Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options
Comments
However, for engines requiring premium, I have experienced differences in performance, mileage and engine smoothness when running 87 octane, none for the better either. My experience has been consistant in running the engine with the octane that the manufacturer recommends. If Acura lists premium, then I would suggest that the buyer uses it.
The anti-knock capability that manufacturers have included with their engines is just for that -- to reduce or eliminate pinging and knocking with sub-standard octane. It is not to mitigate performance reduction. (Wasn't the SAAB Lambda system the 1st car to have the capability to run regular instead of premium without knocking?) My take is that Acura is basically telling their customers that if you want to run lower octane, go ahead. It will not hurt the engine and it shouldn't make unnatural sounds in the engine compartment. However, for maximum performance and mileage, use the minimum recommended octane that they have designed their cars to run with. As manufacturers globalize their car platforms and engines, they need to be able to run the engines in locales that may have varying levels of gas based on the limitations of the local refineries. In Europe, it appeared to me in June, that most "petrol" stations had mostly premium and diesel. The car I rented required premium according to the sticker on the gas cap door.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8844563/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/05/AR2005080501595.html?sub=A- R
Here are a few very brief excerpts:
*****
Automotive experts say using regular gas in most vehicles does no damage and makes no discernible difference in performance. Cars made in the past 15 years have such highly refined computer controls that the engine will adjust to the grade of octane in the gasoline, even in cars sold as requiring premium gasoline. Some drivers -- in some cars under some driving conditions -- may notice a drop in horsepower, but for most people behind the wheel, it wouldn't be enough to notice, the experts say.
"It's not going to hurt anything," said Peter Gregori, service manager for EuroMotorcars, a Mercedes-Benz dealer in Bethesda. In fact, Gregori has been using regular gas in one of his own Mercedes cars for two years, and "it's perfect," he said -- even though Mercedes-Benz says owners should use only premium.
"I get better mileage with the regular than I do with the high-test, in this particular model that I have," Gregori said. Among cars that come in for service, Gregori said, he can't tell which have been sipping premium.
I tested out regular in my wife's tsx. The car ran like a sick dog. This week...filled it back up with premium in hopes of exercising out those demon dogs. Next experiment....mid-grade.
29+ mpg is good, does your commute involve any city driving?
Also, Acura has catagorically stated that V6's, such as the Honda J30, WILL NOT fit into the engine bay of the TSX. So put thoughts of a V6 in the TSX out of your head. Besides, the added weight would spoil the wonderful balance of the car.
Now, a turbo on the other hand...
Johnny
I've only used premium gas. I'm not a hard driver.
Most of my driving is city commuting, but my previous car, a '96 Volvo 850, usually got 19-21 on this same commute. I expected the 4-cylinder TSX to do better (part of why I bought it). The one tank that gave me 19 mpg was about 50% highway.
I also think that the car is a little hard to start for a new car. My old Volvo always started right up when I turned the key. This one has to crank for a few seconds. Is this related to the poor fuel efficiency?
And yes...your 96 volvo got 19-21....but the tsx is probably a funner car to drive.
The car excels in mpg when you get some highway....trust me.
Anyway, the mileage on the first 3 tanks was the worst, with the best being 24.14 MPG. Since then (6 tanks), I have averaged 26.53 MPG with a best of 27.86 and a worst of 25.65 MPG. These are calculated values, I don't have NAV.
The I4 can really suck down gas if you don't drive easy, esp. given the weight of the vehicle.
Daily, my commute is 24 mile one way, one stop out of my neighborhood then 65 mph, into office, park.
That always yields 30-31.
No disappointments but little or no city driving. My week at fort hood was 50 miles of terrible city driving, short trips, the worst. 2.8 gallons to fill up before heading home. Like 18 mpg. Yikes.
How fast did you go to get 28 mpg?
This is in a car that is used 90% of the time for a 15 mile, 35-40 minute commute.
Is your highway mileage close to the rating? City mileage is generally lower relative to the EPA rating than the highway mileage. A lot more variables in city driving.
12mpg is hard to believe.
Uh, no, I'm asking you a direct question. I couldn't care less about dealerships. You must realize that 12-13 mpg out of a four cylinder engine like the TSX's borders on the ridiculous. That's why I'm asking. You might be surprised how many people have trouble calculating something as simple as fuel mileage.
I hope you get your situation resolved. I can't imagine what would cause such a thing, except for maybe insane driving habits. Good luck with it.
Just my 0.02.
I have been monitoring this forum for some time and have finally purchased my 06 TSX last weekend. I am still on my first tank of gas 240 miles so far and it says 222 left until empty. I averaged 37 mpg going home from the dealership 140 miles @65 mpg with air on. I have averaged 30 around town so far. I look forward to some solid numbers here. I will switch to synthetic at the oil change though.
My '06 has 7000 miles and gets anywhere from 23 to 30 mpg depending on the type driving.