Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
Comments
gotta run....
btw, my latest Chrysler repair of the month is a new radiator 2 days ago
other things i've spent on include front engine seals, valve covers twice, alternator within a month of purchase (bought it used at 30,000 miles), new radio because the dash lights wouldn't work, new hatch latch to correct malfunctioning power tailgate, replaced a/c condensor and other a/c stuff. both power side doors have failed and are difficult to open and shut.
i can't remember what else i've done. i think i've spent about $8,000 dollars on this thing since we got it.
looking for another minivan but doesn't look like the alternatives are all that exciting either. wife turned down my choice of MB R320 CDI due to insufficient cubby holes and s....t. likes Honda Touring but seems like Honda has problems too.
whatever the next one is, i will be sure to have a very long and comprehensive warranty!!
Our 1998 DGC Sport with the 3.8 liter engine lost its original transmission at 109,000 miles, just a few months after a tranny flush and fluid change. Interestingly enough, shortly after the tranny service, I posted here in the TownHall that the transmission felt like it was shifting very harsh. A few weeks later, BANG, dead tranny. The post mortem indicated that one or more of the internal clutches failed (probably the TC lock-up clutch) and sent shrapnel throughout the transmission. When clutches fail, it is almost always either the fluid that is the culprit or excess heat. I'm fairly confident that we can rule out excess heat in this case.
"my 2001 t&c limited chucked its tranny for the first time at 70,000 miles (broken planetary or sun gear), did it again about 2 months later (fixed under shop warranty), and for the third time 2 months ago at 120,000 miles (broken gear again)."
As a general statement, planetary gears are extremely robust. Other than your van, I've never heard of a single DC minivan failing due to a planetary gear failure, and I've been following the transmission issues with these vans since my kid brother got one of the early ones in his Gen2 van. This leads me to believe that the problems that you're experiencing may be of your own making. With that in mind, one obvious question strikes me, "Do come to a complete stop before shifting from Reverse to Drive or from Drive to Reverse? Every time?"
"i quizzed the shop about the ATF fluid and they assured me they used the right stuff. the fact that gears are actually breaking causing catastrophic failure indicates some kind of engineering problem to me."
Could you point me to posts from other folks where they have confirmed component failures in their transmissions that then caused a transmission failure? If you can, that would go a long way toward supporting your argument. That said, what do they consider the "right stuff"? Any number of shops claim that they can add some magic elixir to standard Dextron tranny fluid and suddenly it is the "right stuff".
"i think all this talk about the ATF fluid is a smoke screen by Chrysler to cover up the real truth.. they just build crap!"
Like I said before, I've been following the problems of these transmissions for a long time now, and before we bought our 1998 DGC, I had been pretty much convinced, based upon the evidence at hand, that the tranny fluid was the culprit in the vast majority of failed transmissions. Heat, as in towing without a tranny cooler, or from heavy stop and go driving in high summer temperatures seem to account for the remainder. Said another way, your sampling of one vehicle and a couple of transmissions is statistically irrelevant and as such, your comment about the "truth" and Chrysler's build quality is just as irrelevant and unsubstantiated.
"btw, my latest Chrysler repair of the month is a new radiator 2 days ago"
A fairly typical repair for ANY vehicle with that many miles on the clock, ESPECIALLY if the coolant hasn't been refreshed once or twice since the van was new.
"other things i've spent on include front engine seals, valve covers twice, alternator within a month of purchase (bought it used at 30,000 miles), new radio because the dash lights wouldn't work, new hatch latch to correct malfunctioning power tailgate, replaced a/c condensor and other a/c stuff. both power side doors have failed and are difficult to open and shut."
A few things occur to me:
1) Since you bought the van used, you have no way of knowing how well it was treated (or how horribly it was abused) prior to your ownership.
2) Engine seals and valve cover gaskets at such an early age indicate significant abuse as these engines have proven to be extremely robust with many of them reaching 300,000 miles before a single unscheduled maintenance event occurs, gaskets and seals included. We have two 3.8 liter vans, one of which has over 130,000 miles, and yet neither has ever leaked even a drop of oil.
3) Your van is a first year Gen4 van, and by all accounts, it did have some electronic gremlins that needed to be ironed out. I try to avoid first year vehicles (regardless of manufacturer) for that very reason.
4) The clutches for the power doors are a known problem area. Apparently the supplier of the combined motor and clutch unit has since redesigned the part for that very reason.
5) The Denso alternator in our vans has proven to be EXTREMELY reliable and is in use on many cars from many manufacturers from all over the world. That yours failed shortly after 30,000 miles of service raises all kinds of red flags as to the amount of heat your van was exposed to before you owned it. Hmmm, or the amount of water... Do you know for certain that your van isn't a salvaged flood vehicle?
"i can't remember what else i've done. i think i've spent about $8,000 dollars on this thing since we got it."
Interesting, we have nearly 220,000 combined miles on two DGCs (one Gen3 and one Gen4), and so far we've spent less than $3,000 in unscheduled repairs, including $2,600 for a factory remanufactured transmission for our 1998. Most other folks that I know with DC minivans (or that I communicate with in discussions like this) have experienced similarly low maintenance costs.
"whatever the next one is, i will be sure to have a very long and comprehensive warranty!!"
Probably not a bad idea for y'all. We on the other hand took a pass on the optional extended warranties for both of our vans. Good thing too as we would have spent about $3,500 for the warranties, and the single covered failure would have been an ABS wheel sensor for our 2003 that failed last winter. It only cost about $200 to have replaced. All other repairs to both of our vans (1 transmission, 1 door light switch, 1 vacuum battery tray, 1 set of sway bar bushings) came well beyond the 70,000 mile extended warranty period.
Best Regards,
Shipo
My transmission has been flawless on my 3.8L 2005 Town and Country. I am currently at 52,000 miles. The owners manual does not recommend changing the transmission fluid. I drive 60 miles round trip all expressway for work (70-75 MPH). I have the extended warranty up to 100,000 miles. Would you change the fluid even though the owners manual does not recommend under normal driving conditions? Let me know your thoughts.
TIA
FWIW, when I put a new tranny on our 1998 3.8 liter DGC last Spring, it did shift rough at odd times for a couple of weeks, however, I kind of kept a mental log of each rough shift, and it never messed up the same way twice. I guess it just took a while to learn the weird environment in which I drive. :surprise:
Best Regards,
Shipo
Under Parts it is mentioned:
10 Oz Black HFM Fluid
1Gallon Pennzoil Dexon III
32 OZ Clear ATF Flush
Looks like they screwed up big time. I guess I will have to fight it out with them tomorrow ?
I could go to the dealer and get a flush done but then if my tranny has gone bad pepboys get away with no damages.
Best Regards,
Shipo
Long story short, looks like nobody did wrong except for me.
I called up the dealer to setup a tranny flush and the cost here in NJ is $230.(incl tax).
Point 1: ATF+3 is Chrysler's very specific semi-synthetic formulation and no amount of any additive in the world will make Dextron (of any flavor) compatible with ATF+3.
Point 2: Even if they did put ATF+3 in you 2005 transmission, it will still get destroyed. Why? If you check your Owner's Manual, you will see that your van requires ATF+4, which is Chrysler's fully synthetic transmission fluid, and is backward compatible with ATF+3, not the otherway around.
Summary: Get that stuff out of your transmission pronto or you'll find yourself paying upwards of $3,000 for a new transmission. Once you get your tranny flushed by the dealer, demand that Pep Boyz not only refund the money you paid, but that they also pay for your flush.
Best Regards,
Shipo
Is there a fix out there for this tranny problem????
BTW: This started at 50-55K miles, it now has 59-60K miles.
When they did the oil change thay used a FRAM filter. The problem started immediately and I went to Chrysler and purchased a Chrysler filter for my transmission 2002 Town & Country 3.8. No change, problem still exsits. Since the oil change, 400 mi. have passed and still no change in condition. What do you think?
I hope this helps.
Best Regards,
Shipo
Regards,
Captain IBC
Second, depending upon the terrain, the incline (or decline) of the road, your vehicle speed, the load you're carrying and the engine and transmission installed in your van, your transmission should lock and unlock the torque converter. Now, if you are tooling down the freeway at 65 mph, and the road is flat, and you have little load, and you have either the 3.3 or the 3.8 liter engine, then your transmission should lock the torque converter and keep it locked.
Best Regards,
Shipo
Best Regards,
Shipo
Captain IBC
PS...$52.99 (1/2 hour labor to do the program)
Changing the transmission fluid (on our Caravans) is one of the very few things that I don't do myself for this very reason. I think my dealer charges just over $100 for the tranny service, TCM reprogramming included. ;-)
Best Regards,
Shipo
I sort of remember that when I bought it the dealer said that the car had two settings one for power and one for economy and I opted for the one for economy. I'm thinking that it was the TCM unit he was talking about, but I don't know.
The engine is a 3.8 high output engine with standard front wheel drive (not AWD).
Anyone have a clue what's going on?
Thanks in advance
1) I've never heard of a 3.8 liter Long Wheel Base (LWB) Gen3 van getting a consistent 27 mpg highway. Not saying it can't happen upon occasion, but consistently? I'm skeptical.
2) Mileage of 20 and 16 is a tad on the low side, unless we're talking very cold weather and E10 fuel.
3) I've never heard of such a thing as two power settings. Not saying that there aren't two settings, but until proven otherwise, I believe that's a bunch of bilge water.
4) A "3.8 high output engine"? High output compared to what? A 3.3 liter mill? Okay, I'll buy that. However, in the grand scheme of things, while these engines are fairly torque rich, their horsepower per liter output is WAY down the scale. Consider the following, the 3.8 liter engines in my 1998 and your 1999 produce 180 HP and 240 lb-ft of torque, while the smaller 3.0 liter engine of my most recent car produced 225 HP and 214 lb-ft of torque. See the difference? Had my cars' engine been the same displacement as our minivans, it would have put out 285 HP and 271 lb-ft of torque.
5) As for what's going on, hmmm, probably nothing. What with the cold weather we're having up here in New Hamster these days, our 1998 is getting about 20.5 mpg at a fairly consistent 73 mph on E10 fuel (i.e. 10% Ethanol). In the summer time, that same van will get nearly 23 mpg at that same 73 mph on the same fuel. If I slow down to 65, I can get a fairly consistent 26 on really hot days, once again on E10 fuel.
Sorry I couldn't be of more help.
Best Regards,
Shipo
Best Regards,
Shipo
I'm asking because the place where I bought ATF+3 a couple of years ago doesn't sell it anymore; just ATF+4.
Frank
Almost three years ago my mother backed the van out of the garage when it made an awful noise and came to a stop. She got about 134,000 miles out of the original. Her shop (she has a great, honest shop and one particular mechanic that always works on her cars) recommended a Jasper transmission because it had a 3 year warranty and at the time Chrysler only offered...I think it was a one-year warranty? This was April 2004. She paid about $3000 for the Jasper and installation. Since then, the transmission has been replaced three more times.
No. 2 got to where it wouldn't shift in the mornings when it was cold (I go to school at Mississippi State University, and it's just not that cold in Starkville), and apparently it would shift once or twice while the primer pump (something like that) was working, then when it went off it wouldn't shift again until the transmission had warmed up. I'd get to the end of my street and the van would behave like it was in neutral, and the engine would rev and eventually the tranny would catch (this could happen at 3000 rpm, which must've been very hard on it).
No. 3 was replaced because the van couldn't stay in overdrive and would hunt between 3rd and 4th gear.
No. 4 failed Monday before last apparently due to overheating. There was some sort of blockage that prevented the fluid from circulating well and the transmission burned up.
With 177,000 on the clock, I can honestly say that my mother has gotten her money's worth out of the van (ordered direct from the factory, delivered with only 7 miles on the odo Halloween of 1996), but it's a shame that a vehicle that drives great, rides well, has so much interior space, looks great, and has some clever engineering is hamstrung by such poor transmission reliablity.
Transmission numbers 2, 3, and 4 were all replaced for free, but the warranty ends in April. Has anyone else had experience, positive or negative, with a rebuilt Jasper? I can't say I'm impressed, and I baby this vehicle.
Thanks,
Cliff
From Jasper's website on the 41TE page:
6. For 3.3 and 3.8 applications, to handle the torque of larger V6 engines, we install a heavier planet and larger transfer shaft.
Original planets and stock transfer shafts were known to break under heavy loads.
Last year when the tranny lunched itself in our 3.8 liter DGC I went for a factory remanufactured transmission from my dealership. Priced at $2,600, including a 3 year/36 month warranty, it was the best deal going. The other little tidbit about the factory reman unit is that every one they sell is upgraded to the latest engineering build of that generation of transmission, which in the case of our Gen3 vans means from the 2000 model year. That in turn means that the new transmissions are designed explicitly for the newer/better/more robust ATF+4 transmission fluid.
If (when?) your mom's van chews its way through the forth and final Jasper unit, you just might want to consider a Chrysler reman to take its place.
Regarding the planetary gears, while it is true that transmissions meant for installation with either the 3.3 or the 3.8 liter engines have been reinforced to deal with the extra torque, something in the back of my mind says that it wasn't the planetary gears that were the subject of said reinforcement. Regardless, planetary gear sets are considered to be a very robust methodology for changing rotational ratios. Ever heard of a Pratt & Whitney R-2800 Double Wasp engine? It powered (among MANY others) the Vought F4U Corsair, the Grumman F6F Hellcat, the Republic P-47 Thunderbolt, the Douglas A-26A (nee B-26 (nee A-26)) Invader, the Curtiss-Wright C-46 Commando and the Douglas DC-6, and in every configuration and regardless of output (often times more than 3,000 hp for short durations), that engine used a planetary gear reduction to drive the propeller. Not too shabby. ;-)
Best Regards,
Shipo
I don't mind having the ATF+3 replaced every 30k miles, but I just can't find any anywhere. I can't believe Chrysler would abandon it in favor of ATF+4 if there was a chance that seals might fail in older models, so I'm beginning to wonder just what the article meant by "older" models. Perhaps they are talking about pre-1989 vehicles (before the electronic 4-speed transmissions).
TSBs 21-006-01 (June 2001) and 21-004-04 (March 2004) specifically say NOT to use ATF+4 in 1999 and earlier MiniVan transmissions. One of them (I forget which) states that the reason for the restriction is that the torque converter lock up feature might have a problem with the ATF+4. I read elsewhere (allpar.com IIRC) the same as you that the ATF+4 could present a problem with the seals.
Then, not even a year ago, Chrysler released TSB 21-010-06 (April 2006) that inexplicable reverses the two previous TSBs with no explanation as to the reasons for the apparent contradiction.
Personally I still suspect that the introduction of ATF+4 into my 1998 DGC with just over 90,000 miles on the clock was a contributing factor to my transmission failure. I have been soundly criticized from many fronts for stating that opinion, however, that continues to be my opinion none-the-less. In my case the good news is that my Factory Remanufactured transmission is specifically designed for AFT+4, so I no longer have to worry about the lack of ATF+3 availability.
Best Regards
Shipo
This morning I took our '96 LXI to the independent transmission shop that has serviced the transmissions in all of our cars (mine, wife's and all of my sons') and once again allowed him to change out the fluid with the universal fluid containing ATF+3 additive that he used 3 years and 30,000 miles ago. Did not use ATF+4. The magnet in the pan was clean of any debris. He also inspected the small leak and said it was a common problem with the crimp that connects the steel line to the rubber line on the transmission cooler (for the towing package). A new line is $65 plus installation, but he acknowledged that it probably would not cause a catastrophic failure, and that as long as I continue checking the tranny fluid it should be fine. The vehicle only has 92,600 miles, so I'm hoping to get about 3 more years of service out of her.
He said it would not be a problem topping off with ATF+4. I still have 1/4 quart of ATF+3 left in my garage.