Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Also, the new Malibu is a huge improvement.
Ironically, Toyota might be slipping a little. The Tundra and Camry have some cheap bits inside. In fact I'd go as far as saying that the Silverado has a nicer interior than the Tundra.
Lutz is finally getting solid results, i.e. improved vehicles.
-juice
Example:
And here:
http://www.saturnfans.com/forums/showpost.php?p=987662&postcount=5
Example:
Head on over.
I'm leaning towards a van but it was a seriously competent crossover, and yes I'd pick one over a Pilot or Highlander.
-juice
I have tried the Santa Fe again last weekend. Went to the cottage where there are some nice hills on our lot. With a bit more snow than last outing. Tried with TC on or off. Couldn't see a big difference really. When the TC light in the dash came on it was always to late and I was already stuck. Doesn't cut allot of engine power tho. So far I prefer it off. Probably in my head but I feel I have more control of the vehicle.
My dad's friend was there with his Yukon Denali. He wanted to see how his heavy mama, that's how he call it handle the off-road. He has no 4LO or lock button, just AWD. He went everywhere I did but always needed to accelerate allot more before the climb. As soon as he went slow he would spin and get stuck. We both had fun seeing the limitations of our SUV's.
Tried to convince my dad to take his 02 Jeep Grand Cherokee with the nice HO engine. But even with his Quadra Drive 2 system, locking in the middle and back, he didn't want to. He said his tires are almost slick and are due to be changed. I think he just didn't want his son to get him unstuck with his Hyundai.
-mike
I finally got our GV stuck this winter, and I too blame it on the factory tires:-) I was in a situation where any wheelspin resulted in sideslipping, which I definitely did not want to do. I forgot to shut off the tc, which meant the wheels would individually and out of synch with each other, spin one rotation and then be braked. This totally defeated any finessing it out and eventually resulted in a dent. This tc system needs refining.
-mike
Saturn: GM's Best Defense Against Toyota (Auto Observer)
Agreed, its your money. However, wouldn't you like to keep more of your money? I also used to be in the mindset that no other car manufacturer can beat a Honda/Toyota. I ventured out and never went back. Over the years have saved thousands not spending the extra $$ for a perceived quality/reliability advantage. But, to each their own.. Cheers..
Of course I would. But I also believe I get what I pay for in the quality and reliability of the vehicle and the service center and ownership satisfaction and ultimate resale. Each individual makes their own judgement.
The preceding is why I don't go out and buy used Elantras as transportation (and save $$$) and instead buy cars that fit form, function and finance.
The XL7 looks decent, though I'm not crazy about the fact that it shares its underpinnings with the Equinox. I'd consider one if the quality and reliability reports are good after the first year or two.
Buying v1.0 is always a risk, I guess, but if you aren't happy with yours you may be upside down because Zook resale values drop like a rock falling off a cliff.
My impression from browsing forums is that most GV buyers intend to keep them a long time, so they don't care about this anyway. You don't have to take my word for it. Just try to find a used 1-2 year old GV for sale.
-Frank
5 used 2006 Foresters, 1 2006 Grand Vitara (with 166km on it).
$23,000cdn asking price for loaded 2006 Foresters with 35,000km on them, new $30,000. Unfortunately I have no numbers on the GV's to compare them to. I don't think this limited "survey" backs up your claim.
Not sure about how sales volumes compare, but my guess it the GV has a fewer % of leases.
-Frank
Maybe Foresters sell in greater numbers than GV's, and probably a higher proportion of those sales are leases. I thought probably the used 2006 Foresters I checked had come off leases, but I thought that didn't matter in this context. The question was which used vehicle is easier to find, and which retains resale value. I think my information addressed those points, without contradicting what has been said since.
I also suspect I posted the new purchase price of the 2006 Foresters too low, because I took it from the current asking price for a new 2006, which should be discounted because they're a year outdated. Which means the depreciation for Foresters is worse than my numbers indicated. It may be worse than for GV's, in fact.
If people are buying Grand Vitaras rather than leasing them, and if they expect to keep them a long time, does this suggest those buyers lack confidence in their choice? Or are we just nut cases? Park a new GV beside an new Forester and ask someone who has no idea of their pricing, which costs more. This could rub off on used sales.
I cast a wider net. Looked on eBay for 2006 Foresters and 2006 GV's. 5 2006 Foresters and 1 2006 used GV. The asking prices for the Foresters were nowhere near the new prices. Real bargains, actually.
In March 2007, Subaru sold about 20% more vehicles in Canada than Suzuki. While unfortunately I couldn't find information specific to the Forester and GV, it would be difficult to imagine in that number there is an embedded sales ratio of 5:1 between the Forester and the GV. In fact, after looking at this I suspect the GV may retain resale value better than the Forester. You certainly get more vehicle whatever the price.
The Subaru Loyale held resale value well because it turned out to be a very good design, in demand, long after production ceased. The new GV could turn out like that, whereas I doubt the Forester will. The Forester is getting quite dated, and I trust Subaru will soon put out a vastly improved new version.
-Frank
It may be dated but it fulfills it's intended mission the best of the bunch without any pretense. One reason it keeps getting high marks. And the turbo transforms the sleepy beast into a rocket.
Plus, you'd have to know that the owners actually paid in the first place to determine actual residual values. And the condition of the cars, and the mileage, etc.
We don't have enough info to make conclusions. I'd rely more on KBB values or the Automotive Lease Guide (ALG) to make conclusions about resale value.
Subaru fans would have been falling over themselves to praise and buy it
I'm glad to see you have such confidence in your vehicle, that's great.
I was interested enough to test drive one, sure. Would I buy it? No, the V6 didn't offer the extra performance I expected, and didn't sound very refined either. Gas mileage was another concern, especially given the merely average performance. The warranty is great. It's a solid effort, no doubt, but could use a little more polish.
Not that the Forester is perfect, far from it. I'd like to see them add a 5EAT, make stability control standard, and stretch the wheelbase just a tad.
Any how, I found a better source for residual values:
https://www.alg.com/deprratings.aspx
As you can see, the Forester gets 4 stars and the Grand Vitara gets a (still good) 3 stars.
Cheers. :shades:
ateixeira, thanks for looking up the interesting resale value information. As I said before, GV resale values will also depend on location, and my location likes smaller vehicles. I would also guess most of the GV number would comprise the older, less desired version, while the Forester has been pretty much the same since it was introduced.
I think most shortcomings people report with the new GV could be resolved by increasing the sound insulation and softening the suspension. Then the engine would seem quieter, and the whole thing would seem more refined. In fact, I think Suzuki should offer both "softened" and "offroad" versions of the GV. I intend to add acoustic material myself, and the stiff suspension is needed for what we bought it for.
I checked the used listings on Canada.com. 6 used 2006 Foresters for an average asking price of $29,400. 10 used 2006 Grand Vitaras for an average asking price of $25,000. Difference in average asking price is $4400.
The Foresters were from Ont (2), BC (2), Sask (1) and AB (1).
The Vitaras were from Ont (3), AB (3), Quebec (4).
So these Vitaras were more likely to be from provinces where small vehicles are less preferred, which would depress resale prices.
New, the average MSRP of the most and least expensive 2006 Foresters was $33,250. The average of the most and least expensive new 2006 GV's was $27,250. The difference in MSRP range was $5000. I realize this is a very crude methodology, and it still does not factor out regional differences. But it does not support claims that GV's resale values drop like rocks. Instead, the most likely explanation is the difference in purchase price. I still don't believe I will suffer when it comes time to sell the GV. Just the interest on $5000 will pay for the difference in gas mileage.
One thing helping that figure right now is that the new 7/100 warranty is fully transferable.
Unlike Hyundai - only the 5/60 portion transfers. So a used Hyundai buyer is looking at a warranty that ends at 60k miles, while a used Zook would go all the way to 100k (within 7 years).
That actually hurts Hyundai resale. You may as well stretch a buy a new Hyundai, then keep it, to enjoy the full warranty.
Cheers. :shades:
It stinks for about a week or so. Just crack the windows a tad and it goes away in no time.
the usual comments started 'lots of cars off the road'.
followed by 'this thing has a stupid lever i need to use to get into 4 wheel drive, and i had a hard time getting it to engage. i like that button in my escape'.
she even had a sheriff stop her and give her a lecture about not driving during a 'level 3'.
she told me she didn't even think the driving was that bad.
i guess not having many snow plows messes things up, if you are not used to it.
George
Personally I liked the old one better but the newer electronic system did work very well too.
It only had both from 2001-2004. It is now fully automatic and fully electronic. Very much like the Haldex system but this one was developed by Ford IIRC. Like the Fusion, Taurus, and whatever other vehicles use it, it is said to be able to detect when wheel spin might occur and compensate for it by sending power where it is needed making the whole process invisible and seamless. My experience with the first gen version in our '05 Escape is that it did work very much like that but you could still feel the front tires slip ever so slightly from time to time in the soft stuff. Chirping the tires was all but impossible though. I guess the sensors which predict when wheel spin is imminent are programmed to work better on dry pavement.
C'mon scape, you were the only one who constantly repeated that, not the other posters. I'm glad you had good short-term service out of your Escape; I've been urging my folks to check out the new Ford Taurus (they want a comfortable highway cruiser to supplant their economical Civic), so I'm not anti-Ford!