Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I drove the car on city streets, no VCM problem noticed. During acceleration on the highway, no problem. Cruising on the highway at any speed produced a sensation every 15-20 seconds of the engine surging or searching, like a torque converter surge or the air conditioner in an underpowered car, constant switching on and off.
The engine performed perfectly, good power, the car is everything I hoped it would be, but the engine/transmission/VCM would drive me absolutely crazy. There is no chance I will buy this car unless all new cars drive like this, or Honda sees the light and corrects the problem. Without the VCM function, this would be a dream car.
OSUMB
HONDA PLEASE WAKE UP AND HELP US.
:sick:
The 4-cylinder has never had transmission issues that I know of, unlike the V6. They DID fix them, by adding a transmission cooling line, I believe.
Seems like whoever gave you information was misinformed.
If the six worries you, and the four is sufficient, go for the four.
I'm curious about your description of the the acceleration you obtained during your test drive. You floored the accelerator and the car stayed for a long time at " 60KM " till ir reached "70KM". I imagine you mean kilometers per hour.
Did you floor it at 60 kph or did you floor it from a standstill.? You're talking of going from about 37mph to about 43mph taking a very long time. I can't understand that. I haven't seen any other postings here about the V6 being sluggish.
Also, which VCM symptoms did you encounter during your test drive?
Since this is a VCM thread, I had a customer the other day come into my Mazda store inquiring about the 2009 Mazda6 (nothing official yet) wanting to trade his 2008 Accord V6 because he was "not thrilled with's Honda's interpretation of cylinder management" He also said "....that type of technology has been around for a while, and I have no idea how Honda screwed it up in this newer rendition since their previous technology seemed to work OK" This out of the mouth of a man in his 50's, owning 3 previous Accords.
Unfortunately, it appears there is no chance at all of Honda doing this, as much as I would personally like to see it. A Honda news release posted here a few weeks ago had Honda embracing VCM as a breakthrough technology that they plan to use on an increasing number of their products. So instead of seeing it as a problem or some kind of misstep, they see it as the next great thing in engine technology.
Not me. I'm in the camp of those for whom the '08 V6 Accord would be a great choice were it not for VCM (you can also keep ANC, for my two cents worth). I'm going to keep driving my excellent '04 I4 Accord awhile longer until I can find another V6 sedan I'm interested in. I hate to leave the Honda camp, but may be doing so, to get a V6 that is a V6 all the time.
It's pretty well known (on the Accord boards, anyway, thanks to elroy) that the transmission problems for Gen VII were on 2003 and early-build 2004 V6 models, so hearing a 2004 once in awhile doesn't surprise me.
A friend of mine from high school (and now college) has a 2001 3.2CL; it's tranny bit the dust at 88k miles. Replaced free of charge though.
It wasn't limited to Honda 3.0L models.
Just reminder again, most are not making the separation of previous Honda VCMs with the current 2008 V6/VCM version. Previous were 2 stage cylinder deactivation scheme. 2008 is 3 stage cylinder deactivation scheme .....
jusvisitn, "2008 Honda Accord VCM" #1239, 29 Mar 2008 1:34 pm
This is important distinction/difference and people have to look deeper. Again, this VCM is not same as past ones.
There is a another forum called DriveAccord. Only very brief VCM topic there, however, it seems they're maybe mostly young'ish crowd and more interested in accessorizing their Accords for cruising & such. Also, no mention of VCM issue at Consumer Reports' very sparsely populated forum. What about Edmunds long term review of 2008 Accord? When will be that updated? Or maybe people or reviewers who overlook the VCM thing, just figure it's a minor idiosyncrasy to be tolerated because it's for the Eco Cause?
Where I work, just yesterday, I only briefly test drove someone's Accord, he just purchased which I saw in our employee parking lot. Only around the block a couple of times. It seemed okay & didn't feel anything, but not enough time & distance to really check it out. I did not tell that owner about the possible VCM issue which might unecessarily alarm him and then, he might kill me! (the 'messenger') For the last number of years, I've owned American cars & a truck right now, so I am not accustomed to current feel of the latest models. I'll first need to test drive other 2008 models (import & american) at dealership so I get a sense and then can get a better perspective when I do test drive with Accord again, at a dealership. Right now, the field is wide open for another car make other than Accord, but I want to test drive it anyway.
I floored the pedal from 60km/h trying to get the speed up to 70 and eventually to 90km/h. I think i waited for approx 10 seconds and gave up. I've actually read on other forums about the sluggish issue. I am going to test drive it one more time this weekend before giving up on the V6 Accord completely. As for the VCM problem, I felt a forceful shift when I was driving on a highway. I can't remember whether I was accelerating at the time. Sorry I can't give you more tech descriptions.
Alan
i did post a while back about problems with the VCM and I guess I just want to reiterate that I have all of the problems described herein, though perhaps not as bad as some. so yeah, the worst part of my VCM experience is doing about 45 coming up on a stop light, let go of the gas and coast, and suddenly its like the car has downshifted to first gear while i'm still going 40 miles and hour. its not like i'm gonna go flying through the windshield, but its not exactly smooth riding either.
i suppose you could possibly videotape this, but what good would it do? so you get to see someone lean forward a few inches in their car when the 3cyl. mode kicks in. fantastic. great. then what?
A few posters most upset on Edmunds have written letters to Honda, the state's attorney general, Better Business Bureau, etc. Many are referring to Honda's false advertising, or quoting from magazine/newspaper articles. If I were them, I would include a video of my car's behavior to present as strong a case as I possibly can. Put it on You Tube! Having tens of thousands of people watch will make Honda uncomfortable. Whether they feel VCM is an issue or not, they will have to respond to the power of the Internet and video evidence that is presented for the world to see. Without the video (or something that allows the reader to understand the depth of their issue), I think these owners' cases are ultimately very weak and lacking substance. The articles they refernce are mostly positive, aside from a lukewarm comment about VCM. The car is getting overall positive press, so far. The VTEC article (linked by several on these boards) is also generally positive about the Accord. There are no references in that article about surging or abnormal engine behavior. Their only conclusion is that they are reserving judgment on the merits of VCM.
March was a brutal month for car sales in the U.S. However, Honda's results were one of the very best. Sales of the Accord remain fairly strong, in spite of the economy. The other companies are seeing double digit declines, but Honda is currently holding its own with a net increase if you adjust for sales days, and overall they are down -3% on a year to year basis. So far, consumers are buying Accords in decent numbers. If VCM truly is a problem, Honda will have to face the music in the next 3-6 months once these drivers form their opinions based on extended ownership.
This sounds like a "Grade Logic" problem. Unless you were going down a hill, the car should not down-shift like that. My 03 Accord actually did that once (hard down-shift) going down a bridge. I hit the brake pedal kind of quickly, and I suppose the computer took this as a panic situation, and down-shifted hard. Now when I go down and incline, I try not to hit the brakes, or at least try to apply them gently, and it hasn't happened again.
This is the most refined Honda I have driven and I think it is an excellent car.
My 03 has Grade Logic, but it doesn't do that. I think VCM operation is affecting the Grade logic. When the transmission downshifts in 3 cylinder mode, it makes a big difference from an engine downshifting to the same gear, running on all 6 cylinders. IMO, you should have to give the computer an indication you are trying to slow down (push the brake pedal) before it decides to downshift. That would be "Logical".
I don't understand why VCM would make a difference in grade logic the way you describe. If downshifting to a given gear in 3 cylinder mode would be more extreme than in 6 cylinder mode, this would mean that there is somehow more engine resistance when in 3 cylinder than in 6. This makes no sense. This is not the way VCM works. Perhaps, the grade logic in the 2008s is just a different design completely or not working correctly in some vehicles.
THANK YOU!!!
HHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!
The 4-cylinder doesn't have the VCM system. The V6 with the automatic transmission does, and is the system with which some owners are having problems.
sorry
That depends on what forum you happen to be on. On some other forums flickering headlights are a major irritation, and VCM is not even mentioned.
That said,the mileage was disappointing. Nowhere hear what we would get with our 2004 Accord V6 Coupe AT - closer to 30 over the same road and distance. But that is what happens when you gain weight - this car is 300 pounds heavier and I suspect its CD is greater than the '04 Coupe.
Flickering headlights = 4 cylinder Accords which has no VCM
That's why VCM not mentioned.
-------------------------------------------------------
My question: Why are professional car reviewers not scoring negative points on Accord's VCM idiocyncrasies?
Are they letting it slide because Eco designed cars have these behaviors and hence they maybe classify it as 'normal' (similar to battery assist Eco cars?). If that is the case, their ratings are not objective (comparing to non-Eco cars), especially from someone like Consumer Reports. Is the Accord's green eco light a placebo effect strategy to enhance the driver's acceptance of the VCM quirk, so car owners think they are contributing to the Enviro-friendly cause? Just playing 'Devil's Advocate'.
I test drove Malibu & Camry at dealers. They are all verrry nice . Just getting a sense how these brand new cars feel. Accord may be the very last ones to test drive and then I can compare with others.
That's why VCM not mentioned.
The thread I am referring to is titled "08 Accord problems", which in my mind means ANY problems. The majority of the complaints are about the 4 cylinder Accord's flickering headlights. There is a sperate thread titled "08 Accord flickering headlights", and it is about as lengthy as the VCM thread here. This forum (Edmunds) seams to be the only forum where VCM is the MAJOR issue. Birds of a feather, flock together I suppose. If someone does an Internet search for VCM problems, they will most likely end up here on Edmunds. If they do a search on flickering headlights, other forums will likely be the result.
I don't know if your car was operating all on V6 or not, but take a look at the MPG thread. Most posts are better than what you experienced. Myself, have been getting around 30 mpg on FWY trips (and higher on straight flat runs, up to 36). I did notice the mpg got better over time. I've had mine for about 4 months with a little over 4000 miles on it. Also, check under the hood, I noticed about a month ago that the air intake hose was not placed on top of the intake opening (I don't know how much effect, if any, that would have), but apparently it was overlooked by the dealer during PDI.