Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Did you get a great deal? Let us know in the Values & Prices Paid section!
Meet your fellow owners in our Owners Clubs

2012 Honda CR-V Long Term Road Test

Edmunds.comEdmunds.com Posts: 10,059
edited September 2014 in Honda

image2012 Honda CR-V Long Term Road Test

Read daily updates on our long-term road test of the 2012 Honda CR-V EX-L AWD and follow along as our editors live with this car for a year.

Read the full story here


Tagged:

Comments

  • bankerdannybankerdanny Posts: 1,021
    The Pilot's almost verticle rear hatch is a thing of beauty. Imagine, a form the maximizes space in an SUV instead of a wildly sloping rear hatch that compromises utility in an effort to make the S more important than the U in SUV. Well done Honda.
  • I'm fairly sure that the sloping rear hatch has less to do with the S in SUV than with the E in FE (fuel economy). The boxier shape of the Pilot probably creates a larger area of low pressure behind the vehicle, which creates additional drag, and lower fuel economy numbers.

    I'm not really all that enamored of the rear ends of either of them, but the box will be much better for utility, while the roundrump will be better for those wanting good mileage.
Sign In or Register to comment.