By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Car_man
Host
Smart Shoppers / FWI Message Boards
Anyways, I am going to trade the car. I will take a significant financial hit on it, but I am just not happy. At least now I know.
You liked the vehicle at one time, maybe you are over-reacting. A good body shop should be able to fix it to your satisfaction.
With respect to the engine light I suggest that you consult a mechanic.
The bottom line is that you may be paying much more to trade your vehicle than it would cost you to bring it up to a standard that is acceptable to you.
I'd find it tough to be happy with the car after all this, too. What a bent Bentley dealer! Sheesh.
Good luck.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
It is obvious that the car offends you. I say, pluck it out. Get rid of it. Trade it in, give it to the salvation Army, deep-six it, leave it in a bad neighborhood with the door unlocked and the key on the front seat, whatever.
Ed
In my book $500 is less than $9000. So in my book it's a no brainer what you should do.
Here's a thought. If you haven't irritated the sales manager too much where you bought the car, perhaps you can arrange with them to have the body/interior work done at the dealers (wholesale) rate. I'll bet they could arrange this and maybe you could have it done for $200 or so.
It's worth a try !
$500 isn't bad. What did you find out about that engine/service required light?
Every dealership that sells used (or even new) cars needs paintwork/interior work done on some of their cars. They must either have a body shop or have access to one. I assure you that the rate they pay is less than what the public pays for paintwork.
Please advise!
It's not that the verbal misrepresentation is legal; it's that it's impossible to prove.
However, considering this dealer's behavior, I wouldn't be surprised if he left the sales contract vague, on purpose. In that case, as Rivertown said in the previous post, you're stuck.
When you asked if it was AWD, the salesman probably said "Yep" as he was thinking to himself, "It has all four wheels and it drives down the road, so it qualifies as AWD in my book".
The CARFAX, warranty history and mechanic would have all told you it was not AWD - for about $75 total investment.....
Sure enough, she had bought a 2WD one!
" I thought they were ALL four wheel drive!"
Regards... Vikd
I never heard that one before .. I like it.! - can I use it .?
Anyway .. if it's on the contract, then you won't have a problem, the dealer will re-write the contract or get you a new one - or, you can just take it back - dealers don't like all the brain damage, so this can be resolved very easily ~~ Now if it's not in writing, then you are an owner.
Terry.
I have certainly learned how car buying works. I knew there were 2WD versions out there, which is why I asked, I never expected to be blatantly lied to...
My question to Vikd's post, if it doesn't specifically say 2WD on it, do I have anything to stand on?
I think you're simply stuck.
Seriously, I would take your paperwork to a contract lawyer and see what they say. You may not have a leg to stand on, but you never know (I am not a lawyer and I do not even play one on TV).
Geesh, and all this from a Bentley dealer? I would hate to see the domestic dealers in your area.
Might as well try to shine a brick sometimes.
All you need to do is make sure that there were no mistakes made when you buy a car. Given the magnitude of the purchase, this should be a no-brainer. The last car I bought (2002 Miata) I knew everything about the car before I even set foot in the dealership (thank you Mazdausa.com). That includes options, color, trim level, VIN (not VIN#).
Terry ;-)
Instead, it appears that the Bentley dealer told the buyer to buzz off and that it was not the dealership's problem that the buyer was too stupid to make sure that it was AWD before delivery. While I acknowledge that the dealer has the right to do this, it does not make the dealer's behavior right.
I'm scared. I've had a LOT of perfectly decent experiences with car dealers (particularly since I moved out of L.A., which had many many sleazy dealers), but this one sounds pretty bad. Jspry, take heart in the fact that it will never happen to you again, if you're careful (which you should have been already...but hey, it's nice to think you can trust people, particularly those selling those $200,000 cars).
Good luck.
I also agree that it's unrealistic, although reasonable in other contexts, to expect the salesman to know his stock, to seek an answer rather than to give one when he doesn't know, and to own and correct his error.
Regards... Vikd
If there are two things I've learned from the various car biz folks in TH they are:
1) Dealer principles have an ungodly amount of money invested in these vehicles/dealerships and spend a fortune on their flooring etc... and want/need to do everything possible to recoup some of that investment, and
2) UCM's, or anybody else who otherwise purchases vehicles or valuates trades for the dealership, are pretty darned good at what they do and a prospective buyer trading in their 2wd suv would have a VERY hard time passing it off as an AWD. Ergo... this dealership knew exactly what kind of drivetrain this suv had, but just didnt bother to divulge it. I say shame on both parties here for not laying all the cards on the table or bothering to understand if they were a simple 2 of a kind or a straight flush...
Regards... Vikd
Now if he's as ignorant about his own inventory as someone suggested, how would he have known all of that? My latest conversation with him about this was that "Well, I believe the AWD is only an 80/20 split anyways, so I don't know why it's such a big deal." "Because the price point is lower on the 2WD." "Well, I'd imagine you don't plan on selling it right away anyways."
Now, I'm sorry, but I fail to see how WHEN I plan on unloading this vehicle has anything to do with paying for something I didn't get. It's still going to have a lower trade-in value than the AWD.
I was also told this was a local vehicle, which I later found out [from carfax] was not... it was also a corporate lease vehicle, of which I was told it was a 1 owner vehicle. (Not sure if I posted all that before.)
Yes, I know now that I should get an inspection and Carfax first, but I had such a great experience when I purchased my new Audi a couple years ago, I didn't think I would have to go through everything with a fine-toothed comb in order to not be completely screwed over. Unfortunately, I've always believed someone wouldn't blatantly lie to my face in order to take my money...
sonjaab - I'm in Illinois
There in lies (no pun intended lol) the difference. This is also one of the main reasons I don't think I'll ever buy a used car again. Even the reputable dealers here abouts have some cars with rather dubious histories. The key is, as you stated, to get the carfax report before you buy. I was able to cull many a car during my search just by using car fax.
I don't doubt you got lied to. I do doubt there's anything you can do about it. I don't know if you ever succeeded in going up the chain of command at the dealership or actually talked to the owner but my take is you're screwed this time. Bite the bullet and learn an expensive lesson.
You're not the first and you won't be the last.
A local dealer near me has been advertising, for at least 3 weeks, a used car (a Subaru at a Toyota dealership) for about $5K below Edmunds and KBB value. One of those "too good to be true" ads. I understand about loss leaders (one cheap car to get you in, steer towards more expensive) since I've had family members buy the LLs. However, I first called on this used car 3 weeks ago and was told "Oh, so sorry, we sold it yesterday! But let us know if we can help you otherwise." No thanks, but I'll keep you in mind. About 10 days later, my dad (who knows I'm the the market) emails me to tell me about this "great deal". Low and behold: the SAME car was being advertised twice in the same place (traderonline.com) for two different prices (same stock and VIN, though). Curious, I called and they said "Oh, sure, it's here! Come on by!" It's 5min away, so I drop by. Look around: no car. So, I ask a salesperson, who tells me that, "Sorry, we sold it yesterday." I told them that false advertising was illegal (very politely, of course) and they looked at me blankly. So, I started following this car. Well, three weeks have passed since I first called on it, and it is STILL being advertised (same VIN, same stock #, same photo!) on at least two classified websites (local paper and autotrader.com) as well as on their personal website.
Isn't it illegal to advertise something that you don't have in stock (wonder if they ever had it!)? I know this is a common practice, but I wish that this dealer (and others involved in B&S) could be "punished" for their practices. Obviously, I could call the BBB, but I haven't been monetarily hurt (since I didn't buy anything) other than 5mi of gas and 15min of my time. Any suggestions as to how to stop car dealerships from doing this? One person may not be able to do much, but every little bit helps!
At the very least, drop into one of their competitors and drop a dime on the bad dealer - the grapevine will go into effect and have better results.