Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!

Is Tesla A Game Changer?

2456728

Comments

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    edited August 2013
    "That innovation should silence the critics "

    It doesn't silence anyone if you think about it. This is all "future-geek". A current (no pun intended) Tesla owner can't find a battery swapping station right now.

    Furthermore he pays for the battery swap, and then pays again when he has to return the battery to the station he got it from. If he chooses to keep the new battery, he pays a differential on the age of the battery he swapped.

    Don't use a chain saw to cut a butter. This battery swapping, to me, is an extremely clunky solution to a real problem.

    Reminds me of what TUCKER did--they did demos on 30 minute engine swaps.

    Supercharging stations make more sense.

    And "supercharging" is not "free" as the video says. You need to install the supercharging option when you buy the car, for I think some $2000 bucks extra.

    What is really going on here is that the swap stations are a profit generator for the company, essentially a hidden service fee on your car.

    Once again, you aren't saving a dime by driving a Tesla.

    I think this is all great and I hope the company succeeds, but this hype about it replacing the gasoline car, or being more "efficient" than one, is simply hyperbole.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Musk is going to be shuttling us all around on pneumatic tubes soon enough anyway.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    NOW you're talking!! Tube-travel strikes me as far more rational than busing people to an airport, putting them in a large, fuel-filled cylinder, lighting the fuse and hurtling the cylinder through space.
  • crkyolfrtcrkyolfrt Member Posts: 2,345
    A Tesla has fairly good range right now, considering their intended target audience and purpose. I really don't think that too many purchasers buy a Tesla with the intent to tour with it.

    That said, it does make sense for Tesla's attempt to keep a flow of positive type news about the car and downplay that it's entirely reliant on batteries and/or a recharge, and to not be perceived as a deal-breaker for those who are tempted by the car but may talk themselves out of it because of the complications incurred if they wanted to tour. Tesla is simply wanting to keep stock prices increasing progressively and one way to do that is to attempt to stifle any negative perceptions of its 2nd greatest weakness. No harm in trying to nip things in the bud by throwing the extended-range-by-progressive-infrastructure card out there.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    right you are! There's no percentage in marketing the Tesla for what it really is right now---a 2nd car for occasional use....drive to the tennis club, dress up and go out for a local dinner, and most definitely impress your friends.

    One downside of marketing a very high tech product for its status appeal is that "there is no tech as old as old tech", and so in a few years when the Tesla (should it still exist) is improved further, your old Tesla S model might be a bit of crate on the used car market.

    I think Tesla biggest problem is going to be plug-in hybrids. You can buy a Ford right now with a combined range of 620 miles on one "fill-up" for 1/2 the price of a Tesla, and while it's not a luxury car, it's not some cheap piece of work either. It has lots of oohs and aahs on the dashboard, too.
  • bwiabwia Member Posts: 2,913
    edited August 2013
    I think Tesla biggest problem is going to be plug-in hybrids. You can buy a Ford right now with a combined range of 620 miles on one "fill-up"

    I think it is the other way around. The biggest problem with hybrids is Tesla. The whole idea behind electrics is to wean ourselves of synthetic oil, especially imported oil from the Middle East and the Americas.

    There is a finite source of dino oil and with China and India becoming such voracious users of petrol it won't be long before we are brought to our knees with another oil shortage problem. In terms of range, 300 miles is plenty for everyday work commute. And even for the occasional long trip, it is only 200 miles from Boston to New York. Anything farther to Washington D.C. for example would require a free 20-minute charge or a NINETY second battery swap.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    edited August 2013
    Powerplants still need fuels to generate electricity--if not oil, then natural gas, and Russia and Iran are sitting on the largest reserves of that.

    There's no "oil shortage" in America. Fuel oils are our largest export at the moment.

    If the point of Tesla is to conserve fuel, then it is answering a question that nobody is currently asking.

    Now, if you mean lowering emissions and noise in URBAN areas, that is very well addressed by EVs--which suggests to me that the best use of EVs is urban, short-distance use.

    I think the idea of developing EVs for long distance use of no discernible advantage.

    PS: Tesla re-charges are not "free"---you have to equip the car at purchase for "supercharging", so you can add $2000 immediately to your annual fuel costs.
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    edited August 2013
    Less reliance on the Middle East and the wars that are the product of Oil...

    Something about never having to visit a gas station again is intriguing. Call me a Geek, but I love ingenuity the futuristic stuff like that. Heck, the Nissan Leaf has caught my attention as just a cheap little back and forth commuter for me over the past year or so, same with my wife. 70 miles on a charge is plenty and my company is contemplating adding a "Juice Bar" to the front parking lot to encourage green motoring. Clears up some of the "range anxiety" for a few of us.

    The Tesla just happens to come in a sexy wrapper...
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Well in that respect we have a lot in common. I'd love an affordable electric car for much of my business---I just don't want to pay $80,000 to look sexy.
  • bwiabwia Member Posts: 2,913
    70 miles on a charge is plenty and my company is contemplating adding a "Juice Bar" to the front parking lot to encourage green motoring. Clears up some of the "range anxiety" for a few of us.

    Could Outmoded Phone Booths Become E.V. Charging Stations?
    Well the NY Times has looked into the possibility.
    "New York City is full of dormant, albeit still electrified phone booths. Some say the unused infrastructure could be repurposed for electric vehicle charging."
    http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/14/could-outmoded-phone-booths-become-e-- v-charging-stations/?ref=automobiles
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    edited August 2013
    Interesting idea. If nothing else, more EVs in New York City might cut down on the incredible noise level in that city. I hope they do a better job of execution than they did with the CityBike program. The bike kiosks are ugly and utterly destroy the look of some of NYCs prettier streets. (Not that you go to NY for beauty, but...)
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Member Posts: 4,600
    edited August 2013
    Consumers Report says it's the best. The Highway Traffic Safety Administration says it's the safest. It's environmentally friendly and reduces our dependence on foreign oil. It's got great performance. Plus, it's also elegant and beautiful. Gosh, why would any luxury car buyer even consider anything other than a Model S?
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    "Gosh, why would any luxury car buyer even consider anything other than a Model S?"

    Because it'll probably get stranded in an inch of snow? It also has a very minimalist interior, not as striking or as posh as a BMW, Audi, Lexus or Merc... Lastly, there is that nasty dispute between Tesla and the Dealers union which is doing everything it can to make buying a Tesla as difficult as possible...

    Or am I missing a bit of sarcasm with your post?
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Member Posts: 4,600
    edited August 2013
    Yeah, there's some sarcasm in my post. After all the accolades by what are generally regarded as reliable sources, I'm waiting for someone to claim that the Model S can also slice bread. Kidding aside, I'm a little conflicted regarding Tesla, the car, the company and Elon Musk, and whether or not they're game changers. I remain skeptical.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 57,162
    Still needs a lot more range, and less subsidy for people who have already made out like bandits over the past decade.

    Cool to see though, a company led by an innovator who is all about the product, vs ones with endless scores of useless execs and middle managers who can only think about costs and stocks.
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    Join the crowd. Lots of people are on the fence about Elon and his "Visions", just like people are on the fence about how Tesla continues to make a name for itself in an overly crowded market. But quality and safety are key values that others like myself find very valuable, now lets see how it holds up over the long haul.

    Toyota has millions of Prius on the roads and many with crazy mileages and few issues over the years. But that is after 15 years of history and reputation. Heck, look at Fisker, pretty much dead... For Tesla, the model S is brand new, the model X isn't even here yet. Still got a ways to go...

    Me, I'm still kicking myself for talking the wife out of buying shares in Tesla when it was trading in the 40 dollar range...

    At the moment it's got a "1" in front of that number. :(
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Member Posts: 4,600
    Although I'm generally not a fan of subsidies, I can accept them for certain applications if there's an end point. My friend who owns a Model S certainly doesn't need the subsidy. Interestingly, he usually drives mass market cars. The test drive sold him on the S, however. I've ridden in it, and it's impressive and interesting, but it didn't ignite the "gotta have it" spark for me. I'd choose something like your E-Class over the Model S.

    I agree completely with your second paragraph.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 57,162
    I don't know if subsidizing cars for those who don't need the subsidy is a good use of funds. I can take it for cars that cost less than 40K or so.

    I'd pick my car simply because it costs nearly half as much, has a lease aided by the maker, and has potential for ~800 mile range. It's not as cool, but also more affordable, and for now, practical. Not really apples to apples with a Tesla though - the Tesla is its own thing. More interesting than a mid lux car, not a barge like a large lux car.
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Member Posts: 4,600
    Yeah, I lament not having bought the stock much more than the car. At this level I think the stock factors in perfection, which usually doesn't happen, so I wouldn't touch it.

    Since the Tesla has far fewer moving parts than internal combustion engine cars, I expect it to be reliable. I could be tempted by the 3-Series competitor that Tesla plans to introduce around 2016.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    edited August 2013
    The Tesla reminds me of the Tucker--it was a sensation, and a great performer, but not a game changer at all. Big American sedans never went to rear engine, nor did they abandon conventional automatic transmissions, nor did they even adapt a "pop out" windshield or the "safety zone" under the dash that you were supposed to dive into in case of a collision (LOL!). Moreover, the Tucker had plenty of quirks to work out.

    But Tucker himself was a great showman, that's for sure.

    Musk does not seem to share Tucker's arrogance or talent for making enemies, however.
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Member Posts: 4,600
    Yes, Tucker made enemies, but I wonder how much was due to his character and demeanor rather than the Big 3s' dislike of innovation and innovators. I'm wondering whether Tucker was vilified by Detroit executives who feared that he was a disruptor, in a time when the major domestic manufacturers were much more dominant than they are today. The fact that Toyota and Mercedes invested in Tesla enhances Tesla's standing and credibility in automotive circles. Would Musk be suffering a similar fate as Tucker if Detroit still ruled?
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    edited August 2013
    I don't think so. Tucker was small potatoes to Detroit, hardly a blip on the radar. That's like saying Carroll Shelby (low tech) was shut down by Porsche (high tech). Makes no sense.

    Tucker antagonized the Big Three, then ridiculed them, and he started annoying some very powerful people in Washington with his provocative big mouth.

    Tucker's worst enemy was only himself. The little mouse can only pull the tiger's tail so many times.

    Telsa is cutting edge hi-tech. Tucker's *dreams* were innovative but not his actual cars.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited August 2013
    How many cars did Tucker actually make? Fifty odd? Elon probably crash tested that many.

    The CBS This Morning camera crew came to the 3rd floor at Edmunds today to speak to Jessica Caldwell for a feature due to air tomorrow morning about Elon Musk and Tesla. Film at, I dunno, 7?
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    He built 51 cars, Tucker did.

    By "normal" automaker standards, Musk is a very small player. And to some, he's cheating at cards. Between tax breaks for each car and the emissions credits, it's pretty clear that the company can only make money at this point by living off taxpayers and other automakers.

    And at $80K a pop, vast increases in sales aren't that likely.
  • bwiabwia Member Posts: 2,913
    edited August 2013
    And at $80K a pop, vast increases in sales aren't that likely.

    According to a Tesla sales manager, they expect prices to drop to the $40K range in a year or two.

    By the way, I posted this on another thread but I just wanted to share my experience with the Tesla acolytes and skeptics.

    Last Friday, I spent about an hour at the Tesla showroom in Natick, Massachusetts (the Natick Mall). I must say it was a pleasant experience. There was only one Model S on display as well as the bottom frame and skeleton of a second car displaying the battery pack, suspension system, and electric motor, etc.

    Our host, an electrical engineer, explained every facet of the car from the tires to the onboard electronics. Oops, I forgot to ask if one has to be an engineer to sell these cars. Nonetheless, until recently they could only show the car but now they have a license to sell cars in Massachusetts, completely bypassing a dealer network.

    And that makes sense as the car does not require routine maintenance as is common with cars with an internal combustion engine. He said, if the car is damaged in an accident, they have an arrangement with Audi to do repairs since Audi is highly skilled with working on aluminum frame vehicles.

    To say I was impressed would be an understatement because the Tesla Model S is perfect in every way--just the right size and feel. Too bad there were no cars available for a test drive.
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    Wow, that's the first I heard of Audi doing repairs. That's pretty cool IMO. Never owned an Audi but I can see why they would be called upon, they know their stuff (if it's a bit overly-complex).

    I visited that place in Natick about a year ago. Sure, it seems kinda tacky (to me) to have a dealership in a mall but it was pretty neat to be able to check the car, see how the thing actually works, browse the options, etc all without any sales pressure at all.

    I'm looking forward to the Model X myself. My wife loves the idea of electric cars and to have the utility and the bonus of AWD is a huge plus for us.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    edited August 2013
    "According to a Tesla sales manager, they expect prices to drop to the $40K range in a year or two."

    That's simply not possible unless they offer a) a vehicle other than the S model and b) this model has a much shorter range OR c) there is a startling breakthrough in battery technology that nobody right now knows about.

    If the Tesla plan is B (shorter range so as to cut production costs), then they should look first to the fate of the Nissan Leaf.

    EVs with 75 mile range don't sell.
  • jpp75jpp75 Member Posts: 1,535
    We stopped there on vacation over Memorial Day and actually got to do a test drive. Very impressive, but definitely a price premium. Like fintail if I had the money I'd get one for an around town car, but it's a bit of a stretch right now.

    Musk has the vision to bring a smaller car to market in 3 years or so at a better price point, will be interesting to see if it happens.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    He'll have to cut the range, though. Batteries are mighty expensive, so the more you put in the car, the more it's going to cost you to build it.
  • bwiabwia Member Posts: 2,913
    Top 10 Electric Cars 2013 (6 months of sales)

    The price estimates factor in the EV $7,500 tax credit. Starting at the bottom.

    #10 The Honda Fit EV. With about only 300 sold, you can only lease it. It's $259 a month with unlimited mileage. It's 82 mile electric range is higher than some of the pure EVs on the list. It may be available only in select markets.

    #9 The Toyota RAV4 EV. With about 400 sold it starts at about $43,000. It has a Tesla battery giving it a decent 103 mile range. It does not have four wheel drive.

    #8 The Mitsubishi Imev. With about 900 sold, you can get one for about $21,000. The range is 62 miles. The Nissan Leaf is tough competition for the I with greater range and a similar price.

    #7 The Ford Focus EV. With 900 sold and a price tag starting around $29,000, it has a 76 mile range. It looks very similar to the gas powered Ford Focus with a top speed of 84 mph.

    #6 The Ford Fusion Energi. This plug-in hybrid has sold close to 1,600 units. You can get one for about $38,000. Because the battery is smaller, the tax credit also is smaller. It has a decent initial 21 mile electric range and seating for 5.

    #5 The Ford C-Max Energi. Another plug-in hybrid from Ford with a 21 mile electric range. This $30,000 hatchback has sold about 2,500 units. It competes with the Plug-in Prius liftback in price.

    #4 The Toyota Plug-in Prius. The hybrid king now has a plug-in. With about 4,200 sold, you can get one for about $30,000. The EPA rated electric only range is 6 miles. You have to look closely at the window sticker. Many people believe the EPA rated it as 11 electric miles but that rating involved using gas.

    #3 The Nissan Leaf. With about 9,800 sold, a 75 mile electric range, its one of the cheapest electric cars out there for about $22,000. The Leafs sold in the states are now American made.

    #2 The Chevy Volt. It's the plug-in hybrid king with about 9,900 units sold. It has a 38 mile pure electric range before the engine comes on. The Volt's larger battery size gives the full $7,500 EV tax credit. You can get one for about $32,000. The average Volt driver gets about 120 mpg and drives most of the time in electric only mode.

    #1 The Tesla Model S. What is said to be one of the world's greatest cars happens to be all electric. Tesla has sold 11,000 in six months despite it's high price. You can get one for $63,000 to $73,000 depending on the chosen battery size. The EPA electric ranges are 208 or 265 miles. Tesla owners have free car charging for life at any of the Tesla Supercharger stations. You can charge 200 miles in 30 minutes.

    Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cetRkwUg7Q8
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    edited August 2013
    All well and good, but:

    a. Honda and Toyota don't need to sell a lot of EVs to survive. They don't need to sell any EVs to survive

    b. Teslas do not compete with plug-in hybrids. Different market.

    c. Teslas are still heavily subsidized by federal and state tax credits and by emissions credits. Once all this dries up, then what?

    3. The # of supercharger stations right now is under 20 for the entire country

    4. Tesla cannot survive selling 21,000 cars a year under their current business plan. Given their stock price and current products and time line for future plans, it simply doesn't add up.
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    edited August 2013
    "4. Tesla cannot survive selling 21,000 cars a year under their current business plan. Given their stock price and current products and time line for future plans, it simply doesn't add up."

    Sure, but what is stopping them from selling the platform to other carmakers like say, Audi which at the moment is in its infancy with Electric tech and is already familiar with it due to the above mentioned accident agreement? or Toyota, who sold them the NUMMI plant from which the Teslas are built?

    Could be a brilliant next step towards building the Tesla portfolio.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    That's a very good point and may be the way it all turns out.

    No matter how you cut it, it's a tough row to hoe.

    Many a brilliant, capable and wealthy man has put his arm in the automotive shark tank, with predictable results.

    Did Henry Kaiser know how to build machines? You bet. Did John Delorean know about marketing and manufacturing? Sure did.

    Even successful indie car makers fail, because their corporate structure falls down around them----Zimmer comes to mind.

    The automobile business eats men alive, always has, always will. Is Musk up to the challenge? Well, he's an impressive guy, what else can I say?
  • bwiabwia Member Posts: 2,913
    edited August 2013
    Sure, but what is stopping them from selling the platform to other carmakers...

    That's a bad idea as it will irreparably dilute the Tesla brand. Tesla is a development stage company where losses are common in the first five years of development. In the last quarter, excluding one-time items, the company did turn a profit. Yes, the magic word, PROFIT.

    Tesla cannot be a Toyota overnight in terms of sales volume, nor should it be. It has developed a profitable niche market in BEV's and that's where it should play. So far, its model is working just fine. High margin and high turn-over, thank you very much.

    And this brings me to a common business mistake, following the advice of pundits who know very little about Production, Marketing and Finance. Too many a successful small business (e.g. bakery, flower shop) fail because of the unreasonable expectation to be a big business overnight. Stay the course Tesla, you are over hump in terms of technical feasibility, now execute with precision.
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    edited August 2013
    I see what you are saying, but I guess I should expand my point by saying that I don't know why Tesla couldn't sell, say an older, maybe less MPC version to other exclusive automakers like Audi who sells limited numbers of names like Bentley. Imagine what the Tesla drivetrain would do in a supercar like Lamborghini. Heck Lexus and Acura have both proposed hybrid supercars in the future, a Tesla Supercar would make them non-starters...

    I guess I was too quick to name Toyota, because I recalled when they sold the HSD to Nissan for the Altima hybrid.

    I don't think Tesla will see Toyota volume in my lifetime, they are just too small and niche and I don't think they can even produce enough vehicles to hit 2.25 million that Toyota is predicting in the US alone... And I agree that their current path is working.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    edited August 2013
    Tesla already does sell to Toyota, Benz and Smart.

    The high margins are worth examining. If you take away the tax credits, the current gross margin is 2.3% says the Motley Fool.

    Also, in addition to tax credits, Tesla benefits from a low marketing budget due to great publicity.

    But note---these benefits are not scaleable. If Tesla wants to ramp up production, it will a) lose all the tax credits and b)need to advertise heavily and c) increase production costs and investment.

    By any stretch, a company that has a market capitalization of over $13 billion dollars should be producing at least 50,000 cars a year, I'm guessing.

    The P/E forecast for Tesla next year is 243 !! (Nasdaq)

    By any rational standard of measurement, this company makes no sense whatsoever to me.
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Member Posts: 4,600
    edited August 2013
    Good Points! I think the company makes a lot of sense, but not the stock at these prices. Of course, the stock seemed overvalued long before it recently exceeded 150/share. If it's a bubble, it can go to any price before declining.

    Toyota and Mercedes have ownership stakes in Tesla, although neither stake is major. Actually, it's not clear to me whether Mercedes' stake is in the Tesla company or in a major supplier to Tesla.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 57,162
    I seem to recall the MB column mounted gear selector is used by Tesla.
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Member Posts: 4,600
    I would add that while the company makes sense, I agree that it's competing in an industry that's difficult to enter, an industry that's very capital intensive and one in which scale is a huge advantage, an industry with numerous battle hardened and established major competitors, and an industry where many have tried and few have succeeded. Notwithstanding these headwinds, I believe that brilliant design and skillful execution can overcome the odds. It'll certainly be interesting to watch, and it's encouraging to see that a domestic startup is willing to challenge the status quo.
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Member Posts: 4,600
    Sorry, but I don't know where Tesla sources the gear selector.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Tesla may end up a successful company indeed, but not just making expensive electric cars. That, to my perhaps limited vision, is a dead end road.

    In any event, Tesla is going to have to "make a move" somewhere...either downscale or sideways into hybrids, or more diversification.

    Look what Amazon did to stay alive. Now they sell toilet paper.
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Member Posts: 4,600
    True, adaptability is a key ingredient for success. Amazon is a good analogy.
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Member Posts: 4,600
    edited August 2013
    Is scaling to mass market status easier said than done for Tesla, given the financial, technical, distribution and competitive challenges? Or, is Musk and his team likely to pull it off, and eventually join the ranks of major automotive manufacturers. Read on...

    (Bloomberg) --"Tesla Motors Inc. CEO Elon Musk said the electric-car maker intends to add factories in Europe and Asia, anticipating volume gains from a planned mass-market battery car.

    The company this year plans to make at least 21,000 of its $70,000 Model S premium sedans at its Fremont, Calif., plant, and double that in 2014.

    While the factory has capacity to produce as many as 500,000 vehicles a year, the addition of a smaller electric car priced about half that of Model S will require additional plants, Musk said.

    'We'll try to locate those close to where people are, close to where the customers are, to minimize the logistics costs of getting the car to them,' the Tesla co-founder said in an interview with Bloomberg Television. 'I think long term you can see Tesla establishing factories in Europe, in other parts of the U.S. and in Asia.'

    Tesla, named for inventor Nikola Tesla, has been an automotive phenomenon this year, with its shares surging more than fourfold and its market value exceeding some established carmakers such as Fiat S.p.A., the majority owner of Chrysler Group.

    Tesla expansion

    Musk provided no details on how much or when Tesla would invest in more factories.

    The company has opened a small facility in Tilburg, Netherlands, where it's assembling Model S components shipped from California to Europe, for cars it has begun selling there.

    While Tesla's next vehicle, the Model X electric SUV, goes into production at Fremont late next year, the timing of the smaller, lower-priced vehicle, isn't firm.

    'Certainly, within five years we'll have our mass-market electric car available,' Musk told Bloomberg. 'We'll start seeing hundreds of thousands of electric cars going to market every year.'

    Musk, in previous interviews, has said the lower-priced car would arrive in about three or four years.

    Trademark application

    The company this month filed an application with the U.S. Patent and Trademark office to use the name Model E for an automobile.

    Shanna Hendriks, a Tesla spokeswoman, declined to comment on whether that's intended for the still-unnamed mass-market electric car."

    Your thoughts?
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    edited August 2013
    Well it speaks to the ambitions of a brilliant man, but when I actually analyze these statements, after the intoxication has worn off, I still have to wonder where the profits come from to fuel all this---if the business plan is to keep jacking up the stock price with this hype, and make the money that way, then I do fear for the future. This all sounds like a mighty ferocious burn rate of capital--and this to be replenished by profits from 21,000 heavily subsidized cars?

    Also, I'm still not "getting" how he plans to produce an entry-level car without reducing the range of it, given that the number and type of batteries are a major production cost, nor how he plans to fund a major marketing campaign against increasingly efficient plug-in hybrids.

    If plug-in hybrids could double their EV range in the next few years, Tesla is toast IMO.

    OHHHH----"MODEL E"....no, no, in the name of all that is holy, don't use that name! (E= Edsel, once championed by Ford as the "E CAR")
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 57,162
    I wonder how many Model S actually cost the 70K used by the media in nearly every blurb. A loaded model can easily shoot past 100K. Maybe they are trying to lessen the bad taste of someone receiving a subsidy to buy something so expensive?
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Well the media is lazy about things like that.

    Tesla has been silently raising the cost of options on the S, so the price is creeping up as we speak.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Seems like too many people want to build a $100 million dollar company. But lots of those outfits could still make as much profit as a $100 million dollar company just by focusing on their niche. And $1 million in year in profit sounds a lot better when your company gross is "just" $10 million instead of $100 million.

    I'm sure Musk wants the number to be $100 Billion though.
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Member Posts: 4,600
    Well, keeping the stock on a boil, then issuing new shares at inflated prices to finance expansion, then resetting and doing it again, is one way to do it. One could argue that he did that to pay off the federal loan. It's all legal, and it works as long as enough people keep believing in Musk's magic touch.

    Notice that hardly a day goes by without an important announcement, always very positive. Some are warranted, but there seems to be a good dose of PR too.

    If the X and the E are as good, adjusted for price, as the S is purported to be, then I'd become a solid Tesla fan. I might even buy an E. Also, if the E is really good no one would make the connection with the Edsel. Only a tiny percentage of car buyers even remember the Edsel.
  • albanytimalbanytim Member Posts: 18
    edited August 2013
    "S", "E", "X"
    Good marketing strategy.
Sign In or Register to comment.