Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
3 adults in the back row? Not unless they are extremely small (anorexic even) or the ride is short. We almost never are travelling long distances without children so it is not an issue for us. If you want to haul around 7 adults all the time, get a minivan or gigantic SUV.
3d row hiproom on the Odyssey is 48.5. On the Sienna is a commendable 51.8, but while I am seated, my hip is 20 inches wide, and at 170 lbs I am on the thin side of the hips.
There is no way three of me :-) could sit in 3rd row of a Sienna, even on a short trip.
Just kidding.
Let's call it 7 adults and one kid.
I did a quick measure while seated at my desk, and I'm only occupying 17" in width, and I'm 205 lbs!
You must be the world Glutes champion or something!
My shoulders are wider, but there's a lot of extra shoulder room available, much more than 52".
Maybe I am not 20" wide at the hips, but again, 3 of me could not fit in that space...although 3 of you could :-)
I will try it tonight and let you know. I can tell you now, it won't be EASY, but definitely doable for any able bodied adult, and certainly not impossible.
As I mentioned (was it on this board?), I witnessed a full size adult get back there with a regular carseat on one side of the 2nd row, and just the base of an infant seat on the other side. He had no problems.
Obviously when you have the seats in like that, you can't push the 2nd row as far forward as you would normally, so it makes it harder, but still very doable. I will put the infant seat into the base tonight and try it myself to see how hard/easy it is.
But if you put 3 of me side by side, 17" of seat space is enough. So actually 3 of me would fit.
All we need is to clone me twice to test that theory.
Honda's is more narrow there because the spare tire goes there, Toyota puts it under the van so there's much more width for passengers.
Veracruz, while very nice looking in the interior, I found the exact same thing, that the dashboard and surrounding leather had a harsh look as opposed to, say, Lexus's dashboard. I haven't really studied the dash
area too closely on the Lambdas, so I can't comment on those.
Acadia edges out the Saturn just a little bit, because although I think the Saturn has a better-looking exterior, the Acadia has a nicer-looking interior. The Enclave, while having a nice interior, I really don't care much for the exterior look on the Enclave.
Just my two cents!
interior is pretty much close to sumptuous! Even thinking of buying it once the lease is up!
Sounds like there's going to be a fourth Lambda crossover in a year:
IL Exclusive: Chevrolet's Future People Movers
is the world ready for that, edmunds will have to pay for 2 times more bandwidth...LOL
Wow, really? I think the lambdas are wider than that.
I think magazines have pics of 3 testers in the third row of minivans and SUVs, so it's possible, but I won't begoing back there with two other adults.
But that's not my point.I'm saying that the Outlook would have the greatest chance of all three for being picked by Motortrend because it is the least expensive, yet the best value (before non bargain pricing is factored in).
It would also have a better chance of winning the award because it has some of the components the Acadia didn't have that caused it to lose to the CX-9, like a better price, and a slightly better 0-60 time.
I'm not going to lie- I'm not obsessed with this vehicle, but I will be disapointed if MT gives SUV of the Year to another vehicle, because nothing else impresses me like this does
Still don't know why this isn't a more popular vehicle. Find the interior works very well for us and both DW and I prefer the look of a traditional wagon. Based on sales and opinions, seems we're a minority. Maybe it's poor marketing on Ford's part. We think they should go for the retro-cool approach and add wood panelling on the sides and market it as the 70's wagon of the new millennium. The Brady Bunch never had it so good!
Haven't seen it advertised ONCE. And it's a new vehicle (sort of)!
With the popularity of the vehicle, it's probably that the styling is so contriversal. Ford needs to take a play from Hyundai's book and just copy Lexus. Ford decided to be original, copying isn't good, blah blah blah- Lexus sells. And there are some brands that don't have to copy because they get the styling game. Ford doesn't.
"Inside Line has learned that Chevrolet will phase out the Uplander (pictured) next year."
Here's the cover shot. :shades:
Yes, but his point is that the Uplander will be phased put when the Traverse arrives (actually more like wiped out as this is its last year). He probably could have put a pic of an Equinox on there too.
But why does the Equinox get a third row, or bigger size, when they are getting a lambda?
And I'm not sure about this whole Chevy lambda thing. I mean, I know this is One of GM's best vehicles in years being cloned, but you know what they say about too much of a good thing...
Meanwhile, it is a good vehicle and a good buy for those who don't need to drive an "image."
Add to it the no-haggle policy from Saturn and a few months from now, they will actually cost more.
If you could find '07s on the lot, dealers would probably let you have a little bit of bargain space on the Outlook. But you can't. And for now you won't be paying a cheaper price for the Buick, because you can't find any of those on lots either (well there will be one or two, but they never have a stock of them).
And you have to a dealer to get a price because they never advertise prices for these vehicles in the paper- never.
Oh well- curse for us, gift for GM.
My mistake for not being clear; I was referring to an XR vs. CXL comparison.
08' Outlooks have a $500 discount on them right now, but when the newness wears off from the Enclave, either Saturn goes deeper into factory-discount territory, or they will cost the same.
I'll correct something you wrote a while back:
FWIW - FS can tow 2k lbs
Actually we need to add an asterix to the end of that statement, because that applies only if your trailer has trailer brakes.
The limit for an unbraked trailer is actually 1000 lbs.
This is fairly common practice, in fact GM has the same restriction.
The issue here is that most light duty trailers do not have brakes, so the 1000 lbs weight limit often applies.
Anyway, now edmunds will need to double its bandwidth allotment. :-)
(48,147) for your posts and counting "juice"
that's not "trying" that's a cryout for a call to a 12 step program...kidding yet again...
I guess the "LOL" wasn't enough of a clue that I was trying to make a funny in light of the idea of cloning you and what that would mean to that overwhelming statistic.
And as for my comment that the FS can tow 2k/lbs, it still can and thanks for the fine print.
Your last 3 posts were pointless and help nobody.
Smarter folks will note the irony of your accusation that I waste bandwidth. :P
FWIW - FS can tow 2k lbs
Actually we need to add an asterix to the end of that statement, because that applies only if your trailer has trailer brakes.
The limit for an unbraked trailer is actually 1000 lbs. "
And I'll update it for the latest car!
The Ford website lists 3500 lbs as the max tow weight for the Edge; since they have the same engine I suppose that would also apply to the Taurus X.
check it out, low weight, great mileage, looks, hmmmm, looks, I don't think they will bring them here...can't tell if it has 3 rows of seating or just 2...LOL
would have been a better april fool's post...but its october and it'll just have to do
for one of the big 3 to make huge strides in the mpg race in their respective CUV's, sound's like a bargain.
It may have to do with suspension tuning and strength of the frame and not just engine power. I would be reluctant to assume that before I tried it.
We are both failing at punctuation, as I should have added quotes around "certain person" to indicate quotation of the poster's words, and you should have added a couple of commas to yours, lest people think you have a name nastacio :-)
I prefer to refer to you as "the one we don't speak of" or something like it :-)
I can accept that. Can we move on now, for the thread's sake?
The Subaru Stella won't make it here, just like the Suzuki Wagon R never made it here. It's meant for Tokyo and makes a lot more sense there.
It was blogged about back in June here on Edmunds:
http://blogs.edmunds.com/?14@@/Straightline/1133
It's a tiny 4 seater, 660cc engine and a CVT, FWD or AWD. You're a big fan of CVTs and favor fuel efficiency, right? Maybe you should write Subaru a letter!
Write a letter to Subaru.
I think they'd have a market for them at toys r us is they came in pink and blue and were marketed by little tykes.
Sadly there just isn't much demand for city cars here. Photos don't show the scale but it's diminuitive.
The R2 is on the right. Hopefully they come out with a model that is a diesel 2 cylinder boxer, then they can call it the R2D2.
Gosh, that Subie looks like something Minis call short stuff- and Civics eat for breakfast!
Yeah, someone named "slygold" who registered with ebay yesterday. Makes me wonder if he is located in Nigeria.
I don't know why people put up this sort of thing, since the transaction obviously wouldn't go through anyway.
Sounds a lot like the 150 MPG carb that was rumored in 1972...
My favorite - it runs on water! Wow, what will they think of next.