-September 2024 Special Lease Deals-
2024 Chevy Blazer EV lease from Bayway Auto Group Click here
2024 Jeep Grand Cherokee lease from Mark Dodge Click here
2025 Ram 1500 Factory Order Discounts from Mark Dodge Click here
2024 Chevy Blazer EV lease from Bayway Auto Group Click here
2024 Jeep Grand Cherokee lease from Mark Dodge Click here
2025 Ram 1500 Factory Order Discounts from Mark Dodge Click here
Comments
Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport-2020 C43-2021 Sahara 4xe-1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica
Wife's: 2015 X1 xDrive28i
Son's: 2018 330i xDrive
These processing delays are more evident in the newest autos because of the never-ending search of fuel mileage that can compete with fending off the parasitic losses that only an auto can exploit. Just a few of which involves torque converters that communicate (albeit slowly at times and aggressively at poor times) with shutting off fuel injectors and a host of many other engine and ESC computers, and often the worst decisions made at the worst possible times. All of that electronic intervention, can all be so easily avoided with a manual transmission. It gives you the type of control that is directly linked to your eyes/brain/feet/arm/hand etc. All actions that only an auto could dream of being truly in charge of with the predictable results that a manual in the right hands takes for granted only a few hundred or thousand times a day depending on the length and type of your commute.
So all that said, is there a place in the world for autos? Of course there most certainly is. Someone who has poor use of their left leg would be an ideal candidate. As would someone who drives 70% of all their miles in literal stop-and-go congested traffic. And certain other unique but rarer situations.
But with a manual, I like:
- I like the control of the car. Ultimate, unencumbered control of getting the engine torque to the road...and in all the different driving conditions and varied road surfaces...imagine the concept.
- I like how it forces interactivity with your vehicle that an auto, any auto, cannot begin to match.
- I like the less complexity than an auto. And lest you pooh pooh the complexity, consider the lack of sensors that can go bad, the lack of wiring connections that are prone to corrosion. Consider for a moment, how universally safer a manual is if you are in a car that has the infamous apparent SUA? For anyone questioning this, please cite even ONE example, (worldwide if you like) of SUA, with a manual transmission.
- I like the longevity potential in most well designed manuals.
- I like the lower cost to repair if and when it ever does become necessary.
- I like the lower cost of admission to purchase the car.
- I like the ability to provide more efficient fuel economy in the vast majority of the right hands and driving a manual properly than any auto.
- I like the lower weight of a manual.
- I like the fact that if another road user is using a manual, then they are in all likelihood a far safer driver to be sharing the road with, because, assuming they are not a manual and clutch-abusing user, actually get the relationship of friction to the road and what all is actually entailed by the engine and tranny to apply that forward or retarded motion of the vehicle.
- I like that with a manual, parasitic loss of torque pales in comparison to an auto.
- I like that i can bump or push-start the car with low battery gone bad.
- I like that I don't have to have the cost, weight or complexity of tranny oil cooling lines that tap off my radiator.
- did I mention ultimate CONTROL of the vehicle?
- at ALL times?
There are bound to be a few likes I might be forgetting, but I'm sure you must get the idea by now.
Open-minded converts invited.
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
I remember reading about a case where 3 punks drove into a subdivision and decided to burglarize a house. When the police showed up they caught the driver but the other two kids got away. They were found a few minutes later sitting in the "getaway" car. It was a manual- and it turned out that neither doofus could drive a stick.
Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport-2020 C43-2021 Sahara 4xe-1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica
Wife's: 2015 X1 xDrive28i
Son's: 2018 330i xDrive
Of course, I agree with gimme's list a few posts ago. For me, the advantages of a manual outweigh autos by so much I can't believe that no one wants to buy them any longer.
If nothing else, when I test drove an I4 Accord back in 2006, I humored the salesman and took an auto out for a spin, then drove the stick. I couldn't believe the difference in quickness and response... especially after hearing about how "peppy" the auto was.
It's such a shame that Honda dealers have cut way back on the number of manuals they keep in stock, since Honda makes such a great manual.
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
Here's a scenario I try to tell anyone who asks (all my friends and family know my respect for manuals {and stuff about cars} so I get asked) me when anyone goes car shopping. If it's a small car especially, this applies.
You have your A/C on, in 5th gear, going up a hill, and want to accelerate to pass someone or merge onto a freeway. So you drop down to 4th, but just then you felt the A/C cycle on, so I do one of two things, depending on how easy it is to reach the A/C button...I either reach over quick and hit the A/C off, or I go down to 3rd gear. I do the former if I want to save gas, and the latter if not. But my point is that I saved gas compared to an auto in both those situations.
With the auto, you are in 4th OD (or 5th and lately 6th, and is why the 6 speeds really do help save gas, except still very rare in small 1.4 and 1.5 litre sized cars) and you are about to do that same pass or merge, so you had pressed the accelerator to get the tranny to downshift to 3rd, that uses gas to do that unless you pulled it back into 3rd yourself, then the same A/C cycled at that same bad time, so now in order to get any serious urge, now you are faced with having to floor the accelerator to get the tranny to go down yet another gear into 2nd. Now that little engine is sucking big gas at high revs.
But with the stick, you had control. Ultimate control to pick 4th or even 3th gear for that matter right from the start, without having to use any big foot stuffed into the accelerator pedal, getting it to down change.
Even sadder is that Honda is no longer even offering a stick in their highest trimlines.
I have an 06 EX-L w/navi... very rare.
When we bought that 00 Accord we wanted a stick and a sunroof. The EX was the only model with that and included four wheel discs as well. It's up somewhere in the 200k range. My daughter is driving it these days.
Old Accords are great. My son has my old 95 EX with a manual. I think it has about 230k now.
oh, yeah, old Accords are wonderful. My first was an 80 sedan. That funky green that they liked back then.
Honda is putting its money on VCM in the current generation V6 sedan. I don't know if that excludes manuals automatically but that's what they are going with. The coupe doesn't have VCM so the stick is still an option there. Interestingly enough, there is no price break if you get the stick on the V6 coupe but there is on the I4.
Our second Accord, a second generation was a dark blue which was much nicer. I'm betting I'd have gotten 200K out of that one if some old guy hadn't run a stop sign and t-boned me back in 1992. My wife still talks about that car - very fondly.
Are they both 6 speeds? If so, then might be optioned a bit differently? They play around sometimes and you're not suppose to notice.
I guess we can now officially refer to the good ol' days of the past.
The stick is 6 speeds w/o VCM, the manual is 5 with VCM. Other options are the same. Of course, even at the same price, the manual would be my choice.
VCM stands for Variable Cylinder Management. Essentially it shuts off either 2 or 3 of the 6 cylinders when you are cruising at highway speeds in order to save gas. Some people have complained about the roughness and others don't notice. There's a whole forum around here about it.
Or is VCM brand new?
Sounds like what they did with Dodge V8's a few years ago.
I guess they have perfected it since the old 8-6-4 in the Cadillac's eh? They were a disaster. I guess with today's electronics they can shut of the fuel injectors to the non firing cylinders, and not have the cyl walls washed down with gas.
Honda Accord VCM
I have no personal experience with this technology - just observing what others are posting.
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
Review your vehicle
And yes, they use that in the Ody and now the Pilot too. The Accord Crosstour also has it... but alas, the Crosstour has no manual available.
The whole principle of shutting off cylinders that are still connected to (and prone to the exact same reciprocating mass, less a power-stroke) the same crankshaft, I have never really been onboard with, no matter how optimistic I have tried to be about the prospects.
Just goes to show..trust your instincts..
Another, is my (presently still owned and used but not without some serious internal bits attention) 5 hp Honda snowblower. The governor failed (due to a very cheap plastic {actually nylon, but with not enough pork} gear on the very inside of the engine to control the governor. Briggs has perfected that very same governor operation but instead, with a super cheap but effective external, wind-vane governor control. So a person might reflect on this as an over-engineered and complex governor.
"Mr.Honda...you aren't always the perfect engine designer/builder. Don't rest on your laurels just yet. As consumers, (some of us) are watching what you screw up".
But lest I get accused of getting on their case too much, I'll add that the engine in my CRV is so smooooth, that if, at times, I have the tunes very loud, sometimes it takes me a few minutes to realize that I forgot to upshift to 5th from 4th as I made my way from a 30 to 35 to 50 mph zone. That's an impressive compliment in case anyone was not sure why I mentioned it..
I've had that exact thing happen to me in my 06 Accord. My 95 was much noisier and I could easily hear the engine.
Technically though, no two engines come off the assembly line in exactly the same perfect balance. One can extra buttery smooth, and the other one beside it not so much. That becomes more evident if the engine design is a bit raspy to begin with, except non are ever buttery smooth.. :sick: (GM's Quad 4, Ford's old 2.3, Chrysler's well...many of their 4's) etc
You pretty much nailed it... It's the 2354cc i-VTEC engine.
Same displacement but HP is 166@5800 and Torque is 160@4000. Compression Ration is 9.7:1.
I absolutely love this car.
Will it convert those who will not be converted? Probably not. Their loss.
I doubt that was your intention though anyway in this day and age.
Still, it is cool to see the stick faithful here.
Sam
To be fair, though, to myself..I never claimed there wasn't a place for autos. Anyway, I admit now that due to new health issues, I too will be considering an automatic for my next vehicle. Probably will be a 5 or 6 speed.
Standards still suit younger, non arthritic knees and I still maintain they are the transmission of choice for most racing duties.
Just an FYI, if you happen to be considering a stick in Toyota Matrix, Corolla and the Pontiac Vibe, first read the entire thread called "Matrix Transmission Problems". It sure proves two things. Not all standard trans have good design or longevity potential no matter how diligent the owner, and also that Toyota dropped the ball on these poor victims who trusted the brand to do the right thing. Reminds me of how Mazda dropped the ball the rust issues on earlier Proteges. That's another enlightening thread to read.
There are no clutch pedals any present day F1 car or prototype sports racing car. Most other classes of race cars are rapidly abandoning the old manual setups since the twin-clutch setups (invented by Porsche) transmit power better and shift much faster.
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
FWIW, I've raced and no one I know would consider racing with an FJ1300 type dual clutch tranny in whatever race bike you wanna prepare..
Yes, the technology is getting better because of micro-processing abilities always improving, but think back decades ago before there was any computer on earth...you simply COULD NOT beat the dexterity of a skilled human hand judging clutch takeup and final engagement when hiked over with everything on the cusp of scraping..
Anyway, probably you are gonna disagree and I'm going to be ok with that..
FWIW #2..I absolutely KNEW someone was going to mention F1 in some context or another. But what did surprise me, was how little time it took..haha.
Cheers, have a good one..
Also, racing is kind of different from everyday riding or driving. If you aren't competing, it becomes less important.
I say, bring on more automated clutches on cars and bikes. I like to shift, but I grow tired of clutch work in a car or on a bike. I use the tiptronic feature on my daily driver constantly, and my ancient car with a weird prehistoric non torque converter automatic also gets shifted manually. Most bikes I have ridden have featured stiff neglected clutches - so I just got aggressive and shifted without using it :shades: Computer controlled clutches in cars are becoming common, but not on bikes yet - probably due to size/weight issues and cries from luddites who also hate ABS on a bike. Only clutchless bikes I have seen are the unloved Mana, bizarre Honda VFR , and the big FJR. There will be more. Clutchless speed shift (upshift) capability seems to have potential, I know it is on S1000RR and Tuono anyway. Let me shift, but take out a likely needless step in the process.
That said, and I recall you ride also from previous chats in the past, so I know that you too can appreciate that even upshifts require delicate intervention of the personal touch kind in certain circumstances..hence your points about power to weight ratios etc.. and I will add, even though you too were probably thinking also.. the lesser contact patch that a bike has to deal with compared to the plantedness that 4 tires at 4 corners provides.
The principle of my point here is, of course, that when it gets down to exploring those limits of traction..it's still pretty hard to beat a personal hands-on with a skilled rider at the controls, especially when power to weight ratios are in the extreme. Also though, I say that with the thought in mind that my clutch cables were always well lubed, sharp routing corners always eliminated, and even if dealing with hydraulic actuation, I also regularly lubed my pivot on the clutch handle. When going for a Sunday ride with friends and even strangers when stopped for some bench racing I have offered (and been taken up on the offer many times) to grease (silicone type) a neglected clutch pivot pin, on the spot.. and am always amused with the comments after on our next break. "Oh wow!...My clutch feels so smooth now and the feedback is fantastic!! Thanks man, I'll stay on top of that from now to be sure!" Brass bushings have that ability to mask true fluidity feel..but it still performs better when lubed and the difference is always noticeable.
As for shifting without the clutch, I'm not one of those guys who do it. Yes, cassette bike trannys allow this, but nonetheless..longevity and overall feel of the upshift still can't compete as smoothly as using the clutch.
All that said tho..I recall more than once when I got stuck in multilane traffic jams and I sure wished for a switch that allowed me to choose an 'automatic' mode of some type. I'm talkin' severe clutch hand cramp of course.. even with the power of hydraulics to compress clutch springs on a big displacement engine, it still can old pretty fast in those circumstances.
Good point, a bike has more delicate contact patch/balance issues, which IMO makes them even better candidates for an automated clutch which can remove some potential for error. Many riders, myself included, aren't experts, and removing this room for error might help other skills. I am not advocating a full on automatic shift nor would I want one, mind you. I like shifting. But if an automated clutch can be as good as 99% of skilled manual users, and be safer for normal users, why not? I also live in a hilly area, it could solve issues with that too.
Last summer, I rode a 20+ year old bike with a very stiff lever, after an hour my left hand was a cramped up mess, and it ached for days. It has me jaded. I am looking at bikes now, and ease of clutch use will rank high, along with the bike tolerating clutchless shifting. I want something that is light enough to be operated by a finger or two, has an early take up point, and I like that slipper clutches are becoming more common.
On the car topic, back in the 90s, my dad bought a 68 Fairlane out of an estate, 289, 3 on the tree. It was a bear to drive, I think the clutch needed work - seemed the take up point varied with each shift, and the car having manual steering and brakes didn't help. I see why he would leave it in 2nd for most lower speed driving. Haven't wanted to drive a manual since.