Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Scion xA
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
As a side note, the Chevy Aveo is a Korean manufactured vehicle (used to be Daewoo). Suzuki markets the Forenza and Verona models which are also manufactured by the former Daewoo. The xA is all Toyota and the Aerio is all Suzuki.
However, it is important to keep in mind that a lot of buyers of economy cars desparately need to keep them in service economically.
In otherwords, it helps to have good manufacturer and dealer backup.
The Scion has all that. It is backed up by every Toyota dealer in the country, even those that don't sell Scions. Independent service providers like Firestone and Sears can readily get parts for them from Toyota dealers (with Toyota's excellent responsiveness). Third parties make filters etc. for them.
You move to an Aveo, at least you have Chevy dealers to back you up. But, the car is a big unknown, given GM's record with imports (the Aveo is made in Korea), quality is not likely to be high, parts are likely to be slower to obtain, and the mechanics will almost always be happier working on Suburbans and even Cavaliers than the somewhat alien Aveo.
With Suzuki, you can do some research before you start. Check any online telephone directory and see how many Suzuki dealers you come up with. Try that in some town or out of the way place where you might be on a trip.
Now I am not knocking either car if you like their personalities. BUT, think down the road on service and resale value. If you can absorb the hits in these areas go ahead. Otherwise, you aren't really saving money in the long run. You'd be much better buying a Neon, a really fine but underrated car, where there are hundreds of thousands on the road already, lots of dealers and service available. No resale value, but reliable if you keep it for a lont time.
Can anyone offer comparative opinions on the rear seat comfort between the xA and xB?
Also, with the side airbags available on the xA, it seems that this car can be about as safe as the Civics and Corollas (which are larger and heavier than the Scions).
The xB on the other hand, had gobs of interior room. I was able to sit comfortably in the front seat with plenty of legroom and headroom, then I left the drivers seat in the furthest back position and moved to the rear seat directly behind the drivers seat. I still had a couple of inches clear over my head and even had a couple inches clear between my knees and the back of the drivers seat. I was truly impressed.
Head room, of course, favors the xB. But at 5'10", that's less of an issue for me.
What attracts me to the xA is the availability of front and rear side airbags, something that somewhat makes up for the small size of the car among everything else I see on the road in my town (soccer moms--who let them out on the road with their Expeditions and cell phones??!!!).
I'd probably take the xA if they had stuck it on the stretched frame of the xB, and consequently moved the rear seat back a couple inches. As it was, the xA's rear seating seem tighter than in the xB.
The xB was cavernous, as everyone agrees. It's even a bit disconcerting, sliding the driver's seat into position and then reaching way forward to adjust the rearview mirror. Boy! they really place the windshield forward. (Hey Toyota, be the first to manufacturer to offer a telescoping rearview mirror!)
I have to wait until the dealership brings in a couple automatics before I make my decision. The 5-speeds were okay; I'm afraid the automatics will be very sluggish. But then, I could use to accelerate more slowly--for the sake of increasing MPGs.
That works in what's essentially the xA and xB's grandfather... I'll be disappointed if the Scions' AC is worse.
Looking forward to meeting everyone!
I bought a 2005 Scion xA two Mondays ago, and when I bought it, it had a full tank of gas. I didn't have to refill until this past Monday, but I noticed that the odo read 289miles. I'm under the impression that that averages out to about 24.3 MPG. If I am accurate (am I?), then should I be worried and have my Scion service dept look at it? I mean, if I'm wrong then it's ok but I really shouldn't be averaging less than 30 MPG considering I use it primarily for commuting on the freeway for a cumulative (to and from) time of 30 minutes a day!
Any advise would be helpful,
thanks.
There are other factors as well, on your first tank. The dealer may have short filled the tank, not being as careful as you will be in the future; or you may be pushing the car in your driving techniques - the thrill of newness.
First, refill it carefully. It is hard to get a full tank of gas in the xA due to the narrow filler neck, but it can be done if you manually fill it (hold the delivery handle, don't walk away). It takes 2-3 additional clicks to fill it completely; you need to keep the nozzle jammed into the neck and it won't spill this way.
Then reset the odometer and at your next refill, see how much gas you used. The gas gauge is a very inexact tool, in comparison.
I typically get 320 miles between fills. I typically put in a little over 9 gallons, to my so-called "empty" tank still has 2.5 gallons according to my manual.
My mileage was 32 mpg to start and improved to 35 after a couple of thousand miles, but I have a stick and a fairly free flowing freeway to commute, so my mileage is optimal. Figure 4 mpg less for an automatic, which would give you 28 to start improving to 31, which is about what I got with my former Echo automatic on the same commute.
Subtract 4 mpg for heavy city driving - not stop and go, just regular stop light to stoplight driving. That would be 24 to start improving possibly to 27, but it's hard to imagine that kind of mileage with city driving. Let's face it, although its a light car, accelerating is much "thirstier" work for the engine than cruising on the highway, even though there is a lot more wind resistance.
The xA gets outstanding mileage. There are other cars that I have driven that are a lot bigger or heavier that match it - the Cavalier with Ecotec and stick came in at 34, my stick Neon (one each first and second generation) came in at 35 - but none of these is a slick and well made as the xA. The xA is penalized by the fact that it's heavier than the Echo, and runs at an incredibly high rpm (at least with the stick) on the freeway. Those high rpm let you run up from 60-80 with relative ease, and the engine is so precisely made you are still getting 35 mpg (but you might get 40 with a more boring, but fuel efficient, lower gear).
Still, I'm satisfied.
A word on service: Toyotas (and now other cars) have been in the new with sludge problems. This is not one of the engines "officially" affected, but word on the street is that the coolant and oil passages in all these small, hardworking engines are very tiny and its easy to start to "cook" your oil and build up sludge. This is generally taken out by the oil filter, and isn't a problem on 3,000 mile oil changes (because you don't exceed the filter capacity and still have enough lubricating properties left in your oil), but popular wisdom is you need to totally ignore the 7,500 mile "regular" oil change interval in the owner's manual; and if you want to follow the "conservative" factory manual 5,000 mile recommendedc oil change interval, you should use full synthetic and not conventional or even synthetic blend. Synthetic blend is no good, because the conventional oil in the blend will still cook. Only full synthetic oil is exceptionall heat resistant and won't clog your filter, your engine's oil passages, or lose its lubricating capacity.
Right now the oil companies are transitioning from SL oil to SM oil; the car makers finally beat them up enough to upgrade oils across the board. The SM spec is much harder to meet, so much so that Conoco, which makes Union 76 oil, Motorcraft oil, and their own branded oil, has announced that in 5-20 and 5-30 weights it is discontinuing conventional oil in favor of blends and full synthetics.
Personally, I'd use my three free oil change coupons to get 3,000 mile oil changes at the dealer. Thereafter I'd either choose a Toyota dealer with an Express Lane for 29.95 oil changes (with no $144 "minor service bs), or I'd research the issue and bring my own oil of choice(my favorite is Mobil 1 5-30) purchased at Walmart to the Express Lane. That way I'd have the best of all worlds: dealer service with a record of every oil change; the benefit of the best oil money can buy, without a 100% dealer markup; and (thanks to the Express Lane) a low cost, comparable to an independent oil change shop. Keep in mind that you can safely bring down the cost of Mobil 1 by extending to 5,000 mile oil changes, and save yourself the time in the service waiting room. I wouldn't go 5,000 miles or more with a conventional or blended oil, though.
Toyota's own branded oil is actually Mobil Drive Clean, btw, a decent but not outstanding conventional oil.
Wow thanks for all that info. I am wondering if my driving methods are decreasing the fuel economy of my xA...I don't really race on it at all (the most I've gone on it was 70mph) but what I notice is that (for my automatic xA):
1) Even when I turn the car on with the parking break, it is at the 1000 RPM mark. I don't know if that is normal or not?
2) Accelerating from park mode - when I speed up to like 20mph (I don't really think I punch it), it goes from 1 to almost 3000rpm mark just at that acceleration. Again, I'm a novice with this car and so I don't know if this is normal.
3) Sometimes it struggles on hills even if the hill is not too steep, in fact it seems like I am pushing the engine if I am going 40mph uphill on a city street. The manual suggests I keep it on D gear and keep the overdrive on so that is what I do. Basically, I never use the "2" gear. Which makes me wonder if I am handling the car wrongly by never using the "2" gear? The only time I've used it is going downhill a couple times to go slower.
4) On the freeway, I tried a couple of times to punch it from 3k rpms to 4k rpms and once it got to 4k rpms it forced itself back to (closer to) 3k rpms so I stopped trying to push the issue with it. From what I've experienced, I have to accelerate at a gradual pace in order for the engine to be comfortable going to higher speeds.
Lastly, I don't really like my oil dipstick. It's plastic and yellow, that's a first for me, and I had trouble reading the oil on it.
Any feedback would be helpful...
1000rpm is a totally normal idle speed. An engine has to be revving at least that fast to keep itself on. If you're not moving and the engine's on, you should be at 1000rpm, whether you have either brake system on, you're in park, or you're in neutral.
Then you hit the gas pedal, which actually gives more air to the engine, and then the engine feeds itself fuel to match the airflow. They combust, and the explosions speed up the engine - its revs go up. You can go up to about 6000rpm in a typical car (that's redline, the engine's physical limits).
This is a simplification, but assume each rev creates the same amount of torque (twisting force). The faster you're revving, the faster you're sending torque to the transmission. If it's not in neutral or park, the transmission multiplies the torque by a gear ratio (a different ratio for each gear) and sends it to the wheels. The wheels get the car moving.
If you only had one gear, the car's speed and the engine's speed would go up and down together, linearly. So when you're going to 20mph, if you only use 1st gear, the tachometer and speedometer would go up together. The tachometer would reach its redline at 6000rpm, which might be, say, 30mph. At that point, the engine's doing all it can, so you can't go faster without shifting. Then the car shifts to 2nd gear. (btw, I'm not using numbers that'll match your car exactly)
In first gear, 0rpm = 0mph, and 6000rpm = 30mph. (In any gear, being at 0rpm would make you stall - so when you're idling at 1000rpm, you're not in gear.) It's a linear relation in between.
In second gear, 0rpm = 0mph (like always), but 6000rpm = 60mph. Since the relation is linear, we know that 30mph = 3000rpm.
So... you were going 25mph, in 1st gear, at 6000rpm. The car shifts to 2nd gear. In 2nd gear, that same speed is achieved at 3000rpm. Therefore you see your tachometer drop from 6000rpm to 3000rpm. When that happens, your car's speed remains 30mph.
Whenever your car shifts, the rpm's look like they've been forced back.
===
Going up a hill is harder, and to accelerate better you have to be in lower gear (so you'll be going at the same speed as otherwise, but at higher rpms, because that gives you more torque). Higher rpm's means more noise, and it'll sound like you're straining your engine. If your engine has been broken in (you've gone more than a few thousand miles) then it's ok to do that now and then. It won't live as long if it's often at 5000rpm, but you won't spend that much time at high engine speeds. Change the oil more often if you do.
I guess you can look for a different dipstick from another Toyota that has the same dimensions, but I dunno. Amber-on-yellow does seem hard to read.
Re: RPM up a hill. Your automatic is electronically controlled and adaptive (with so called fuzzy logic, or hill logic). It is designed to "learn" your preferred mode of driving - sporty and aggressive, or laid back. Sporty and aggressive cause the engine to stay in a lower gear until a higher RPM is reached, and to downshift more readily. Laid back is the opposite. In either case, skillful use of the throttle (heavy throttle short of a downshift, or heavy throttle to cause a downshift, additional throttle just before it would shift to keep it in lower gear, etc) can be used to get more flexibility out of the auto.
Re: Mileage. Did you check your fill up requirement? What do you estimate your current mileage to be? 28 mpg is perfectly normal during break in on the automatic. Expect to hit 30 there after, but only mid 20's with a lot of city driving thrown in the mix. In otherwords, you are "normal." The EPA estimates on the Scion and Echo are way optimistic. The are on a lot of cars. A few cars make them, and a few cars exceed them, but these situations are both in the minority.
I totally wouldn't worry about mileage. You did the right thing by buying a high mileage car in the first place. I was nervous about driving techniques to maximize mileage on both my Echo and Scion, but after a while I learned that unless you are doing a lot of city driving, were jackrabbit starts penalize you, your mileage won't be adversely affected by accelerating fast to get on the freeway or to pass someone (it will be affected if you tailgate a lot and are constantly using your brakes then your accelerator - and that wears out the brakes early too.).
If you ever want to pick up a free additional 4 mpg, learn to drive a stick shift and joing a dying breed.
Happy driving!
The New York Times had an article on this. Some cars can actually tune themselves up to benefit from one grade better. My VW Golf is EPA tested with regular, and runs fine on it, but the manual says "Premium recommended" - that's Premium, not midgrade. I have been running my latest Golf (I had a 2001 and now have a 2004) on Premium and it seems to run better, definitely gets between 1-1.5 mpg better - and that is with the factory 5-40 oil.
The other way I notice it is in holding gear longer before downshifting. Before, the Scion would rattle a little (knock). Now it doesn't. The Scion seems to benefit from midgrade, with no additional improvement for premium.
Finally, keep in mind that every economy car engine post 1999 is designed and tuned like the performance engine of the '80s - look at the much improved horsepower!
The ride was very hard initially, until I checked the tires. There was 34 pounds of air in the tires. I brought the pressure down to 29, as recommended, thus producing a better ride. I intend to use MOBIL 1 after the 1st oil change. I use MOBIL 1 in my Highlander and picked up 1-2 MPG.
Any comment appreciate
thanks!
I bought a 5-speed XA with side and curtain air bags. The car was 12,480; the air bags were 650 and delivery/processing & handling fee was 515. Total was 13,645.
Any comment appreciate
thanks!
so the price is pretty fixed...now I have another question about sales tax, in every state is the auto sales tax same as the store tax? each state has own auto sales tax?
What about for those states that has local tax? do they charge tax depending on the state or where your local is?? do you know what I mean?
if you don't let me know, I'll try my best explain in another way.
To answer you question directly, sales tax, is sales tax, whether you buy a car or a playstation. Some states levy luxury taxes, but I assure you that you won't have this problem on a Scion.
You'd be better off talking to someone in your state or the dealer to answer local tax questions. I don't see your point though, we're not talking huge amounts of money.
I do know you pay the tax according your state, my question is what if you have different local tax, should you pay where you buy or the city you are in? (this is in-state situation)
What if its out-state? I'll be going to another state for vocation, I'll probably need a car there. Do I pay tax according my city or their state. Because you buy car in another state, thats their state revenue. Thats why I am confused about the tax. and thats why I am considering in and out state situation.
For example,our local tax is 6%, however, we don't have scion dealership unless you go another city which is 8% sales tax. Another state I'll probably have trip has 4% sales tax. We are talking 4% difference here. You might not think 4% is a lot. I do think car is lots amount of money though, for a student and beginner like me.I rather spend as less as possible on car. If I do pay tax according to where I buy the car. Then, if you can buy 4% less why are you pay 4% more?
I already asked dealership about tax, waiting for response.
A friend bought a car from out of state. He got waived on tax in the state where he bought it, and took it to the local DMV to register it at his address...and pay the sizeable sales tax (actually called a "use tax" since the sale took place out of state, but the amount is the same as a sales tax). Theoretically we are supposed to declare all of our out of state mail order/internet purchases on our state tax returns, too.
I've asked people about different local taxes. I also emailed dmv to ask tax questions. I got one answer saying the money you pay goes to state, city and forgot the other one. I guess they spread the money to those three places. Maybe thats why they have these local taxes.
did you mean when you purchase car say in SFO, you don't pay sales tax until you register your car? sounds very good! but I've heard if you don't pay sales tax, the dealer wont' let you drive your car away; guess that was wrong, or its only in CA??
Internet tax has been an issue. Theoretically I agree what you say, and there are some sites has already practice sales tax. But as customer view, I ususally go for the site I don't need to pay tax just to save some money because shipping is another cost on internet order.
The tax is the same 5% that is taxed on everything else we buy (excl. clothes and unprepared food, which is 0%).
I just bought an RS 1.0 xA (#865) about 2 weeks ago and off the lot i was averaging 27 mpg. After all kinds of timing and checking w/ wheel size issues (since RS has 17" wheels) I finally checked the tire pressure -- 30 psi in my low-profile 50 psi rated tires. I inflated to 47 psi and now getting 35 mpg!!!!!! So maybe check your tires...
my 2 cents...
~jonathan
50psi-rated means it's in danger of blowing up above 50, not that it's the recommended pressure.
The ride on the xA is reported to be a little rough for the first couple thousand then gets somewhat smoother.
In terms of inflation, for what its worth, my 2001 VW Golf, which weighs about 400-500 pounds more than the xA, came with 195x65x15 tires, very close to the stock 185x60x15 inch tires on the xA, and only required 26 pound of tire pressure. This may well be all a car with this weight and this much tire requires. However, in light of the Firestone tire blow out debacle on Fords, no one seems to want to spec low tire pressures anymore; for example, the 2004 Golf is now stickered with a 32 psi requirement, the same as the xA. Thinking is, that if owners neglect checking the tire pressure, there is more of a safety margin for leakage and lowering of ambient temperatures before you are in the danger zone. On the other hand, my Neon says 32psi is good, but if you are going to drive over 80 mph or in the summer in hot climates, 35 psi is better. I have also read articles on driving techniques that highly recommend 35 psi for safety and handling reasons (but check your sidewall for max psi ratings! usually 45 psi, but sometimes as low as 35 psi).
For my wife, I always put in 35 psi so there is a margin of safety, and I also check it once a month, or if there is a sudden rise or fall in ambient temperature (heat wave, cold snap) check it again. You are supposed to have the mfg. recommended pressure based on ambient temperature, before driving more than a mile or two.
So, then, a tire with a proven reputation for soft riding will help; keeping it at 32psi will help. But don't go below the mfg. recommended minimum tire pressure.
For my wife, I always put in 35 psi so there is a margin of safety
35 PSI is on the firm side.
anyways, thanks to all who answered re. the rough ride and tire pressure. dumb question: where do i get my tire pressure checked - gas station? (sorry first car owner)
also, any idea if purchasing another size of tires would affect the ride at all?
to answer the question re. rear winndow visibility, i actually took out the rear headrests. i don't usually have rear passengers though. don't know if this is do-able for you.
I also walk my car before every drive to see if I have a flat or low tire, just to be on the safe side.