Older Honda Accords

16162646667389

Comments

  • indian3indian3 Member Posts: 14
    Thanks for the reply. I am little confused. I do not want to control another cd player with my radio. I was wondering if I take my 95 radio out will another year model, for example a 2000, fit in its place. Will the mounting brackets and wiring harneses work?
    "The cd player with the radio does not have the counter, random mode. But the bass is the best. You already know the radio is from Alpine." Are you talking about another year model radio? What is the counter random mode?
  • canadatwocanadatwo Member Posts: 198
    Anyone know why the 2001 Accord got 5-star frontal ratings (nhtsa) while the 2000 only got 4-star?

    Aren't they the same car?

    Did Honda really make some improvements or is it some testing anomoly or "adjustment".
  • matador2matador2 Member Posts: 1
    Whats the deal with the 2002 se model? Is it a good deal, [car]. What about price.
  • deerlake7deerlake7 Member Posts: 176
    Actually, Honda did strengthen the Accord body in '01, along with adding more sound deadening material and a freshing of the grill and tailights. I read this in a Honda news release back in the fall of 2000 as they announced their 2001 models.
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    If you read the manual, it'll tell you that 7500 mile oil change intervals are not for severe service. If you make a lot of short trips, drive a lot in traffic etc you should change it more often.

    I try to change oil and filters in all of my cars between 3500-4000 miles. Oil changes aren't expensive and the car will last longer.
  • will4271will4271 Member Posts: 187
    I am not sure if the 2000 radio will fit into your '95 car. Check with the dealer.

    I was talking about the honda cd player for your current radio.
  • ghomazghomaz Member Posts: 68
    Thanks "isell" for your advice. Actually my problem is the time interval since I live in New York City and all my driving is done only on weekends and holidays. These are usually highway/expressway drives of at least 50 miles, so I really don't do any short drives in stop and go traffic. I use the subway to go to work and all shopping/grocery is within walking distance. Thus my total annual miles driven is somewhere between 4000 and 6000 miles. Do you think I should service my car every 6 months (instead of the specified 12 months) then?
  • timadamstimadams Member Posts: 294
    If your annual mileage is 4 to 6k, I would think changing your oil every 6 months is the way to go. I think going one year is too long, no matter what the mileage. Better safe than sorry.

    I change mine every 4k miles, which happens about every 3 to 4 months. I have a Ford van which doesn't get driven much and I have the oil changed twice a year.
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    Time is as important as miles. I would probably change oil and filter every six months in this case.
  • elmoblatch1elmoblatch1 Member Posts: 134
    I am thinking about buying this car...looking for constructive comments from fellow posters. The price seems right, just wondering is anyone else here has one. I own a 1998 Civic & the car runsa great. I change the oil every 3,000 miles...can't believe anyone would go longer.
  • jvkalrajvkalra Member Posts: 98
    With the Accord selling below invoice (just look at the Saturday paper), why not get a LX instead?
  • fxashunfxashun Member Posts: 747
    Unless you drive in the "severe" areas of the country. I've owned several Civics and the oil is still rather clean after 7500 mile. Hondas are very clean running engines. I have never heard of any problems by changing the oil at the factory recommended 7500 mile interval. Actually I heard the new Civic and RSX have a 10,000 mile interval. But it's up to you.
  • jfavourjfavour Member Posts: 105
    I have a 2002 CR-V. The new CR-V has oil change intervals of 5,000 miles for severe driving and 10,000 miles for normal driving. The engine is a variant of the new i-vtech in the RSX, which explains the similarity in the intervals. I suspect the new Accord (2003) will also receive this interval change. As to the oil change interval discussion, why would anyone feel it necessary to change the oil more frequently than is recommended by the manufacturer? If they say 3750 or 7500 depending on your driving, then wouldn't it make the most sense to just follow the owner's manual?
  • jl8w3jl8w3 Member Posts: 7
    to answer your questions about oil changes...just glance over at the Toyota boards and read about the "sludge" issues owners are having with their particular models '97-'01. Toyota claimed that this was due to improper maintainance (oil changes) by the owners and not a defect in the engine (sure). However they are repairing them as long as you have proof of proper maintainance. Something to think about...

    I would definitely follow the owners manual as a guide line, but to be on the safe side maybe change the oil more frequently. After all, it doesn't cost that much. However I know that Honda does not use the Toyota engine, so hopefully will not have this problem now or in the future with Honda's!
  • dz_annaba23dz_annaba23 Member Posts: 6
    I know the EX has ABS as standard unlike the DX an LX. I am looking for 5 speed EX or LX but afraid of the LX because it doesnt come with the ABS, should I have ABS ? (I guess its safer..). Also, with the 03 Accord coming in September, do you think I can get a good deal on a 02 Accord in April-May period ? thanks for your comments..
  • ickesickes Member Posts: 82
    The EX also has a 6-disc in-dash CD changer, sunroof, aluminum wheels, side airbags, and ABS. Check out the SE model which has lots of the EX stuff at LX prices.
  • claywaterfillclaywaterfill Member Posts: 534
    ickes hit the nail pretty much on the head. The EX not only has more "toys", but it is better mechanically. The 4 wheel anti-lock disc brakes being the biggest difference, IMO. The EX also gives you auto-off headlights, lumbar support, power height adjustable seating and stearing wheel mounted audio controls, to name a few more things. The SE does give you some of the "toys", but I don't think it gives all the little things that the EX gives.
  • claywaterfillclaywaterfill Member Posts: 534
    Give a hard look to the LX instead. I know the DXVP looks real nice--air, auto, cassette and CD--but it gives up a lot to the LX. The DXVP has no power windows, locks, mirrors, or cruise. It has 14" wheels, black manual rear view mirrors, black body side molding, no map lights, non-illuminated vanity mirrors, non-variable intermittent windshield wipers, and no height adjustable seating. The biggest thing, IMO, is it has a 135 hp non-VTEC engine, instead of the LX's 150 hp VTEC engine. The LX sells for a little over $17k around here--may go down even more as the model year comes to a close. The LX should sell for about the same as the Jetta GLS 2.0 you were looking at. Do yourself a favor and check out the much superior LX!
  • jimjetjimjet Member Posts: 27
    I think a reputable source on the subject is an article done by Consumer Reports about 4 or 5 years ago. They tested many taxis in NY City. Their conclusion, after "opening" the engine and measuring for wear was that 6,000 miles between oil changes was plenty safe.

    I have owned my '86 Accord since new and change the oil myself once per year - each 10,000 miles - using Mobil 1 10W-30. After 160,000, I have to add a little oil (~half qt) once per year between changes. I'll tell you if my procedure is still working okay in another 10 years. This engine is so well balanced at high speed (80). I test drove an '01 Accord LX 5-speed last summer and it seemed similar - smooth and balanced. You can't beat Honda engines and std trans (well, Getrag, maybe). BTW, I would change the std trans fluid by 50,000 miles and replace it with a synthetic like Mobil 1 15W-50. Just personal experience that has worked so far.
  • dz_annaba23dz_annaba23 Member Posts: 6
    Thanks again for you comments... Can I get an EX with 5peed manual ?, bacause I dont think the SE comes with 5M . It seems like the Ex would be better than the LX, but you seem to dissagree Claywater, any reasons why ? I heard that the auta on the accord sedans is not that good, thats why I want a 5 speed plus I enjoy the shifting anyways, all I can say is that I hope I can find a good deal on the EX. Do you recommend a used Accord, I would consider that too. thanks for the comments
  • ickesickes Member Posts: 82
    Note that their is a difference between the DX-Value Package and the SE. The DX-VP is somewhere between DX and LX, whereas the SE is between the LX and EX. Also the 4cyl in the DX-VP is a 135hp unit, and the SE gets the 150hp engine.

    The EX only has steering mounted radio controls on the V-6 model. Our 2001 EX 5-spd w/ cloth seats doesn't. Not that you really need it because of the excellent dash design (although it would be nice for turning up the stero unoticed!)

    The dash is one thing I have high hopes for on the new'03. The current one is among the best and seems to have started the high-forward "pod" design that is showing up in other makers. I really hope they keep the vent buttons versus dials. They are real quality pieces.
  • claywaterfillclaywaterfill Member Posts: 534
    I think you are getting posts 3170 and 3171 backward. Post 3170 is why the EX is better than the LX not only cosmetically (sunroof, alloys), but mechanically as well (4 wheel anti-lock disc brakes). Post 3171 was why the LX is far superior to the DX Value Package that one person was looking to buy. I do think, however, that the LX is more superior to the DXVP than the EX is to the LX--but I would never say the LX is better than the EX.

    If I am not mistaken, the EX comes standard with a manual transmission with the 4 cylinder engine. You may have to look far and wide for a manual transmission equipped EX, but it does exist. For the V6 equipped LX and EX models, though, an automatic is the only choice in transmissions.
  • elmoblatch1elmoblatch1 Member Posts: 134
    Thanks for your post....not sure where you are from, but when I look up the LX, the sticker price is over 20k. I know, no one pays sticker, but they don't exactly have to give the car away.

    The value package does have power locks, but your point is well taken.

    I will keep an eye on the LX prices....my lease runs out at the end of May, so maybe the market will soften a little by then.

    I agree that the 150hp engine is a big plus. I am hauling a family of 4 in the car.

    One thing that really bothers me about the Accord is the lack of lateral leg room for the driver.

    My leg hits the center console that jets out into the front area....very poor design !

    Sure wish Honda would upgrade it's warranty to 4 yr/50k miles like Volkswagen did.
  • claywaterfillclaywaterfill Member Posts: 534
    I agree that the Honda 3/36 does seem a little "behind the times." Honda fanatics will say the Accord does not need a warranty because they are so good. Well, even Toyota--as good as or maybe better than Honda in reliablity--has gone to a 5 year or 60,000 mile powertrain warranty. it used to be said long warranties are to reassure people who were buying cheap (read Hyundai) cars. Today, it seems everybody but Honda has expanded on the basic 3/36. I live in metro Atlanta where Honda dealers are a dime a dozen. Prices of Accord LXs and Camry LEs always hover in the 17's. If you don't live in a major market, how far away is your closest one? I used to live 100 miles south in Columbus, GA where there is one Honda dealer (and Toyota as well). If you don't want to pay sticker, then they happily show you the door. Here, Honda dealers not only charge less, but they give you free oil changes for life, free replacement tires, car washes with all service appointments, etc. With an all new Accord rolling out this September, I have heard of people paying as low as $400 below invoice on 2002 Accords. Check around, it'll be worth it!
  • vonlinzvonlinz Member Posts: 12
    My sister just purchased a 2002 Accord Special Edition. It has about 300 miles on it. The Check Engine light came on and she took it to the dealer who suggested there was air in the gas tank. They drained the air and told her to make sure the gas cap is tight. However, a few days the later the Check Engine came on again. She returned to the dealer who examined the car again. This time the dealer suggested that the transmission is failing and if replacing two solenoids does not solve the problem, he'll need to replace the transmission. It's a four cylinder and the transmission hasn't given any indication its not functioning properly. Has anyone had a similar experience or could shed any light into what's going on here? I'm a Honda guy and have had really good experiences with all of my Hondas. Thanks.
  • canadianclcanadiancl Member Posts: 1,078
    They seem to be guessing at the problem. They should be able read a code off of the ECU that indicates what the problem is. Did you add an aftermarket accessory to the car, such as an alarm system, remote starter, etc.?
  • elmoblatch1elmoblatch1 Member Posts: 134
    I stopped by the local Nissan dealer this evening, to check out the new Altima.

    WOW-

    Tons of room !!!

    Very comfy for me ( 6'3" )

    Lots of room in the back seat.

    The Altima S version was loaded and the 4 cylinder engine rips 175 horsepower....25 more than the Accord LX engine.

    The only thing the car did not have for that price was ABS, which was in an option package for about $800 & included side impact airbags.

    The car looks much more sporty than the Accord, has bigger tires, more trunk space & ler room, etc. The trunk has those goose-neck hinges that sink down into the cargo area.

    I also checked out the Accord LX vx. the DX value package....I just can't see spending the extra $1,800 for power windows & a few other options.

    I am not located near a big city...only 3 Honda dealers in town. When I asked how much over invoice they sell the car for, the salesman told me the discount was already taken on the sticker.

    I spoke with the sales manager of the Nissan Dealer../he can get 5.5% bank financing. He did come down of the Altima sticker price & was willing to negotiate. However, there aree no rebates scheduled for the Altima right now.
  • will4271will4271 Member Posts: 187
    I just got that fix in my car under warranty. See if it's covered.

    First time. They said that they did work on the spark plug, changed oil, replaced some oil washer. I noticed that they did some gas cap troubleshooting too.

    Second time. I brought it in right back two days later and changing the solenoid fixed the problem.
  • will4271will4271 Member Posts: 187
    I have an EX. I did not noticed a major different between the two. The EX had better tires, a moonroof, better stereo, better quality fabric, ABS, more power seat stuff.

    If I pick again, LX will do but with ABS. I found ABS reduces my stopping distance in most situations in a straight line.
  • will4271will4271 Member Posts: 187
    I heard that Castrol is better oil than the other ones?

    Is that true? How about Havoline?

    I know that it's better than Penzoil.
  • claywaterfillclaywaterfill Member Posts: 534
    The Altima is nice that's for sure. I'm sure you'll do fine in it. One thing, did the dealer qualify you for the 5.5%? If not, do you have perfect credit? Salesmen love to say "I can get you 2.9%!" The fact is, until they run your report, they have no idea. If you have an 800 Beacon, then great. Otherwise, don't bank on that 5.5% just yet. They can and do make money on your financing when they can get away with it.

    Also, if the current Accord is too boring for you, that's fine. You won't be the first person to say that. But, the $1800 for the LX is NOT spent on power windows and mirrors. True, you do get those things-as well as cruise control, rear seat armrest, rear cup holders, trunk pass through, and height adjustable seating. The biggest thing you get, IMO is the VTEC engine with 150 hp instead of the non VTEC engine with 135 hp. The LX also gives you 15" wheels instead of the DXVP's 14". There are more things, but you get the idea. Again, if you don't want the Accord, fine. I don't sell Hondas, work for Honda, or even drive a Honda, so it's no skin off my nose. What the Accord can give you, though, is a fine, reliable automobile that sets the benchmark that all other mid size sedans are measured against. The Accord has made more Car & Driver 10Best lists than any other car on the planet for a reason. But, please don't say the extra $1800 is not worth it because all you get is power windows. Thanks. Good luck on your choice, I know it is tough.
  • vonlinzvonlinz Member Posts: 12
    No, we haven't modified the car at all. May be the solenoid is the problem. Still not sure what the tie in is to the transmission, though. We'll find out in the next few days.
  • bblachabblacha Member Posts: 160
    ABS *extends* stopping distances dramatically in the snow. I can stop in about 1/2 the distance on plowed-and-packed snow if I avoid getting the ABS engaged. In other situations the difference is not noticeable.
    The biggest advantage of ABS to me is not reducing stopping distance but maintaining steering control when braking. So I can hit the brakes AND steer the car around an obstacle without worrying about skidding sideways, which would otherwise occur and which I don't have the skills to control.

    Automatic trannys: what did you hear about them that's unfavorable? I just bought an LX-V6 auto, and I like the way I can shift it with the gas pedal, it's quite responsive, just could be a little smoother when it downshifts.

    --Bart
  • dz_annaba23dz_annaba23 Member Posts: 6
    thanks bblacha for your input, I just read from previous posts that Honda does not make good auto transmissions ( but I could be wrong). You mentioned that you just bought Accord LX V6, did you not like the EX V6 ? I am trying to debate now between the LX and EX. seems like you preffered the LX V6 better, can you tell me why? thanks for your input. I still like the EX but prefer the 5 speed, although I like the V^6 for more power and Honda does not make manual for V^6!...
  • soberssobers Member Posts: 496
    After 98 Honda trans are as smooth as any other Automaker out there. Pre 98 Accord used to a shift a bit jerky fashion (not that dramatic anyway but noticeable)

    Also, 412,000 owners do not think that Accord's auto is not good ! :-))
  • elmoblatch1elmoblatch1 Member Posts: 134
    You should work for Honda...a very good description of the LX vs. Dx Value Package.

    I hear the Accord is getting re designed later this year...hopefully the 2002 models will be "bargain" priced this summer ( as much as Honda will "bargain price anything" ).

    I need to look at the LX again...I have the Accord catalogue.

    I want a car that will hold some resale value...Accord should do it.

    I am not bothered by what some perceive as "ho-hum" looks of the Accord.

    The wife wants power windows & locks.....I pretty much get to pick the rest.

    The 5.5% financing was through a local bank I guess...my credit is in good shape.

    Since Honda is not offering any rebates or low financing on the Accords, there is no harm in waiting until my Buick lease runs out at the end of May.

    My biggest [non-permissible content removed] about the Accord is my leg hitting the center console that sticks out too far.

    My 98 Civic runs well...only put brakes and tires on it so far. That too was a DX that I added A/C, an armrest and cassette tape player to. Looking back on it now, I should have bought the LX model. I will keep that in mind if I buy an Accord this time.

    Thanks for your posts.
  • ghomazghomaz Member Posts: 68
    After filling gas make sure that you turn the gas cap for at least 3 to 5 "clicks" after tightening, otherwise the "check engine" light comes on. It takes at least 3 gas fillings for this light to go off.

    This procedure is mentioned somewhere in the owners manual.

    If this does not work I guess it is something else like the solenoid, perhaps. But give the gas cap procedure a shot. Good luck!
  • bblachabblacha Member Posts: 160
    I see the LX-V6 as offering a much better value for my needs. I look for good performance and quality, but no luxury features. In fact, I could really do without the few "luxury" features the LX does provide, like power driver's seat and CD player.

    But on the performance side, LX-V6 and EX-V6 are the same - same brakes, tires, engines, etc. Steel vs. alloy wheels shouldn't make much difference.

    And of course quality is superlative in any Accord.

    So I got the LX and saved a couple grand. The two models are identical except for some luxury and appearance features (moonroof, leather, alloys, etc.) which to many people are worth the money.

    --Bart
  • jrct9454jrct9454 Member Posts: 2,363
    Firstly, if the condition is reset by retightening the gas cap, the light will not go out [OBD computer reset] for a fixed number of engine on/off cycles [it has nothing to do with the number of tank fillups]. It can take upwards of a dozen engine cycles [starting, running, and shutting off] before the light will go out.

    Secondly, there are only a couple of hundred reasons why the light may come on that have nothing to do with the gas cap. That's why the dealer should plug his computer into the OBD socket on the car and READ THE RESULTS. It shouldn't be a matter of guessing or trial and error. 90% of the time, it is the cap problem - but the other 10% can be a gazillion other possible emissions-related problems.
  • venus537venus537 Member Posts: 1,443
    i won't say the accord's transmission is sub par, but it's probably the worst auto that honda offers since the rsx (integra) was redesigned. i suspect that the 03 accord will come with a 5 speed auto and move to the top of its class for automatics. the new crv auto is superb along with the new engine. if the rumors are true, this engine will be the accord's new 4 cylinder engine.
  • timadamstimadams Member Posts: 294
    Some might think I was stupid, but I bought the V6-LX instead of the EX simply because I didn't want a sunroof. I added a Honda CD player (it fits right in where it belongs) and bought atermarket alloy wheels from Sears. I now have both cassette and CD, which I love. I like listening to music on CD and books on tape on the cassette player. I spent probably $500 on those two items and got it just the way I want.
  • talon95talon95 Member Posts: 1,110
    The rumors that I've heard are that Honda won't include a 5-speed auto in the next gen Accord, because that's a key differentiating factor between the Accord and the Acura TL. They don't want an overly upscale Accord to eat into TL sales.
  • carguy62carguy62 Member Posts: 545
    Every review I ever read says the best value is the LX V6. I personally went for the EX V6.
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    I'd buy EXV6, because I prefer having moonroof (last five of my cars, two Toyotas/three Hondas, have had them). EXV6 is a loaded car for not too much, especially considering that price can be negotiated, and possibly with financing. A friend of mine got his EXV6 for $22.9K (before TTL etc.) a few months back.

    LXV6 may offer value to them who do not want most of the extras that EXV6 offers. Back in Fall 1997, I bought EX-L over LXV6, because I wanted those extras, although it cost me about $700 more.
  • jrct9454jrct9454 Member Posts: 2,363
    ...the choice between an LX an EX 6 is strictly academic. In many areas, the LX V6 is so rare that for all practical purposes, the choice doesn't exist. When I went shopping for our Accords [March '98, Sept '00], the combined 5 dealers in our area had a grand total of 2 LX V6s between them. I tested one, and found the lumpy Bridgestone tires were causing the car to shake at freeway speeds...one of the nice things about the Michelins on the EX [and std on the LX 4s...go figure] is how well they resist flat-spotting when the car sits for any length of time.

    Anyway, when we wanted the V6 we went with a very early model year 2001 EX, and while I consider the sunroof a useless device, the rest of the difference between the two seemed worthwhile to me - and yes, bargains are to be had on this model, as well.
  • dz_annaba23dz_annaba23 Member Posts: 6
    I started this discussion between the LX and the EX, and now I know what the difference is and why most people prefer EX V6. I guess its a matter of choice and how much you wanna spend for all the bells and whistles the EX offers. Although, I am disappointed to hear that EX V6 Manual 5 speeds are hard to find. If not, I'll look for LX V6 5 speed, although the Bridgestone tires will diminish from the performance of the car. Big difference between 'em and Les Michellins...! thanks again
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    Are VERY hard to find since they don't make them.

    As far as LX V-6 Accords. Like all Hondas, they are great cars. They just aren't very popular and sell very slowly.

    Personally, although I own an EX V-6 coupe, I think the 4 cylinders are more than adequate.
  • postoakpostoak Member Posts: 537
    I went with the LX because the EX has the moonroof and leather seats. Many of us know we would never use a moonroof if we had one and on at least some cars, I don't know about the Accord, it reduces the head clearance, a factor for me. Leather seats are a negative in hot climates, especially if you park your car outside all day as my wife does.

    On the issue of automatic transmission and Accords, I don't know the history. Are there 2 issues? I know some people have complained that the shifting of the transmission is too "sporty", that is, it shifts later than they want and there is a perceptible jerk. On this, I can believe the poster who said they have been redesigned, because our new Accord shifts smoothly -- it's a non-issue. The 2nd issue, though, is reliability. I did talk to one Accord owner who had to have their auto transmission replaced (or rebuilt, I forget which) at 90,000 miles. That was a '96 or '97, I believe. Is there a history of auto transmission problems on the Accords?

    As Isell said, you can't get the V6 with a standard transmission.
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    Get a 4-cyl with the manual tranny, it is just about as quick as the automatic V-6. It may be just a little rougher, but it is still pretty smooth. I have said before - it just depends on how many mattresses you need over a pea. The 4-cyl is also quite a bit cheaper and gets much better gas mileage. High 30's on the highway with the manual.

    If you need a nice smooth quiet place to relax there are better choices than a car - buy a big fat leather arm chair and ottoman, a nice stereo receiver, some awesome headphones, and a fridge full of your favorite beverage with the money you save. You'll still have money leftover, plus the money you save every month on gas.
  • dz_annaba23dz_annaba23 Member Posts: 6
    it makes sense as you said dudly, the EX 4cyl 5M or the LX 4cyl 5M will do for me. probably the EX is better in this case, but I'll check the price difference and the nice-ties of both cars. I also beleive that auto trannies in Honda is iffy and thats a fact, but probably better than a lot of tranny for other cars.
    thanks again for your commnets.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.