Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Mine Would Be Blue, Expensive - 2015 Porsche Macan S Long-Term Road Test
Edmunds.com
Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 10,315
Mine Would Be Blue, Expensive - 2015 Porsche Macan S Long-Term Road Test
Our 2015 Porsche Macan isn't equipped how I'd have it. Here's what I'd get.
0
Comments
http://www.porsche-code.com/PG8IYM66
As someone who placed a Macan order yesterday I agree with almost of all of your recommendations, however I have a few comments:
(1) If you like driving sports cars, I think it's really worth considering getting into a Turbo rather than an S model with 20k worth of options (many of which are included with the Turbo). Sure - on paper the Turbo only has only 60 more HP, however the low-end torque is unreal & makes you feel like you're accelerating in a 911. Yes, the S model offers incredible performance, but if you have the extra cash I would at least think about the Turbo. I received a 5% discount off MSRP so my Turbo build came out to 10k more than a highly optioned S build.
(2) I think the Burmeister stereo upgrade is only "worth it" if you're A. rich, B. a serious audiophile, or C. both.
(3) It's interesting that you added Sport Chrono but did not add PASM which is recommended by most professional Porsche drivers. I would add PASM (with or without air suspension) before even considering Sport Chrono.
(4) Also - don't forget the low cost option of exterior trim in high-gloss or the free smokers package which improves interior aesthetics.
Here's the build that I placed: http://www.porsche-code.com/PGE47UQ0
No matter how you spec a Macan you really can't lose... it's a fantastic car!
Best,
Josh
-mm
(2) Little bit of B, but mostly I just like to be able to "feel" the music and, even loud, the Bose has no character. Just noise.
(1) Yep, Turbo has CRAZY acceleration (we got 4.4 to 60 and a 12.8 @ 105.9)
, but on the canyon roads around here, I just never needed that much power. And that's a phrase I've NEVER said before. It's a heckuva good car, I just like the S a little more on the roads here.
(4) High gloss? Not interested. Smoking package: That DOES look better.
Your build looks great! Congrats and let me know (either DM me through here on via twitter) when you get it.
-mm
White w/ Black
Painted Side Blades & Rear Fascia
20" RS Spyders w/ colored center caps
Gloss Black Windows Trim
3 Zone Climate
Premium Package+
PASM w/ Air Suspension
Sport Exhaust
Comfort Lighting
Sirius/XM
I configured my Macan for comfort since I doubt I'd ever take the thing to a track and it seems sporty enough for me out of the box. That said, I omitted all the performance options since I doubt I'd ever use them once the novelty wore off. I considered the Air Suspension, but the reliability of the system over the long term concerns me. (To say nothing of the cost of repairs.)
I can't imagine why anyone would get the Infotainment Package. $3000 for a mediocre (at best?) nav system? Can't bring myself to do it. (@Mike_Magrath: I'd love to know what your rationale is for wanting the infotainment system.)
As a pragmatic audiophile, the price of the Burmester system makes me question its value. I'm sure it's nicer but is it $5700 nice? I highly doubt it. And the Bose system? I'd just as soon take the $1400 towards the Bose and spend it on aftermarket audio. (I'd keep the headunit but upgrade the speakers and add a 8" sub.)
I'm on the fence with regards to the Lane Change / Lane Keep. I'm not sure if they work well enough to justify the $700 (each) asking price. I wish the Edmunds.com Macan had them (along with ACC) because I'd love to hear the staffs thoughts on Porsches implementation.
I briefly considered the Thermally and Noise-Insulating Privacy Glass myself, but after lurking on other forums for a bit the general consensus seems to be that it is NOT worth it.