaker’ for most. [[ The actual 2007 sticker for this Accord was 20 \ 29. ]] A 1 MPG difference between the Accord V6 and G8 V6 ( assuming the rating translated exactly to actual driving ) would mean, in 15,000 miles of ( all city ) driving:
2007 Accord V6 = 18 MPG, gas $3 = $2,500 per year
G8 V6 = 17 MPG, gas $3 = $2,647 per year
G8 V8 = 15 MPG, gas $3 = $3,000 per year
Using these assumptions, the Accord’s gas consumption would cost approx $12.25/month less than the G8 V6, and not quite $30/month less than the G8 V8.
Assuming ‘base’ G8 V8 at $30K vs the ‘base’ BMW 535i at $50K – well I can drive a loooooong way on $20 grand worth of gasoline. . .
The remaining questions ( for me ) regarding the G8 are actual dynamics ( acceleration, trans. behavior, braking, handling, ride, fit & finish, etc. ) of production V8 examples.
It appears that published reports by Edmunds & the Monthlies are likely 2 months away, at least. And a test drive is likely 3+ months away.
- Ray
Waiting for those future events, oh so very patiently . . .
By the way, when younger, I had bought into the whole debt sales pitch of the lenders (buy now, pay latter, your income will go up in the future, etc.), but now have no dedt (except mortgages on two rental houses) and buy vehicles with cash.
The key point with regards to the G8 is that it should not be targeted to buyers who can't afford it. There are plenty who can afford it, and GM and their dealers will do far better if they focus on those buyers.
As for Accords and other front wheel drive car, GM and their dealers need to focus on the vast superiority of rear wheel drive (and yes, I grew up in St. Louis,a nd lived there and in DC until I was 32, so I have driven plenty of RWD cars in snow, and I did just fine in the winter with good tires and a limited slip rear, and tires and RWD vehicles sold now with stability control and so forth are even better for winter driving).
SS has won that award for a couple of years now.
And yes, the award is called,"Best Bang for your Buck".
I therefore used the same assumptions – in comparing what seemed ( to me ) a somewhat more accurate \ reasonable comparison.
Some people who have done no research into the EPA’s new test numbers will likely be somewhat startled ( ? ) by the difference between the City & Highway numbers they have seen up to 2007 and the numbers posted on the Window Sticker for 2008.
My point(s) here are really 2:
1 - That the 15 MPG number is for the G8 V8, and compared to 2008 EPA ratings for some comparable V8 Sport Sedans ( that cost a lot more ) the G8 V8 is not significantly worse. . . So, I doubt that the 15 MPG will be a “tough sell”, if one also looks at other RWD Sport Sedans offering competitive acceleration.
2 - The G8 V6 is that 17 MPG number, and the comparison to a well known and somewhat more comparable Accord V6 results in what I’d consider very close estimated fuel mileage numbers. [ The Corolla \ 25 MPG numbers I don’t see as quite fair to the G8. ]
1 MPG difference is as close as published EPA numbers will ever be, as long as they round to a whole MPG. I presume that someone with fuel mileage as a higher priority would be looking at the G8 V6, not the V8, and compared to an Accord V6, the annual difference in cost for gas ( under the assumptions above ) is more like $147 per year in my comparison – a whole lot less than $1,200 per year.
Just my 0.02 gallons worth . . .
- Ray
Back to driving my 6.0L V8 . . .
Ford Taurus / Mercury Sable AWD City 17 Highway 24
Chrysler 300 V8 City 15 Highway 23
Infiniti M45 16 21 premium
BMW 750i 15 23 premium
Mercedes-Benz E500 15 22 premium
Volvo S80 V8 15 23 premium
Cadilac STS V8 13 19 premium
Accord V6 19 29
Camry V6 19 28
Altima V6 19 27 premium
Azera V6 17 26
The estimated city 15 highway 23 on regular for the G8 looks quite good when compared to this list.