Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Man, my next car is going to be a *tough* choice.
I cannot believe Saab will sell a N/A 2.5l version! Heck, it's a gussied up TS wagon! That surprises me, I figured it would be turbo only.
In fact, I think that is a mistake. All Saabs are turbos now, I believe, so they should keep it that way.
-juice
Bob
So THAT's why we didn't get the AWP and moonroof on the WRX. Those might be Saab exclusives.
That's what I suspect, even though I don't necessarily like the idea of Saab limiting what Subaru can offer itself.
I say put leather standard in the Saabs. Throw in thick carpets, wool or whatever, padded headliners, real wood and aluminum. People gladly pay for that stuff.
-juice
Depreciation is steep, though.
-juice
-mike
I'm with juice on most of this. People pay gladly for this stuff, true, but this stuff does not have a bearing on how well the car is screwed together. Padded headliners fall apart just as easily as vinyl ones do. Subaru was in the process of creating a nice niche for itself; if Saab becomes the upscale Subaru, the latter trends back to the old "inexpensive and built to stay that way" mantra.
Ed
Great marketing scheme IMHO.
-mike
PS: They are both rooted in aircraft so that's a link too.
it is the GM getting closer & closer to suabru that scares me......as long as they don;t mess with subaru mechanically, i am fine.
Sometimes I'm not sure I see things the way other people do. Right now I see the existing Subaru product line as an affordable and more reliable alternative to Audi and Volvo, maybe even to parts of the BMW line and, yes, even to Saab. The bargain all-weather performance car for people who don't need to impress the neighbors or clients with badge snobbery.
I dunno, maybe I need my medication adjusted today.
Ed
Ed -- I'm bummed too about the AWP not being an option on the wagon. It's going to be the gating item for me. In regards to the XT and Legacy turbo is that the 2.5T is a new engine. I don't want to beta test a second time around.
Ken
I'm hoping that this marriage moves Subaru in the direction of "no frills" performance across the board, not just in the Impreza line. For example, offer VTD, VDC, performance engines (and related transmission, wheels, brakes, tires, etc.) in "base" models. If you want a Subie with frills, it'll be at your local Saab dealer.
Definition of frills - wood trim, leather, power seats, etc. Make the moonroof optional on Subies.
Keyless entry & AWP are not frills! :-)
DaveM
-mike
paisan: Everyone, not just car companies, is in business to make money. If you don't make a good product, though, you are not going to get repeat business, which every company wants. You can only cut costs and overhead so much until your product suffers - even more so when it comes to services. If Saabaru quality drops to the level of GM's US nameplates (and I know about this, I've owned a Buick and driven many Chevy trucks), then I will look elswhere. No amount of leather, chrome, or free passes to the flower show will change that.
Ken - yes, I don't really want to be a beta tester either. That's the main reason why I waited until mid-cycle - 2000 - to buy the Forester. Good luck with Kana and the baby.
Ed
Bob
http://www.autoweek.com/cat_content.mv?port_code=autoweek&cat- _code=carnews&loc_code=&content_code=01780168
Join us tonight, 6-7pm PT/9-10pm ET for Town Hall Trivia Night and member-to-member chat – come test your knowledge and chat with fellow members!
http://www.edmunds.com/townhall/chat/townhallchat.html
See you there!
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Need help navigating? kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Share your vehicle reviews
http://www.autoweek.com/cat_content.mv?port_code=autoweek&cat- - _code=carnews&content_code=08965036
(As if my local dealers weren't already offereing $4000 off MSRP.)
I guess I'm not too worried about a WRX rebagged as a 9-2. I'm concerned more about the long term outlook for Saab (aka Subie-Lexus), if this is the 'new' direction it's getting taken to? Is it only going to be 1 vehicle? Or are we to expect all top end models becoming Saab's? How soon?
Makes me start thinking that the new Legacy Turbo will be more likely a Saa-buru to justify the cost points.
I'm going to keep my SU-BEAR-U plate, so I'm sure that my next vehicle (late this year/early next year) will be an XT to go along with that plate. I can't see getting SA-BEAR-U, ;-)
-Brian
http://www.autonews.com/news.cms?newsId=5069
Bob
I have no problem howver with Saab being the premium line of subarus.
-mike
a turbocharged 2.0-litre four likely to produce somewhere in the vicinity of 300 hp
The stateside STi gets a 2.5 turbo.
Either it's a typo or they're running the twin-scroll found in the JDM models. Maybe Saab has some budget left in their emissions restriction.
Ken
On the other hand, with all the problems Saab has had for years, I would not even consider them.
I now drive an Infiniti. Am I looking to Down-Grade to a Subaru? Maybe this is not a wise decision after all?
CUSAFR
Speaking for myself, It's not so much that I want this to happen, but more a resignation that GM, in some fashion, is going force Subaru to share a platform with one of the GM brands. That being the case, I would pick Saab over Chevy, Pontiac, Buick or Cadillac. The only other GM brands I would entertain would be GMC or Hummer, both of which are long shots at best.
Bob
You can/should buy a subaru in my opinion....esp if you live in the snowy areas.....
I don't live in the snow belt, but I plan to travel across the country and would like the security of AWD. Many others have, or are coming out with AWD, (including Nissan and Infiniti) but all my previous reasons appear logical including Subaru's long-term application/knowledge of AWD.
CUSAFR
www.fitzmall.com
for best subaru prices......
Basically it's my opinion that as long as it's a subaru vehicle, I don't care if it says saab, nissan, JLRP (JuiceLarkRSHollandPaisan), or GM on it.
"I now drive an Infiniti. Am I looking to Down-Grade to a Subaru? Maybe this is not a wise decision after all?"
It's funny you mention that, you essentially own a nissan, not sure why you bought infinity, most likely you bought the infinity for the options available on it, rather than the infinity name plate.
-mike
If the 9-2 proves successful, you can bet future 9-3s and 9-5s could also become Saabarus. The 9-3 could be built off the all-new Legacy, and the 9-5 could be spun off the larger upcoming 7-passenger crossover.
Bob
TWRX
I don't think GM is totally stupid
<snip>
Oh, I do. I think they've proven that they are totally stupid. They buy car companies with unique markets and followers and mash them together.
It's a stupid plan. Less choice, more mediocrity, nameplates that mean nothing.
-mike
SAAB
Make a list of what comes through your mind when you see the name. Maybe we'll see why Subaru would struggle in the luxo arena.
I'll start.
SUBARU:
All Wheel Drive
Rally
Commuter Work Horse
Performance/Handling
SAAB:
Performance/Handling
Luxury
-Dave
I'm not terribly fond of GM either though they've built some things that I liked a lot in an earlier time. Their automatic transmissions are among the world's best and their light-duty trucks, even with switchgear problems, have served my family well for many years.
I'm no industry analyst but I know that GM's old method of slapping different trim and fenders on the same body and calling it a Chevy/Pontiac/Olds/Buick/Caddy, then creating this social strata marketing campaign, doesn't strike me as being effective. This may sound like a generalization but the primary places I see GM vehicles that aren't light trucks or SUVs are in rental car fleets or in xenophobic parts of the country where people would rather die than not buy 'Merkin.
Ed
Saab is basically re-badged Opel already. They have no unique platforms. I bet Bob's right, the next 9-3 will be a gussied up Legacy, the next 9-5 based on the 2005 SUW.
If Saab fails, Saab fails, Subaru sticks around. I kinda like the idea of keeping a $30k price limit on Subies, because that's all I could ever afford anyway! LOL
The VDC probably had a limited budget, so the attempt at "near-luxury" was half baked. 4 speed automatic? C'mon, 6 speeds are arriving now. No manual controls, either, when even low-end Kias, Mitsus, and Chrysler offer that. Where's the wool carpets? HIDs? Navigation? Accords and Maximas have some of those.
VDC is a very nice mid-sizer, worth the $27-29k they actually sell for. It is not now, nor was it ever, a $33k near luxury car.
Saab can successfully make those, if given the resources, and if allowed to charge the price of admission to get there.
-juice
The only technology I can think of on Saabs that could show up in Subies are the cooled (not heated) seats, the HVAC ducts that are adjustable in all directions, and the "black panel" instrumentation I once saw on a 9-3 that allows the driver to black out all gauges except speedo and fuel. The latter wouldn'e be very popular with most Subie owners I know.
Hmmm...the Opel/Saab connection now has me thinking that it won't be the Legacy and 9-3 sharing platforms, but the Legacy and Saturn L series...?
Ed
Imagine they give Subaru 20% more budget for future models. We'll then see 5 speed autos, shiftronic, HIDs, Navigation systems, AVCS, etc. All luxury items that Saab would require, and would then be on the shelf for Subaru to sell as well. Or for us Mod freaks to install after the purchase.
-juice
NO, with Suzuki.....they did not mess with the technology...but used suzuki products & rebadged as chevy/geo
I think they will the same with Subaru...not mess with it. If it does, easy decision for me to get out of this messssssssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!
Saab insiders say they are looking at using the next-generation Subaru Impreza platform to develop a new small car for Europe. The problem is Subaru doesn't make diesel versions.
"The boxer engines (Subaru's horizontally-opposed fours and sixes) are stumbling blocks," says Lutz. "Nobody has yet done a boxer diesel. There isn't one in our portfolio."
However, engineering sources says Saab and Subaru are seriously looking to develop a diesel boxer for the so-called Saab 9-1 and the next-generation Impreza.
A Saab-Subaru SUV for the U.S. and a 9-1 for Europe are far more than just rumors. Perhaps GM will follow something akin to the Renault SA revival of Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. – with one attractive and desirable new car after another. Otherwise, Saab could be consigned to history.
Bob
oh and regarding the list earlier about what each brand name means-- to me Saab means TURBO. the base 9-3 has it with low boost for good low-end torque. higher end models have high boost. I don't understand why (besides cost) they would mess with that model and use a naturally aspirated 2.5L as the base engine for the 9-2. To me it's like having a non-AWD Subaru, turbocharged engines are that much part of Saab's identity.
-Colin
Ed
Doesn't look good for the long term...
-mike
Ghost of Isuzu Christmas Past
-mike
-Colin
http://www.autonews.com/article.cms?articleId=42416&a=a&b- t=subaru&arc=n