Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Galileo757, there are several posts in this thread that deal with the use of regular fuel, including one or two of mine. Briefly, it's ok to use lower octane grades, as the engine has a knock sensor and adapts. You won't get lower mileage, just lower peak horsepower. In fact, you should get slightly better mileage on lower octane fuel.
You crazy canadians.......8^)
It is kind of odd that the TRD website doesn't have the 4.7L supercharger on it even though TRD makes it. I did see it on www.trdsportparts.com for $4,699.
It looks like there's a different part number depending on WHICH specific 4.7L V8 vehicle you have (4Runner, Sequia or Tundra) and in some cases which year (Tundra).
The site www.partznet.com/toyota/tundra/supercharger.html has a lower price for the Tundra supercharger.
-Eric
What we were able to dig out from the specs is that V6 4Runners (that's what he is looking at) got "mufti-mode part and full-time 4WD). Also, it looks like that all 4Runners have "ABS & Driveline traction control" which I'm not sure have any connection to 4WD system.
Judging from what Isuzu uses, I got an impression that part and full-time 4WD is analogical to Isuzu's "Torque on Demand" where you have an option of using 2WD, All-time 4WD and part time 4WD. The difference in Isuzus was that when using "all-time 4WD" you were not required to be on wet/slippery road. When you manually engaged 4WD (on Isuzus) you had to be on wet/slippery road. Is it the case with 4Runners as well or Toyota meant something else? Also, do 4Runners also offer 4WD-Low? Is it used only with manually engaged 4WD? Any additional comments/suggestions/"for dummies explanations" will be appreciated. :-)
Thanks for the speedy replies, I did not mean to start another same topic msg thread that has already been hashed out. Premium unleaded gasoline here where I live is .20 US cents more then regular, maybe a compromise with mid-grade 89 octane. Good to know the V6 can use low end octane gas and higher than 91 octane racing or avgas...lol Computer and knock sensor for timing adjustment, wow technology is wonderful.
I had posted earlier.
Ran it on a quick trip from Santa Fe to Las Vegas, NV, could not have had a better experience with a vehicle. V8 decent mileage of 21-22 MPG, using midrange gas. Owner's Manual calls for at least 87 Octane, but suggest 91+ for better performance.
I have no squeaks, rattles, thumps, or rotten egg smell.
I have a first class truck, which is what I wanted.
Thx.
At the present time Toyota does not have a fix for this. If you see where the exhaust ends right under the bumper it makes sense. Poor design. Some suggestions were given to me were get an extention that points down or have a muffler shop bring it out the side. I think and hope Toyota will correct this soon. What is the sense having windows if you can't use them. Anyone having this problem. I have 5,000 miles on the vehicle.
http://www.toyota-4runner.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=12
It will answer most of your question about Torsen Center diff...just scroll down.
SV
Anyway, this seems to work: If you're given a rating in L/100km, just take the number 282.5 and divide it by the L number. This will yield MPG. Thus Galileo757's 13.5L/100km is 20.93MPG.
Which is not too bad for a vehicle of this mass and horsepower, by the way.
Thx,
SV
-Jared
Perhaps it's time for someone with the smell problem to test drive a few tanks of the lowest-octane stuff from the scuzziest off-brand station in their neighborhood and see if that helps?
Steve, Host
After 2,000 miles my gas consumption is averaging out at 19.6 MPG, in mixed driving.
'Anyway, this seems to work: If you're given a rating in L/100km, just take the number 282.5 and divide it by the L number. This will yield MPG. Thus Galileo757's 13.5L/100km is 20.93MPG.'
Ah yes, but is this Miles per US gallon or Canadian gallon?
I'll look there... I'll let you know if I have more questions...
Next thing you know, you guys will be asking for something like drams/furlong!
tidester, host
Pls go to www.tdiclub.com and use the link on the lower left side of the main page. Now all problems should be easy.
Steve d. 2003 runner sport. (no smell)
Awesome truck bur need some bush bars for the side so my kids can climb in easier. Any one have recommendations?
Also the fog lights don't through as much light to the side as my previous Sequoia did. I really miss this on country roads as we have a lot of deer here. Any one have ideas on that?
Cheers
'Anyway, this seems to work: If you're given a rating in L/100km, just take the number 282.5 and divide it by the L number. This will yield MPG. Thus Galileo757's 13.5L/100km is 20.93MPG.'
and then I wrote:
'Ah yes, but is this Miles per US gallon or Canadian gallon?'
and then corancher wrote:
'Very funny, billf6531, let's just hope nobody takes you seriously. This conversion stuff is strange enough already. Fiddling with Canadian gallons would just make it worse.'
Actually I wasn't trying to be funny. I think your calculation, resulting in 20.93 MPG, was per gallon of Canadian gas. A US gallon is only .835 of a Canadian gallon. Therefore your mileage would be 17.48 miles per gallon of US gas.
Anyone want to re-do the calculation from scratch and verify this? BTW, I used 3.8 litres per US gallon, and 4.55 litres per Canadian gallon in my conversions.
EDIT: I saw Stephend2's posting referencing http://www.tdiclub.com/misc/conversions.html after I posted this note, and plugging the 13.5 litre value in gives the correct MPG in both Canadian and US gallons. Neat stuff!
Anyway, if you find yourself wanting to do the conversion and don't have a web browser handy, (that site IS nifty) the real figure to divide by your L/100km figure is 235. And the result (in US MPG) of 17.5 is more realistic for a V8 in mixed driving. Thanks for setting me straight.
http://www.onlineconversion.com/
For anyone interested, I have posted a bunch of Toyota and aftermarket accessory part numbers for the 2003 4Runner in the "Accessories and/or owner's club?" discussion...
Has anyone found a good price on aftermarket auto-dimming electrochromatic mirrors? The best dealer price I found was $157 for one w/ compass. (listed above) The Gentex and Donnelly sites show pricing much steeper at closer to $200.
I like my 2002 Sport Edition better than the redesigned 03's so I will not consider trading. This truck is awesome, just turned 30,000 miles and has not been to the dealer for anything. I change the oil and filter every 2500. With frequent towing I may consider this more often.
If the supercharger with transmission cooler will, if only slightly, improve my towing performance, I will order one. Appreciate comments and recommendations.
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
The rotten egg odor is due to sulfer dioxide. Certain blends of fuels have varying levels of sulfer content. Fact. Typically, the level of sulfer varies by region and varies by season as the refineries change the blends to meet local conditions.
The emmissions systems in the vehicals sold in this country are designed with sulfer in mind. Some obviously deal with the sulfer content better than others. This should be evident from the posts in here over the last few months. But please realize that ALL exhaust contains the sulfer is one form or another. The emmissions system does NOT "remove" the sulfer; where would it go? Does anyone think there is a little holding tank somewhere in their car to hold all the nasty pollutants? So, whether you smell it or not, all auto exhaust contains, amoung other stuff, sulfer.
Now, the health "risks". Where else does one smell this rotten egg odor? Anyone here ever been to Yellowstone NP? Do you suppose that there is a huge increase in the cancer rate amoungst park rangers working there? Has anyone ever been cautioned by a health official to wear an environmental suit if they intend to visit Yellowstone?
And how about (how do I put this.....) excess intestinal gas? Many cities in this country have implemented smoking bans in restaurants over the concerns of 2nd hand smoke. Are you guys gonna start lobbying for farting bans in restaurants too? Are you going to picket Mexican restaurants until they remove their beans from the menu. I sure hope not; I love a healthy portion of refried with my enchiladas.
Okay, we get that you are unhappy that your truck has a sulferous odor. But I have a REAL hard time buying your concerns that there is some health risk involved. Could someone, anyone, find evidence of a study, any study, showing that sulfer dioxide poses ANY health risk?
I was kind of wondering about that, if the sulfur originates in the gas, where does it go? Why would some vehicles smell and others not? Is there something in the emissions system that's supposed to catalyze the stinky sulfur to the not bad smelling stuff?
Well, since you did ask, look here.
A quick search on Google yields an abundance of such studies.
Incidentally, the park rangers at Yellowstone do stand up wind of the Old Faithful when telling the public about the marvelous phenomenon.
tidester, host
rorr, lol. These boards do produce a lot of good information. And I'm wondering where to go to get my sulfer collector drained?
What is the factory installed Toyota system ?
My question is how exactly did you navigate through the process of negotiating and ordering? Any details you can provide would be appreciated. I am planning on negotiating the best price through the internet sites and local dealers, then ordering through the lowest bidder.
Since you ordered without adding any options, what type of cladding did you end up with? Is it the greyish black or does it match the body color?
Thanks for your help and insight in advance.
Thanks for your question and suggestion. I know the TRD supercharger will improve performance. But will it have noticeable increased torque at low rpm's when towing 4000 lbs.?
Before investing $4,000.00+ that includes tax and installation, I want to be sure that this is a worthwhile upgrade. I would like feedback from someone that has this accessory and tows a trailer.
I could upgrade to a Sequoia or a Tundra but my 4Runner should be capable of towing a trailer of this weight. Suggestions and comments very much appreciated.
thank you.....
Do you know when the 2004s will start rolling in? Dealer said probably not until November because the 2003s were so late in coming out. Don't believe I can much trust this dealer now, though. Also is there an expected price increase for 2004. I've heard $300, which would be insignificant.
All things considered, it seems like it might be best just to wait for the 2004s, but patience is NOT one of my virtues.