Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I guess of your choices, I would say "stealthmobile" would be the spirit of the reason people do it. I haven't had one done (de-badged) for several years and I've never had my windows tinted, but when I see a silver Mercedes or Audi or BMW with tinted windows, massive 5 spoke wheels/tires and debadged, I think it looks pretty cool -- and then I think too that it looks like a pimp's car. Yea -- a pimpmobile, that's option code "pmb" on page 29 of the salesman's configuration guide isn't it? Just kidding .
To each his (or her) own -- as my dear old mother used to say (she probably still does, since she is still alive and kicking). Sorry mom.
P.S. Get the sport package.
But they are fun, great performing, confidence inspiring and safe cars.
P.S. Get the sport package -- and at least test drive the 6spd for a minimum of one hour!
I started suspecting Mobil 1 now, because on AMSOil website, Mobil 1 0-W30 was rated last in some test.
Sometime in the next three years I'm going to be looking very hard at either an Audi 2.7T (or whatever the next iteration is) w/ manual, or an Infiniti G35 manual.
Time and again the Audi response is that Asian cars are dull as dishwater and have no "soul."
I've owned an MGB. It had lots of soul. The Miatas I owned later also had soul, but didn't break or leak oil.
You asked the key question that will help me decide whether the beautiful Audi interiors and mechanicals (Quattro) are worth the possible downside. I buy, rather than lease, and consider extended warranties crutches. The OEM warranty is (or was, at one time) meant to weed out infant mortality failures. Long-term reliability is either there . . . or not.
I guess there's been complaints about Audi reliability. I wouldn't dismiss them, of course, nor would I attempt to rationalize them. I do think cars need to be driven and maintained in the manner they were designed. I don't think taking the Audi to the convenience store (8 miles round trip - doesn't sound too convenient, does it?) is good for the car.
I settled on the Audi because it fits my style. I spent some serious time looking at just about everything in the class. In the end I went with Audi because I like the design, features, comfort, and performance. These are the real reasons to buy a car, in my opinion.
For what it's worth - I encourage you (if you have aspiring drivers) to to teach your kids to drive a car with manual transmission. And make their first cars manual. I'm convinced that if a study were done of accidents involving teenagers, and normalized for auto versus manual, there would be far fewer accidents involving cars with manual transmissions. Drivers with manuals are forced to pay more attention to driving. Another good reason - my kid's cars never got borrowed in high school or college. They were asked, of course, but nobody who asked could drive a manual.
Hope I didn't start a huge controversy (about manuals or using the A6 site).
My friends who do have some of these cars, Honda, Toyota and Acuras do grace the company parking lot -- do like their cars. The comments they make about their cars generally have nothing to do with performance, fun, safety or that generalized term "drivability." When the topic of cars comes up, the two folks who have Acura's talk about reliability and how long it has been since they last serviced the car.
The VW new beetle driver talks about how much he enjoys the car. There are 5 Audis in the company parking lot -- 4 A4's and 1 A6, presently. One of folks talks about the Audi in terms of how spoiled he has become because of the dealer and the Audi advantage. He comes in with just under 20,000 miles on the car and exclaims "they did all the work, replaced the wiper blades, even replaced the trim piece that I knocked off, loaned me a car while mine was being worked on and when I picked up the car it was washed and vacuumed." He has a mini-van which is a Chrysler product and while he appreciates the space for his wife and 2 kids and all the stuff that they need to haul around, he has lamented that it is not as well made or as reliable as his Audi. His last car before the A4 was a Jeep Grand Cherokee.
The other folks with their A4's also have remarked about the great service they get at the dealership in Cincinnati (Northland). But when they talk about their cars they discuss how much fun they have driving them -- "I got here early, turned off the ESP and did donuts in the parking lot while it was completely snow covered -- I got into a really cool four wheel drift." And so it goes. The 55 year old put the "factory" spoiler on his A4 1.8T quattro sport -- this is his second A4.
And so it goes. Anecdotal evidence to be sure, but it is similar to the Car and Driver TV show's comments about appliances and utility and reliability. No one wants an unreliable car, and my bet is that if these Audis were unreliable that their owners would not be repeat customers no matter how fun to drive they are (or were).
The Saab owners and the one BMW owner are cases in point. Both the Saab owners and the BMW owner discusses the great pleasure they have in driving their cars, but also comment about how they "have to visit their cars at the dealers" they are in for repairs so much. Actually, no one currently owns a Saab any more -- after their experiences with Saab, one fellow went Acura and one Volvo (the AWD "station wagon"). They both like their current vehicles (as noted above the Acura owner talks about filling the tank and forgetting it -- the Saab's fun factor plus reliability factor has soured him on "fun" when it comes to autos). The Volvo owner liked his so much he bought it off lease, gave it to his daughter and bought a second one for his wife (new) -- and this is the guy who had a Saab turbo that was often out of service for problems.
I do not think most of us on this forum are making excuses or rationalizing about our decisions to buy or lease Audi's. I have had dozens of them -- and I only kept one over 100,000 miles, so I may not be the poster boy for discussing reliability. But, my Audi's hardly ever go into the dealer except when I want them to. And, the only extra pampering I give them is more frequent oil changes than the manual calls for.
But, I do not claim that any of my Audi's have been as allegedly reliable as the stories I hear and read about from time to time that concern some Lexus or Nissan or other Japanese brands.
I have high expectations and the Audis have, for me at least, been almost trouble free.
Now, let me tell you about the fellow who owns an Avalon. . .he calls it his "bic pen" car. When it runs out of ink you just throw it away and get another, or words to that effect.
To each his/her own.
But so many people don't know what they're missing -- and they criticize them. I figure you can't say lobsters taste bad until you have tried one, if you get my drift.
All Audi dealers have electronic diagnostics that allow them to download vehicle data, and analyze any irregularity. Even camshaft/valve malfunctioning can be diagnosed. It would seem that any such malfunction, as you describe, would be discernible by such a test. I recently had a driveablity problem that was easily traced by the dealer, using the approach I have related.
If a dealer will not assist you (hard to fathom, but possible), insist on obtaining the Regional Service representative's number, and call yourself.
Let us know the outcome.
Tim's comment about "limp" mode sounds correct. It is a programmed operation that allows the vehicle to travel for short distances, at slow speed, when there has been a potentially catastrophic mechanical or electrical failure. My understanding, gleaned form an Audi engineer, is that its original intent was to allow a "damaged" vehicle to be removed from a potentially dangerous situation; i.e. in the path of traffic.
To reiterate: your dealer is caught in a time warp; the line: "we have to see it malfunctioning" was outdated by the the early eighties. Your problem is exactly what on board diagnostics were created to deal with. Give your service department a pink slip.
HELP PLEASE.....DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY CELL PHONE EXPERIENCE WITH THE 2001 A6??? I HAVE A 6 SPEED AND NEED HANDS FREE!
THANKS!!
http://forums.audiworld.com/a6/
You might want to ask your question there also.
But the greatest thing is NO dropouts, better reception -- than digital by far. The phone is a full 3 watts of broadcast power and null areas that always seemed to effect me here in Cincinnati have all vanished.
Here is what I did. I went to Verizon and purchased a Morotola world wide digital, dual mode phone with "call forwarding option on it" -- My wife and I have in addition the Audi factory phones in our Audis.
When I walk out to my car, I push a button on my digital Motorola i2000 phone that says forward. Then I turn off my phone.
All inbound calls now "ring" in my Audi.
My wife bought a package of minutes for her car which has a unique phone number, then I (for an additional 10 bucks a month, added my unique car phone number to her package of minutes).
We have three "cellular phones" -- two of them are affixed as god intended in our 2001 Audi's -- indeed we ordered our cars from "the factory" with the factory phone option and that is the way they came off the truck. We bought one of those packages which is 1000 anytime minutes, free long distance and 5000 evening and weekend minutes or some huge number like that because it is so cheap, then we pool our usage and "ta da" -- I have a phone that I can carry in my pocket that works anywhere on the planet earth (105 countries) with the same number and two car phones that can share minutes and again when I am in the car, I forward the hand held digital phone to whatever car I happen to be in at the time (either mine or my wifes).
Problem solved --
My friends who use the Nokia digital interface (described in detail on www.audiworld.com) still have drop outs, digital garble and all the other maladies associated with digital low power phones -- while I have the super power analog phone that blasts through null signal areas like a daisy cutter!
S. Florida has mandated hands free usage for fall of 2002 in certain areas, a move sure to be spreading across the state/country. While the hands free devices sold by cellular mfgs are better than nothing, the in-car phones are still the way to go. Unfortunately I think that auto mfgs are going to take advantage of this, case in point, in my BMW (sorry, bad word!)since I leased it off the lot, to add BMW (Startac) cell phone would require a cash outlay of $2,000 for the phone and installation, a lot of money for a $199 (retail for phone alone) phone!
Hopefully your analog service will remain available at reasonable rates. Down here we're out of luck, progress is good, right?
But that old shudder seemed to always be waiting to come back and when it rains was pretty clearly audible and "feelable." I wrote Audi another letter and they sent me an explanation letter that said the brakes worked as designed and that they were out of options.
It was a really nice letter and in spite of some frustration and disappointment in the message, I was NOT pissed off. The responsiveness coupled with my great dealer care plus the great Audi cars, pretty much means I'm sticking with the brand.
A couple of weeks ago, the dealer service manager called me and asked the follow up question "how are those brakes" -- so I said, OK from a stopping standpoint, but they are shuddering again. He said, how about this, "the Audi Advocate (a person who's job it is to be a customer advocate and a dealer advocate -- but who is paid by AoA) comes to our dealership every few weeks, I could arrange a meeting for you with him, if you would like."
I said to my Audi svce mgr, not only would I like to meet him, I want to take him on a drive in my car -- a nice long drive, up and down the freeway, on back roads and around the block. Guess what? They said "no problem." Last Friday I spent an hour with an Audi Advocate (he even had a German accent) and I gave him a test drive with me behind the wheel and then turned the car over to him (this Audi employee's personal car is a 2001 A6 4.2, BTW). He agreed with me and did something I had never done at speed -- he got the car above 60 miles an hour and pulled on the emergency brake while holding the button in -- talk about rumble, shudder, shimmy and sounds like from a supernova sub-woofer! "I think ve founder der promlem, no?"
Turns out we had been replacing front rotors (three times now), turning the rotors once with a new piece of hardware that turns the rotors while they are on the car and replacing the pads twice, balancing the tires, getting new tires and performing 2 all wheel alignments (and all of this in 18,000 miles)! Whew!
Tomorrow or Wednesday, I get all new rear brakes -- I am very optimistic because of the clear indication of the problem (at least so it seemed) -- and that it was from the rear.
The heck of it is, I only have 14 months to go on my 30 month lease, which means I'll be ordering a new car in October or November -- just about when I get EVERYTHING the way I want it. So the way I look at it is -- I have perhaps helped all of Audidom discover that the front brakes may not have been the "bad guys" after all. What a world.
Did you ever replace your A8? (with another Audi, that is?)
"My brakes suffer occasionally from what feels like a warped rotor, but isn't. Sometimes at higher speed, or not so high speed, I'll feel the pulsing or shuddering that normally indicates a warped rotor. But since this is at other times wholly absent, I don't understand how it could be the rotor. Also, the caliper/pad combinations on our cars can tend to trap moisture, and produce high spots on the rotors from oxidation. Perhaps this is what I'm experiencing, and several applications take the high spots down."
Despite this problem, I still love my A6's brakes. I continued: "I'm in an Avalon rental while my car is in the body shop and, boy, do I miss my Audi. The brakes on the '01 2.7T really are VERY powerful, and if you are ever in an emergency situation, they can generate serious stopping power. But even more importantly, I now realize how much I've come to rely on the fact that I can easily, quickly and with no loss of control take off as much speed as I need to whenever I need to. Most sedans don't offer that degree of margin."
Note that for '02, Audi dropped the larger brakes from the 2.7T. I suspect in part that's because they've been problematic. I think you also monitor AW, and you've probably noticed that a couple of drivers have had success fixing warped rotors by having them cryogenically treated. Others have said it's nonsense, but those who've done has said it's fixed warping
Needless to say I was dissapointed at these numbers considering that my best friend and I have personally purchased about 15 cars from these guys (including 2 Ferrari's, 1 Aston Martin, 2 A8's, 1 A6's, 6 996's (911's including an '02 996 twin Turbo - "can you say Acceleration", and 3 Boxsters) all within the last 6 years! I then tried to get hold of "a friend of a friend" at another Audi store and found he had moved to a BMW store, so I went to him, gave him a ridiculous offer on a 4.4 X5 and asked for too much money for my A8 and they countered within $1,000 of my ask on my car and met my numbers on the X5.
I have put an order on an '03? S8 (a new co-worker has a relative who owns an Audi store in PA - would have liked to have met him about a week earlier!) and am waiting for information on when this new bodied A8/S8 will be here. Until then, I'm Audiless (except for my co-workers 2.7 6spd that i steal now and again). I always keep an eye on this board to see what's going on and how everyone's doing. Keep up the good work.
The Audi rotors seem to be soft iron, so the only solution is probably an after market performance rotor. But that's pricey, and probably not something one would want to do to a leased car.
Please respond by March 9 to lordusky@aol.com
Any questions? Contact Edmunds.com PR at jfallon@edmunds.com
Thanks!
kirstie_h
Roving Host
Edmunds.com
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Need help navigating? kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Share your vehicle reviews
It's the best body shop experience I've had. The car looks literally as good as new, the cut lines are perfect and the paint is expertly blended. Just as importantly, the folks at Foreign Specialties are good to do business with. They're friendly, direct, and honest and do what they say they will. This is distinctly different from previous body shop experiences I've had. It looks like about half their work is Audi's. When I picked it up, we talked a little about their business, and the gentleman explained they started doing just restoration work. I think this helps explain their skill level.
And boy, am I happy to have my car back! I learned to appreciate it all over again. My initial positive impression of the Avalon faded fast because of uncomfortable seats, and handling limits that were low and scary as you approached them. This past weekend I had that car out on my normal two lane twisties, and it and I were unhappy. It didn't like them at even moderate speeds. It was joyless and worrisome as I attempted to transition through switchbacks. Poorly balanced, understeering, lacking in feedback with obviously no extra margins beyond it's intended uses. Even worse than my unlamented former ES300. It's OK, and even pleasant around town and up to 75mph or so on the highway, but go beyond it's comfort zone and you won't want to.
The quality of my A6 is second to none. It's beautiful, comfortable interior, build quality, handling (Yes, even with the non-sport compared to most other sedans.) and power are a total joy once again.
It is a blast to drive and none of these problems made the car undrivable, just annoying, I don't like driving a Mazda 626 as a loaner! The net of it is, while the car is a blast to drive, I cannot bring myself to get another Audi. Too much time in the shop.
2001 Prelude Type SH, 2022 Highlander XLE AWD, 2022 Wrangler Sahara 4Xe, 2023 Toyota Tacoma SR 4WD
At 5,000+ miles, every Audi I have ever owned (over 2 dozen) becomes a "new car."
I generally do nothing really special during the break in period -- except I try not to have any panic stops and I also do not hold the car in gear until redline, even though I might go to 75% of red line (and this applies to either the manual or automatic Audis I have owned).
These cars just are incredible at around 6 months or 5 or 6K miles and then again at 10K+ miles another shot of B12 seems to be evident!
With respect to the tires, I love them, would get them again, but have a comment about them -- they have a "tread wear" number of 360 -- the Pirellis P6000Z rated were 180, the Dunlop SP9000's were perhaps 200 (I'm a bit fuzzy on this). And, I know we are talking about three different company's tires -- but it is my hunch that the Yoko's tread life, to my comfort level at least, will not be twice what the Pirelli's are. Which is sort of understandable -- while they AVSdb's are all - season tires, they are also UltraHigh Performance tires. And, as you may recall they are 255 x 40 x 17" size -- a long life, all season, ultra high performance ultra low profile (super wide oval as they used to say) tire is like the old list of life which states:
You can have:
1. High quality
2. Immediacy
3. Low price
Pick two.
I get all season, ultra high performance but not long life -- this is my prediction.
On the other hand at $144 per tire from the Tire Rack, they are a lot less money than the Dunlop SP9000's.
The message: I like the tires, a lot. I will buy them again -- or one's like them if someone else builds a better mousetrap.
And, while not perfect, I am -- at least for the time being -- pleased with my brakes. Since I love the total car so much, I have put up with this issue, which as I have said previously is mostly really annoying (exacerbated by the fact that the car stickered at $54,000+).
PC
BTW the SP9000's had to be changed out at 20,000 miles -- my service manager told me that 18-20K miles on that tire was normal (to keep the overall balance of the car optimum). There was still some tread on the tires to be sure, but at about 20,000 miles there was some loss of grip (wet and dry) and some increased road noise.
If our ambient temp here in Cincinnati never dipped below freezing, I would probably feel comfortable with summer tires (Max performance) + quattro. But the max tires do have some issues with really cold temps that the all season Ultra high performance tires don'w have.
So again, if you do not want to have two sets of tires/wheels -- the AVS db's are only a small compromise. And who am I kidding, I so rarely get a chance to use the performance that even these tires afford, the slight improvement of the SP9000's (in our climate) would be lost.
If you live where it doesn't have much of a winter, the SP9000's are probably the best tires I have ever had -- but for RiverCity Ohio, the Yoko AVSdb's make more sense (IMHO).
http://www.forbes.com/2002/03/04/0304vow.html
Look at it this way, if you could get this car with a 12 cylinder engine for $45,000 you would have to at least consider it. So, don't take this article to your dealer and demand one of these babies for $45 grand.
I asked him about the 2.7T engine and my favorite topic, manual transmissions.
He said that the buzz among the dealers is that there will be no more 2.7T that it will be a 2.9 (T I presume, but he didn't say T).
He also said that there may be some more shifting in the product line than he likes, for example dropping the 2.7T allroad and replacing it not with a 2.9T model but with the already known 4.2. He says this will mean the allroad will move up in price -- which is fine, but that there will be a gap between the the curren A6 Avant and the allroad -- and that the S6 Avant will just be a "and more so" Avant with the 340HP engine.
I hope this is incorrect -- what would be the middle engine, perhaps as Tim says the W8 (from the new Passat?) This doesn't wash as it would seem to "steal some thunder" from the Passat and NOT differentiate the Audi VW family perhaps as much as would be desired.
Anyway, anyone else hear of a "for sure" discontinuation of the 2.7T? Oh BTW, the dealer said the 2.9T would be "detuned" to 275HP -- hmm same as the W8 and way below its potential, but with the 4.2 at 300, it makes Marketing Sense. If this is so, the chipmakers and aftermarket breathers (turbos, air filters, cat-back exhausts, etc.) will have a field day with this engine!
2003 is looking like a breakthrough year for Audi (and then who knows who will up the ante again, but it is certain it WILL be upped).
Reports says the A6 should be avoided due
to reliability problems.... are they more prone to
problems than others in their class.... I'm considering
the A6 4.2 ...any info appreciated
I love these things to death, but would not have one without a warranty.
As far as CR goes -- I think so much of their automotive writings are bovine scatology.