Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
That's a low blow,
As far as the VSC goes I couldn't find it on the standard equipment list or the options list. :confuse: I've combed through the spec book and find nothing new. Even the colors are the same. WTF?
Mackabee
Maybe not.
Suppose Toyota rushed a new transaxle into production that has a variable displacement ATF pump as a final solution for the downshift delay hesitation and the "flare" issue..?
I checked techinfo.toyota.com for new car features but that is not yet available for the 2009 Camry.
I mean, we just had the Sequoia in December, the 09 Camry in January (this month), the 09 Corolla and Matrix will debut at stores in mid-February. I wonder what's on the schedule for March? Toyota is showing the Venza at the Detroit auto show on the 14th of this month. I expect that vehicle to be here in late summer early fall of this year. Maybe they just want a 1-2-3 punch to begin the year.
Mack :shades:
Mack
I can say I am happy with my 2007 Camry XLE 4-cyl. It gets good mileage, and has been dependable so far. It is an adequate car. What would make it better in my opinion is as follows:
1. switchgear on the dash is flimsy in some cases, e.g. the dual temp control
2. dash assembly, and other parts of car, is imprecise; plastic parts don't fit together well, adjacent pieces don't line up in some cases
3. visibility out the back is bad, especially when backing up; a lip on the trunk lid would help see where the rear of the car is, or at least some marker in the design
4. no quiet glass available on the XLE (at least, not even on the V6)
5. Engine HP for 4-cyl is adequate, but should be higher; Honda Accord now has a 190HP Accord 4-cyl
6. No full size spare, or at least accomodation for a full size spare (let the customer decide whether or not they want to buy a 5-wheel and make the well big enough to hold)
7. VSC and TC not standard on all models (should be at least standard on the XLE models)
8. Pearl White Paint not offered on the Camry, but on Rav 4 all models (makes no sense to just offer flat white)
9. Seats are OK for most short trip use, but terrible for long trips. The best seats in the industry (in my opinion) are Volvo seats. Volkswagon, and even some Lexus seats are comfortable, and now, many Ford and GM cars have seats comfortable for long hauls. What would it take to make a comfortable seat?
10. No memory seats offered (at least on the XLE models). This might help with #9 above.
11. More adjustment positions for the power seats (Lexus has more positions/adjustments for the seat back and pan)
12. braking is adequate, but not great. This is also true of the Honda Accord. Specifically, stops from 60mph should be at least below 130 feet, and with the best, close to 120 feet or less; this should be true for both wet and dry braking. I know some of the reason has to do with tires and suspension. However, Mazda seems to do it, some Fords, and even the new Chevy Malibu stops in 124 feet. I think this is related to brake size.
13. Adjustable Pedals (brake and gas)....
I can't believe it's as simple as it costs too much; there has to be some marketing impression that these features and improvements are not needed. Are any of these planned improvements for future models? I believe these simple improvements would raise the Camry from Appliance status to a Great Car status (yeah, I know, they sell a ton of them anyway, regardless of how they build them).
Honda may not always hit the mark, but at least they (seem to) strive for greatness, whereas Toyota, at least with the Camry, seems to strive for average, middle of the road, no surprises (some might say boring).
I agree the quality of the plastic pieces is not up to par. Mis aligned and ill fitting. I believe this is mainly due to the hard plastics being used.
The panel display seems to me that is very ergonomic and user friendly. This is the first I've heard a complain about it.
It's interesting you find the seats uncomfortable. We've owned three Camrys and to me this one has the best seat ever. Maybe because I'm short and I feel like I'm in a bucket seat from the 70's or 80's. I have a herniated disc and when I drive my wife's 97 it acts up terribly. My 93 is just right but I do like the new seats. Memory seats would take it up to Avalon/Lexus ES territory. I think they want to keep a slight distance from those two.
VSC/TRAC should be standard however, some customers don't take kindly to electronic nannies.
Pearl white on Camry only is offered in special editions. Why? I have no idea. It would be nice if they offered it on all trim levels or maybe just the XLE.
Brakes have always been "mushy" in all Camrys. It's just inherent and it works well so they leave it alone.
We tried the adjustable pedals on the previous gen Camry but not many cars were built with that option and very few customers requested it.
Oh the last thing about the spare tire. I was disappointed they went with the donut spare. That was always an advantage over the Accord, Camry having a full spare. They must have a new team of bean counters at Toyota.
You must admit though, that the car has been substantially improved thru generations and the price has remained steady.
Mack
So, you may ask, why don't I buy a Honda or Chevy, or Volvo? I have owned 6 Accords in the past; as I got older, I didn't like the harsher ride. The Chevy hasn't proven itself yet, and GM dealers are a bit smarmy IMHO. Volvo is expensive to maintain, and requires premium fuel. I do think Toyota makes a good car that will last longer, and be more reliable, in the long run. I had 85K trouble free miles in the Avalon. Oh well, maybe some of these improvements/features will appear in future models.
First through fourth place results for #2 above are in the order specified above, although Malibu and Accord were within inches of each other. As for the Toyota, it's transmission and overall performance are above the pack in SE guise.
Consumer Reports tested the new Accord, Ford Taurus, Kia Amanti, Subaru Legacy and Dodge Avenger this month. The Avenger was completely trashed by CR (based on the tests, looks like a real stinker). However, the order of best sedans now for CR is Nissan Altima, Honda Accord, Kia Optima, Toyota Camry, Hyundai Sonata, Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan. For LARGE Sedans, Toyota Avalon is on top. Accord fell from top for transmission and mpg. This says to me the next gen for the Camry will need to be something special.
Mackabee
Mack
Good Luck
Caaz
MACK
I also informed them of your thread regarding the nose of the Camry being shaped that way in case of pedestrian accidents.
They then put jumper cables on my nipples and hooked me up to a 2020 Seqoia that hits the streets next week. (you heard it here)
I STILL believe everything you say.
Caaz
p.s. I really enjoy my 03 camry, i actually hit 40 mpg at 65 mph on my last trip.
Mack aka Your number 1 source for information irt Toyota :shades:
Mack
If they didn't know they have an 09 Camry then I wouldn't worry about the jumper cables. They will probably connect the cables to the starter and not the battery.
You can buy a 2008 Accord or a "newer" 2009 Camry.
Toyota looks a little desperate trying to counter the all new Accord.
Mack
Check out the car rental lots and look at all the Corolla's, Camry's and Avalon's.....no Honda accord in sight. That's why Toyota and GM are neck and neck with units sold.
Toyota desperately wants to be #1 and changing the model year date on a 5 month old model is all about marketing......... "2009" Camry vs 2008 Accord.
Yeb...been thinking the same here. I don't care too much if it's a new design but there's no need to get out the same car (NOT even any minor changes) this early.
You don't suppose Honda has no need, requirement, to sell at the discounted price demanded by the rental companies...??
This same person now works for a large rental car company and in one of their largest locations with excess of 275 cars they have 2 Toyotas and no Hondas. Most of the cars are from the american big three. There are not nearly as many Toyotas in rental fleets compared to GM.
:shades:
Hogwash.....
That's probably true in many states where the dealers have managed to get state laws passed in their favor, but in many states the manufacturers still has, exhibits, a high level of control over product sales price, marketing, etc.
When you have to sign a document at sale stating that you are aware that the dealer is in no way responsible for warranty coverage or work you can bet the manufacturer has little oversight or control in that state.
Honda doesn't care how much the dealer charges after the dealer has bought the car from them...."
No individual car, UNIT, sale, manufacturer/dealer wise, is complete in and of itself.
Baloney. I've never seen such a document.
:shades:
We were hunting for a replacement for our accord (no troubles except one transmission replaced under warranty - a long standing problem for honda). We drove a 2008 camry 6 cyl xle and were not impressed. I would not own this car. And if they haven't fixed their transmission problems they had on the 2007/8 the 2009 won't be any improvement. We drove a 2007 accord and it was no better than our 2000 accord - may drive the 2008 soon. I have never even been in a hyundai, but after reading consumer reports I may actually drive one for the first time.
I do appreciate the crossflow of information, though, as it has given us a lot of good ideas - once we filter out the dealer/dealer reps inputs.
Two corrections - Consumer reports only rated the V6 less than average, NOT the I4, which is the vast majority of Camry sales. This was due to the V6 transmission.
I would not say that Toyota is "flooding" the rental market, because I think it is around 10% or less. I am sure someone will have the exact numbers, and I can say for certain that it is significantly less than Ford/GM. Honda also sells to the rental market, although less than Toyota.
As you have experienced, and as you can read about on some other forums here at CarSpace, Honda has had transmission problems with the Accord, Civic, and Odyssey. Consumer Reports has given some Hondas in the recent past black dots or half black dots for the transmission (meaning avoid them). I am sure that both Toyota and Honda will solve the problems though.
WA state.
Wasn't there some litigation back in the 1980's against Honda for dealer price fixing. I believe this was on the Federal level.
I remember the scandal or read about it. Some dealers were providing favors to factory reps in order to get more inventory. I remember in the 80's Hondas were pre-sold before they hit the dealers lots. A friend of mind bought a Civic at full MSRP plus addendum. CA dealers have or had a habit of putting ADM stickers on all cars. It was a good time to be a Honda salesperson.
Mack :shades: