Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
2013 Ford Escape vs. 2012 Honda CR-V Comparison Test
Edmunds.com
Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 10,315
Comments
They're pretty close in mpg and with the CRV's sluggish performance the driver probably has to punch it all the time and that uses more gas.
After reading this article I would choose the Escape over the CRV.
I'm with Tony, you sold me on the Escape.
It's true the CR-V does these things too, with even more space. But it sucks all performance out in exchange for the change from a car to a car-in-SUV drag. The Ford keeps the performance, and while it might not return the same fuel economy when driven 'normally', it can (SEL 2.0 4WD here, overall fuel economy at 25.2 so far, best tank at 30.3 just this past week). Even the 1.6 is more lively than the wimpy 2.4 in the Honda, and returns even better fuel economy, especially in FWD form.
And then, there's simply the ability to look at it as you go to get in (and enjoy what you see!).
The majority of buyers seem to agree. I don't think most are buying CUVs for utility, so much as improvements over a mid sized car. Those who really want utility either go minivan (spaciousness) or hardcore Jeep / pickup truck (real strength). Most of us will take some extra power in exchange for a little space and lost mpg's.
The Mazda is very intuitive and easy to drive quickly -- almost sensing what you want from the steering, brakes, suspension and engine. And the high road clearance and interior volume gives you the ability to cart a bunch of stuff down dirt roads or up wet and snowy mountain roads.
For those wanting a very engaging driving experience in an SUV the Mazda may be an even better choice than the Ford Escape.