Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see May lease deals!
Options
Subaru Forester (up to 2005)
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Doesn't it only have 122HP or something?
It's too bad, because I really LIKE the Matrix. But the Forester and the Mazda Protege5 are more fun to drive.
Ed
-Frank P.
Bob
http://www.veh-tech.net/
Ross
http://www.subaru.co.jp/forester/fascination/index.html
I downloaded the spec sheet and noticed a couple things:
- Three trims: XT (2.0 Turbo), X20 and X (2.0)
- Only the XT gets 16" rims
- VDC is an option on the XT as well as HID lights
- Rear LSD standard on all models
- Dual range 5MT only on X20 and X
- The X looks like a total stripper model that's built only to order
- XT gets EBD
- DVD Navigation system optional on XT and X20
Ken
Patti
1) Honda CRV, EX seems dependable, roomy, and not as expensive as some of the competitors. However, look does not excite me.
2) Tribute and Escape have a very appealing look and seem to perform well on the highway but reliability seems to be an important issue for one to contemplate.
3) RAV-4 is "cute" and looks like it would be fun to drive. However, no side airbags and small engine for an AT.
4) Subaru Forester has excellent safety rating but somewhat bland in appearance. Also, I have been informed by a co-worker that parts are hard to secure.
Does anyone have information on the 2003 Forester and if so, would it be worth waiting for?
Also, does anyone have any information on how the 1997-2002 Foresters perform in snow as compared to the others mentioned? My residence if slightly off the main highway and I traverse a steep asphalted hill which may be snow covered.
ckirk4: Go over to Future Models forum as well as scrolling up in this one. The 2003 Forester was introduced to the press on February 6 and has been the subject of much discussion here.
I cannot compare the other models you describe but I can say that my 2000 Forester does very well in snow, even with the OEM tires which are so-so. Dedicated snow tires would make it even better as many here who live in snowier climes than I (I'm in eastern PA) will attest.
Ed
-Frank P.
I'm on my 3rd soob (since 1992), and never had a problem with parts availability. Then again, I did not have much of mechanical problems either...
-mike
Oh well. I've been out of touch before.
I did have to buy a front door handle/lock for my '92 Camry last year and it took the dealer almost a week to get one. This belongs in the stupid dealer tricks column, but I told them what I needed done when I made the appt. and when I got there they said I needed a new door handle and they'd order it. Well, duh.
John
I notice the new Forester gets the cool lit key ring from the 2002 Outback, which is cool. Weather band radio, too.
I think Varmint brought up EDB and 4 wheel discs because Honda made those standard on the CR-V LX. Clearly he's a very educated Honda fan, and really knows what to point out in favor of the Honda. Kudos.
But I'm not a whole lot different with Subaru, am I? ;-)
But remember, that Honda does not even have ABS (!) on the LX model, so if you're comparing safety features Subaru wins easy (adding standard side air bags as well, not to mention AWD).
The specific topic was brakes, and I'm pretty sure the Subie would have the edge with 4-channel ABS w/drums vs. rear discs with no ABS at all.
Even if you step up to the EX, where you finally do get ABS, it's still a cheaper 3-channel system, vs. Subaru's 4-sensor 4-channel system. For comparison sake, the Acura TL gets a 3-channel systems, but the Type S gets 4 channels. Heck, even the S2000 only gets a 3 channel system. Honda cuts costs here, big time.
Plus, with 16" wheels and 60 series tires, traction will be much better, to make the best use of the brakes. Take my word for it - I've had both on the same vehicle, and it makes a HUGE difference. Light night and day.
I don't believe the CR-V costs less than a comparably equipped Forester. Once you add a cargo cover, cargo liner, fog lights, mud guards, cross cars, etc. to the Honda, plus installation costs, plus a 5/60 extended warranty, you'll see what I mean.
-juice
$465 5/60 powertrain warranty *
$85.20 keyless
$85.20 floor mats
$130.80 cargo cover
$135.60 cargo liner
$238.80 fog lights
$34.80 front mud guards
$310.80 side cladding
$178.80 roof rack cross bars
Total is $1665! WOW! That's WAY more than I thought!
Even if you don't want the cladding, you need carpets. The fog lights are a must because there is a cheap-looking plastic plug in their place.
So, Subaru accessorizes your Forester for you. Honda lets dealers charge extra for them.
Look at the site, there are actually several more small items that Subaru includes as standard (ash tray, lighter, etc).
-juice
* from Alton Blakley Honda, an extended warranty wholesaler, basically
Why don't you post that info over in the CR-V vs. Forester forum> Let's see what the CR-V crew says this time around.
While the CR-V did get improvements, Honda still nickel and dimes you for options. I don't agree with the counterargument that Honda is "letting" customers pick and choose. They're a business and are out to make a buck.
Ken
As for 3 vs 4 channel... Since the front brakes do 90% of the braking, I suspect that Honda doesn't put it on most models because they haven't found it worth the extra expense. Can anyone seriously complain about the braking of the S2000? Off the top of my head I can't think of any Honda that uses 4 channel without also having VSA (that's VSC to you folks). 4 channel is necessary for VSA so that the system can brake only one rear wheel. As with many things, Honda offer VSA on the JDM CR-V, but not the NA models.
Paisan - When my family owned Subarus (late 80's), Subaru had a reputation for protecting their dealerships. They didn't release parts on the open market. This meant that you had to pay the dealer's premium to get many parts when other manufacturers allowed free(r) distribution. That may also be part of the "myth".
~ferretboy
Varmint: you owned Subies way before their prime (which is now). How 'bout a WRX as your next car? ;-)
Indeed, Ken, I moved that discussion over to the "versus" thread.
-juice
Thanks,
Soon to be Subaru Forester owner, Jim
Cars have windows for looking outside.
Mine even has a big sunroof.
And an exterior temp readout that I think is a total waste. Touch glass - glass hot means it's hot out - glass cold means it's cold out.
I guess I just long for a simpler time
John
Personally, I love the outside temp gauge and use it daily. Sure you can roughly guess at what the temp is by feeling the glass, but that won't tell you that the temp just dropped to 32 degrees and therefore you need to watch out for ice on bridges and overpasses.
-Frank P.
Ed
And I do love the temp. gauge on our Forester. It has proven useful going skiing: the icy road thing, getting idea how cold it is for choosing which clothes to wear, predicting how much it will warm up. I remember by first trip across Texas in the winter. Wish I'd've had a temp. gauge! I didn't know HOW cold it was until I got out of the car -- yeah, the glass was cold, but hey, the reason I couldn't see out was the ice forming on the side windows...it was 17 F out there! And I might have figured out that that white stuff by the side of road, it wasn't waste-cotton left over from harvest...it was snow.
I sat in an MR2 yesterday, and it ain't much better. It also has less storage space, if that's possible.
Why weatherband? You gotta remember the type of folks that buy Subaru. Not your average folks. Imagine working alone doing winter photography in the snow belt, that type of thing.
Funny thing is I'd rather have it on my Miata vs. my Subie, just to be able to track rain. I once got stuck with the top down and got soaked very quickly. I see clouds, but 9 times out of 10 it doesn't actually rain. This was that 1 time.
An exterior temp readout is useful because you'll know when/if bridges may get icy. With AWD, you may get overconfident. If you know it's 32 or colder, well, it's nice to know.
I guess if the price crept up, I can see how come would object. But it hasn't. The 2002 Forester costs just $300 more than the 1998 model. That's a lot less than inflation over the same period, never mind that they added about a dozen things to it.
-juice
Any vehicle I purchase in the future will have to have a temperature gauge *tsk* ...pitiful.
--'rocco
...and I know paisan is going to rebute this with his KISS argument --what can I say *sigh*
--'rocco
We'd be at 40, though, not minus 40!
I had a cheap stick-on compass on my last car, and while I think it doesn't fit in with the Forester's nicer interior, I do miss it at times. I always know which general direction to head in, just not exactly which turns to take.
Maybe I'd like a Navi system after all, but that's a bit of overkill and big bucks.
-juice
Ross
For instance my '88 XT6 has a trip computer (temp/avg speed/extra odo/alarm clock/countdown milage) and full instruments (Oil Pressure/Water Temp/Volts/Fuel)
The guages are important especially when a car gets older so you can monitor things like the oil pressure.
Suprised yah rocco didn't I
-mike
Ken
*tongue-in-cheek*
--'rocco
--'rocco
Patti
Thanks,
Jim
The 2WD cars are sliding off of the road.
And I don't care what the weather is up ahead because I'm not turning back and I have clothes in the back from bathing suits to Thinsulate/Gore-Tex. Drive the road conditions and pray.
I was driving back from Hatteras years ago when a twister went through the Frisco campground and sucked a guy out of his tent and threw him in a ditch 100 yards away. He was okay.
Then there was the day at Rodanthe when a front blew through and our cottage was bracketed by six waterspouts. Luckily, they lose power when they cross land.
And I don't have time for gauges while I'm driving because I'm enjoying the view from the moonroof
Seriously though, my '86 GL wagon had oil pressure and volt meters and they ended up being a pain. The last six or seven years(out of 14) the oil was either too high or too low and the volts were either too high or on zero. Worry, worry, worry. I finally put duct tape over them.
Reminds me of an old Datsun with a check engine light that would come back on no matter what the dealer did. I drilled the dash and got the bulb with a very fine bit and never had another problem.
What is it Click and Clack say? "Put it in the self-diagnostic mode. Drive until it breaks and then you know what to fix."
I am now hooked on remote locks. But I want it to open the hatch if I punch it a third time. Not unlock - hands-free power open.
John
I didn't believe in extended warranties before, but now I am beginning to wonder if I should have purchased one. According to Consumer Reports, the 98 Forester is above average as far as reliability is concerned. But I wonder if I got a lemon. Anyway, I still love driving it and hate to have it in the shop.
1. I saw the Bronco II with its backend into the trees by the side
of the road...
2. And the rear of my 4x4 pickup took off with me and I ended up by the side of the road next to the tracks of the truck that had gone off the road ahead of me...
3. Then a guy came walking up to say that he'd just gone off the road about a half-mile back...
4. And the tribal cop couldn't drive any faster than I could walk beside his car because he kept spinning out on the ice.
Forester is dead last at 2.19 percent . Looks like it needs our help .
http://www.motortrend.com/
-tom
http://homepage.mac.com/gvmelbrty/
-tom