Brake Pads for 2009 Subaru Forester 2.5X

twrippertwripper Member Posts: 3
edited September 2014 in Subaru
I have a 2009 Subaru Forester 2.5X and have been looking at getting new brake pads but looking to upgrade from the standard OEM pads. I was wondering if anyone out there has tried any higher performance pads and if anyone out there can recommend any specific brake pads? I was looking at the Raybestos Professional Grade Ceramics and the Hawk Performance Ceramic pads...the price of the Hawk's are about double that of the Raybestos and I am wondering if it is just a brand name thing or if anyone can actually vouch for the Hawks that they are worth paying double for. Also any other suggestions would be great, I am just lost with picking out brake pads since I havent tried enough brands to know.

Comments

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    C&D had an article where they changed just the pads and I recall the Hawk pads performed quite admirably.

    I'm not familiar with the Raybestos but it sounds sort of generic.
  • twrippertwripper Member Posts: 3
    @ ateixeira

    All they did was replace the pads? Just wondering cause usually from what I know you also want to resurface your rotors before putting on new pads. Also do you know if the test was done on a Forester or on another vehicle?
  • ic_designeric_designer Member Posts: 28
    edited April 2011
    I use Akebono brake pads in my Outback and Corolla. I am very happy with it. You can read the review at tirerack.com or amazon. The brake pads are very quiet. I use ATE slotted rotor on my Outback and Centric rotor on my Corolla. Centric is a lot cheaper. Stopping distance seems to be better with Akebono pads and Centric rotor combination. This is probably because Corolla is a lot lighter.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I can do better - here's a link to the full article:

    http://www.caranddriver.com/features/02q3/shedding_light_on_fading_brakes-featur- e

    Looks like they used a Subaru after all - a WRX!
  • dcm61dcm61 Member Posts: 1,567
    I'm not familiar with the Raybestos but it sounds sort of generic.

    Raybestos (circa 1902) is a year older than Ford Motor Company. Raybestos doesn't sound as generic as Ford. :D

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raybestos
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.