Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
There are things that can still be done to the 3.8 motor to get more horsepower and torque. Variable timing is one. They did this on the new Galant 3.8 engine, so the horsepower went to 230. Torque stayed the same.
So, we'll see again what happens.
Or, invoice+$300 with $3000 rebate?
They said they can't give both 0.0% financing and the $3000 rebate.
Thinking of either trading in the 2001 LTD or keeping it, installing the ARB OME suspension on it, and buying another one for my wife. If I trade it in they said they will, probably, swap my BFG AT KO's for the OEM tires on the new one.
Two points, brake jobs are expensive, especially if the rotor need turning, and sometimes crappy at the dealers, and stuff like tires and brake linings wear out.
Uh, If the '84 had such "awkward problems", why'd you buy another one?
Personally, I'd stay away from a Ford Expedition if you don't want to spend a lot of money and time having things fixed. Third hand information is that they are poor quality and have problems too.
New to the message board, please bear with me. I'm in the market for a pre-owned SUV and have come across a 2000 Montero Endeavor for sale, 48k miles, for $17k. Looked very nice, has leather and a sunroof. Unfortunately the dealer had closed and I won't be able to test drive it until Monday. My familiarity with Monteros is limited to the fact that my father used to have a 1987 Montero 2 door, and he put 200k miles on it before giving it away, and the last I heard was that it was still going. I guess I'm just soliciting any comments people might have on the vehicle / year / trim level. Thank you very much for reading.
and has nothing to do with the new model.
You might want to spend a little more and
buy 2001 Montero XLS model, which is a
much better design than the old 2000 design.
$17,500 for the 2001 with 52,700 miles (knocked down $625 for miles).
$36,300 + 7.75%tax and $200 license with $0 down, 0.0% financing for 60 months. Refused service contract, or to pay for "paint protection plan". I did, probably stupidly now that I think about it, go for the "depreciation insurance" ($600) on the loan (pays off the loan if the vehicle is "totaled" and worth less than the balance of the loan.
Dealer agree to switch tires with the 2001 next week so I will still have the BFG "D" range 265-75x16 AT-KO's. I may just have them switch both the tires and wheels. I like the 2001 spoke design better.
Monthly payment dropped $200 from what I was paying on the 4.9% 48 month loan on the 2001 which still had about 15 months on it.
Anybody know what the switch on the console with the skidding car is for? Traction control, on-off? Haven't had time to read the Owner's Manual yet.
Change out the springs and shocks to the ARB OME's week after next.
PHOnos
Ive been off the site for a while. Will be taking delivery of my new Dodge HO diesel tomorrow. Now there should be no power/towing problem. We will definitely be keeping the Montero and will probably sell the cars. May keep one for commuting.
About 50K on my Monte and no problems, no rattles, good mileage, great ride (with the OME springs and shocks), awsome off road ability (nothing stops this rig, except my wife who thinks I wont take it off road...hehehe)
I have the new Bridgestone Revo A/T. I went to a 6 ply tire which meant going to a 265/75-16 from the stock 70 series. this makes the speedometer run 3-4 mph slower and there is no adjustment I can find yet to correct this. the advantages however are unreal.
The 6 ply tightens up the overly soft stock tires very very well and gives this heavy SUV tires that better match its abilities and needs
The tire is quite, very quite for an A/T and better than the Geolander in the HT or AT
The tire wears very well
It handles mud, loose soil and water so much better than the HT that I can leave it in 2wd with the LSD and do things that took 4wd with the stock tires.
The grooves and water handling are so good that you can drive at crazy speeds in a hard rain and not even thing about hydroplaning. At reasonable speeds you cant even tell you are on water.
I am going to put these tires on my new Dodge 4wd HO diesel truck just as fast as I can wear out the stock A/T tires. I wont even look at another tire as I am that happy.
For those of you in SoCal who are familiar with the stretch of Hwy 60 running from Moreno Valley to its end at the junction with I-10 in Banning through the "badlands" hills, you know this
is an uphill and downhill left-right back-and-forth curving section of highway with a net gain in altitude eastbound.
In the 2001 I usually down shifted from 5th to 4th and left it in manual for the entire stretch to eliminate the up and down shifting in auto. This weekend I left the transmission in auto and while it did shift up and down with the grades, the shifting was much smoother and less noticeable.
Brill - Good choice on the Dodge Diesel. Half, 3/4, 1-ton? Is it turbo or supercharged. Have a friend who has a slide in cab-over camper in a 3/4 ton. Loves it. Goes up Cajon pass (I-15 L.A.-Vegas) with no problems in high gear.
For those who are thinking about buying -- just got an e-mail from a SoCal dealer with an "internet special on all 2003s in stock". "One dollar ($1) over invoice with $3000 rebate or 5-year financing with zero ($0) down and 0.0% interest. (Damn, should have waited two more weeks, oh well . . .)
sonja in l.a.
Any input is appreciated!
555 ft pounds of torque at something like 1800 rpms. This thing flys past everything uphill short of a sports car and can even give them a run for the money.
Should tow my new, larger trailer like theres nothing back there.
We are not even considering getting rid of our Montero. It is better off road, more comfortable on road, easy to drive and still not a single thing wrong with it at about 50k miles.
P.S. Do you know where I could get more info on the TSB?
Sounds like to me they installed an after market pad on the front that do not meet original specs.
My 2 cents worth.
I heard somewheres that there are new, but probably very expensive, "ceramic" (or ceramic impregnated or something) brake pads coming on the market that do not squeak and squeal like the metal impregnated pads.
If I have the same problem brake noise with the 2003 that I had with the 2001, I will try them.
I hope the 2003 proves to be as reliable as the 2001 and if this is the only problem, I will be more than happy.
VIET2, I believe that you are right...a further fight with the dealer is not worth my time. It already hasn't been worth it. I just hate the whole principal of the thing, you know?
Anyway, thanks to all. I hope the $150 fixes the problem because outside of the bad service I've had from the dealers, I love my truck!
Sorry to hear about your local dealer. It has always been my biggest complaint that the service/dealers of any brand cars dont go far enough to be customer focused. I am going to drive 400miles just to pick up a new RV trailer just because the guy gave me a little better price but is MUCH BETTER in the customer focus area so he is going to get my buisness.
The 2001 Limited averaged around 17-18 mpg.
Here is one example:
http://www.velocityjrnl.com/jrnl/2003/vmd6478ov.html
Is there any way of ordering a 2003 Montero with these wheels? Is this a special factory upgrade package? Or was this just a special vehicle that Mitsubushi used PR & show purposes?
My only concern with the vehicle is it pulls to right, the dealership is currently working on the problem, they say it is alignment problem and need to put shims in it to correct the issue. What does this mean? Is this going to be a long term recurring problem? should I be concerned?
Thanks...
I looked long and hard and it appeared most racks would require an extension, unless you want to spend over $300 for your rack. I believe it was Hollywood racks that made one that would clear but it was $300+ for 2 bikes.
I don't live in an area where you can't go down the street and buy anything you want, I rely mostly on the internet so I bought everything at once instead of waiting to see what I actually needed. So my suggestion is buy the rack you want, install it and see what size extension you need, if at all.
I spent $40.00 + shipping for an extension I really don't need since I only haul one bike. Like I said, one bike fits perfect without the extension I can't remember what size extension I bought but my guess is I could have gotten away with a shorter one if I did want to haul two bikes which = less $.
You can always call the manufacturer and ask them the distance from the center of the hitch pin hole to the upright piece of the rack and that would give you an idea of what you need if you are like me and want everything at once so you can use it.
Good Luck.
Will post how they well they worked in a couple of weeks.
These are about my only complaint with the 2003. They are too narrow to be useful and prevent addition of substantial rocker panel protection.
By the way, another awesome family trip in the Monte (2001 Ltd.) Loaded up with two bikes on the roof, three on the rear, luggage box on top, and 5 family members and all their gear inside. Of course it was a bit sluggish on the highway, but who cares? The truck effortlessly handles rough roads and is so comfortable to drive. I'm glad that Land Cruiser owners love their trucks, but I love mine too and I've got $20k more in my pocket because I bought a Monte.
My question is, has anyone installed a DVD system in their Montero. If so, what the the cost and were were the components mounted.
Thanks,
Having one small problem. On the front set-up the installer replaced a rubber thingy that he says was on the OEM set-up between the spring and where the spring "perches" on the shock. When we got home after about 1600 miles, heard a squeak on the right side that turned out to be the rubber had moved slightly and the coil of the spring was slightly in contact with the "purchase" support (on the front right only).
He moved the rubber back in place yesterday and it is fine now. However, when I called ARB they said the spring and shock "purchase" were supposed to be in complete contact, without any "gasket" between. When I asked the installer, he said that would make it real squeaky and the spring would be free to move around even more on the shock "purchase" ledge.
Do you have a thin rubber gasket like "thingy" between the springs and where the spring contacts the shock on the front (left and right), or is there metal to metal contact?
Steve, Host
The road was in great shape, could've taken the wife's 2wd sedan through, but one good rainstorm can change all that.
Henry Mountains, Circle Cliffs, Navajo Mountain, Muley Twist Canyon, Hall’s Creek Overlook...let's roll!
Am I asking in vane!!!!
Someone PLEASE let me know.
Thanks,
Anyone else?
Steve, Host