Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
it is tru though that they make GM NA look like CRAP compared to them..haha so tru!
and ive heard a lot about CAFE..what does it stand for though??
The closest I've personally seen to that is the Lexus RX330, but this is better.
About 4-days ago, went to start car in garage, and nothing. Well, actually, it kindasorta clicked a little but wouldn't start. Lights and stuff worked. Got it pushed back out of the garage and it jump started fine.
Okay for few days, then today, same thing again...wouldn't start for wife at work. Gets a friend to help her with a jump...still nothing. Until I have her put it in neutral (I had to shift it out of park to get it out of the garage the other day.) Then, with the jump, it starts fine. She gets home, parks in the driveway. Checks it a couple hours later, dead again, sort of. DIC shows low voltage at 9 or so volts. Don't know if the battery's bad, or something more sinister. Hopefully I can get it started in the morning then it's off to the shop. I read some old posts about battery a/o electrical problems similar if not exactly like this. Anyone know what the end results of those were?? Little over 7k miles on the car now.
The doors are very CTS like.
Another thing is that the seats are really low to the floor. Similiar to the CTS.
Unusual for a sedan.
One thing I don't like about the CTS is that there is a large distance between the seat bottom and the steering wheel. I had a hard time finding a comfortable place to put my hands on the CTS wheel.
The STS seems to have the same ergonomics.
Also software upgrades for the 3.6L engine.
Each class of cars and trucks has to meet a certain federally mandated minimum mileage and if they don't then the mfrs have to pay big bucks. This causes them to jump through hoops sometimes - like the skip-shift in the corvette and having to lock out 1st gear starts in manumatic trannies (Lincoln LS V8 and Audi A6 4.2) because of the testing techniques which have since been corrected.
Good theory - poor application.
Uh...well...I guess I gotta say, duh. Most engines have that "problem". That is why the ECU will raise the revs by itself until it senses that the engine is operating within parameters. This is why Mazda invented their "3000-rpm rev up" for the RX-7. This is why cold-start injectors were invented. Engines have a harder time when they are cold and have been at rest for a while. I'm not sure I have driven a car in many years that hasn't had mild issues at start up that the ECU solves with an idle up. I know in my 1968 Eldo, I solve the issue by applying more gas until it evens itself out.
As far as your normal idle being rougher than you would like, that may be more concerning, although "what you like" is pretty subjective. Things like having the AC on, plus the basic design of the CTS V-6 may contribute to that.
"Back in the day" car companies produced dozens of variants for each model -- rear-end ratios, transmissions, engines, fuel delivery systems, you name it. Now, each and every configuration (that's a government word that I work with every day) requires its own set of "documentation" (that's another one). God knows what the documentation package consists of, but I'm betting it'd outweigh the Manhattan phone books (all of them, not just one), plus which every car needs its own test series, door panel plate and who knows what else.
I'm not really against fuel economy -- it's the bureaucracy that demands copious documentation for each and every variation of any vehicle sold. The result is that every manufacturer that sells vehicles in North America is being driven to minimize the number of variations.
This is why the manual transmission vehicles I cherish are going away, as well as many other variants that I'm sure many of you would enjoy.
can someone please explain to me why it doesnt make as much as the VQ-series engines!
I am interest in any ECM flash to improve idle quality please keep us informed !
I have not been able to find the TSB #.
This CTS thread is so unlike other edmunds threads because no one talks about their CTS problems. Until someone else mentions something and then others chime in and say, "mine has that too." Or "I had that fixed months ago."
I had to go to other sites to find people who are dealing with probs. After all every car is not perfect.
here are some more.
Whining rearends. I no know of 4 owners who have had new rear axles installed.
We have talked about the driveline probs before.
Driveshaft may lose bolts and drop out.
popping noises. My old GM FWD nemesis is not just exclusive to Intrigues and Impalas. It has now appeared in the CTS.
Usually while turning left or even over bumps. Knocking sound, as if something is loose in the suspension.
ISS were to blame on the FWD cars.
Mechanics believe it is shock mounts in the CTS.
That is all the "negative" news I can find right now. LOL.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
They now have a lube kit which consists of a syringe that injects lube into it.
The problems with this part are epidemic.
Thanks
Bingoman
And, short of carefully-instrumented testing under perfectly repeatable conditions, it's not really possible to say whose transmission is more 'efficient'.
What matters is area under the torque curve (usable rev range) and gear spacing. So, the first question would be, for each of those engines, at what RPM does the torque curve get to 200lb/ft on the way up, and where does it come back down to 200lb/ft?
The Maxima is FWD, so it automatically loses power-to-the-ground points anyway. I've driven a new Maxima, it didn't feel particularly quick. Also had a godawful-ugly interior and the worst case of orange-peel in its paint that I've ever seen in a new car - the surface looked like leather.
The new 3.6L GM engine is appealing.. runs on regular (87) gas, gets practically the same power output, and considerably better gas mileage. There are variables such as headers, intake, ECU programming, exhaust, etc. that affect the power -- and we've only seen one configuration of GM's engine at this point. If this engine had been available when I bought my car, I would have had a much tougher choice to make.
Bingoman my cable/chain experience was not in a CTS so irrelevant here. The posters from the snowy climes are always praising Blizzaks. I suppose that's not an option for you?
Makes sense and the way the car was acting was like a bad battery. So, we'll see if that was the final solution.
My '99 Intrigue's was replaced under warranty, and I just put a new one in my 27 month old 50K mile Impala.
I can't blame the body filler problem on Cadillac, as it was a storm and I didn't see the road debris until it was too late. The underside of the car took quite a hit and it leaked badly. Our dealer fixed the leak (under warranty) and it's been dry as a bone ever since.
We have noticed a stiffening of the power steering, so I'll have the dealer check it out when they get my "new tires" this coming week. Otherwise, our CTS has been exceptional for a first year car.
1989 Regal, battery lasted 10 years. Second battery is at 4 years and counting.
1998 Century, battery was still strong when traded @ 4 years.
1999 Contour, battery is at 4.5 years and still going.
1983 Regal, both batteries lasted about 7 years.
1997 Cutlass Supreme, original battery to this day.
All these cars were usually garaged, but in the Cleveland area where winters are cold. In my opinion if you're only getting 3 years either you drive an exceptional number of miles or perhaps you live in the desert.
jemiller: the Maxima is actually RWD
1374 produced this week.
Almost 6000 (5951) produced in October!!
50,000 produced this year vs 40,000 last.
The difference had shrunk to 7,000 more than last year, but last month's production got it back on track again.
If they can get all those cars to the dealers between now and the end of the year we might see a 50,000 sales year. 13,000 more than last year.
Talk about a home run for Cadillac.
I still think that the SRX will cannibalize sales from the CTS.
Interestingly 10,000 SRX's have been produced already but my dealer has only sold 1 of the 4 he has gotten.
Problems: Still haven't taken it back to dealer for 2nd time to get radio squeal and static-when-braking problem fixed. I listen to AM mostly so it can wait till I have more to get fixed. When the car is cold the tires seem to thump like the old radial days until they warm up. The auto transmission sometimes thumps into lower gear at the end of my street in the morning. After a mile or two it doesn't do it. The clock is 3 minutes off. The glove box can't hold the owner's manual. But the most annoying thing is the low fuel indicator. I never look at how many miles of range I have left. The only time I want to know that is when the fuel gets low. So when the indicator says "Low Fuel" the range says "low range". How stupid is that? I ran out of gas at my daughter's school waiting to pick her up from practice. No help there.
I've read all the posts since I got my car. I just caught up, so I'm going to check out the steering recall and the tire recall. I may ask the dealer to replace the cluster for the clock problem. As mentioned, the volume of complaints on this message center is small for any car, much less one that is so new. My congrats to Cadillac for a winner.
I would like to change the doors unlock, maybe enter me & my wife's name vs. Driver 1 & 2 etc.
Living in SF bay area, I used to travel to Tahoe regularly. Tried chains and they were such a hassle getting on and off I went on a quest for anything better. Tried something called Trax or such. Cross-pieces of yellow plastic with pop-rivets thru them, connected by nylon strapping. Definitely the easiest on and off, but don't think they were that effective and I believe they're off the market now. Then I tried cables. They were OK. Easier than chains to deal with, but they do not have the traction nor stopping power of chains. They are good for restricted clearance applications but my experience with them was not on a CTS.
Personally, I never plan to drive my CTS in the snow. The whole schtick... the cold, the snow, the salted roads, the yahoos who can't drive dry let alone wet or icy... is a formula for prematurely aging car and driver. If I absolutely had to drive in it, I'd rent an SUV and just fuggitaboudit.
Opinion related to CTS problems: I'll bet if you search for the word "problem", you'll find the discussions of problems by CTS owners are limited to 4 or 5 relatively minor nuisance issues and a tire issue in which Cadillac has offered to replace the tires. Most of the complaints about the CTS are from people who don't own one. Speaks volumes in my opinion.
Personalization: I think the differences in the DIC features may have more to do with whether or not you have the Bose package than differences between the Base and Lux Sport models. Maybe the Bose package isn't available without the Lux Sport. However, the bottom line is that if you want to use and become proficient with all the DIC features you have to invest a good bit of time reading the instructions (however unmanly that may be) and then play with all the features. I did all that, but because I drive mine primarily on weekend trips and vacations, I usually forget how to take advantage of the features between trips.
It's a great car.
Is anyone surprised that my WIFE's key works and mine doesn't? (smile)
I know this because I owned an '81 Maxima for 3 years in the mid-'80's.
It was the sedan with with a Z car heart or something like that.
Can't remember the adcopy.