Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Turbo or No Turbo?
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Around here, though, the traps are EVERYWHERE, so you basically have to slow down all the time, and that's annoying.
I try to keep a consistent speed, usually 6-9 over. They nabbed me for 11 over, which is lame since the limit is set artificially low. It's a 3 lane road where I was fined, 3 lanes and 35mph?!
Also, you can help minimize engine and turbo wear by simply letting the car idle 15 - 20 seconds after starting, before you drive off.
Finally, there's a reputable oil additive around, ASL Camguard (web search will find it). Although promoted for aircraft, its maker shows it helps prevent oil burning and deposits in any engine, especially ones with turbochargers. The maker is considering making a version specifically for autos - why not email or write them if that sounds interesting?
I don't find ours underpowered.
Power to weight is 3360 lbs / 175 hp = 19.2 lbs per horse.
What Ody do you have? For the 08 it's 4385 lbs and 244hp, so 18.0 lbs per horse.
Fairly similar IMHO.
The XT's is 14.2 so it's in another league.
Your Ody should feel more like the Forester X, though.
The turbo is geared taller so I can see how it could potentially do better, but in practice the non-turbos are getting several MPG higher averages.
I looked it up - the final drive on the XT is 8.1% taller. The 4 ratios on the automatic are the same, so on the highway it should rev 8.1% lower at a given speed compared to the X Limited, which has the same size tires. Off boost, in theory it would use less fuel in steady, flat cruising.
In practice, unless you have cruise control on and are driving on a totally flat surface with zero traffic, I doubt that's the case.
The hood scoop alone increases aerodynamic drag at highway speeds, plus it's 100 lbs heavier. Though come to think of it, once up to speed I don't think the weight is a factor. It's the slowing down and then speeding up, the latter which the XT does at a higher rate, that would hurt your real-world MPG.
Unless there is something wrong with your stock BOV, you should never hear it. The Subarus use a recirculating BOV and the air isn't released it's fed back into the system, so there is no tell tale BOV sound.
-mike
I guess I've heard so many aftermarket BOV applications that I thought they all made the noise!
-mike
VroooOOOOOM - PSSST - VrooooOOOOOM....
Must be modded cars, I suppose.
-mike
Motorsports and Modifications Host
I spoke too soon - a neighbor backed in to my left front fender and I had to have it replaced. 2nd time.
At least it was just the fender, and I got a brand new one.
However, if I lived in a location where I would be able to stretch the foresters legs, or had some serious hills to climb.....I would definitly get the XT. However, I can't imagine racing that mustang GT with the XT from one traffic light to the other is much fun.
For long weekend drives and trips I take my new mini cooper S with the 6 speed manual transmission. Now that is one fun turbo
-Frank
The transmission is similarly responsive, especially in Sport mode.
I swear, I'd take this 4EAT over the 5 speed in my Toyota Sienna, any day of the week. No contest. In the van you have to wait for the 2-stage intake to open the 2nd valve, and the tranny takes longer to pick a gear also. Eventually, it's a lot quicker with its big V6, but it's not nearly as responsive, if that makes sense.
I'd like to see Subaru try a CVT or more ratios but IF AND ONLY IF it is as responsive as the current powertrain.
Bob