Honda Odyssey vs Dodge/Chrysler minivans

13435373940134

Comments

  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Heh that is nice - someone linked a Forbes article around Town Hall this week that indicates Honda's long range plan is to build all cars to order.

    Common knowledge holds that you have better bargaining power if you can find one on the lot - did you find that true? Seems like the people ordering Odysseys are mostly at MSRP.

    While my '89 Voyager was pretty good, I really wanted to try another brand anyway, and I really didn't have the energy to walk the lot or try to find a good DC salesperson. The Honda guys were even worse gameplayers. The salesman I landed with at the Nissan dealer was a straight shooter - naturally he quit to go sell Jeeps the week after the van was delivered :-)

    Steve, Host
  • mliongmliong Member Posts: 231
    My wife special ordered her new car. We got close to invoice on it because of the:

    "Are you kidding? Who's going to buy a car at that price in this economy?" card

    I think we would have been able to hit or go a bit lower to invoice had it been on the lot - since they get paid more the quicker they move the cars.

    If you have the money, this might be the best time to buy a car - because of the really poor October, and November sales to date.
  • saverisaveri Member Posts: 19
    I spoke to Chrysler and asked them about the lack of Gen 4 seat belts in the 2nd and 3rd row seats on the T&C. They replied that there was no plan to replace them. I loved the minivan but will not be buying one because of this issue. I also work in the automotive industry and find it amazing that a potential safety issue is not being addressed. There is at least 1 customer complaint (2002MY) regarding this issue on the NHTSA website.
  • hayneldanhayneldan Member Posts: 657
    Before condeming the gen 3 seatbelts which have been around for over 10 years, I suggest that you sit in the second or third seat and try to get the belt to unbuckle by hitting it with any part of your body (except your finger)It's near impossible to do. It takes a great deal of pressure to unbuckle. The reference to the site in earlier posts was for a class action lawsuit filed by lawyers ( who certainly are more concerned with saftey, than their share of the multimillion dollar possible settlement) NOT!
  • maltbmaltb Member Posts: 3,572
    There is at least 1 customer complaint

    Wow! stop production! Honestly, one complain means nothing. I could have phoned it in from the boredom of my armchair yesterday. Of course, I don't own an armchair so really, it wasn't me.
  • saverisaveri Member Posts: 19
    I am not condemning the Gen 3 seat belt. I do not see the logic in continuing usage of the Gen 3 when a more robust Gen 4 is available. They already use it on some of their vehicles lines, either completely or partially. Another point to note is that even on say the Concorde the Gen 4 is used for the front passengers only. The rear has the Gen 3. Why?

    The cost of making a full change is probably a couple of dollars/vehicle. The bean counters figure this as a cost save over the entire vehicle volume.

    Regarding climbing in to the 2nd and 3rd row seats and depressing the unlatch button. I have done that. This is not proof that this or any component works. Components are tested for durability over their life. The first press may have an entirely different effect than the 1000th press. And their may be failure modes which get activated under certain usage conditions.

    Please visit the NHTSA (Highway & Transportation Safety) site, there have been several, I re-checked their database, customer complaints of the buckles unlatching over the years.

    In my automotive experience it is usually the customer that spots problems which sometimes slip past the company's eyes.
  • saverisaveri Member Posts: 19
    For automotive safety systems even a few incidents prompt an investigation within a company. I have been part of a safety investigation team. If a design defect is found the company could face a recall.
    Anyway, peace, I have no quarrel to pick on this board.
  • pluto5pluto5 Member Posts: 618
    You cannot simulate the failure of these belts IMO. I don't want to be stuck with them for 10 years. I complained but DC ignored it so I bought a large sedan. Has Latch system to accommodate 3 child seats in rear although I don't have any kids in seats anymore. If you are a family of five or less a large sedan can cost you $$$ less and still provide safety not to mention better handling.
  • maltbmaltb Member Posts: 3,572
    I have worked in that area for an automobile manufacturer and the crap that would come back from NHTSA (they called them documented complaints...lol) was unbelievable. Leads like that were near worthless. For every 10 NHTSA complaints, maybe one is legit. So when somebody mentions that NHTSA has one complaint, I chuckle and cringe. I will agree however that legitimate safety problems found through more thorough reporting channels are escalated rather quickly inside a manufacturer. Liability is king.
  • saverisaveri Member Posts: 19
    I re-checked the NHTSA site and from 1999-2002MY's there were 7 complaints against the TC and about 10 against the Caravan. I did not check the rest of the Chrysler line up.
    As far as customer complaints go it is nearly impossible to analyze their claims directly as engineers very rarely get to see a vehicle with the problem currently occuring. The customer themselves would have attempted some form of repair or the dealer would have already serviced it, disturbing the condition under which the alleged fault occured. Their complaints are used as a tool to begin a preliminary investigation.

    Anyway, you hit the nail on the head when you said liability is king.
  • pluto5pluto5 Member Posts: 618
    There is no failure to analyze in an accident. It simply appears that passenger/driver failed to buckle his belt. Nobody can be sure except the victim who cannot testify.
  • xafxaf Member Posts: 37
    The Oddy and the Chrysler minivans are a very appropriate comparison point. It seems that the two are very competitive and very similar.

    The Oddy is on a downward slide in reliability and quality if I read all their problem boards correctly.

    The Chrysler is improving with each year since their transmission problems have been resolved.

    This puts them about even in my books.
  • dmathews3dmathews3 Member Posts: 1,739
    This puts them about even in my books

    Which books are those? Comic books
  • dave210dave210 Member Posts: 242
    Wow......
  • pluto5pluto5 Member Posts: 618
  • xafxaf Member Posts: 37
    I think it a very clever thread, I used to own a GC, bought the Sedona before the GC really started to go. I like the GC ride best of all the minivans. But it was too pricey when compared to the Sedona.

    The Oddy is just an overated, uncomfortable, ugly van with a "magic" seat.

    If you read the problem boards, you would see a trend, the pre 99 chrysler/dodge,... are not very good. The post 98 Oddys are not the solid vehicles that Honda is known for making.

    I expect some angry retorts from the Oddy people, they have trouble with comparing vehicles, they tend to take it much too personally. Remember people, its just a van.
  • mliongmliong Member Posts: 231
    Can anyone shed some light as to whether or not Chrysler actually fixed their tranny problems?

    I know that Honda acknowledged their tranny problems, and have mentioned a fix for it, but I haven't heard of anything like it from Chrysler. I heard rumors that they did fix it in the last redesign, but I couldn't verify.

    I'm not trying to ding DCs, I'm just curious as to whether or not Chrysler got around to adressing that long standing problem.

    Thanks!
  • hayneldanhayneldan Member Posts: 657
    If you check the List of Technical Service Bulletins TSB's on the DC transmissions, it appears that they have been improving it all along. I don't think they would be offering a 7 year 70,000 mile powertrain warranty if the problem had not been fixed.
  • mliongmliong Member Posts: 231
    That's a good point on the powertrain warranty, but another school of thought could also be argued for the "KIA" style of warranties - make them longer to offset the reliability issues - at least that was why they originally had a longer warranty.

    Honda recently had to lengthen their tranny warranty to seven years on some models of the Odyssey to waylay customer concerns too, so I'm not sure if the extended Chrysler warranty is a sign of confidence, or admission.

    Hard to read with these car companies.
  • grandtotalgrandtotal Member Posts: 1,207
    I don't think they would be offering a 7 year 70,000 mile powertrain warranty if the problem had not been fixed.

    They did before!
  • bdaddybdaddy Member Posts: 171
    Hard to say if DC has a permanent fix. Most tranny problems show up after 60K, so vehicles that are less than 3 years old may not be seeing significant defects.
  • pat84pat84 Member Posts: 817
    I traded in a 96 Dodge Caravan with 74 K miles because the transmission fluid was foaming out the dipstick and onto the exhaust manifold. I knew it wasn't going to be too much longer before it found a new place to overflow into and die completely. I traded it in for a 99 Odyssey. Tuesday at 68 K miles, the transmission died. It doesn't have reverse anymore. It remains to be seen what Honda will do about it. I am running out of car companies I wil buy from.
  • maltbmaltb Member Posts: 3,572
    wanna buy a Mazda?
  • mliongmliong Member Posts: 231
    Talk about bad luck! You must have angered the transmission god.... :)
  • bdaddybdaddy Member Posts: 171
    Whatareyabitchinabout Pat? Just don't drive in reverse anymore! I drove a car in high school that had a manual tranny without reverse. You just have to get a little creative when/where you park it, that's all.

    The important thing to note here is that Honda admitted the problem and subsequently fixed it, after a little over 3 years of production. While I agree they could/should have covered the 99 model in their extended warranty as well, they have at least done more than some car manufacturers in the area of defect transmissions.
  • maltbmaltb Member Posts: 3,572
    Paint it chocolate brown and sell it UPS. They encourage their drivers to not use reverse, making them more efficient.
  • dennisctcdennisctc Member Posts: 1,168
    That's such an impossible question to answer!!
  • tasillotasillo Member Posts: 51
    When my wife and I learned we had twin's on the way, it was time for the Sebring convertible to go! We had a new Tahoe, but my wife was set on the convenience of a minivan with two sliding doors. As the Chrysler's had just been redesigned for 2001, we put them on the short list with the Oddessy and Windstar.

    Although our Sebring was trouble free, our earlier Concorde was anything but, I was pushing heavily for the Honda. Checking out the new Dodge first, my wife was wowed by the power door and liftgate, the removable center console and the relatively nice leather interior (ES model). I was impressed with the 4-wheel discs, touring suspension with 17" Michelins and smoothe and torquey 3.8L. Still, the Honda seemed like the sensible choice.

    Next we looked at the Ford and ruled it out immediately. Nowhere as nicely appointed as the Dodge, it also seemed "clunky" in appearance and driving dynamics. Disappointing.

    Last stop, Honda. The dealer had two Oddessy's available and was proud of that, pricewise! Without leather, the dealer had built the aditional sticker up to 32k, with high-dollar items like floormats, mud guards, hood visor, a lot of crap! OK, we'll take a drive. Less torquey than the Dodge, but once the RPM's built, it moved along well. Seemed noisy, though. Back at the lot, we climbed all over it. Drum brakes in back, no leather available from the factory (and $1800 from the dealer!), poor stereo and less than substantial feeling power doors that seemed less cooperative than Dodge's. Loved the "magic" seat, however, and there was no arguing the Honda reputation and resale value. However, once the dealer told me they wouldn't budge off the add on's prices, and ordering a van in the color we wanted would result in an "indefinite" wait!

    Back to Dodge and we drove out in a loaded to the gills GC ES, at almost 7k off sticker! Two years and 28000 miles later, we made the right choice. Only significant problem was a squealing from the rear brakes at 10k miles. Dealer claimed to rear pads were glazed due to driving with the emergency brake on. No Way! Only possibility was recent mountain trip with a full load, probably cooked the brakes coming down the mountain. Dealer got the pads covered under warranty, I paid the labor ($175) and drove off questioning the Dodge decision. 18k miles later and that has been the only blemish. I'm constantly amazed at the Van's handling and poise at highway speeds with a full load. Just returned from a 1300 mile trip to FLA, all interstate at 80+ mph. As stable as any full-size sedan I've driven, minus the BMW and Mercedes class vehicles.

    Overall, I can't be happier with the Dodge and now that they are available with a factory moonroof and DVD entertainment system, we may be looking for a new one.
  • jawandajawanda Member Posts: 30
    Well, after taking out the Ody EX/L and T&C LXi out for drives back to back from dealerships across the street from each other, we went with the Chrysler. We got the LXi with the following options: Heated seats, security group(alarm and txn. control), upgraded stereo(rear wireless headphones, in ddash cd changer), full size spare and tire pressure monitor system, and we got it for less than the sticker of the Ody EX w/leather, since it was a brand new '02 model. IMO, at sticker price the Ody would be a better choice, but at equal price, it was no contest for me.

    Like many others, I found the Ody interior to be too spare, though I like the simplicity of controls. I haven't seen many mentions here, but I found the Ody stereo to be a joke, and I would have replaced it immediately if I bought the Ody, whereas the TC with Infinity speakers, etc. blows it away. I put on a lot of miles so I care a lot about the audio setup. Also, we all(there were four of us) found the overall noise level to be much lower in the TC, with vastly more comfortable seats. I realize that to some extent this is a matter of opinion, but the Ody seats are flat, no side bolsters at all, though the seatback is OK. In driving, I found the Ody to feel more top-heavy and van-like, I agree with majority of reviewers that the T&C ride is head and shoulders above the competition.

    Pros for the Odyssey IMO, were the feeling of size inside. The large expanses of glass and high straight roof make it feel huge. The engine is very nice and quiet, I think VTEC is great, but really needs a manual tranny. One needs to really keep the hammer down to achieve 245 hp. Nevertheless, an excellent(and nearly silent) engine. The 3rd seat is nifty, but I don't imagine folding or removing the seat very often at all. The tight turning radius would clearly come in handy as well.

    I had actually put down a deposit on the Ody, because I had tried every other MV besides the Chrysler. I hadn't checked the Chrysler because I've never had a particularly good impression of the company, and the old MV's clearly had some issues, but I decided I had to check out the granddaddy of MV's before closing the deal, and as I said earlier, the ride blew us away. Then I checked JD Power for reliability, and when I found that the T&C was rated equal to ODY in mechanical quality and better in body & interior quality, my choice was made.

    Sorry for the lengthy post, but I thought I'd share my $.02
  • jawandajawanda Member Posts: 30
    Just to add another tidbit. The Honda dealer was ok, not particularly good or bad, and they were doing straight MSRP, no surcharge.
    The Chrysler dealers were slimy dishonest weasels, but unfortunately I couldn't beat their price at the other relatively close dealerships, but they definitely will never receive my service dollars.
  • leebealeebea Member Posts: 25
    Just picked it up last Wednesday and love it. Have been asked if I miss my Chev Blazer SUV - not at all. The T&C rides, handles well, is quiet and looks great in my garage next to my '01 Sebring Convertible Limited. Unlike "tasillo" I didn't have to part with my convertible. "Tasillo", my granddaughters love the DVD in the back, and what sound out of it. My daughter was as taken with it as the kids were. I think I may be moving her away from her Pathfinder.
    ...and my dealer is the best I have ever dealt with. He is a small dealer in the Boston area and is very much customer oriented. From some of the posts I've read he must be a rare find.
    Happy motoring,
    Lee B.
  • spruchman1spruchman1 Member Posts: 6
    My wife and I have been shopping around for a MV.
    I like the DGC sport with 3.8, upgraded speakers, split rear seats. I priced the GC at around 28. I liked the 0% financing Dodge offered and the free DVD player plus I was able to get a discount of 1% under dealer cost. I wife wanting to test drive the Ody. We went to our local dealer and found an EX/L with the DVD system in the color we liked. The Ody contained heated seats, side air bags plus a host of other features that the GC does not have or are additional options. The Ody
    listed for 30,360. The dealers advertised price was 29,260. My final price was 28,250!

    As other have mentioned, the radio stinks for a $30,000 van and the controls on the steering wheel and the window controls do not light up. But for the price, the Ody offer much more than the Dodge. (I still like the look of the GC better) but I had to go with the Ody. I hope I will learn to love it.
  • artgpoartgpo Member Posts: 483
    Excuse me, but who is saying you cannot get side airbags on the DC vans? They are very much available.

    I do not drive either a DC or Honda van but do follow this message board. There is all this talk of reliability and depreciation. If you keep a vehicle long enough depreciation becomes a non-issue. Read and listen to the so called "experts" and you will know that the least expensive way of ownership is to keep a vehicle long after depreciation is an issue. Many people (me included) buy new vehicles WAY too often. I really do believe lots of people get sucked into buying an Odyssey because of what they read in the press. Spend your effort searching boards such as these and owner comments on other sites. Once you have a bad experience with your $30,000 darling you are more apt to spill your guts on one of these boards. Likewise, happy drivers will form a defensive line around their favorites. I have found Consumer Reports (I have subscribed for many years) to be nothing more than another opinion, especially the frequency of repair.

    What my rambling is saying is that get ALL the information from a lot of sources and do not believe everything you read.
  • bdaddybdaddy Member Posts: 171
    You will soon love the Ody. Yeah, the stereo isn't as nice as the DC, but you don't buy a minivan to bump your way down the street. You also don't buy a minivan to shift a manual transmission - I don't know where that came from.

    DC vans are just fine, I'm sure. The one thing I do notice (brought to light by another poster) is that DC owners don't stick around here too long. The first 60k on any new vehicle is easy. What happens after that is a whole different story. While Honda is not immune to problems, as their recent tranny issues attest, they do seem to hold people's attention longer (an observation). Time will tell for the recent versions of MVs by Honda and DC.
  • jbpehrjbpehr Member Posts: 4
    Can you post the dealer name you got your T&C from? I live in Natick and am looking for good folks to deal with. Thanks! JayP
  • impact01impact01 Member Posts: 95
    Hi all,

    I am looking to replace my 1993 T&C FWD (~85000 miles, no tranny problem so far thank heavens!). While I love my van, I am looking at both the 2003 T&C and Odyssey. One of my chief complaint with Chrysler is that the second row captain's chairs are fixed, they don't even move aft/forward. I actually like the set up in Honda where you can have the middle seat both ways but don't care much for the magic seat. The Honda is not as luxurious as a T&C, however it has all the essentials minus the overhead console. Do any of you recommend good dealerships in the central maryland area?. I keep my cars for a long time, and this time around it seems to me luxury of T&C Ltd doesn't warrant the difference in price (and I hate the gaudy wheels!). Thanks in advance.
  • dave210dave210 Member Posts: 242
    If I'm not mistaken, if you have a 1993 Town & Country, don't you have the gold floral designed wheels? All I know is I was thanking the lord that Chrysler ditched the ugly flower gold wheels that they offered from 1992-1998 and offered something a little better (In my opinion the 16 spoke chrome wheels).

    I had a 1996 Town & Country LXi and was embarrassed everyday that either my wife or I would be driving around a car with floral designed GOLD wheels UGGGG!!! But to each his own!

    Oh but for advice on the buying process, you can basically get a T&C LTD for around $31,000, where an EX-L Odyssey is around $28,800. So the Honda is cheaper and will probably hold its value a little better in the short run, but the T&C does have many features that the Odyssey doesn't. The T&C has:

    1) 2 position memory seats, mirrors, radio presets
    2) 6 disc CD changer
    3) 3 zone digital automatic climate control
    4) Overhead console (same as '93)
    5) 4-way power passenger seat
    6) Removable center console
    7) Power trunk
    8) Optional power pedals with memory
    9) Optional sunroof
    10) Optional load-leveling suspension

    But in the end, the Honda may still be the better value to you. It's up to you how much you value the above luxury features. If you end up with Odyssey, good luck and I'm sure you'll be happy; same goes for the T&C if you go that route. I for one am trading the T&C on an Acura, so maybe I shouldn't talk :-)
  • impact01impact01 Member Posts: 95
    dave210, You're right. However, I feel the gold/silver floral wheels are/ were a bit better (IMHO). I agree with all the points you brought up however, I would like to use Chrysler's 0% financing, so T&C limited invoices around $33K at the minimum. Add in the options, the invoice pushes $35K. I am yet to start negotiating, but Edmund's TMV is not much different from invoice. I should also point out, I dislike the feel of honda power sliding doors. With 0% financing, I may actually come out ahead with T&C, but as I said earlier, I expected the 2003 Chrysler to have second row seats that at least moved fore/aft to get more leg room for my daughter, a shortcoming in 1993 T&C. I'll have to go for a test drive with her to see how the 03 T&C is, though I don't expect it to be very different than 93.
  • dave210dave210 Member Posts: 242
    Impact01: Yeah, if you were to go with the financing, then your price pre-tax would probably be around $33,000. It would only be $31,000 if you went for the rebates. But who knows, there are MANY T&C's on the lots so dealing under invoice actually shouldn't be too hard.

    But yes, movable fore-aft bucket seats would be nice, although I must say, getting into the third row in a Chrysler is much easier with their flip forward bucket seats, which I believe your '93 has.

    One more thing to note is, if you really don't like the Limited wheels, the LXi may be a better fit. Minus the extra Limited luxuries like memory seats and the chrome wheels, the LXi is more comparable to an Ody EX-L than a T&C Limited is to an Ody EX-L.

    With an LXi, you still keep the automatic dimming mirrors, automatic headlights, triple zone digital climate control, heated leather seats, etc.

    But again, whatever choice you make, it won't be a bad one!
  • leebealeebea Member Posts: 25
    Jay,
    The dealer is Foley Chrysler in North Quincy. If you take Squantum St. east from the SE Expressway, you will drive right into their front door. The Sales Mgr. is Rich Snyder and the Service Mgr. is Paul Sutherland. Their phone is 617 328 5400.
    I knew Paul because our wives used to work together. When I was looking for my '01 Sebring convertible last year, Paul introduced me to Rich. A couple of weeks ago I picked up my '03 T&C. I haven't had any problems with either car yet but I have no doubt that I would be satisfied with the outcome.
    I live in Bridgewater and am moving to North Attleborough in the spring but will continue to take both vehicles to Foley for maintenance and service.
    Good Luck,
    Lee B.
  • jawandajawanda Member Posts: 30
    I agree that the LXi is more like the EX/L, but is still better equipped, and as I mentioned above, you can pick up an new '02 below the price of the Odyssey, if you're willing to do that. Dealers are getting $4000 cash back for '02 models, but no financing options are available so you have to do market rates.
    I posted all the options on my LXi above, and still came in below the Odyssey price.
  • bowke28bowke28 Member Posts: 2,185
    the difference in the resale value of a honda and a chrysler is the fact that the value holds FAR longer. so if you drive till resale drops below $2000, you get about 10 years/125k miles from a chrysler. even a '95 ody(isuzu) with 215k miles brought $2200 on trade in last week. retail still holds around $4800.
  • pluto5pluto5 Member Posts: 618
    Why would an executive type drive a Honda minivan?
  • bdaddybdaddy Member Posts: 171
    Cuz executive types are too busy to sit in DC service department waiting areas whilst their DC vans are being repaired. You asked:-)
  • dkrabdkrab Member Posts: 77
    The 95 Odyssey was not built by Isuzu. It's pure Honda. The Isuzu version (Oasis) was just a rebadged Honda.
  • pluto5pluto5 Member Posts: 618
  • bdaddybdaddy Member Posts: 171
    Lets not forget, there are many women executives. some of them, I suspect, are responsible for getting their kids to day care, to school, activities, etc. and therefore, own a minivan. Nothing wrong with that - in fact, it's probably the most practical solution.
  • shadowfax2shadowfax2 Member Posts: 22
    My Chrysler experience was not good. I purchased a 1994 Plymouth Grand Voyager brand new. My family really liked the vehicle. It was well designed and very comfortable. However, mechanically, it was junk. We had a multitude of problems including a power window that malfunctioned, a radio that died without any apparent reason, cracking of the interior plastic, and faulty bolts on one of the pulleys..kept breaking. Just after the 3-yr warranty expired the entire air conditioning system died, and I had it. I traded it on a 1998 4Runner and never looked back. I will never buy another Chrysler product of any kind. They are beautifully designed and seductive vehicles but are nothing but junk under that beautiful facade. Sorry Chrysler, you've lost me for good.
  • leebealeebea Member Posts: 25
    That was 1994, this is 2003. Nine model years is a lifetime. It's not fair to say a product IS junk based on your experience nine years ago. Rather you can say the product WAS junk.
    At one time I hated Chrysler products. I now have a 2001 Sebring Limited convertible and a 2003 T&C Limited. So far they are great vehicles. Consumer Reports reviews are good on Chrysler these days.
    On the Toyota side, compared with the Sebring convertible look at some of the issues with the Solara convertible. It has its share of problems.
    Lee B.
  • shadowfax2shadowfax2 Member Posts: 22
    Sorry leebea, no disrespect to you or your own choice of vehicles. I do like the look of many Chrysler products (including the Sebring and T-C) - I think their exterior styling is superb and appealing. I had a bad experience and got no satisfaction from anyone at Chrysler and that's why I left. Maybe I just got a lemon. I know other Chrysler van owners who say they've been very happy with their purchases. Good luck with your vehicles.
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.