Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Oh, so you've done the job before? I always love when people say something should cost X-dollars because it sounds right.
I've seen numbers ranging from $30 up to $300. Unfortunatly, my dealership was the $300 quote. Since I'm not much of a mechanic, I'll need to depend on someone doing the work and haven't really heard what is a valid price for a 2001 Sienna. I suspect $300 is the extreme upper end of the range.
Has anyone actually paid a mechanic to do a Valve Cover pull and what price did you pay?
Thanks for any info!
Not to mention all the other sources that have indicated these vehicles. Once again if this problem were so universal wouldn't there be others here? I mean at least a couple. One maybe in the last few months at least. But no it's ALL Toyota. And not all Toyota, just those with the engines that strangely Toyota says has a problem. Go figure.
And one more thing I have failed to notice...If this problem were universal and caused be owner maintenance wouldn't there be other people that at least complained about it here on Edmunds? I mean in every forum there are people that complain about squeaks and rattles and dimming lights and alignment but there are no sludged or seized engine complaints on other forums that I have seen. And as I said before if this were a universal "owner maintenance" problem why did Toyota not include ALL their engines? Hmmm.
My e-mail's on my profile.
Oh yeah wait you reminded me of one more thing...You say that the Toyotas bought at auction are more prone to sludging since the owners may not have cared for them as well as people who buy. Another way of looking at it is that since most cars at auction are there at around 30,000 miles, that's about the time some engines are failing. Not only would that explain the high incidence of sludging but it also would cut drastically in the number of owner warranty complaints. If the cars are sold to someone off lease, they would have NO proof of prior maintenance.
As reported by Automotive News, expert, independent mechanics starting noticing a large number of Toyotas coming through their shops for sludge-related engine repairs/replacements. These Toyotas were all related by engine type and model year. (Incidently, these repairs at independent mechanics are most likely not counted in Toyotas now 3200 complaints.) These independent mechanics rightly question why there is a spike in this type of problem and why don't they see that same rate of problem on other manufacturers products or even other models of Toyotas.
CarMax has an economic incentive to watch out for problem cars. They evidently saw these problems back in 1999, long before any 'alarmists' on the Internet started talking about them.
Also, the Better Business Bureau came to the same conclusion that something is badly amiss, and that Toyota is not repsonding appropriately to it. The BBB even gave Toyota "an unsatifactory business performance record" because of this problem.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=carmax+sludge&hl=en&selm=FEY0OINerOiBE5JGIwyu9IKPNcsl@4ax.com&rnum=1
How much labor?
1 hour maybe 2?
So assuming $80 per hour labor(depending on where you are), that gets you pretty close to $300.
If their Toyota is sludged, they have collected one statistic. If they meet 6 people on Edmunds with this problem, then they have a statistic of 7 failures. If Toyota gives a number or percentage of people complaining, then it's their Toyota and their Town Hall friends plus .1% of owners. So that's better. You can say with assurance 3007 owners.
Does this allow you to say "Toyotas catastrophic engine failures". No, then you are still an alarmist. Can you say "there's a problem here with sludging in some Toyota engines". Yep, I think that is fair, you are on solid ground and immune from the label of "alarmist".
It's like that Saab statistic I quoted....8% head gasket failure. This allows me to say, I think, that Saab had, at one time a "substantial head gasket problem on the blah blah models, years blah to blah". This does not allow me to say "All Saab engines have bad head gaskets".
Am I being too harsh here?
Perhaps this rubber seal is supposed to be replaced, but mine is not leaking after about 500 miles (with synthetic oil). I had a 78 Mazda GLC that required checking valve clearances every 10,000 miles. It too had a built in rubber seal. I removed the cover each time for about 100,000 miles and never had the gasket leak. Luck, maybe so but I always thought this type of cover seal was far superior to the old replacable gasket type. No, I'm not an auto mechanic any any means and I don't have a shop manual for this vehicle but maybe this info will be useful.
whats the labor charge to change it?
Attacking Mr. Shiftright for giving his opinions. We should be so lucky. Take a look at his bio. I would rather have some informed well thought-out opinions, as opposed to the other types.
But, whatever floats your boat!!!
He reminds me of a well educated talk show host.
Just an opinion.....
Toyota settled the case by paying full refund, but it gained an important point: it's not the engine design flaw; it's the lack of maintenance.
I can imagine the Toyota's database will have the following entry:
case XXX, owner: "catgem," amount settled: $4600, cause: lack of maintence. This may be true. But the way it plays out does not look credible to me.
But you let me know, it doesn't hurt my feelings to stay out, really.
Teo, was I mean to you? Sorry. Sometimes, though, people really do confuse the fact that the Host is not censoring your opinion but only the method of delivery (e.g., delivering a pizza by handing it or by throwing it are two very different ways of handling the same basic object).
I think you bring a needed perspective to this topic. You don't seem to have a dog in the fight.
I think I'm like many observers who just want to know what really caused a well built, reliable mark to stumble.
1. Is it an engine redesign not well tested?
2. Owner neglect, especially leasers?
3. Jiffy weforgotto Lube?
4. An oil brand that doesn't handle the heat well?
5. PCV valve plugging up?
Hey, maybe a combo?
I'm staying tuned.
Although you have to be careful when buying a used or slightly used car, leasers in this respect don't differ much from others. If anything, leasers have to maintain the car well (especially the exterior), since they get slapped on with penalties from the dealership if it's damaged.
As an example, I recently bought a very slightly used 2000 Solara SE V6 (19,000 miles), that was originally bought at the dealer, resold to the dealer, and the people bought another Toyota at the same dealership. Good thing, because I had access to a computerized list of the oil changes and other maintenance (changed the air filter) on the car when I bought it.
This is what really happened to the Corvair in fact. You were supposed to maintain STRICT tire pressures at all times, and people didn't and they got into trouble with the car. Also folks weren't used to owning air-cooled cars, and their driving habits did not follow factory recommendations in that regard either.
seems GM could have at least copied the VW bug
and what has been, or will be done to prevent it in the future (other than the -- change your oil more --recommendation)
so that then the "sludge risk' of a Toyota will be the same as other cars.
OH SHIFTY, don't stop posting. You actually seem to know about cars!?!
seems GM could have at least copied the VW bug"
And Bugs didn't?
1. You used Havoline, generally considered a high quality oil.
2. You had oil changes for at least 10 years at the same location with at least 2 other vehicles all without any problems before your Sienna sludged.
3. They blamed your quality of oil first.
4. No mention of the oil filter was done even though they did the actual cleanup.
5. You had detailed discussions with Cobb Toyota and even went through an arbitration process. All without mentioning that the original filter was on the car.
6. The Station you always used would neglect changing a filter on the vehicle that would cause them the most liability, while always changing it on your older vehicles?
7. Now that the claim has been made and agreed to be paid, the Dealership suddenly "remembers" that the van had the original filter.
At this point you will have to pardon my skepticism.
On a side not, Cliffy1, do you know anything about a program where the dealer offers cars at invoice, no haggling. When I called about it, after recieving a card, I was told to come in and they would be happy to answer my questions, but not over the phone. I did ask about a Rav4, as I would not mind picking one up, but they said this was not one of the cars this promo covers. Is this a dealer thing, or a Toyota program?
Rayfbaird- I think you are correct about my air filter,but ancient oriental wisdom says that one must always let one's opponent save face. Or something like that.
It appears toyota is sticking by the maintenance issue and ignoring their own maintenance manual problems.
I am still waiting for a PCV valve issue to come up; if 5k maintenance can cause some sludge, it could easily contaminate the PCV, which would accelerate sludge as crankcase ventilation is then restricted. There is no specified maintenance for the PCV valve, and it's not easy to reach on these transverse mounted v6's..
Normal.
There's always gonna be some crusty nastiness under there.. no worries
Bill
Pay $15k to $40k for a car, have Toyota blame the owner's for the sludge (even-though the problem is not repeatable on other new cars), then after a BBB ruling against them they issue an SPA (out of kindness to the owners), what a cruel series jokes.
Now it appears that Toyota is going to fix it problems with BG MOA, why not motor-honey, and STP? So much for the "proud professionals" at the dealerships.
Am I being too harsh?
Ok, are you ready for a really bad maintenance story? I had a 53 Ford flat-head eight, the burned oil at a rate of 1 quart per hundred miles. It was suggested to just add motor honey, and use cheap oil (10 cents a quart), which I did. This worked until the winter-time when the car would not crank. The solution, just dilute the oil with kerosene in the winter, so I tried that. It worked again, the car lasted for two years, until I sold it. It is hard to imagine much worse abuse then that.
Thanks to Ramblinon for posting this info. though, and for others that followed with solutions.