Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Plus, any 2002 vehicle is going to require maintenance and repairs beyond oil changes and tune-ups. Tires alone for the Escalade (or any other full-size SUV) aren't cheap.
During Christmas 2006 my wife was surprised that a cousin of our sister-in-law had received an Escalade from her father for Christmas. She asked, "How can he do it?"
I then saw the Escalade in question...it was the first-generation model, which meant that it was about 6-7 years old. He didn't really give it to her - he had retained the title and allowed her "use it," but had never signed it over to her.
It apparently didn't last long, because after about a year, I never saw the Escalade again, even though we still see her on a regular basis.
On topic I guess, I wonder what the future is like for the Escalade. Current one is getting long in the tooth.
New one is due for 2014 along with new Tahoe/Yukon/Suburban.
Back to the naming thread, it appears that Chrysler gets it. Caddy should get on board too.
Storied Jeep nameplates are poised for return (Detroit Free Press)
http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/f70/cadillac-confirms-twin-turbo-v-6-8-speed-- automatic-2014-cts-117093/
That's one thing I don't get about auto makers. They spend insane amounts of money. Literally flush it away by the bucketful to make these cars to out-do each other and yet the average car we normal people have to drive can't even figure out how to build a car that doesn't feel and drive like a rental car.
I don't need 420hp and 20mpg. What I need is 210hp and 40mpg. What I need isn't $60K, I need a car for $30K.
If anyone is listening at GM, please bring back some of the overhead valve V6's (e.g. 3.5, 3.8, or 3.9). There are customers who prefer simplicity.
What we need is a 1.8-2.4L engine with turbos (or superchargers) that gets 40mpg and 200HP+. Mercedes and others have done this already, why not GM?. Why are we stuck with giant engines that are awesome but largely useless.
I drive my mother's Cadillac CTS every so often and it's great. But I also haven't pressed the accelerator down more than 20% of the way, ever. There's just no way in city or highway traffic to do so, and it already has a very twitchy throttle. Adding another 100 hp for the same fuel economy sounds awesome until you realize that they're going in the wrong direction. They need to be using that technology to SHRINK engines.
MPG is determined mostly by displacement due to the minimum amount of fuel required to keep the engine running. Since it's a fixed compression ratio (Can't go much below 9:1 these days), that means you can't ever get better MPG than a certain number . For many cars with 3.5-3.8L V6 engines, that's 25mpg. Maybe 30 if you do some insane gearing and have it running at 800prm at highway speeds, but 25mpg overall on a good day.
They extract more power out of the fuel, but the limits on MPG still apply because of the mass you're moving (inside the engine) and the displacement. The solution is to get smaller. Much smaller. There's no practical reason why they couldn't put a small 2.0L I6 engine in a car and raise the mpg from 25mpg combined to 40mpg combined. I doubt if most people would notice the difference since nobody actually does 0-60 burnouts getting around town.
I chose I6 because of the lower weight and complexity, as well as smoother running characteristics. If you ever get the chance to look at an old 1960s Mercedes, look under the hood and marvel at the tiny 2.2-2.3L I6 engine that they have under there. If you want to really blow your mind, look at a 1960s 300S. Here we have a car with a 3.0L engine that gets 200HP out of regular fuel. All manual (not a single piece of electronics), with mechanical fuel injection.
We made incredible strides and then somewhere around the 80s we just got lazy in the U.S. and said "whatever" to actually increasing the efficiency of our vehicles. But not in Europe.
BTW - BMW. 520i (E39) - 2.0L engine, just under 150HP. Not sold in the U.S., but it got fantastic gas mileage. (30mpg *combined*, 40mpg highway easily.) And that was without a turbo or other technology like direct injection added. 200-250HP out of a modern version of that engine should easily be possible.
Oh, wait. Mercedes and BMW are doing it for their next generation of cars. GM will be stuck with a car that's just as fast and just as capable but with an engine that's twice the displacement and half the MPG.
"The CTS was the vehicle that began the Cadillac renaissance," said Robert Ferguson, Cadillac's global brand chief. The new model "is a cornerstone vehicle for us and will keep the momentum going."
Can the New Cadillac Catch Up to BMW? (WSJ)
Sales for the luxury brand are up 38 percent year-to-date and Bob Ferguson, vice president of global Cadillac, said he’s optimistic U.S. sales for the brand will jump by 30 percent for all of 2013. And the brand has its sights set on more growth in the years to come."
Cadillac rides new models to best start since '76 (Detroit News)
http://www.edmunds.com/car-news/2014-cadillac-cts-sedan-starts-at-46025-comments- page.html
- Ray
CTS V Sport now off my shopping list,
to replace the BMW in my garage...
The prospective Mercedes-Benz S-Class competitor was under review for several years, but the business case for the high-end Cadillac sedan didn't add up, insiders said."
Cadillac May Shift Focus to Flagship Coupe or Sports Car
For 2014, the CTS gets even better.
The all-new version — rolling into dealerships this month — now takes direct aim at its mid-size rivals, with added equipment and sophistication to justify a higher price tag."
2014 Cadillac CTS likely to help brand gain ground (LA Times)
"Cadillac hopes to grow by double-digit percentages this year globally and in the U.S. as it expands its footprint in China and adds new models to its American lineup.
General Motors Co.’s luxury brand sold nearly 251,000 vehicles last year as global sales jumped 28 percent and U.S. sales rose just shy of 22 percent."
Cadillac sets ambitious sales goals for 2014 (Detroit News)
If you recently bought a Chevy Tahoe, Cadillac Escalade or a Buick Encore, please email PR@edmunds.com before Saturday, July 12, 2014 to discuss with a reporter.