Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Have you recently purchased a small/crossover SUV? A reporter would like to talk to you about why you chose one over a smaller car or larger SUV.; please reach out to [email protected] today for more details.
Did you get a great deal? Let us know in the Values & Prices Paid section!
Meet your fellow owners in our Owners Clubs

2013 BMW 320i Full Test

Edmunds.comEdmunds.com Posts: 10,037
edited September 2014 in BMW

image2013 BMW 320i Full Test

Edmunds' road test of the 2013 BMW 320i. Includes instrumented test data, on-road driving impressions, photos, specs and more.

Read the full story here


Tagged:

Comments

  • The basic Beemer returns, but at a far from basic price I'm afraid.
  • Interesting. The 320 seems like a way to get back to the pure expression of the 3 series from years ago. It's a model that's a stripper in a good way-- stripped of all the gadgets and fluff that have increasingly weighed down its modern cousins. Now, if only we could get that with sharper handling and a better engine! (Other than by buying an E36/46, that is.)
  • emajoremajor Posts: 332
    I like the idea of a stripped down BMW, and unlike many potential buyers I would be willing to forgo the latest tech goodies (incl. even ye olde navigation systems) and still pay a fairly premium price for it if it drove like the legend it's supposed to be. Here's my problem: according to everything I've read about this generation of 3, it doesn't drive that way. From the article: "Its slightly numb steering and occasional springy body motions may mean it's no longer the runaway sport sedan choice". There you have it. Other reviews have been less kind, and I've heard a fair amount of criticism about the cheapened interior quality compared to past generations. And yet it's still $35K. So what, exactly, would I be paying for? The 3 series used to be an aspirational car for me, one I would seriously consider once I no longer needed as much backseat space. Not anymore. Now a $27K GTI starts looking like one heck of a smart buy and the 3 series looks more and more like a hopeless status symbol.
  • fordson1fordson1 Posts: 1,512
    Hey, you can barely notice that almost-2-second-to-60 difference. Yeah, right. I'm trying to imagine why I would not get the new Mk7 Golf R for this money. Slow BMWs don't compute with me.
  • sp1sp1 Posts: 1
    Did BMW write this article for Edmunds? This 320i review states that "... the cabin is standard BMW fare, with excellent materials and top-notch construction." Really??? Even the 328i is unworthy of the BMW namesake with its cheap interior quality and hard plastics everywhere (especially on the console and doors). Lower-priced VWs have better interiors and some other non-luxury brands have caught up or surpassed the 320/328. The 2.0 engine is loud (not in a good way), buzzy, and unrefined, and feels very under-powered for any driving enthusiast.

    BMW is really doing a disservice to their reputation of sport and luxury by putting out garbage like this. If they want to go after the lower income market, they should spin off another brand to do so.
  • noburgersnoburgers Posts: 500
    I still can't understand why German cars come with "leatherette" AKA Vinyl when cloth would be so much more comfortable. But overall this package sounds like a good deal. I wonder if those who want a little more power would just get an engine tune, even if it comes at the cost of some fuel economy, and save a lot over a 328i.
  • fordson1fordson1 Posts: 1,512
    Because it's already running pretty high boost, like a 328...it's just down some compression ratio. In other words, they deliberately detuned it so that you would find it very hard to bring it up to 328 specs. They left the benefits of direct injection (that you can run higher boost AND higher C/R) on the table on purpose. A tune works by raising boost and jiggering the fuel mapping, for the most part. You are not going to raise the C/R to 328 levels with a tune.
  • The vinyl seats are a deal-breaker for me. I would take cloth or even velour over this, any day. Absolutely horrible! I don't know why they offer these plastic seats, when cloth would be more comfortable and pleasant. Cloth seats are offered on various trims in Europe, so it doesn't seem like it would be difficult to do it here in the US. Other than that, it sounds quite interesting. Sort out the seat material and I might go take a look. Until then, forget it.
  • noburgersnoburgers Posts: 500
    @fordson, thanks for the technical explanation. I would not have known that, so it looks like "it is what it is". I personally would leave it alone out of concern for voiding the warranty, even if it could be backed out to stock.
  • huisjhuisj Posts: 1
    fordson1, the article says the 320 actually has the higher compression ratio (oddly enough, BMW's website says they are both 10:1). It says it has the same "nominal" boost pressure, but I think what is unsaid there is that the actual boost pressure across the entire rev range has to be down considerably from the 328. If it weren't there would be no way to explain the peak torque difference (the 328 and 320 both peak at 1250 RPM) or the peak hp difference (both peak at 5000 RPM). The supposedly higher compression ratio would help efficiency at the expense of being able to boost it to higher pressures, probably because of knock limitations. It would be very interesting to actually see the torque curves and boost pressure maps of these two engines to get a more complete story on the differences. The "nominal" boost pressure thing makes no sense.
  • huisjhuisj Posts: 1
    I'd also guess that it's probably also not anywhere near knock limitations even if the CR is 11:1.
  • fordson1fordson1 Posts: 1,512
    Hmmm...huisj, you are right. So if they are running a higher C/R, then how could they run the same boost and make less hp? They can't run the same boost, is the answer. I agree with you that theoretically, the higher C/R would mean more power off-boost and higher efficiency but limit boost potential. I don't see an 11:1 ratio anywhere in the competitive set of small turbo fours - the Focus ST runs 10:1 but most of them are running mid-nines to 1. The more I think about, the more I doubt that BMW would make two different engines (pistons) to do this. And I would bet they have done other things to make it hard to reverse-engineer 328-level power out of it.
  • habu987habu987 Posts: 11
    I'll pass. I rented a 2013 328i for a weekend a couple months ago and was less than impressed by the interior. The vinyl seats were pretty cruddy (just the surface, the actual seat cushioning and support were fine) and there interior was quite plasticky.

    I've got a really hard time rationalizing dropping that much cash on a car and not even freaking getting leather!

    I'm not in the market for an entry level *lux* sport sedan, but if I were, I'd most likely look at the A3 when it comes out.
  • boff_boff_ Posts: 51
    The leatherette is not vinyl like your gramp's Plymouth Scamp, it is tiny fragments of leather that have been bonded to a man-made backing. Of course it isn't the real thing, but looks and feels pretty similar (it even gets squeaky after cleaning with leather cleaner) and wears as well. For the money saved it is not a bad thing; cloth would be better but entry luxury buyers wouldn't go for it.
  • There are other alternatives besides the Germans - a Volvo S60 T5 will smoke this base 3 series and offer superior safety including City Safety autonomous braking standard and can be had for the as tested price.
  • tim_bootim_boo Posts: 14
    So for the most part all of the components for a 328 powertrain are in place but with less power. So the savings for BMW is the less equipment offered but the powertrain costs roughly the same. I have a hard time buying this car since I'd feel a little ripped off, BMW just give us a stripped down 328 that would be the car I would buy.
  • I think there are aspects being missed here as far as the engineering of the lower powered engine. Apparently it has the same boost and a higher CR as the 328i, but they also mention ECU differences, a different engine wiring harness, and a less powerful water pump, so I think it's not just a simple tune to bring this engine up to 328i levels.

    I also find this article a little disingenuous. They're saying that other than the acceleration, this 320i pretty much matches the 328i. However, you have to consider that the numbers are delivered with a Sport Package installed. In the same vane, they're talking about the wonderful, manually adjustable seats and that they have 10-way adjustments. Is that the same for the regular seats, because this car has the sport seats installed.

    I'd be far more intrigued by a test of the completely stripped, no options 320i and how it performs. Even so though, I don't find this generation of 3 series all that appealing, from a looks, interior design or quality, or driving dynamics aspect. I don't feel that it's still the benchmark of the luxury sport sedan market like it used to be, in my mind. I don't think any of the cars out now really shine above the other at this point either though. I think it just comes down to a preference on the blend of brand, styling, interior design/quality, and driving dynamics for the consumer. It seems Cadillac is the new driving benchmark in this segment when it comes to sport sedan dynamics.
  • kiiwiikiiwii Posts: 318
    cheapie edition?
  • My local dealer called and offered me incentives to terminate my lease a few payments early on my 2011 328i, so I took delivery of only the second 320i they had delivered in the Charlotte area. I wish I could say I liked it as well as my 2011, but I do not. The handling is the biggest difference, but there are other smaller things that you notice after living with the car for a while.

    First, the auto stop/start is the most annoying feature ever put on a car. Maybe if you live in a city with long stoplights it would make sense, but for the small town where I live it is just a major annoyance. I now turn it off the instant I crank the car.

    Second, the entire radio/iDrive experience is just a mess. If you are on the screen to view your preset stations you can't see the song/artist information unless you toggle through the menu. Also, why does the radio have buttons on the dash? They do not correspond with the pre-sets that have been entered with the iDrive controller. If you use the scroll wheel on the steering wheel the red channel indicator on the information screen doesn't change to the new station you have selected. I could go on and on about this radio, but I won't.

    Third, if you turn the climate control off, when you restart the car it will turn itself back on. This can be a pain if you are running errands and are in and out of the car several times.

    Fourth, the trunk release sensor under the rear bumper only works about 50% of the time and it is s-l-o-w. It is much faster to use the remote fob or the trunk release above the license plate.

    Fifth, the quality of the plastic and rubber on the car is really questionable. All the trim around the windows looks several years old and I only took delivery 5 months ago.

    Last, but not least, is the handling. So much has been lost in terms of how the car handles versus the 2011 model. It feels big and ungainly. I loved to drive my 2011 in the mountains but this one doesn't inspire me to do that.

    I probably sound like a whiner, and had I never driven a BMW prior to this one I would probably think it an awesome car. As it stands, I think it is a good car that has lost its way.
  • rat73rat73 Posts: 6
    Buy an IS250. If you have to buy something as slow as a snail, at least buy something that will stay out of the shop. And don't bother with the righteous BMW vs. Lexus thing - everything that has made a BMW the more desireable proposition (engine, steering, build quality) has been stripped out of this car. This is a car for people who know nothing about cars beyond being a status symbol. More specifically, this is a car a rich guy will buy as a high school graduation present for his daughter.
  • No matter what anyone says or would like to believe, we all know BMW dealers NEVER have "stripper" cars on the lot.
  • Well at least they left it "Rear Wheel Drive" unlike the CLA250 FWD, uggg. Regardless I don't see any 'stripped' versions of the 320 showing up on dealer lots! So I'm guessing, HIGH 30's with tax/OTD, This little 4cyl Bm'er could push $40K optioned!
  • makakiomakakio Posts: 25
    Way to put it, emajor. As a four-generation 3 series owner I will be trading my current 328 for a 2014 GTI this coming year. Yes I love the looks of the new 3, but after seeing the quality and drive of my 3 series' continue to diminish ever since trading my old e46 3 series (2003), I can't see wasting the additional $5k on a stripper 3 series that is down 30hp and 60lbft to a loaded, lighter GTI that so far has been lauded by media as the best one ever...
  • banhughbanhugh Posts: 315
    For $10k less I prefer to get the BRZ/FRS witch is faster and more reliable than a BMW. It doesn't have as nice interior but with the extra $10k you save, one can work miracles, from leather seats, to a supercharger you can get a hell of a better car than the 320 blond high school chick car.
  • And why are they calling this an entry-level luxury car? No leather, no nothing. You might as well by a Ford Fusion, get more and save some real money.
  • It seems, one again, that BMWs are an easy target because of their cost and prestige. I recommend you actually drive one of these cars before offering opinions on them. It looks like Scottnc2 has done that but his complaints are more about it's meaningless gadgets rather than true performance and handling. The 320 is entry level so be prepared for that. Want more? Spend more. Otherwise go drive your tinfoil asian imports with grapefruit-shooter exhausts and leave the real cars to the grownups.

    BTW
  • mrrytemrryte Posts: 28
    "BMW's 2013 320i exists because entry-level luxury sedans are about to lose their place at the front door."

    Correction: BMW's 2013 exists because there are those potential buyers out there who want the "prestige" of driving a BMW and couldn't care less about what's under the hood or the performance aspects of the vehicle (poseurs; badge whores; snobs-define them as you will.)

    Think of it: rather than having to create a whole new car from scratch like the MB CLA; they simply lowered the boost and simplified the option list. A pretty shrewd and smart move for BMW if you ask me.
  • schtieglitzschtieglitz Posts: 1
    edited January 2015
    These comments are amusing. Nothing like the internet to bring together a bunch of armchair stoplight racers to talk all about a car they have zero seat time in. Well, I'll bite. I've had my 2014 320i with sport package for over a year and the car is sublime. I came from a 2010 6 speed GTI with stage 1 software. I have been running a BMS Stage 1 piggyback tune since week one and have had zero problems with it. The tune adds 35WHP/TQ and the car dynos at 210HP/230TQ at the wheels. The quoted 180 stock HP on this car is also at the wheels. This is the first thing you geniuses would know if you knew anything is that BMW has always underrated their cars. So the stock 320 is more like 210HP at the crank.

    The sport package includes the M sport suspension, M sport napa leather steering wheel, sport seats, increased top speed limiter and staggered HP summer tires. The handling, road feel, composure at high speeds and flat cornering are excellent and 100% BMW. The car is lighter than the 328 and 335 and my selling price on the car was $32k, down $4500 from MSRP. This gives me a perfectly balanced (ever heard of 50/50 weight distro?) RWD german sports sedan with the best 8spd Auto in the business. The tune brings it about 15HP shy of a 328i and I get 35mpg highway. Contrary to what a few of you said about how it is for 'snobs' and 'wannabes' and 'people who don't know about cars', I got the car because I do know about cars and I knew I could get a no frills sports sedan with excellent driving dynamics, world class suspension and handling for cheap. Yes, this car is cheap. If you don't think so, all I can say is that it must suck to be so poor. If you would seriously rather drive a Fusion than this car, you are just hopeless.

    The 320 has won entry level comparisons against the C250, IS250, CLA250, Audi A3 sedan, VW CC and Buick Regal, because it's the best entry level luxury sedan out there. And for a little more real world data, since you guys live and die by published HP and 0-60 numbers, Car and Driver and Road & Track clocked the stock 320i at 6.7 sec to 60, right in line with the previous generation GTI. If that's not good enough for you, tune it. If that's still not good enough for you, get a 328.. Oh wait, that's right. You can't afford it. Sucks to be you.

    Now all you guys need to do is save your pennies and In the meantime, keep on keepin' on in your Fusions, Camrys and other rental fleet turd boxes and bagging on every BMW review you see, talking about how they are too expensive and have 'lost their way', all while you have most likely had zero seat time in any of them. Waaaah.
  • RubbingmanRubbingman Western NYPosts: 1
    Thanks Schtieglitz. I am about to turn 90 K on my 2013 320xdrive. I have put brakes on the car, a turbo oil line\ and a thermostat control repair, all covered by BMW. I have gotten 40 plus miles to the gallon. Previously have owned 2011 535x and 2008 335x and have an 2016 x5 in the stable. My squawk list:is short: replace struts for a firmer, sportier ride, (that has soften over the years) so time to toss a few bucks at this little gem. I don't really feel the need to throw a tune at it, she does what I want, when I need it. I have a classic Porsche in the stable as well so if I feel the need to drive like a raped ape... I can.
Sign In or Register to comment.