Older Honda Accords

1…306307309311312…389

Comments

  • rphillips2rphillips2 Member Posts: 40
    Justin,

    What did you trade for?
  • justinjustin Member Posts: 1,918
    got a VW Golf. so now i have a Miata for fun, and a Golf for commuting and utility. fun :)

    Honda resale value is still pretty good BTW.
  • tribblestribbles Member Posts: 56
    Most of the 17" wheels I've checked are 20lb or less incl chromes. If stock is 30lb, weight should not be an issue.
  • rphillips2rphillips2 Member Posts: 40
    Justin

    I am surprised you went to a standard Golf from a V6 Accord. I could see you in a GTI or GLI to keep the same power.

     I am looking at the V6 Accord to replace my Mini Cooper S I just sold since it has much better low end torque around town. Your brake problem worries me since I do drive aggressively around town. I have owned cars before that were hard on rotors and don't want to go there again.

    The Accord sure is tempting.
  • 03accordman03accordman Member Posts: 671
    Folks,

    The tires on my 03 Accord with 45k need to be replaced. I don't like the OE Michelins, and they are expensive too. Any suggestions? I drive aggressively, and place more importance on grip than long life of the tire
  • justinjustin Member Posts: 1,918
    i have to say, if you are looking for a car to drive fast and brake hard, be prepared to have brake issues based on mine and others experiences, if you get the V6 Accord.

    the Golf is fine for me. i have learned with vast VW experience, the most simple VW is the most reliable :) just think, the Golf will make my sports car (Miata) feel fast! having the Accord made my Miata feel slow, haha.

    you might be totally fine getting an Accord. you are familiar with rotor/pad issues, so at least it won't be a NEW problem like it was to me.
  • tcvb22tcvb22 Member Posts: 50
    Why did you trade it in - did you not like it? What did you get in its place? I'm considering the 05 Accord ex V6 and the 4 cyl - not sure which one to go with.
  • htthtt Member Posts: 75
    It's funny. I have an '04 Accord EXV6 and I think it's too big for everyday commute. I wished I bought the Mini S instead. I think it would be more efficient for everyday use (less gas, space, etc).

    My Accord is not bad or anything like that. It actually is very solid and powerful. It takes off so fast if I floor that gas pedal. the problem is I have to look around for cops before I do that. This car is not designed for 60MPH speed limit.
  • justinjustin Member Posts: 1,918
    I got rid of it for several reasons. Didn't need the space. Brake issues were always there. Rattles/squeeks refused to go away. And since I have a second car now, I just didn't need the expense of the Honda.

    I recommend the V6 for anyone that wants smooth economical power in a very roomy car.
  • tribblestribbles Member Posts: 56
    Are you saying even the new accords have brake issues. All three of my accords - 1 '87, 2-'93 had excessive wear issues that I got a lifetime warranty for the brakes on all of them. I still have both '93 and now an '05 EX-L. I guess I will plan on getting a lifetime brake warranty on the '05 as well when the time comes.
  • rphillips2rphillips2 Member Posts: 40
    On a hot summer day with the ac on, the MCS is really slow until you get the revs to 3500 and above. If you want to accelerate quickly from a stop, you have to slip the clutch a bit and get those revs up.

    After 3500 or so it takes off like a rocket. To keep up in Atlanta traffic, you must drive it like a race car almost all the time. It's fun for a bit, but too tiring in traffic.

    If you live outside a metro area it would probably be the perfect car.
  • rutger3rutger3 Member Posts: 361
    Try BF Goodrich Traction T/A in H speed rating.
  • clint98v6atclint98v6at Member Posts: 54
    If you don't want to go the summer tire route and and want to stick with an all-season, check out the Bridgestone Turanza LS-H or LS-V. The Tirerack website has reviews on these and other brands.

    I'm very happy with my LS-H's.
  • anonymouspostsanonymousposts Member Posts: 3,802
    Good luck with the Golf. Hopefully, after 6 years of building this body-style VW has gotten reliability more on par with the rest of the market.
  • justinjustin Member Posts: 1,918
    fingers crossed. i think they have worked out the bugs. you couldn't pay me to buy the MK5 Jetta or Golf though! CR doesn't recommend the Jetta, but they still say the Golf is okay. must be the Brazil (Golf) vs. Mexico (Jetta) thing ;)

    anyway, car is so basic, nothing to break at this point. they got the MAF issues worked out. and its the old 2.0 so no coil issues. window regs are worked out too :) those were the huge MK4 Jetta/Golf issues here in the states.
  • tcvb22tcvb22 Member Posts: 50
    Someone was saying that the the 2.4 has a smoother ride and better suspension than the V6. Can someone comment on that?

    Thanks
  • justinjustin Member Posts: 1,918
    I will tell you that yes, my 2003 V6 Accord had brake issues. Its a matter of underdesigned rotors and pads. I would not be surprised if for 2005 there was a silent change in materials and/or size of the brakes. One other person on here got rid of his Accord for the same reason.

    But, if you have the 2005 Accord, don't LOOK for brake issues. Just enjoy the car and worry about problems IF they show up. Easier said than done, I know :)
  • tcvb22tcvb22 Member Posts: 50
    I had a 91 honda that needed a new transmission after 85,000 miles. I'm now going to get a new 2005 and was wondering if the 2.4 has a better transmission than the V6
  • gee35coupegee35coupe Member Posts: 3,387
    We may have one too. It's a vibration. Barely perceptible right now. And it's not a warp type feeling. It's a higher frequency vibration than any rotor warp I have ever had. I'll post more if it gets worse.
  • justinjustin Member Posts: 1,918
    check your tire pressure. as you know, Honda's are REALLY senstive to that. and you can feel what the wheels are doing especially when you press the brake.
  • gee35coupegee35coupe Member Posts: 3,387
    The MXV's are as smooth as glass...until I brake. You have to paying attention right now. We'll see how it progresses. Thank god it's a lease.
  • bobstbobst Member Posts: 1,776
    We may be buying a 2005 Accord this winter. A 4-cyl 5-sp EX with cloth interior. What should we look out for in the test drive? These are the things I am aware of:

    1) Rattles. Which ones are the most common?

    2) The car should track perfectly straight with my hands off the wheel.

    3) The brake and clutch pedals should feel right.

    4) When I apply the brakes, the car should stop in a straight line.

    Anything else come to mind? Thanks for your ideas.

    Bob
  • hmurphyhmurphy Member Posts: 278
    Didn't you have some brake work done after a "carwash incident" or was that a prior Accord?
  • azorglubazorglub Member Posts: 43
    Good luck with your Golf. I have a 95 GL (the basic one...), and it has been the worst car I've ever owned. The list of things that failed on that is way too long for me to go through it now. A few examples: door locks, fan bearings, dashboard lights, speedometer and tachometer, etc.

    Hopefully, the newer models are more reliable. Also, spares are quite expensive.
  • zitchzitch Member Posts: 55
    As for #2, I find that this newer model Accord (at least the 2003) can be more sensitive to crosswinds and road crown than other cars. I find that my 2003 Accord will track in either direction on my daily drive to work, based on those conditions, if I let go of the steering wheel. Not necessarily a bad thing, it is probably a side effect of giving the driver more "road feel", but something you should be aware of.
  • bobstbobst Member Posts: 1,776
    Our 1999 Accord feels very stable on the road, so I will make sure any new model feels just as good.

    In 2002 we rented a Nissan Maxima for three weeks when we were on vacation out West. The engine was wonderful, but the car did not feel nearly as stable on the road as out Accord.
  • gee35coupegee35coupe Member Posts: 3,387
    But I did just have them turned because I turned the front rotors blue. I'm gonna try Brembo drilled rotors next.

    This is our third of this gen. It sat on the lot for months before we bought it. I was concerned about the thick rust when I bought it but thought the problem corrected itself.
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    But gee, with your CCB disorder it may have only been 3 months ago so some folks may be confused.

    :)
  • tribblestribbles Member Posts: 56
    My '87 had 199,000+ when my grandson totalled it
    original auto tranny and engine.

    My two '93's (LX Auto) both have 165,000+. Only major things other than brakes have been two scheduled timing belt replacements on each (incl water pump of course).

    I expect our new '05 EX-L will provide years of great service again. Luv that Navi although sometimes it takes me the long way around to get to a freeway entrance. My wife is always a nervous wreck when I read maps while driving.
  • cookecompcookecomp Member Posts: 1
    Just picked up my 2005 Accord LX. Owned a 2001, then a 1998 LX before that. This new one's a gem. Handles even better -- but a couple of quibbles, and wondering if any other 2005 owners feel the same? The driver's seat doesn't seem to have as good lower back support -- and there's no way to adjust it, with that little wheel on the side, like my previous Accords. Also, Honda did away with a couple of my favorite "cubbie" storage areas -- both on the dashboard. My previous Accord had a little pull-out drawer to the left of the steering wheel, a great place to store toll $$$, also a flip-open little box right under the CD player opening. Both of those storage areas -- gone! Boo, Honda!
  • venus537venus537 Member Posts: 1,443
    well the seats are suppose to be a big improvement over the previous generations. personally i find that to be the case but everybody is different. honda made a big deal about how great their seats were when the car was first release.

    i'll assume that little wheel on the side you're talking about is the lumbar support. this has always been available on the EX models but not the LX models.

    the area to store the toll money is now in the upper level of the center console (but you probably know that). granted, the little drawer on the left was more convenient. fortunately i don't live in a state with pay tolls. i don't think the new accords have any less overall storage area than before but is instead situated differently.

    enjoy your new wheels.
  • richards38richards38 Member Posts: 606
    Just my opinion, but the Accord EX-L seats are among the most comfortable of any I've sat in.

    Note especially the length of the driver's seat cushion which on many cars is too short for thigh support. The Accord seats are better than those in many luxury cars IMO.....Richard
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    All of these points are fine except for # 2.

    No car will track "perfectly straight" for very long. You will know instantly if there is a problem since you are used to driving Accords.

    All cars will drift to the right after awhile depending on the crown of the road.

    If you opt for leather, you'll get the nifty XM radio, heated seats and dual climate controls.
  • stragerstrager Member Posts: 308
    http://www.autoweek.com/news.cms?newsId=101151

    Honda is trying to blame the expected sales drop on higher gas prices. Why don't they admit that the American design team screwed up the Accord by giving it Buick styling?

    People buy Japanese cars because they want Japanese styling (just look at the terrific TL), not GM/Saturn styling!
  • chucko3chucko3 Member Posts: 793
    Didn't see too many people at the Honda booth at the Auto Show in Boston this weekend. More people at the TL & MB.

    The wife really likes the TL & Highlander. I guess those are the choices to replace my 89 Accord when the time comes.
  • nfjimcnfjimc Member Posts: 21
    Can someone tell me the difference between a Fram or STP replacement air filter and a K&N? Aside from the fact that the K&N costs about 8 times as much, I'm wondering what the big differences are before I order one? Thanks.
  • tcvb22tcvb22 Member Posts: 50
    I'm still debating over the Accord Sedan 3.0 EX and the 2.4 EX-L. Noticed that the EX 3.0 has the Drive-by-Wire Throttle System and the Traction Control System(TCS). Aside from the V6 -are these 2 other features worth the exrta $$. Thanks.
  • htthtt Member Posts: 75
    The Accord actually is designed in Japan. It has the same styling as the Inspire which is only sold in Japan. The Acura TL is designed in the States and only sold in North America.
  • maxhonda99maxhonda99 Member Posts: 1,289
    THe Fram and probably STP are throw away filters. You use them for approx. 15K miles and toss them out and get a new one. The K&N will basically last the life of your car. All you have to do is wash it with a hose and apply some of the K&N oil and put it back in.

    REgular filters are also made out of paper, whereas the more expensive filters like K&N are made out of a fabric type of material that supposedly let's more air pass thru and is more durable.

    The K&N filters are also *supposed* to give your car more power. The idea is more air passes thru therefore you gain a few BHP.
  • tribblestribbles Member Posts: 56
    I can only compare with my '93

    Better seat support
    I kinda miss that pull out drawer too and I use it same way you do. Have ones in there in my '93 for toll. I do have the coin holder on the armrest on the '05. Wife like the armrest height on the '93 better.
  • smpearsmpear Member Posts: 11
    I had another near miss accident this weekend driving 40 when an SUV pulled out (w/o looking) in front of me from the right side street. I slammed the brakes hard and felt the ABS doing its thing. I had to steer while braking to avoid the wreck and the card handled flawlessly.

    I have had 2 other near misses in the last year during which the Accord ABS and good handling characteristics helped me avoid a smash up!

    Needless to say I am quite happy with the handling and performance characteristics of my EXV6.
  • lmacmillmacmil Member Posts: 1,758
    Only you can decide if those features are worth extra $ to you. TCS will be handy if you encounter snow a lot. I'm not sure of the benefit of drive by wire. I know it was implemented poorly in a BMW X5 I drove and the gas pedal acted like an off-on switch in the first inch or so of travel. To me, the V6 alone is worth the price differential.
  • pyroman002pyroman002 Member Posts: 3
    On my new 05 accord the cover over the DC power outlet in front of the shifter does not rise up once it is popped up as does the adjacent compartment. The piston/spring holds it down once it is opened. Is this normal or malfunctioning? If so, I plan on getting the dealer to fix it.
    Thanks.
  • gregoryc1gregoryc1 Member Posts: 764
    The modern automobile engine is a balanced system. If you change one thing you alter the entire system. That is why it is VERY important to use original replacement parts in the system. Filters are a part of that system. Change the air flow into the engine, and you introduce a new variable into the engine's computer command system. This is especially true when you replace engine sensors. Aftermarket units might not be exactly the same as the original. Stay with the original Honda filter. It was designed for the system.
  • maxhonda99maxhonda99 Member Posts: 1,289
    I have a AEM Cold Air INtake system on my 2K Accord V6 and it hasn't changed anything except added more power, although slight, at the top end. Gas mileage hasn't changed nor has anything else changed. Also my car has Comptech dual mufflers out back. Car runs perfectly fine.

    I would agree you are altering the *system* but you are not causing any damage to the any system.
  • hdjcpahdjcpa Member Posts: 15
    Since 1984, I have purchased 4 Honda Accord Sedans brand new: 1985, 1994, 2000 and 2004. They have all been 4 cyl manual shift and I have been extremely satisfied with enough power. You have to consider the after-purchase cost factors. You see, with the 4 cylinder, you use regular gas, but with the V6, you have to user a higher octane. Also, I'm sure regular routine maint must cost less on the 4 cyl as to the v-6
  • tcvb22tcvb22 Member Posts: 50
    I heard the 87 octane is just fine for the Accord EX V6 ifn fact it states in the specs that regular unleaded is recommended
  • tcvb22tcvb22 Member Posts: 50
    Which car handlesbetter in the snow the 2.4 or the V6?
  • maxhonda99maxhonda99 Member Posts: 1,289
    I don't think there is going to be much if any difference between the cars. It's probably going to depend more on which car has which tire model.

    THe V6 is a bit heavier but also has a bit wider tire. I would say both would basically be equal.
  • carzzzcarzzz Member Posts: 282
    Just wondering when will this gen of Accord be redesign/ move to the next gen? THis gen has the "all time ugliest back-end"!
Sign In or Register to comment.

Helpful Tools

Most popular vehicles

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.