Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
What redesigned/refreshed vehicles should we expect to lay eyes on in 2008, people?
Mazda 6, of course. What else? Any changes to the Fusion for 2008? Will the redesigned version debut this year? How about the Camry, changes there? How about our less-talked-about domestic friends, the G6, Sebring, and Avenger? Or the Legacy?
Just looking to create some new topics to kick the year off on a good note in here.
I'm sorry you had problems with your Honda. Having a car company fix the problem for free as if it weren't there would be enough for me to do some singing. People don't forget, that is why Hyundai, imo, will have a tough time, and, because people don't forget Honda is the car that sells itself.
I, too, have owned Honda's in the past, and still do - an Accord. But, I took a chance on a 2006 Hyundai for my wife, and haven't regretted it in a minute. For the past 25 months, it's been more glitch-free and reliable than any new car I've ever purchased. It had absolutely no issues at delivery, and still doesn't. My past two Civics and the current Accord don't share the same track record however.
Hyundai may have a tough time changing peoples minds, I agree. But, if they produce well-built, trouble-free reliable cars regardless of their price point, perceptions will eventually change.
The Sebring, Avenger, and Camry are too new for any major changes.
Accord LX-P was first, then the Malibu 2LT, and in last place the Camry LE. So the order was the same as the public's comparo, in which the Accord edged the Malibu and the Camry brought up the rear. This comparo was like the one Edmunds did a couple of years ago, in that it was based on "how much car can we get for a certain price point", in this case $23k. Except they did something rather odd, I think. In almost every comparo I've seen, the winner of the previous comparo gets a chance to take on the newcomers. But not this time. In Edmunds' last comparo like this, they pitted the Accord and Camry I4s against a Sonata GLS V6, and the Sonata won--and as the editors noted, it wasn't close. Wouldn't it have been interesting to see how either the Sonata SE V6 (MSRP just under the $23k limit) or maybe the Sonata Limited I4, loaded up with everything except a moonroof (MSRP just over the $23k limit) would have fared against the new Accord and Malibu, and the Camry? I think that would have been a fairer way to approach the comparo. Given that the base Sonata V6 beat the Accord and Camry (albeit previous-gen models) last time, I think the better-equipped Sonata SE V6, and maybe the loaded Limited I4, would have had a great chance in this field of sparsely-equipped I4 competitors. But now we'll never know, will we?
http://www.edmunds.com/apps/vdpcontainers/do/vdp/articleId=124091/pageNumber=1
It would seem that Edmunds, and maybe others, have decided the top three mid-size sedans are the Accord, Malibu and Camry, in that order. Even so, that doesn't made me like our Ford Fusion any less. It is a great car with a host of nice features.
I think it's more a matter of comparing the newly redesigned models against the best sellers. We all know pretty much all their is to know about the Fusion. When a new redesigned Fusion comes out I'm sure their will be plenty of comparisons done with it included.
Good point. The 2009 Fusion will no doubt be improved over the 2006-08 models. For one thing it will have the 3.5-liter V6 instead of the 3.0 Duratec, which is a relatively "old" engine as such things go. A new I4 is on tap, too.
What really surprises me is that the Fusion/Milan/MKZ trio hasn't sold very well in the grand scheme of things.
Same with my Sebring. In 07 they completely redesigned the Sebring but it still gets little respect. I've had mine a little over 3 months and I love it more each day. Great car with a load of features. When people see it and I tell them it's a Sebring they are surprised. Current owners give it high marks on the Edmunds reviews.
I guess it'll take time to get over the rental car stigma.
My thoughts exactly (about comparing the new guy against the annual sales-victors).
Having said that,my KIA does seem to have a much nicer fit and finish than any Mopar I have ever bought.If Chevy can do that with their Bu, why cant Chrysler with the Sebring? :confuse:
A lot of people share that opinion. It will be interesting to see where Cerberus takes the company.
When you're betting $25k don't you want the safe bet?
So what am I supposed to base my decision on? A test drive? JD Powers? CR? Or a combination of everything? I think using all the possible information combined, I would come up with the same common denominator.
Perception is largely formed by reality.
I had had my '05 Sonata almost two years last February (totally trouble free) when we bought an '07 Sonata SE (mid level trim).
The price was $16,651; $18,189 OTD incl 6% tax, dealer fees, registration, etc. That's a far cry from $25K.
(MSRP was $22,080)
In my opinion, Honda has the best overall customer service (and cars) in this segment, although Toyotas' is pretty good. People who sing Hondas' praises have a reason to do so.
I've owned lots of honda stuff including a generator, lawnmower, 2 accords (one of which rolled over into a ditch and still ran another 30k miles until I sold it) and all have been quite good from a reliability standpoint. Until a few years ago, I was very committed to Honda and their products.
But I came to want/need a vehicle that had better cargo carrying characteristics and Honda only had the CRV and some hard to find Accord Wagons that cost more than I thought they should. I never liked tall cars because I felt handling was compromised too much so the CRV was out. A friend had a Subaru that had been reliable and other people I knew had good luck with them so I gave it a shot and it worked out pretty well. Then a couple years ago, I wanted something that still had good hauling capabilities but was a bit more fun to drive and got the Mazda6. After a couple years of ownership, I have no complaints about reliability (which is what I expected from the research I did in Consumer Reports and JDpowers) while I still enjoy driving it. To me, it's a great combination of comfort, performance, good aesthetics/ergonomics, and utility (because a hatchback can carry many large loads that a sedan could not handle).
Bottom line, I think most of the cars in this segment will be very reliable... so while I used to sing the praises of Honda exclusively, I've come to understand that the midsize sedan segment has many good quality cars to choose from.
The price was $16,651; $18,189 OTD incl 6% tax, dealer fees, registration, etc. That's a far cry from $25K.
Well, the Sonata SE is a far cry from an Accord EX V6, IMO. The important thing is to get your money's worth, whatever the amount may be.
Someone interested in a BMW or Mercedes is more likely to come from a Honda then a domestic car. Don't you hate it when common sense gets in the way of your conclusions? I'm a former Honda driver that drives an Audi.
Thats very interesting. A sample size of 1 is always very valid to me. Do you have any links to data that suggests this is actually a trend? I find it interesting that someone would go from a vehicle with a very high rating for reliability and durability like a Honda to one that lacks that record, like a VAG product.
I think the point wasn't so much that someone went from vehicle X to a BMW or Audi, just that certain car buyers evaluate their needs against all available cars on the market at the time they are planning a purchase.
I would not let a commercial influence me that much one way or another. I did not trade in my Mazda when I saw their dumb commecial with people in a circle singing "zoom, zoom, zoom" and I did not go out and by a VW when I saw and enjoyed their new Jetta commercials a few years ago, the "it's time to pimp zee auto" ones ..
I wouldn't let it stop me if I was really interested in buying one. I see a lot of ads that are "so dumb they're cute" and like a lot of them, but this one just got to me. My wife feels the same way. I used to participate in sample groups once in awhile so I can't believe that they ran this ad by a sample group and people actually thought it was good. I can appreciate campy as much as the next person but this one was just obnoxious. To me there is a difference between tongue-in-cheek and stupid.
I agree Honda isn't the only choice, but if I were to get a midsize sedan it would be an Accord. I nearly bought the EX a few years ago. But then I drove the Forester XT. Much roomier than a Mazda 6. Sunroof is great and the turbo makes it a blast to drive. Full time AWD doesn't hurt either.
Thanks for letting us know!
I do. Thanks for your assistance.
Yup, I almost got the Legacy GT wagon at the time... if it weren't for the huge price premium (about 5 k more than the Mazda6) and the seats that weren't comfortable for me, I would have been very happy to own one. Extremely fun to drive (though a bit soft - nothing a couple suspension bits couldn't fix) with excellent grip in the NW's wet weather due to AWD. And of course the crash ratings of the Legacy are excellent too.
I find it odd that with the increased desire for more fuel efficient vehicles that more cars in this category aren't offering more body styles that offer greater cargo carrying capability. Some wagons and, to a lesser degree, hatchbacks offer utility similar to a smaller SUV/ crossover w/ out the weight/gas mileage and handling penalty. If consumers want a vehicle that has more flexibility in hauling things, they will have a hard time finding many choices in this segment anymore. But in the end, fortunately the Legacy/ Outback and the Mazda6 are good choices for those who want family friendly comfort and utility.
So, what determines the 9 that get displayed - whoever sent Edmunds the most money that month?
That was the case when I created the Midsize Pickup Comparo discussion.
Why the obvious chip on your shoulder?
The new Sebring seems to get no respect.
The manufacturers of the cars that are displayed within the nine vehicle limit send us the same amount of money as your annual membership fee, so you can see that you have the same weight with us that they do - actually you have a lot more, because you are here talking to us and they are not! :-D
FWIW, there a large number of vehicles in this segment that "get no respect" - all we have to do is get a conversation going about any or all of them if anyone is interested. Give it a try!
CU said it had a nice 6 speed auto and the 3.5 was lively, or something along those lines.
The thing is they don't want those vehicles. Americans will pay a premium only if a wagon is a tall pseudo-SUV or "Crossover". This is why the Mazda6 wagon could only be priced at $1150 above the comparable sedan, while the Edge is priced at $3885 above the comparable Fusion (a bit of that difference is accounted for by the 3.5 vs. the 3.0). Now if you are a manufacturer and the customer has told you "put this wagon on stilts and I'll give you an extra $2500 for it" what would you do? I'm pretty sure you'd be installing those stilts.
Mazda certainly has done this with their CX vehicles. In the case of Subaru, no one wanted the Legacy wagon they wanted the Outback.
I think comparison tests done by people who don't own any of the cars, are more likely to be fair and unbiased.
Does it deserve it?
I drove a 2001 Sebring for 6.5 years and actually liked it a lot. I wanted so badly to like the newly redesigned Sebring. I looked at an 07 Sebring before buying the Aura. I was unimpressed at the build quality, ambience, and performance. While I am always a bit skeptical of Comsumer Reports' opinions, read the article on the Sebring's twin, the Dodge Avenger. They point to very objective flaws in the car ('clunks from the suspension', 'our car came with a wiring harness hanging under the dashboard on the driver's side that was easily kicked', 'more wires hang under the seat and in the trunk'. They said that many of those who took the car on long trips described the seats as painful over time. They showed a picture of a huge blind spot because of a poorly designed rear door pillar.
The Avenger they tested had the top-of-the-line 3.5 liter engine. It did 0-60 in 7.7 sec. and got 20 mpg. The Accord V6 tested in the same issue was both quicker (0-60 in 7.4) and got better fuel economy (21 mpg). The Saturn Aura XR they tested last year blew its doors off, doing 0-60 in just 6.6 seconds.
When you're up against the likes of the Accord, Malibu/Aura, Camry, Fusion, etc. mediocre simply doesn't cut it.
i.e. under MPG rating, one person might rate 22 MPG a 9 and another person might rate 22 MPG a 6. There is so much subjectivity without a defined standard. But by reading many reviews, one can get an overall impression of the car being reviewed.
I wouldn't feel qualified to rate a car I took on a 15 minute test drive. I could only honestly rate a car I had driven a few hundred miles for the rating to have any credibility.