By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
A good example of this was when they compared the Toyota Corolla with the Chevy Prism. They recommended the Toyota over the Prism, their reason: the build quality on the Prism wasn't up to the Corolla's..... WHAT!!!!! Hello same exact car!!!!!!!!!
Anyway why don't you do this, go to a comparison site like the one found on Toyota's website. Now compare the HL to the Pontiac Aztek. I guess the easiest would be the V6 HL 4x2 vs the Aztek 2WD.
First off you'll be shocked by the difference in price. The one advantage the HL holds will talk about now, more horsepower and torque, 35 more horsepower and 12lbs more torque. Torque is where it really matters anyway, this is a truck, well sort of. Now you'll find that almost all the options available on the HL are also on the Aztek. You'll also find that the Aztek gets better gas mileage. If you look on Carpoint.com you'll see that the Aztek offers alot more cargo room, more payload capacity, more passenger room, more ground clearance, it's quieter, has more optional features, it's more versatile, side airbags standard, tighter turning circle, and it comes with a really cool Icechest.
Oh now go ask the Aztek owners how much they love their vehicles, I think you will find a resounding wail of gushiness towards a car. I guess it's why it won that most appealing vehicle award. Anyway I don't think Lutz will axe the Aztek. I think they fixed it up pretty well and it looks alot better now. I'm talking about the 2002 of course.
Now about that quality thing, even CR couldn't kill it, check their report ha ha poor CR.... Just so you know, the Aztek is probably one of the highest quality offerings from GM right now. That's probably not saying too much to you, but hey GM quality is pretty good and I'll prove it.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2001-10-17-gm-quality.htm
Now lets do a TMV on the Highlander and the Aztek, then lets factor in that $2002 rebate, gulp that's like $7000 when comparably equipped.
Man I hope you really like you HL, you certainly paid for that Toyota name.....
you stated "Heatwave, this statement seems out of place for someone who's a stickler for "proof"! : )" You got me and I agree there's no support for the statement that you have the Envoy longer, although I think its accurate you'll keep more of your money in your pocket vs the dealer's:)
Uhhhh...last time I looked the GM triplets far outsold the Highlander therefore I think its fair to say most consumers see the value of their investment in a mid-size suv abit different from you and in fact find that the new GM triplets better fit their needs and wallets than the Highlander. I think the sales figures are much better indicators of "what most consumer's are like" than your opinion.
you state "After you realize that, lets face it, the Aztek as currently designed is history, and the Rendezvous based on Consumer Reports is only going to be purchased by diehard GM loyalists. GM doesnt really have anything to compete with the HL, unless you put credence in publications which receive most of their funding from GM advertisements...."
The Rendezvous and Aztek, last time I looked, outsell the Toyota Highlander, therefore is it your view the Highlander is also "history"? And I believe GM's has many fine vehicles that compete with the HL....there called awd minivans such as the Astro, Venture, Safari, Silhouette, Montana:)
And finally, although the USA Today report of GM finally breaking into the top 3 in initial quality, it kind of verifies what I've been saying, Toyota has been there for 20 years.
Oh well check your username I don't think 2 are allowed??? If they were I'd get my name spelled right.
Also I doubt the Highlander is much quieter than an Envoy or as comfortable. Again though you are comparing the Highlander with the wrong vehicles.
You should look here, the Highlander really needs help in this topic.....
corey76 "2002 Aztek vs. CR-V vs. Highander." Jan 16, 2002 11:36am
I want to make the best choice (don't we all).
Thanks.
1. Our Lexus RX300 has been an excellent vehicle, with no return trips to the dealer (outside of normal maintenance) since purchase.
2. Our recent test drive of the GMC Envoy showed a vehicle with (our opinion) ride comfort only slightly firmer than the RX. My wife feels its more "sporty" than the RX. I would assume that the Highlander rides similar to our RX.
3. The Envoy has vastly more "seat of the pants" power than the RX, with a corresponding reduction in gas mileage.
4. The Highlander is UGLY! Maybe its the "Emperor has no clothes" syndrome, but the Highlander is another Japanese vehicle that the stylists were out to lunch during most of the development cycle. GM has some sins in that department as well, but the Envoy isn't one of them. I guess I'm surprised that no one mentions the poor styling of the Highlander.
Gray Area; What You Need to Know About Canadian Cars in the U.S.
Steve, Host
The biggest hassle some people had was getting their bank to wire the money to the Canadian dealer's bank. Most people got through the border in ~15 minutes. Converting the speedo was a concern since there was a question whether you could "certify" the miles when you traded your gray market car in.
There were also some people posting last year about their nice Toyota service managers entering VIN's into their computers for the new "import" owners to ensure warranty coverage.
People were reporting savings upwards of $4,000, which paid for the airfare to Toronto or wherever, with lots left over. But it t'was too good to be true (for too long).
Steve, Host
During a test driver I found major problems with the Envoy that led me straight to Toyota and the HL. From the drivers seat, initially you get a nice feeling about the vehicle. As the driver progresses, you begin to notice the A-pillars block your view considerably, the steering wheel is offset to the left instead of being centered on the driver, the wind noise past the A pillars and/or mirrors is totally unacceptable, and some of the switch gear is CHEAP.
Check out the rear passenger compartment. Foot room demands that a 6-foot passenger place their feet together and their toes are under the driver seat between the seat support brackets. This can't be comfortable for a drive of any duration.
Go to the rear compartment and check out the storage compartment. Not much there to brag about. Compare it to the HL or to the Explorer and it becomes a joke IMHO.
I like the engine/transmission. I like the leather quality and the seat heaters are powerful. However, GM didn't do their job well enough to gain my business.
Review: Before I invested 36+K, I read all the reviews and drove most of the others “domestic” and “foreign” in this field. Only Toyota was even close in performance & quality, but with better gas mileage. What are you guys smoking? On a tippy or numb steering scale, Envoy ranks far lower than all the others except maybe 4-Runner. There is NO problem when pushing through corners “in the twisties", even on dirt roads. Yes, the ride is unusually comfortable and steering is very smooth, rather than feeling every pebble and crack with your butt and hands. Folks, there is no under or over steer, no hop, no rear end drift or tendency for the inside rear wheel to lift like some notable others.
Favorite features: Interior layout, comfort of seats and ride with loads of power (bottom to top end). Envoy has smooth reliable handling on the flat lands or mountains, with excellent off road performance and stability if you are willing to risk scratching a 36K SUV on Jeep trails in Colorado.
Suggested improvements: Envoy gas mileage is underwhelming at 14-16 in town & 17 maybe 18 highway in cruise control and not loaded down. The gas tank, even in Envoy XL, is TOO small! With an average 16 mpg, better gas mileage or a 25+ gallon tank is needed for reasonable cruising ranges in western states!
Steve, Host
Huh? The HL has like .9 cu ft. more than the Envoy. Not to mention the HL has those wheel wells that intrude on the cargo area.
the steering wheel is offset to the left instead of being centered on the driver
I did not notice this in my Envoy XL until I read your post. It's maybe 1" off center, hardly an issue IMO.
Suggested improvements: Envoy gas mileage is underwhelming at 14-16 in town & 17 maybe 18 highway in cruise control and not loaded down. The gas tank, even in Envoy XL, is TOO small! With an average 16 mpg, better gas mileage or a 25+ gallon tank is needed for reasonable cruising ranges in western states!
The Envoy XL has a 25 gallon tank. It's plenty big. Any bigger and I couldn't afford the fill-ups. :-)
Have you driven a Highlander?
THIS comparison is like apples and oranges. One's a practical SUV that can be used to tow a 5,000lb boat, and the other is a glorified station wagon.
On quality - My mom's 2002 LS430 (basically a decked out Toyota) has had more quality issues than my Envoy (1 vs. 0). You never know who is going to build your vehicle. Everyone has a bad day.
Interior of Envoy was much better. Lower level HL had odd looking silver plastic parts.
Biggest killer on Envoy - Gas mileage.
Worst thing on HL - steering wheel is too close to the dash.
But what do you need? A car with extra height for around town or on the highway - HL might be my choice (except fo r the steering wheel issue). A vehicle for serious foul weather, to go offroad, tow, or haul stuff - Envoy
I did not mean to be offensive and I agree that Toyota, etc..has their fair share of problems,but, the 2000 Envoy that my brother-in-law has, has been in the shop more than he has practically driven it. Alot of fancy electrical gadgets that Toyota did not have back then and yes, improvements have been made,but, SUV's cost so darn much that, it is good advice to check out forums like this, in order to hear the truth from previous owners of these rigs?
If I didn't own a 2002 Limited 4 Runner, I would have chosen either the Sequoia or Yukon/Tahoe!!
But, there again, apples and oranges with usage, gas mileage woes, etc..
2)They were also thinking of eliminating the back tailgate and replacing it with a swing out door does anyone know a year,make and model that we can probably swap out.
Any help will be greatly appreciated!!!
GMC = Problems