Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
At around the 0:30 mark, "The Party" was soon to become the famed Whisky-A-Go-Go where many of the iconic performers of the '60s L.A. music scene made their names.
A bit further on, the Largo was a burlesque/strip club which became The Roxy, and next to it, the Villa Nova became the Rainbow bar & grill, both rather famous places on the street as well.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
I tried googling Bentley coupes from that era, and the only thing I saw was a Type R. And it looks bigger, to me. Also, the rear wheels on them look like they're either fully open, or fully-skirted, and not with that little lip at the top of the rear.
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
The name change may have helped, although in general, the '73 model year was better for everyone than '72.. In '72, Dodge sold about 49,000 Demons. In 1973, they sold about 79,400 Dart Sports (regular and 340). For comparison Plymouth sold about 227,000 Dusters in '72 and 264,000 in 1973.
On a percentage basis, the Dodge did better, jumping around 62%, versus 16% for the Duster, so there may have been some merit to that name change. Of course, it's easier to make a big percentage jump from a smaller volume, than an already high one, too.
2018 VW Passat SE w/tech, 2016 Audi Q5 Premium Plus w/tech, 2006 Acura TL w/nav
I liked the styling of the initial version of the Demon better, both the Dart front end with the angled corners and the different taillight design in the rear. Both it and the Duster suffered from a bit of a fat-hipped look around the rear wheels unfortunately.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
https://youtu.be/rSuiEY5JY6U
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
But in my opinion, they messed both of them up a bit for '73. The Dart got that little beak for '73, while the Valiant's front-end seemed to have some upscale pretentions about it. But either way, both of them managed to look a bit frumpy to me. Like something Aunt Fran might drive on "Mama's Family." Oh, wait
And it looked less hippy with the lower rear fenders rusted away.
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
Mama ends up buying a Nova in a pleasing shade of blue from Fred Willard:
But it ends up being a lemon:
Maybe it wasn't "born blue"
yup. no Prindle for me. Though my daughter always called her shift lever that.
now, I have some weird pushbuttons and levers on the Acura, and if I get the Maverick, that has a spinny knob.
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
2018 VW Passat SE w/tech, 2016 Audi Q5 Premium Plus w/tech, 2006 Acura TL w/nav
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
My memory's getting a bit fuzzy, but I think my '80 Malibu was "P-R-N-D-L2-L1" with the "2" and "1" being superscripted.
I had never heard the word "Prindle" until "Mama's Family" taught it to me as a kid. I have heard it every once in awhile since then, although often that's when the subject of that particular episode comes up. So, it has me wondering...was "Prindle" a common slang term in the older days, or was it just something that the writers came up with for "Mama's Family"?
As for that hippy look on the Duster/Demon/Sport, I always thought the narrow rear track on the Dart/Valiant in general, was a detriment to its looks. It didn't look as bad on the sedans and hardtops, but they did still look a bit tipsy from the rear. Most of them these days have wider, sportier rims and bigger tires on them, so these days they don't look so bad, but back in the day, when they were a common sight on the streets, running around on stock, skinny wheels and tires, they really looked different.
Mama's Nova...we had a '73 trimmed out like that one, wheels and all, but ours wasn't a Nova Custom like Mama's so lacked the rocker and roof drip rail moldings.
At the time, although in my mind I only compared them as 'compact cars' and not by price, I never could see why someone would choose a Maverick or Hornet over a Nova or Valiant/Dart. The latters just struck me as more substantial.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niAlyaTYi20
The '73 Maverick started at $2,248 for the 2-door fastback, while the Nova started at $2,377 for a base coupe. $129 doesn't seem like a big difference, but adjusting for inflation it's about $796 in today's dollars. Not to sound like a trust fund baby, but to me, $796 seems like chickenfeed, if it gets you into a car that you like better, but for someone who's on a budget, it could make a difference.
I wonder if there might have also been a bit of a difference in buyer demographics. I could see something like a Dart or Nova being popular as a primary/only car for a family, who didn't want the bulk of a bigger car. Heck, even in that "Mama's Family" episode, they got six people (Mama, Aunt Fran, Vint and Naomi, and Vint's kids Buzz and Sonja) into "Blue Thunder", before it blew up!
But with a Maverick, I could see that being popular as a second car. Have a bigger car for when you need to haul the whole family around, but perhaps use a Maverick for commuting back and forth to work. Or, one spouse drives the bigger car and the other drives the Maverick.
I know the Hornet is pretty much at the low end of the spectrum for domestic compacts back then, but for some reason, I just get this perception of it being a bigger, more substantial car than a Maverick. Its 108" wheelbase is shorter than the Maverick sedan's 109.9", but definitely longer than the coupe's 103.0". Maybe it's just something about the proportioning? I think the Maverick had more overhang, so I want to say even the 2-door Maverick was a bit longer than a Hornet?
So many manufacturers had problems with white cars. It was so bad on Fords they call it “Ford Fail White”.
2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic / 2022 Ram 1500 Bighorn, Built to Serve
2018 VW Passat SE w/tech, 2016 Audi Q5 Premium Plus w/tech, 2006 Acura TL w/nav
I will say though, that the standard hub cap in '73 was a 'moon', which looked better IMHO than earlier and later Nova dog-dish caps.
Car was light green metallic outside; a darker green inside.
Add whitewalls, and replace the replaced blackout grille with the correct standard 'argent' plastic grille, and our car looked just like this one:
https://gmauthority.com/blog/2019/06/this-super-clean-1973-chevrolet-nova-is-for-sale/
While the Maverick was fancy inside and out, it was clearly less of a car than the Hornet. It was slower, the steering was vague, and the brakes were lousy. Plus it began rusting with a vengeance after a year or so, and it leaked water and wind everywhere. The Hornet was not fancy at all, but it had good-feeling steering, disc brakes that worked well, and just felt much more planted to the road. It was also fairly zippy with the 258-6 and Torque-Flite and felt much more solid overall. I really liked how it drove and could see the appeal of one that had a nicer interior than what ours came with, though the dash design would have needed to be totally redone to really fix it, which they finally did when it became the Concord.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
2018 VW Passat SE w/tech, 2016 Audi Q5 Premium Plus w/tech, 2006 Acura TL w/nav
I did always like the looks of Hornet Hatchback, introduced for '73.
The posting about the instrument panels of Hornet and Maverick cars was spot-on IMHO. Early Mavericks just had an open shelf area instead of a glovebox, and I'm thinking Hornets (and Gremlins, which shared the same panel) had a shelf but also had a glovebox.
Without looking at pics, my old memories of the Hornet panel bring up smallish round instruments, bright green instrument lights, and a lot of hard plastic where you could see and feel it.
The Valiant and Nova panels, agree, weren't great, but they were better.
The Nova wheelbase was 111", only an inch shorter than a Chevelle coupe. The trunk space and rear-seat legroom bettered a '72 Chevelle coupe. I always wondered why they bothered to make both so close in size. The Nova was a good bit less expensive, but also more basic in its sub-frame/unibody construction, sedan-only bodystyles, drum brakes, etc.
2018 VW Passat SE w/tech, 2016 Audi Q5 Premium Plus w/tech, 2006 Acura TL w/nav
Found this pic online that looked a lot like ours right down to the color:
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
This one, before he rebought it painted gold/tan, appears to be the "Gold Duster" variant, by the badge:
Lots of special editions:
“ Numerous trim and option package variants of the Duster were offered with names that included Feather Duster, Gold Duster, Silver Duster, Space Duster, Duster Twister, Duster 340, and Duster 360. ”
I’d like either of the last two.
2018 VW Passat SE w/tech, 2016 Audi Q5 Premium Plus w/tech, 2006 Acura TL w/nav
I don’t know. I’d think do, given how you could mix and match things when you ordered a car back then. It wouldn’t have been a Twister, it would have been badged a 340 or 360. But maybe you could have gotten the performance options without the stripes and fake hood scoops.