Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Offer him 20K. Point out that it's a year and a half old and the 2008s are coming out in 5-6 months(though wait until March 1 - it'll be hurting his bottom like just that much more. Also point out that so few miles meant it sat and sitting for a year isn't good for anytihng - it probably will need a new battery much sooner and of course, new gas and fluids and such. My take is - either you steal it or you just wait 5-6 months.
Gotta come in from behind the grille/cowling, like most cars.
Manual without a doubt is the way to go.
The door way on the RX-8 (not even using the suicide door) is probably the largest entry of any sports car out there.
My ex-Marine uncle is 6.4 and he got right into the driver seat with no problems. Of course he has a Mini-cooper that he loves to drive.
If you get the sun roof however, all this advice goes out the window.
But VOD's going to do a rotary engine podcast next week. Let's all jump on it. Let's show'm that rotor heads are still out here in large numbers!
Then the video showed a formula one rotary racer, kind of poor video quality. 14K revving was cool.
Wasn't as good a VOD Car podcast as I had hoped though. Stupid synthetic oil adds got spliced into video. Ugh!
fun factor? power? handling? roominess?
thanks.
I get the best of the both worlds. I prefer my wife's IS in city driving, especially in traffic. Its easier to drive in traffic. I prefer mine when ripping up backroads, twists & turns, and highway driving. The IS350 is pretty damn smooth though.
I love having a manual transmission in the RX8. Hers is an automatic, but it is smooth. No complaints-except for her annoying traction control system that is a pain in the neck to turn off. The 8's disengages with a push of a button.
Hers definitely has more power. Off the line, both cars are close to about 30 mph, and then she pulls away. Her car has noticeable low end power.
My 8 handles better, brakes better, and offers better resistance to body roll. I think mine looks better, and thats the reason why I drive it. Mine gets the driver more involved in the driving experience, and my wife agrees. It does not mean hers is boring. In fact hers is fun too. Its a matter of different tastes in styles of driving.
Hers has much better trunk space, more rear leg room, better gas mileage, and a much better looking interior. She doesn't have to check her oil every third fill-up and she does not have to warm up her car before turning it off. Does this mean I favor her car? Not really. I do not mind the anoyances of the RX8 because the payoff is the huge rev line and awesome handling.
My wife and I will go to our graves arguing which of our cars is better.
Just as a follow up, present day F1 spec 2.4 ltr V8 reciprocating engines revving to 19K and developing 800+ HP is far more impressive.
Clearly the racing V8s offer much more performance, but there's a big price tag. Normal folk probably can't afford to play, but I think anyone could swing a rotary racer for week end tracking.
The Mazda Club Chat is on tonight. The chat room opens at 8:45PM ET Hope to see YOU there! Check out the schedule
Thanks.
I used one of those styrofoam filled cushions under neither the car seat to prevent dent's and marks on the back seat itself. The styrofoam cushion helped lock in position plus it covered the entire back seat so as to provided a nice barrier to food particles and toy parts from falling down into seats crevises.
The car seat was installed for 9 months, until my son got to 8 years.
Also, revving to 3000 before shut off is also nice finish to any RX-8 drive, no mater how short.
Once you get into the habit, it's easy(I have had a lot of old cars with carbs so it's no big deal) and you should have zero reliability issues.
Of the colors, the dark grey/anthracite looks the best, IMO. The sunroof is useless, though - it's too far back to even see out of while driving and kills your headroom. Pass. Also pass on the packages - get the limited slip/traction control individually. The low-profile tires and bigger rims don't help nearly as much as just getting better tires for less money. The ride is a little bit softer, too, which is always a good thing in a sportscar.
I will buy a new car soon, have been reading about the RX8 for some time.
I know about the flooding issue and oil burning in the 8, but recently read a concern about proper oil weight, that the rotary's parts can suffer if you don't use the right oil. Anyone, what works?
And did anyone test drive a Speed6, then choose the RX-8? If yes, how come?
The proper oil to run in it, IMO, is a semi-synthetic blend. Unlike typical engines, the idea of breaking it in and seating the rings doesn't apply. You want as little wear and friction as possible from day one in a rotary, so changing oil is also critically important. A lot of people think that they are fine letting it go longer, because in a 4 stroke engine, if it's burning oil, putting in half a quart every few weeks kind of makes oil changes moot.(filter aside). Not so in a rotary.
It's a lot like a motorcycle. Have to warm it up, not rev it to death for the first few minutes, check the oil and fluids every week or so, blip the throttle when shutting it off... But the results you get from the RX-8 are well worth it, IMO.
The best answer to the question is to drive them both for yourself.
They are two completely different vehicles with completely different drivetrains. I really don't think you can compare the two.
I do intend to drive both the 8 and Speed6, just wondering if others already had done so.
As for weight, I don't know. I would suggest a bit of oil stabilizer in it, though. It makes a great deal of difference in my truck.(new, 1/4 of a quart would be about enough for a full oil change - mine uses a quart - lol)
Oh - I currently have an old 4-runner until I can get something better this fall.
Starting with a piston engine, they do burn oil. If they used no oil the rings and cylinder walls would wear out very quickly. Oil is needed between the rings and cylinder walls for lubrication. It needs to be a very thin layer, or the vehicle would use too much and not meet emissions as well as disappoint owners. Hence the "oil rings" scrap most of it off, but what is left is burnt. Note that on piston engines the rings and cylinder walls are exposed to the crankcase, and oil splashes from there to the cylinder walls (some designs also feed oil directly there). If you measured the volume of oil you drained out at oil change time you would find it was down about a quart (after 3000 mi of use). If it's not down it's because you have gasoline in the oil making up the difference.
Now for the rotary engine. There is no way oil can get at the equivalent of the rings (apex, corner, and side seals) and cylinder walls (rotor housing inner surface), as the rotor housings are continuous and the oil is held below them. So oil had to be injected into the engine along with the air and fuel. Getting this mixture "just right" has been quite an engineering adventure. Too much and you carbon up the works (NOT GOOD!). Too little and you quickly wear out the apex seals (the rotor housing surface is chromium and doesn't wear much if at all). Mazda switched to electronics to meter this oil in the 2nd gen RX-7 (1989), and has continued to use this method since. The Renesis engine has improvements over the 3rd gen twin turbo version with better electronics, but mostly in the nozzles that distribute the oil into the intake stream (trying to get the droplets small so the oil arrives more consistently - it's a very small amount of oil and surface tension makes it difficult to distribute the small quantities required).
Mazda could have used a separate injection oil tank, like two stroke street motorcycles used just before they went the way of the dinosaurs (my Yamaha RZ350 and DT200 both use this method, with a metering oil pump). I suspect it was considered too complex and required too much faith that owners would keep enough oil in a separate tank, so engine oil was used, from the oil sump.
As for the thought that the rotary is some kind of two stroke engine, it is not. It is a "continuous combustion cycle" engine. The misconception is easy to get due to the oil injection, and the fact that there are no valves, that the engine is "piston ported" (rotor ported actually). You can visualize the equivalence of four "cycles" however. Facing the front of the car, the rotors turn clockwise, intake occurs in the 9 o'clock to 11 o'clock part, compression from 11 o'clock to 2 o'clock, ignition from 2 o'clock to 4 o'clock, burning or power from 4 o'clock to 6 o'clock, and exhaust from 6 o'clock to 9 o'clock. The rotor turns at 1/3 the speed of the the "crankshaft" (eccentric shaft). Note the power part or burning of fuel occurs at the bottom of the engine. This was done just in case there was a coolant loss. The hottest part is the last to loose coolant.
So, I think you'll find the RX-8 uses just a little more oil than an equivalent piston engine (one with 230 HP). I find it's not necessary to add oil between changes. The amount of oil carried is enough that the injected (and burned) oil decreases the level just enough that at change time you are down to "add oil" levels, but still safe to run.
Do keep an eye on the level, however. Certain use methods can use oil faster than others. And you don't want to EVER overheat or run low on oil with a rotary engine!
I find it interesting that owners complain as if the engine is faulty somehow for doing what it should normally do. Mazda needs to put a page in the brochure and manual explaining how it works and why you need to add a little oil regularly(as opposed to every 3-5K miles in a typical 4-stroke engine). The engine also appears to have a much smaller amount of oil in it compared to a typical 4-stroke, so being a quart down is more of a problem whan when you have 8 quarts total.
Me? I would have had a separate little tank and used a special oil. Less chance to get the thing messed up if the oil is always "rotary oil"(some specific weight/etc that works best). But I can also see a LOT of people doing zero maintainence on their cars and it dying as a result.
Either way, it's reliable and fun if you do the preventative maintainence/checks every weekend.
You're assuming the average owner reads the manual...
Better look again. The RX-8 holds at least 5 litres of oil. You can't drain it all out, because it's held in the cooler and you also can't fully empty the oil pan. We fully drained ours once, and had to put in the full amount. Shocking! I started calling it "the truck".
Also, Mazda has played fast and loose with the dipstick, raising and lowering its' calibrations (full and add marks) a couple of times since introduction. So it's kind of hard to know when you -really- should add oil. If I'm near change time I let it run a little low. Some have stated you can actually run it a quart low with no problems. Don't try to race it like that though! In hard cornering, the oil -could- slop away from the pump pickup. That would be a "bad thing" (tm).
Also, Mazda has played fast and loose with the dipstick, raising and lowering its' calibrations (full and add marks) a couple of times since introduction. So it's kind of hard to know when you -really- should add oil. If I'm near change time I let it run a little low. Some have stated you can actually run it a quart low with no problems. Don't try to race it like that though! In hard cornering, the oil -could- slop away from the pump pickup. That would be a "bad thing" (tm).
****
You just made my point. The design of the engine tolerates a low oil condition much less well than a typical engine. So you have to check the oil every couple of weeks. Of course, if you have a bike or an old classic car, this is perfectly normal. A little extra work and you're good to go. But the RX-8 isn't a put gas and forget it Honda Civic, either.(and it's not washing machine bland, either
The oil temp rises as there is less mass getting cooled in the pan.
The anti-wear additives are being worked X times as fast (depending on how low the oil is).
I am about to make an oil change for the first time since I came to Korea and have a little bit of problem :confuse: . The manual says I am supposed to use 5W20 and I remember sometime ago on this board that synthetic oil is not good for rotary engines. Well, there is the problem. Apparently, it is not easy to purchase regular petroleum 5W20 here. Synthetic 5W20's are sold in a specialized stores for racing car tuning but not petroleum oil. Just wondering if I can use synthetic oil at all. Or, petroleum 5W30, which I can also purchase here. If neither, I should order oil from overseas (which is whole another problem).
Thanks.
Please note, synthetic is also petroleum oil. It's just got certain petroleum molecules in it that don't occur in nature. They have to be converted from "normal" oil. In fact, these days, most synthetic oils have moved back to being very close to normal oil. It's expensive to convert to the group 4 molecules and they are using group III more often now (eg Mobil 1 has changed from group IV back to group III last I heard). I think Royal Purple, Redline, and Amsoil still make group IV, and the German Castrol was group IV as well. Don't know if it's still available. Only reason I mention this is many think the group IV works best in the synthetic world.
Mazda allege synthetics will harden certain seal materials in the engine. Lots of people use synthetic oils with good results. As always, YMMV.
Anyway, after some extensive search for 5W20 non-synthetic, I did find a website which says they import such. I know you are in Canada, and this particular brand is Petro Canada. Is it a good oil? I think they have SL and ILSAC GF-3 seal.
Thanks again.
For example, I learned synthetic group III oil doen't harden seals like group IV and group V does. So if that's true, Mobil 1 would be fine in the RX-8.
At any rate, I don't think you have to be really worried. As long as you stick to the grades specified by Mazda it should work just fine. The weights are not that critical, except for mileage. Especially if you are sure to warm the engine up before reving it or putting high loads on it.
Mazda are walking a fine line re fuel economy in the US, hence the insistance on 5W20.
After reading about the RX-8 for two years, bought a 2005 Nordic green last week. Can't make the smile go away -- I'm wondering, when using the paddle shifters, is there an 'ideal' RPM level to shift from one gear to another? Is it the same to go 1-2, 2-3, etc.? Thanks for any help.
Performance dictates that you shift at 2/3 to 3/4 of maximum(bottom of the red/orange area) if possible and try to always maintain about 2/3 max rpm. this, as expected, kills gas mileage.
Maximum mileage you want the thing to barely be moving - so never let it get over about 3000 rpm if you can. Yes, it will be glacially slow by comparison. And you might as well be driving a Civic.(ie - you get this car to DRIVE it)
(Automatic is limited by software to not blow itself up as opposed to the manual with is limited by software to not blow the motor up)
When I have driven them I pound it up to 6-7k with impunity. It'll take a while for your ears to get used to hearing it whine like a sportbike. Of course, make sure it's properly warmed up before flogging it. Give it a mile or so to get going, sort of like if you owned a motorcycle.
Any yes, it is a crazy fast car for the price. Wind it up hard and you're essentially getting the same results as a ten year old 911.(non-turbo of course)
1995 Porsche 911 Cabriolet 6.4 14.5
1997 Porsche Boxster 6.0 14.5
2004 Mazda RX-8 5.8 14.49 (6 speed) (MT Mar '04)
Yes, a real shocker. In manu-matic mode, expect to add about 1/2-1 second, which is still very very fast.