Nissan Altima

1777880828397

Comments

  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    I know what you mean about the Passats. I wouldn't call their engines whiney, but they are certainly not fireballs. I just wish Nissan hadn't created this great handling, wonderful car with such a cheap interior. They spent money on the engine and suspension, but cut corners where it was most obvious of all.
  • s852s852 Member Posts: 1,051
    If you like the Altima, but not the interior, why not get a Maxima? The 2004 has the same Altima exterior styling and probably has a nicer interior.
  • cfocfocfocfo Member Posts: 147
    Because to get the good looks of the Altima on a Maxima interior may cost you an additional $ 5,000. A fairly high interior upgrade.
  • anonymouspostsanonymousposts Member Posts: 3,802
    3 stars?? It's one thing to spout misinformation, it's another thing to just flat-out lie.


    http://www.hwysafety.org/vehicle_ratings/ce/html/0220.htm


    Accord driver's stay below the speed limit? Maybe where you are but here in Atlanta it's always a Honda/Acura/BMW flying past you. My Honda/Acura is usually the one right behind the fastest car because us Honda owners are a practical lot. You get better gas mileage and less speeding tickets when you are drafting.


    I never compared the 02 Altima to the 93-97. I just said that the 93-97 was the best all-around Altima made. For it's time it had good power, a nice interior, and a "substantial" feel. The design when shown in a clean version still looks modern. I don't think the new Altima will stand that test of time. It's already looking trendy. Those clear lights may be nice now .. but they probably won't be in a couple of years. Laughable is saying the Altima has a nice interior.


    And as far as women only caring about cupholders and interior design .. that may be true and I do love my cupholders and a nice interior. But if you try to race me please don't think I am just a girl or you might get embarrassed.


    They should've just put the Maxima interior in the Altima. Then the Altima would be a serious competitor in my book or just put the Altima suspension on the Maxima.

  • aromasaromas Member Posts: 314
    I'll agree that the Accord has a much nicer interior but I dare anyone (objective non-Honda owners please) to say that the exterior of an Accord even compares to the Altima's looks (not to mention handling) . As for the clear tail lights at least they stand out and not in a gaudy way. The Mazda 6 has their models in Europe with the clear lights so it must be rubbing off. The interior design is sporty and different and people don't like change so mixed with the cheaper materials may be turning people off.


    But styling is purely subjective so this argument is pointless, so let's deal in facts the Altima is hot looking and the Accord looks cheesy.(Ha Ha). You may have alot of people who can't stand the interior but I don't 1 person who likes the Accord's exterior so there's your tradeoff. The Altima has nice cupholders as well so nah nah nah.


    If you want to race an Altima with that bubble car, trust me you'll lose. God forbid if we have to make a turn before we finish.

  • anonymouspostsanonymousposts Member Posts: 3,802
    I think the Accord is much classier than the Altima but looks are subjective. I think the Accord will age better as the Altima is already starting to look a little rough around the edges.

    Cupholders you say? "If there's an area where the Accord stomps the competition, it has to be in cupholder design. For 2003 the Accord offers a total of eight, including one in each lower door panel." From Edmunds test of the 2003 Accord.

    In which version would the Accord actually lose? Automatic to automatic V6 0-60 times are tied. By the 1/4 mile they are still tied but the Accord is gaining speed. The Altima with 17" wheels and tires only outdoes the Accord by 1 MPH so if I am that worried about losing to an Altima in the corners I can take some of the money I saved with the Accord and upgrade. If you want to talk about the 5-speed Altima vs. the automatic Accord then go ahead but then you have to deal with the 6-speed Accord coupe.
  • aromasaromas Member Posts: 314
    What stats are you quoting that say the times are the same in either auto or manual? The Altima has 245 HP as well as 32 more pounds of torque (I believe it's a lighter car as well). Every report I've read quotes Altima times as being faster 0-60. It ranges from 6.5 to 6.9 Although Nissan quotes 6.3 which is a bit of an exaggeration. I've never seen any Accord times posted in the mid 6 range.


    Let's make a deal, I'm from Toronto and you're in Atlanta, let's meet in say Lexington KY (sounds like halfway to me, I was never any good in geography) tomorrow and race. Just make sure those 8 cupholders are empty because I don't want you to make excuses that the car was weighed down. By the way since you have so many cupholders can you pick up a coffee on the way for me(double cream, no sugar, large please don't be cheap you have all that extra cash form buying the Accord). Thanx.


    Please don't laugh at my classless car when you see it and I promise not to laugh at yout cupholders.

  • anonymouspostsanonymousposts Member Posts: 3,802
    All numbers were from the December 2002 Motor Trend. Their Accord went 0-60 in 6.6 seconds as well as their automatic Altima. The 5-speed Altima is 6.3 and the 6-speed Accord is 6.2.

    Actually we don't have the Accord yet. It was supposed to be built yesterday and at the dealer by the 20th.

    Sure I'll pick up the coffee, Starbucks no less, although the interior in your Altima might get jealous at all the nice materials Starbucks uses on their cups so you might want to give it a little pep talk beforehand.
  • cfocfocfocfo Member Posts: 147
    Number of times a month I race another car ......... 0
    Number of times a month I use the Cupholder ..... 58

    ; )
  • clpurnellclpurnell Member Posts: 1,083
    The Max will not cost you anymore than a loaded altima. A loaded max (GLE) sans navi is 26035 an altima with Premium Leather sport pack and abs is 26632 the max is actually cheaper. The SE max loaded can be bought for 26587 so its about 50 cheaper. It just doesn't make sense to buy a loaded alty when the max has all the features and more with a better interior for less money. The only alty's it makes since to buy are base 3.5se with only maybe abs/side air and 2.5S's
  • lsclsc Member Posts: 210
    There is still a trade off choosing the Maxima. I agree that it's a better buy for what you get, it's good to keep in mind that the chassis dates back 2 generations and you can definitely feel that difference. There is more body flex and the beam suspension makes the ride a little less smooth or sophisticated.

    Also, I don't know if it really matters that the Accord has 8 cupholders. How many do you really need? Sure it may be come to good use, especially if you like to have multiple beverages and/or if you're a pig and can't throw away your old Starbucks coffee cup.

    All in all, these comparisons are just pissing contests. I bought the 2002 Altima 3.5 SE because that's what I could afford. I don't think I have ever aspired to buy cars like Accord, Altima, Camry. Just buy the one that fits you the best but none of these will be considered a "desirable item". They are all just a regular cars on the road, whether they have 2 cupholders or 4 or 8.
  • implicitimplicit Member Posts: 41
    Hate to inform you but if the Accord got 0-60 in 6.2 sec then it was probably the coupe cause there is no 6speed sedan. Altima is the fastest car period. In 5 speed form the fastest time was 0-60 in 5.9 sec. Also the Altima can hang if not beat Hondas precious S2000. Look around there is a video out there somewhere. Keeping it fair and not allowing the S2000 peeps to rev the car to death and the Altima will win. Not to mention when they rev the car their transmission will be dead after the race. So if the Accord is faster then the Altima it should be able to even beat the S2000. Hows that for an unclassy family sedan?
  • anonymouspostsanonymousposts Member Posts: 3,802
    I know there is no 6-speed sedan as do 99% of the Edmunds population. Where was the Altima tested at 5.9 seconds? I subscribe to all major publications and the 6.3 was the fastest time I have found..

    Why wouldn't you let the S2000 driver rev to it's redline since that is what the car was designed to do? And IF there is a time of 5.9 seconds for the Altima how do you think they got it? Or even the 6.3 seconds for that matter. Do you think that they changed gears at 3500 RPM? And with the S2000's 0-60 time of 5.2 seconds and a 1/4 mile time of 13.8 @ 100.5 MPH (December 2002 MT) and slalom speed of 70.1 MPH the only thing the Altima would be hanging on to is the S2000's tailwind.

    An S2000 transmission dead after a race? I'm sure if our Civic SI's can handle full-throttle starts the S2000 won't have any problem with it.
  • s852s852 Member Posts: 1,051
    Will Nissan be making a new minivan that can beat the Oddysey in the 1/4 mile by 1/10th of a second next?
    If the 240HP Accord is "too slow," then does it really make any difference if an Altima is slightly quicker, if at all? For a real noticable difference, you will need to be looking at cars that can do 0-60 in the low 5's.
  • regfootballregfootball Member Posts: 2,166
    low fives....now that's getting darn fast....maybe even too fast for me.
  • clpurnellclpurnell Member Posts: 1,083
    From a pure price performance aspect the better buy is the Max especially if you count interior accuments. However I think the max is butt ugly. It has gotten better since the 2000 redesign but still not to my liking. I think the altima with the fully ind suspension and better exterior is a nice car. I think they intentionally handicap it by not outfitting it with a better interior to give people reason to buy the max. I think it is a flawed way of doing business because I am sure they loose those people to VW, Honda and Mazda. I say build the best car you can and let the people decide.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    I totally hate the way the new Accord looks. It looks like a big Civic to me, and I think that's only fugly car. The Altima is better looking, but I don't really like the taillamps either. They remind me of the clear lights that alot of friends of mine add to their Civics. Tasteless.

    If the Altima would beef up its interior decor, I would consider one in a second. Just have to change the taillamps or paint them or something...
  • ctalericoctalerico Member Posts: 23
    I think the taillamps on the Altima is what makes it stand out. I also don't like the aftermarket white taillmaps the kids put on their Civic's, etc. Some can look real cheap but I think the Altima's look real nice.
  • lsclsc Member Posts: 210
    I think one of the reasons for the Altima's cost cut looking interior was an attempt to minimize the cannibalization of Maxima sales.

    But the other reason is that because of the higher fixed cost (overhead) in building the Altima vs. say a Honda Accord it needs to trim some of it's variable cost (interior material) to achieve the same profit margins.

    This may be the reason that the best Nissan Altima they could make at the time had the inferior interior. But with Nissan back in the black and more importantly the Altima achieving a successful sales run, they can make cars in the future with higher quality interior materials due to lower fixed costs. Still I feel like I got screwed, so this is my last Nissan. Hope it lasts me until 2005.
  • implicitimplicit Member Posts: 41
    If you know there is no 6 speed sedan, then why are you comparing times of the coupe to the Altima? Autoweek even said Altima is faster then a TL-S so who has the sick Horses? If Accord can beat Altima, then something is seriously wrong with TL-S and it is not the value everybody make it out to be.

    Honda transmissions are already breaking down and if you keep on launching any transimission it's gonna go sooner or later.

    If people are finding the new Accord ugly now why would it age well? Thats like saying the Aztek will look beter in the future, maybe a distant future! I happen to find the Accord ugly. The car does not go together well. It kind of has a creepiness to it. Like edmunds said it even looks like a model below the civic. The Altima on the other hand looks elegant any body who doesn't think so better say the same thing about a bunch of other cars too. I think Altima will age well.
  • ppowerppower Member Posts: 93
    "You get better gas mileage and less speeding tickets when you are drafting."

    Sorry, but that is just flat out false. To get better gas mileage drafting you would need to be about 2 feet from the guy's rear bumper. And as for speeding tickets, maybe in your state but here in florida if a cop sees one person speeding and another in tail he will pull you both over, period.

    Ppower
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    Seen two people get pulled over at once on 95 when driving to NC, and see it here all the time on the highway in MD. The cop also can give you a ticket for reckless driving (following too closely) in that instance as well.
  • ppowerppower Member Posts: 93
    tail someone speeding and not got nailed. As, for the drafting you have to be so freaking close to get a vacuum it isn't funny. And if you tail me that close your going to be getting pennies out my sunroof.

    Ppower
  • capitanocapitano Member Posts: 509
    How can you say you got screwed? Did you buy the car sight unseen? Didn't you check out the interior when you bought it? Did you think it wouldn't be a problem and now it has become one?
  • ppowerppower Member Posts: 93
    tail someone speeding and not got nailed. As, for the drafting you have to be so freaking close to get a vacuum it isn't funny. And if you tail me that close your going to be getting pennies out my sunroof.

    Ppower
  • garnold1garnold1 Member Posts: 11
    I know from experience the Max SE is a better deal & a better buy than Alty. We love Nissans & have 2001 Alty & 1997 Max SE. We bought the Max used 3 mos ago, the Alty brand new. The loans on both cars are $9k each, yet the Max is so superior in ride, quality, handling, and loaded with options our Alty does not have. Our Alty "squeaks" like crazy. The trunk, the rear door, the left front tire area. All 4 tires just aligned, cleaned debris from door hinge and WD 40 to keep squeaks at bay. Meanwhile the "old" Max is so quiet you can't even tell its running when we crank it up. No vibration, no noise, nothing. It's a totally different class of car.
  • anonymouspostsanonymousposts Member Posts: 3,802
    You all take things way too seriously. My comment about drafting and less speeding tickets was said (or typed) tongue-in-cheek.

    implicit: There is also no 5-speed Accord so if people compare the 5-speed Altima to an automatic Accord why not compare the 6-speed Accord to the 5-speed Altima?

    And what Honda transmissions are breaking down? Do you think car magazines get the 5.9 and 6.2 second runs by gently launching the cars and slowly running it up to it's redline?

    You find the Accord ugly .. I find the Altima's interior to be hideous .. let's call it even.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    You can get aftermarket leather/wood trim for the Altima and somewhat fix the problem though...
  • anonymouspostsanonymousposts Member Posts: 3,802
    Right after the 350 came out we went by the Nissan dealer to check it out. They had a 03 Altima SE V6 in the showroom with leather and a woodgrain kit .. it didn't help. The "improvements" that everyone talked so much about amounted to little more than slightly soft plastic around the power window switches and an armrest with slightly better padding but the same flimsy feel when opening and closing. My opinion of the Altima interior is just that .. an opinion. If it had an interior comparable to the Accord or Maxima we probably would've VERY seriously considered one.
  • s852s852 Member Posts: 1,051
    No. The Altima is already expensive enough and that doesn't fix the cheap plastic in the console and dash. It will make more sense to just buy something with a better interior to start with. You can get a 2003 Maxima for about the same and maybe less than a loaded Altima and have more horsepower and a nicer interior. Go to carsdirect.com and see what 2003 Maximas are going for in your area. They are going for well below INVOICE in my area. You just get an older platform.
    The new 2004 Maxima will likely be around 30K MSRP with options added since a fully loaded Altima with the cheap plastic interior is already around 29K at full sticker.
    How cheap the interior looks will also depend on what you are used to. If you drive a Pontiac with the Fisher Price grey plastic interior trim, the Altima might not seem so cheap inside.
  • implicitimplicit Member Posts: 41
    You just don't get it. Why are you comparing a coupe to a sedan? Thats a BIG FAT DIFFERENCE.
    Even if the coupe got 6.2 with a 6 speed manual. I have not seen times of 5.9 from any Accord. Altima has done this with a 5 speed. How aout that? You should read more Honda forums and quit whinning in the Altima ones. Read around and you'll find that 26,000+ (I'm probably underestimating)Accord, Acura owners and other models have had failed transmisson (not reved). You probably haven't heard about it cause your Honda "God" will refuse to do a recall, I guess extending the warranty extension was less money. The problem should be fixed with the new Accord though (I hope). Theres Honda reliability for you.
    I find the Altima interior to be interesting. Thats the reason I don't have a Camry or an Accord. I think I'll take a creative interior with average materials than a boring interior.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    The package you saw was probably not aftermarket though. I saw the leather/wood pkg. in the Altima, and thought it was awful as well. I sat in an 03 S model, and still though the dash (particularly around the center stack) was cheap looking and sounding, along with the steering wheel cover. I figure that I have to look at the steering wheel cover every second (nearly) that I'm in the car, and want it to be visually appealing.

    Edmunds even compared the Passat to the Altima interior in their long-term tests.
  • aromasaromas Member Posts: 314
    I need input from 3.5 Altima owners out there. I'm seriously considering the 3.5 in the next month or so and need to know how it performs in the snow with the 215\55HR17 all seasons? I do not want to go through the hassle and cost of putting in winter tires. Is it acceptable as I've driven my friend's 2000 Maxima with 215\55HR16 in bad weather and it was fine. Do 17" rims as opposed to 16" make a difference if both tires are 55's.
  • anonymouspostsanonymousposts Member Posts: 3,802
    There's a minor recall on the Altima affecting 116,500 cars sold out of 230,000 or so. The Honda/Acura voluntary replacement/warranty extension covered 1,200,000 cars while only 2% (or 24,000) have experienced problems. So late-deploying airbags (which could increase chance of injury) on over 100,000 Altimas or the possibility of maybe having a transmission problem on 24,000 cars which span 4 models and which would be fully warranted ... your choice.


    http://vtec.net/news/news-item?news_item_id=39434

    http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/problems/recalls/central2.cfm


    Problems with V6 Accords, TL's, and Odyssey's transmissions are also irrelevant when considering the S2000. Only V6 automatic transmissions were affected, the S2000 is a 4 cylinder with a 6-speed manual the only available transmission.

  • implicitimplicit Member Posts: 41
    An airbag recall is hardly a call for comparison to the transimission failing while your driving. At least Nissan had the guts to recall it's cars. The recall was voluntary wasn't it? Honda refuses to fix the transmissions until you have a near death experience. Plus the airbags are probably supplied by a supplier on the the other hand Honda makes their transmissions. I'd be more worried about that.

    I already know S2000 supposedly isn't under the recall. I was implying how the trannies will fail with continuous launches.
  • aftyafty Member Posts: 499
    The airbag sensor fix took literally 15 minutes to do. I dropped the car at the dealer and went to the deli next door for breakfast, and by the time I finished eating the car was ready. It was not a big deal, and certainly not as much a cause for concern as Honda/Acura's widespread transmission failures IMO.

    aromas, I live in Boston and have an Altima 3.5. The car drives pretty well in the snow on the all-season tires. It has snowed here several times this year, and I haven't had any problems getting around.
  • acmeroadrunnracmeroadrunnr Member Posts: 81
    I have the 3.5 auto with TC and it is very stable in the snow, as long as you go easy on the throttle. Also, had a 2k Accord with tranny problems, take a look in accord and odyssey problems forum to see first hand.


    Another note. Motorweek report on Accord is not even close to perfromance numbers presented on SE. http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2201.shtml

  • anonymouspostsanonymousposts Member Posts: 3,802
    Honda didn't have to recall their cars. It was never a safety issue for nhtsa and there were no investigations launched into it. Honda does build their own transmissions but they source the parts out from different companies so it's safe to say there might have been a defective part just like you say happened with the Nissan airbags. I don't see how a transmission problem which they say will give you adequate notice of problem is any worse than your airbag not working in what could be a life-death situation.

    Here are a few quotes for those of you who obviously didn't take time to read the article.

    "Torrance, CA 09/20/2002 -- American Honda Motor Co., Inc. announced today it will provide extended warranties on approximately 1.2 million Honda and Acura models equipped with automatic transmissions due to problems that may result in premature wear or failure. The extended warranty will cover affected transmissions for seven years or 100,000 miles."

    "While only two percent of these vehicles have experienced these transmission problems, American Honda will provide extended transmission warranties on all potentially affected vehicles."

    "There is usually plenty of warning to the driver that the transmission is not operating properly, such as slow or erratic shifting, giving them ample time to take the vehicle in for service."

    Never heard of S2000 transmissions failing. Is it safe to say that the 350ZX tranny will fail? It is a sports car and alot of people might launch hard .. same with the Altima V6 and the Maxima 6-speed for that matter. Fact is there is no record of any of these transmissions having problems so your point is moot.

    That 8.0 second run for the Accord was the slowest I've seen. All other V6 tests have been around 6.6-7.0 seconds. But regardless they still loved it. "The 7th generation Accord is simply more mid-size car for the money than you will find from any other brand."
  • s852s852 Member Posts: 1,051
    That was a super slow test.
    Even the old Accord with 200 vs 240 HP and the 4-speed vs 5-speed automatic was regularly getting 0-60 in the 7's in road tests.
  • anonymouspostsanonymousposts Member Posts: 3,802
    It's also interesting that the 333HP Infiniti M45 is slower to 60 (6.1) than the Altima times reported in MotorWeek.

    It's also strange that they tested a Honda Pilot at a faster time to 60 (7.8) than the Accord. And if you look at their best picks page it's easy to see why they aren't a major publication. Best Convertible: Thunderbird? Best SUV: Saturn Vue?
  • lsclsc Member Posts: 210
    For some reason when the Altima came out, it was the first time I had to have a car and I paid I believe 3% over invoice for the car. Usually, I won't buy a car for anything over $100 or so over.

    I think I did have blinders on not noticing the key flaws that would have been deal breakers if I was in my normal state of mind.

    I do not think the Altima is a terrible car, it's actually a very good car. But the fact that I could have waited and bought the Accord EXV6 and could have had leather w/ heated seats, dual-zone climate control, 5-speed auto tranny, 6-disc CD changer, homelink transmitter, and most importantly side curtain airbags, traction control and ABS for the same price, I feel like I got shortchanged.

    It sucks that being a big supporter of Nissan gets the shaft. Especially now that I hear that for the 2004, Nissan is going to greatly improve the Altima's interior. I am certain that my car is going to have a very low resale value.

    I still like Nissan but they won't see another dime from me.
  • s852s852 Member Posts: 1,051
    There were some people posting that they thought they heard someone else say Nissan might consider thinking about greatly improving the interior for 2004.
    That is unlikely since it will just make the more expensive Maxima look less desireable.
  • aftyafty Member Posts: 499
    Notice that Nissan also did not have to recall the Altima. It was a "voluntary safety campaign," as they put it.

    Basically what happened was that when the IIHS did their collision testing on the Altima, the results didn't match up with what Nissan expected. They looked over the test results and noticed that the airbags were deploying late. They issued a safety campaign to replace the airbag sensors and had the IIHS retest the Altima. The NHTSA was not involved in this.

    Again, I consider this a much smaller issue than even a 2% transmission failure rate (if you believe Honda's press release numbers). I have never needed the airbags in any of my cars, yet I use the transmission every day.
  • aftyafty Member Posts: 499
    And if you look at their best picks page it's easy to see why they aren't a major publication. Best Convertible: Thunderbird? Best SUV: Saturn Vue?

    Motor Trend chose the Thunderbird as Car of the Year last year. Does that mean they are also not a "major publication"?
  • anonymouspostsanonymousposts Member Posts: 3,802
    If you will read the links Honda voluntarily extended the warranty on all cars involved not just the one's that they had to do the replacement on. You are right though, you do use your transmission every day. Even more reason why you should be able to detect a problem. You can't detect problems with your airbags until it's too late.

    COTY is far from calling the Thunderbird the best convertible. I don't really think the Thunderbird is better than a BMW M3 convertible or a CLK convertible etc. And those weren't the only 2 strange choices but it doesn't really matter. The Accord is a 10 Best .. the Altima isn't and in the other major magazines the new Altima couldn't even beat the old Accord much less the new one.
  • whampa65whampa65 Member Posts: 36
    Your right all the Altima did was get rewarded as CAR OF THE YEAR by people who know alot more about cars than we do.
  • implicitimplicit Member Posts: 41
    Do on to others as they do onto to you? Just like the guys in Honda forums catch a fit should we do the same? Your not going to convince us that the Honda Accord is a better car to me personally it is not. I find it ugly, small, and boring. The car has a trunk size that hardly rivals it's own civic. The car couldn't even make the list for North American Car of the Year which Altima won for 2002 (a first for a Japanese automaker). I find the award more credible then "Car and Drive me to the bank" 10 best list.

    Speaking of safety and trannies. Have you seen the stopping distances for the new accord? HORRIBLE does not even began to describe it. The 133ft Motorweek got is one of the better times I have seen and with options like side curtain airbags only available on the V6 safety seems to be a non priority for Honda. I have read those articles why would I read them again? I don't see anything there that I have not mentioned. Have you read the article about the honda owner who was in the situation with a failed tranny and almost lost his life? IF the transmission gives you a warning as Honda says what are you going to do about it? What can you really do but pray for your life? Especially going at 50mph. Honda claims 2% only to not make it seem like a big deal there are and will probably be far more. Like I said instead of recalling they are extanding the warranty. So when the trans failies you have a 50/50 chance. You either walk away from the accident or you don't. It's really your problem until something happens as far as Honda is concerned. Why didn't Nissan extend the warranty for the air bags and wait until we banged our heads on the steering wheel unitl they replace it? An Altima, 350z, Maxima etc would be less likely to have tranny failures cause you don't have to rev the car to get the power, It is already there to use.

    In Hondas attempt to get back at the Altima and design an eloquent car they have failed miserably. The car looks cheaper then a civic for goodness sake.
  • anonymouspostsanonymousposts Member Posts: 3,802
    I would think ABS would be more of a safety feature than side curtain airbags. Cars have done just fine in crash tests with only front and side airbags. ABS can help you avoid an accident. The Accord has ABS standard on even the DX so is it "safe" to say that safety isn't a priority for Nissan either? Actually they both do pretty well in crash tests with the Accord performing marginally better. And these results are without side curtain airbags.


    http://www.hwysafety.org/vehicle_ratings/ce/cecompoutc.asp


    Looks are subjective. Some people like the Altima's interior and some like the Accord's exterior. It seems that both are more polarizing than the cars that preceded them.

  • sandman46sandman46 Member Posts: 1,798
    I think it's safe to say that y'all agree to disagree so please, let's move on. Look what happened over at the Accord forum, it's been given a much needed rest. Anonymous, you should also remember the trouble you got into over in the Mazda Protege forum!
    Edmunds is a great place to talk about our passion for cars, so let's all move on now!
    Happy Holidays to all my fellow Edmundites!

    The Sandman :-)
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.