Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Did you get a great deal? Let us know in the Values & Prices Paid section!
Meet your fellow owners in our Owners Clubs

Importing Canadian Vehicles to the U.S.

1457910

Comments

  • landru2landru2 Posts: 638
    I must have missed that. Where and by whom was this right conferred?
  • tboner1965tboner1965 Posts: 647
    I believe NAFTA covers that.

    And as has been established before, it is not illegal to buy a vehicle in Canada, as long as it meets US safety and emissions standards.

    Now, many vehicles that are not offered here, such as a Mitusbishi Lancer Evo7 are not cost effective to bring here. But, they can be legally brought here.

    But that comparison is apples to oranges, please show me where it is illegal to bring a vehicle sold in Canada into the United States.

    TB
  • landru2landru2 Posts: 638
    Nowhere have I said that it is illegal. In fact I have made the point in a couple posts that it is quite legal.

    So let me get this straight. I have found some computer components to be cheaper in the U.S. than in Canada even after the exchange rate. The problem is that many of these U.S. companies refuse to deal with Canadian purchasers. Are they in violation of NAFTA?
  • masspectormasspector Posts: 509
    I never mentioned the importer problem because I agreed with you and did not feel that it was necessary to mention it again. Sorry if I did not explain myself well. The difference I see is that the manufacturers should be going after the real problem, the importers, not your individual car buyer.

    What tboner mentioned does not apply in this case. He is talking about used equipment that his company knows nothing about its use. I am talking about brand new cars. Why would they have to be certified? I am sure tboners company does not ask you to pay for a certification on brand new equipment that you buy form them and they provide the standard warranty (apparently anywhere in the world, according to his post).

    landru---I do not feel that i am entitled to anything that I want. But I can express a desire for the way that I would like things to be, not only for me, but for every buyer. I do not single myself out to be ahead of anyone else.

    I am not sure about your use of the term "rights" so I will not argue that point. But I will agree with tboner that people have certain reasonable expectations and I agree with what he posted above.

    And as for the airlines, consumers have been taking your advice, Here in the US Southwest and Airtran (the low cost, no frills, no fancy fare rules airlines) were the only ones to make a profit the last couple of quarters. All of the big 7 are losing millions.
  • landru2landru2 Posts: 638
    Sorry, but it's been sounding to me like you would like to enjoy some savings at the expense of another country's consumers.
  • robr2robr2 BostonPosts: 8,863
    The manufacturers are going after the problem, the importers. But as I've noted before, the individual consumer gets caught up in it and lost what was a great opportunity. In a simplistic format, no one in the 3rd grade classroom gets recess becuse little Horatio wouldn't listen.

    IMHO, the manufacturer will not set up a system to exclusively deal with what you say are just a few people who would do this. The mfrs are huge companies and to establish what you think would be an easy system, would require huge investments of their time, money, and resources. Big companies do not easily set up simple programs. Additionally, by doing so they undercut the sales potential of the US dealers that would have to handle the process in the field.

    This policy does not apply only to autos but most consumer electronics. Try calling Sony, IBM, Panasonic and see what they say.

    As for the certification process, you noted before that tboner "hit the nail right on the head". I presumed you agreed to paying for certification and conversion to US standards.

    The system is what the system is. Pricing is different in Canada due to the nature of their economy. Canadians have to pay their national GST (15%??), some AC fees, etc. We may not like it, but that's the way it works. The manufacturers make less money in Canada than they do in the US. The US market is priced higher because it can be. The mfrs protect that pricing differential because a reduction in US sales in exchange for Canada sales is not a zero sum gain. As a shareholder in more than 1 auto company (and most of us through mutal funds/401ks, etc.), I'd prefer to see them earn more profits.

    As for your warranty card in the coffee maker, did you ever notice they ask more questions about what magazines you read and what you do as opposed to your name and address? Those registration cards are more for marketing purposes than for warranty/recall purposes. Your name may be registered in a database, but guess how many times I've been contacted about a recall that I know about other than by an auto mfr - 0, zip, zilch, never.

    As for pricing differences, look at a Honda CRV LX equivilant in the UK - 17,595 british pounds. At today's rate that is US$27,272. A US unit is US$19,260 - about 12,425 pounds. And they are made in the UK and shipped here!!
  • tboner1965tboner1965 Posts: 647
    Very much earlier in the topic. I've not purchased anything from Philips/Magnavox for about 13-14 years now for the very same treatment that many customers are now getting from automakers.

    Landru, you said that consumers don't have the right, and that is what I took exception to. Consumers have the right to buy anywhere, provided what they are buying is legal (I.E. consumers don't have the right to purchase illegal drugs, kiddie porn or whatever the laws the society forbid.)

    Any seller can refuse to sell the vehicle, that is true. But again it may not be right to refuse based on Nationality. But they do have the right to sell to anyone they want.

    However, because of the Byzantine system the carmakers have set up, you can't by a car from the carmaker. You buy the car from the dealer. So now the carmaker is telling the dealers who they can and cannot sell to. As a dealer, I would be a bit concerned about that, as it seems to limit your market place.

    However, as I think about it, I do know that there are often geographical restrictions on rebates or other incentives. But I know of no restrictions stateside that prevent say dealers in Missouri from selling to citizens of Illinois or other.

    I guess I'm just a free market kinda guy. These additional layers, from the consumers point of view, only add costs to the car. What benefit do I as a consumer get from additional layers between the selling dealer and ultimate parent company? None that I know of.

    Please notice that I don't say the carmakers can't do what they are doing. They certainly can. However, the bottom line is, consumers don't know about Ford of Canada or Ford of USA or Ford of Fill in the Blank. They simply see Ford on that blue oval and want Ford to stand behind their product.

    Let them do what they want, but don't complain about the consumer when he or she begins to look at another brand.

    Sure, the other brand may do that too. But why take the chance that the consumer might get a perfect car than never needs warranty service from the other brand and it is never an issue.

    The hardest customer to win is one you've previously lost.

    TB
  • landru2landru2 Posts: 638
    As far as I know, every manufacturer is taking steps to stop exporting/importing. So what other brand are you going to look at?

    So a Canadian dealer should be concerned about losing the market of American buyers but shouldn't be concerned that these sales result in no service/parts/bodyshop business?
  • tboner1965tboner1965 Posts: 647
    Should be pretty clear. Flatten the organization so there isn't Brand XXX USA, Brand XXX Canada, Brand XXX Japan.

    Ford and GM in particular irritate me because most of the models they make that appeal to me are not even for sale in the USA. I.E. Mondeo, Falcon, and much of the Holden hardware from down under.

    This is where the consumer loses.

    And I hope you don't think I blame you or hold you accountable for this because I really don't. I think dealers get a rather raw deal from the carmakers themselves.

    Perhaps if each business unit of a dealership could turn a profit, you wouldn't need to rely on service/parts/bodyshop business.

    All I know about is providing service. That's what I do for my customers.

    Dealerships are in the unenviable position in so much as they bear the major burden of customer satisfaction, but are often hamstrung by the car maker.

    I wish you well.

    TB
  • tboner1965tboner1965 Posts: 647
    and I just thought of these. I believe BMW and Volvo let you buy their cars in Europe and bring them back to the US. At least with the BMW, the pricing is below what you would probably pay at the dealership.

    So there is a model that seems to work for one or two car makers.

    TB
  • landru2landru2 Posts: 638
    As a citizen of the U.S. you do not have the "right" to even be in Canada. Just as I do not have the "right" to enter the U.S. It follows that you do not have any "right" to buy anything in Canada. These things are allowed by the respective governments but they are certainly not rights.
  • audia8qaudia8q Posts: 3,138
    Like you, I love some of the cars the domestics offer for sale in other countries. Especially Australia. But in defense of the automakers. If they thought for a minute they could sell those products here and make the type of profit shareholders expect they would....Those pesky shareholders always screw things up..haha

    Rich
  • tboner1965tboner1965 Posts: 647
    I guess that's the difference between me and you. I believe that we are born with all sorts of rights.

    Only governments and God can take them away.

    So you are telling the that the Canadian government doesn't want me to have the right to buy a car in Canada, or is it just Ford that doesn't want me to do that?

    Again, if there is no law prohibiting my purchase, then I DO have the right.

    Is there such a law?

    TB
  • KCRamKCRam Mt. Arlington NJPosts: 3,516
    I think where youcross yourself up is, BMW and Volvo are domestics in Europe. They don't also build their complete line of vehicles in the US for US consumption. Those European Delivery discounts reflect the fact that BMW and Volvo don't have to go through the trouble of getting that car to the coast for the big canoe ride. You do it yourself. Ford is domestic in the US, so bringing the same model Ford from Canada isn't doing yourself any favor in that regard - Ford is not discounting the car because they're saving some shipping costs. There's no Ford-sponsored "Canadian Delivery" program. Instead, you're dealing strictly with an exchange rate issue between the US and Canada. This is why the DOMESTIC manufacturers are trying to block this practice - they lose money on it!

    kcram
    Host
    Smart Shopper and FWI Message Boards
  • robr2robr2 BostonPosts: 8,863
    Yes - BMW, Volvo, SAAB, MB all let you take delivery of US SPEC units built in Europe. You can't take delivery on a non US spec unit and bring it in without going through major EPA headaches and NHTSA paperwork and I believe limitations on usage.

    As for getting rid of Ford US, Ford Canada, Ford Mexico, these subsidiaries are set up to meet local laws of presence, taxation, and incorporation. There is almost no way around those requirements short of relying on a local company to act as your distributor but then you risk having your name destroyed.
  • Myself to chase a rabbit, rising to the "right" question.

    The bottom line is there are US consumers who buy "Canadian" cars every day and then find they are without warranty coverage. My original point, going back to my post about my experience with Philips/Magnavox is that the consumer has a reasonable expectation that the manufacturer stands behind the car. And all the denying of warranty coverage will do to the customer is alienate the customer from the car maker. What ever happened to service? All those commercials about the carmaker being there for you don't count if you buy the car in Canada?

    I believe in all of these cases, the manufacturer sells/transfers the car to Brand XXX Canada, or Brand XXX USA, regardless of where the car is made. (It might be made by yet another division.)

    Sure, make all the divisions you want carmakers, but then stand behind your product, and don't put up barriers to customers who are looking for a better value.

    I just see this as another way to annoy customers instead of helping them.

    What's next, outlawing currency exchanges or the stock exchanges.

    TB
  • robr2robr2 BostonPosts: 8,863
    "...the consumer has a reasonable expectation that the manufacturer stands behind the car."

    It's all what you define as reasonable of course. Manufacturers deem warranting what they consider to be gray market products as unreasonable. Even if they alienate customers, the numbers are relatively small and it probably doesn't worry them.

    I've staged a one man battle against Goodyear since 1988 due to the incompetence of a tech at one of their stores (I never quite understood the need for using a screwdriver and ball peen hammer for weight removal from alloy rims). I basically was told by Goodyear corporate to pound sand. Since then I have refused to buy Goodyear tires or a car equipped with Goodyear OEM tires. It makes me feel better even if it doesn't hurt them in the least.

    Once again it comes down to stopping the mass importers - the individual consumer just gets caught in the net.
  • I don't know why I didn't think of this before.

    On these very boards, car dealers complain that the new car sales typically are at a loss.

    So we have US dealers complaining because consumers are not giving them the chance to lose money by selling the car.

    So what do they get. The manufacturer will not pay them for warranty work. Some warranty work is gravy, easy money. Other warranty work, the dealer loses his shirt on. However, warranty work, in my view, is how a dealership can earn the trust of their customers. Do that part right, and you'll have a great chance of getting additional service work. Screw up the warranty work, and you won't see the customer until they are ready to buy a new car, maybe.

    Once the average customer learns that there is no warranty coverage, do you really think he will return to his local dealer. Nope, probably won't return to the dealer for service, or the next car.

    Yes the numbers are small. But again, the easiest (and probably cheapest) customer to keep is the one you have.

    As long as the customer is maintaining his vehicle, not taking out for the World Rallye Championship, why not stand behind it and keep the happy customer?

    If the Canadian dealer is selling the car for full sticker, I find it hard to believe that no money is made on those deals.

    TB
  • sonjaabsonjaab Posts: 1,057
    The used car store across the street from me
    sells TONS of Canadian imported vehicles !
    I live in northern NY along the US-Can.
    border. This guy also owns a Ford dealer
    too.....I will ask what it costs to bring
    them over from Canada monday and post..geo
  • landru2landru2 Posts: 638
    Er, you do realize that Canada is a country and not another state don't you?

    The fact that different countries have different requirements to operate businesses is the reason for the "byzantine" distribution systems as you put it. Just like I can't just go and start doing business in Nevada without going through a bunch of "byzantine" red tape. Just like I can't go to the U.S. and take an American worker's job without going through the U.S.'s "byzantine" immigration system.

    You want to import a new car from another country? Be my guest. But be prepared to go through some "byzantine" inconveniences.
  • It seems Ford is able to ship cars built in the USA every day to Canada.

    So why is it ok for Ford to move cars across borders and not individuals?

    And borders do not change the logo on the hood, so please stop trying to change the subject. Ford and other carmakers build the cars and hide behind the system setup, required or otherwise, to provide an excuse not to stand behind the product they produce.

    All I want is for the carmaker to support the car they build.

    What does a border have to do with that?

    And if that car was built in the USA, shipped to Canada, then purchased by a US citizen, why is it ok for Ford to sell cars to Canadian businesses, but not ok for US citizens to buy from those Canadian businesses.

    When you boil it all down, it really doesn't make sense for a carmaker to not honor the warranty when they ship vehicles across borders every day.

    That is point? Why do you keep trying to make this a discussion of citizenship?

    TB
    Who got A's in history and geography, although that was a few years ok, but I do remember much of it 8^)
  • yes I did, I do know that Canada is not another state.

    Now answer my question, why do dealers cry about losing money on new car sales and then complain about customers who may:

    1. Pay full sticker knowing the price is much lower in Canada.

    2. Desire to have the vehicle serviced at their local dealership.

    I find it odd that many who complain about losing money on new car sales are the very ones who then complain to the carmaker about not being able to lose money on selling some US citizen his car.

    I find it odd indeed that, at least in the US, new car dealers have fought every attempt to bypass them in the sales process, yet many note or complain here, that new car sales is a money losing activity.

    So why do dealers hold on to such a loser? Why not just do the service and used car sales and let someone else lose the money?

    I await the answer.

    TB
  • landru2landru2 Posts: 638
    You think a car maker just ships stuff across the border without any importing red tape? Please.

    And most dealers would love to do away with their new car departments but dealers don't get to pick and choose what aspect of the business they want to pursue. But that would be rather shortsighted from a dealer's point of view. You want to be a Ford/Dodge/Toyota dealer? You have to provide the full package if you want that big sign out front.

    You must've missed the earlier discussion of how the mass importing of vehicles has a detrimental effect on an entire market. I happen to think that protecting the market that I make my living in is a little more important than if some American can save some money on their next car purchase. What is bothering me about some of the arguments here is when people feel that their need to save a few dollars should outweigh another country's entire car-buying population.
  • I never once said that cars are not shipped across borders without red tape. And if an American buys a new car in Canada, I expect that there will be red tape.

    Heck, there is red tape for us when we buy a car here at home, so it is reasonable to expect red tape to bring a car across the border.

    But it must be obvious that I am anti-protectionist market practices. What support is the seperation of the two markets. (EDIT, I have no idea what that last sentance was about, so I don't even know how to change it.) I don't agree with that, pure and simple. Nothing personal, so I hope you don't think I'm picking on you, I just don't agree :) (Plus I'm a bit miffed, a stock Ford Taurus, say a 97-99, just cleaned my clock at the Auto Cross event I returned from. He is allowed race tires, but I don't think he was using them. It was just insane watching him drift that 3L, Automatic sedan through a very tight course. I turned a 29.8 to his 28.8, so I'm a bit grumpy!)

    Are there really that many people who can travel to Canada to buy a car and bring it back to the USA to significantly change the Canadian Market?

    I'm a free market guy, and know/believe that artificial barriers (such as the withdrawl of warranty support or governments instituting trade barriers) in the long term artificially raise prices and stunt economic growth. Free trade allows the participants to find areas of relative advantage and capitalize on such advantages.

    This of course is in the macro view of the world. Of course there will always be individuals who are adversely effected. But even this should be short term as people and businesses can/should adapt as well.

    So just put me down as a free trader.

    TB
    As much as I don't like what the automakers are doing wrt Canadian imports, it's minor compared to my contempt for Microsoft's Business practices.
  • If you want to buy a car from a Canadian Ford Dealer, by all means, do so. If you want Warranty service on said car, have it performed by a Canadian Ford Dealer. They sold you the car. Ford Canada warrants the car. To ask a U.S. dealer to warrant the car is ridiculous. They (the U.S. dealer or Ford U.S.) did not sell it to you. Won't get reimbursed by Ford. Why this has gone on for almost 200 posts is beyond me. Just my two cents.
    Jim
  • I recalled when I was in the military and shipped my Chevy Beretta to Germany. You know what, the Opel dealer was more than happy to perform warranty service on my car. In fact, I was able to contact GM about what to do with my car and how to get service while overseas. They were very happy to give me a list of dealers who would support my car. I did take advantage of this as well, as I had an issue with an exhaust component that would creak and pop under acceleration/decelleration. The Opel service was excellent.

    If an Opel dealer across the ocean can support cars they don't normally sell, and provide warranty service, why can't a Ford dealer in the United States provide warranty service to a nearly identical vehicle? (The question about the differences still hasn't been answered, BTW.)

    Like I've said before, I believe it is just wrong for a manufacturer to not stand behind the vehicle they build.

    FWIW,

    TB
    Off to BBQ
  • sonjaabsonjaab Posts: 1,057
    Bought a Canadian Imported truck from the little
    dealer across the street. Had a warranty issue
    and took it to the local US ford dealer. Paid
    the 100? deductible...no problem.
    But as I read lately they are denieing (spl)
    warranty work on Can. Import cars. Who knows !
    Will talk to the used car dealer across the
    street about it and how much it cost to bring
    a used one over from Can. and post.....geo
  • KCRamKCRam Mt. Arlington NJPosts: 3,516
    from 192:
    It seems Ford is able to ship cars built in the USA every day to Canada.

    So why is it ok for Ford to move cars across borders and not individuals?


    Ford is sending untitled inventory to Canada, not sold titled cars. No different than Japanese-assembled home electronics being shipped to the US for sale. Not an apples to apples comparison at all.

    From 193:
    Now answer my question, why do dealers cry about losing money on new car sales and then complain about customers who may:

    1. Pay full sticker knowing the price is much lower in Canada.

    2. Desire to have the vehicle serviced at their local dealership.


    Dealers sell new cars at low margin in the hopes that the majority of their customers will return for parts, maintenance, repair, warranty/recall, and repeat business. THAT is wheree they make money. I can use myself as a good example for this. I ordered my Ram in Feb of 1996, and it was delivered in May. Sticker was $33,991 - invoice was 29,278. Selling prioce was 30,376, giving the dealer almost 1100 in gross revenue, plus almost all of the $1019 of holdback because that truck was there just long enough to be prepped. Good deal on both sides. And for the last 6+ years, I have all service except tires and alignment done there. They made LOTS of money there - thousands of dollars. And in return, I get price cuts on service and parts. I don't get the runaround when I do say something is wrong because they see that truck regularly. You know what another of my rewards was? When my dad was shopping for a minivan in August of 2001, they sold one to him for invoice and added a $2000 rebate to that. And knowing how well they treat my Ram, Dad goes there for all his Grand Caravan service too. It's all about establishing a relationship. And next spring, I'll likely be back to order a 2003 Ram that will sticker for $42,000.

    Now, had I purchased the truck in 1996 and never shown up there again, then expected another great deal in 2003, I likely wouldn't get one.

    From 197:
    I recalled when I was in the military and shipped my Chevy Beretta to Germany.

    Military and diplomatic personnel in other countries are considered guests of that country - you weren't establishing residency and becoming a German citizen, nor were you a German citizen bringing a brand new Beretta into the country from the US. Again, your situaltion was not an apples to apples comparison.

    kcram
    Host
    Smart Shopper and FWI Message Boards
  • Yes I was a guest in Germany. But if GM can service my car there and honor the warranty, why can't all car makers honor a warranty on a product they build?

    And titled or untitled really makes no difference mechanically. Assuming the car can be serviced in either country, what difference, morally speaking, does titled vs untitled have to do with it? A Ford Taurus built in Chicago or Atlanta is almost identical whether it is shipped to Ontario or St. Louis. Probably the only differences are daytime running lights and a speedo that reads in kilometers vs miles. So tell me how does the title status impact the carmakers ability to support the vehicle? It doesn't one bit.

    In my scenario, the customer still wanted/desired his vehicle serviced at his local dealership, so if we are to believe that new car sales is a money losing proposition, then why fight so hard to prevent buyers from buying from someone other than your local dealer?

    I guess what I'm saying is I don't really buy the argument that new car sales is a money losing proposition.

    And I don't buy any argument that has an automaker denying warranty coverage on a vehicle, regardless of where it was sold, unless the owner has abused the vehicle to cause the failure. I.E. if the vehicle truely failed due to a substandard part or design in normal use during the warranty period, it should be repaired by the manufacturer or the local service representative of that manufacturer.

    What part of having the carmaker stand behind their vehicle is unreasonable?

    TB
  • KCRamKCRam Mt. Arlington NJPosts: 3,516
    TB, your question was:
    So why is it ok for Ford to move cars across borders and not individuals?

    Here's why titled versus untitled DOES make ALL the difference: Ford is "selling" the car to the dealership - the dealership is NOT the end user! They are the retailer who in turn will sell the car TO that end user. The dealership will not be driving the car. And Ford can't sell directly to a consumer.

    As far as warranty coverage is concerned, your Beretta wasn't brought to Germany in an attempt to save money on the identical domestic product. GM was honoring warranty work on a US-spec vehicle, bought in the US buy a US citizen, who happens to be overseas in the military. It was a goodwill gesture for GM because parts needed would have to be flown over from the US at considerable expense.

    The equivalent situation to the US/Canada gray market would be (and this is pre-Euro monetary unit), a German citizen goes over the border to Belgium and buys a BMW because it's cheaper there, then brings it back to Germany to register and drive it. The issue is, someone from a given country going over the border to buy a product that is domestic to them because the foreign country sells it for less. Because the auto industry does not retail directly to the consumer, they are losing money on a Canadian gray market car because the invoice price is ALSO less.

    TB, make yourself the producer/manufacturer. You build Widgets in the US. You also sell these Widgets in Canada, but they're cheaper there because of the exchange rate and the market is substantially smaller, so you make less on a Canadian-sold Widget. You also have to mark the Widgets destined for Canada in Metric units. Aren't you the least upset that US citizens are going to Canada and buying your Widgets for less, which reduces your income on that Widget than if you had sold it in the US to the same person, the customer then goes to a fourth-party shop to install US measurements, then this consumer demands the same level of after-sale service despite the fact they are slicing your revenue stream that helps pay for that very service? "Morally right" is a nice idea, but it doesn't pay the bills in big business. Not saying I agree with it or even like it, but that's the way it works.

    kcram
    Host
    Smart Shopper and FWI Message Boards
  • So you are saying it's ok for a company like Ford to take advantage of exchange rates and lower labor costs by moving production to whatever country they chose, but it's not ok for customers to try to take the very same advantage as the manufacturer.

    Sorry, if it is right for Ford (or others) to produce where labor and exchange rates are in their favor, then they should allow their customers to do the very same.

    I guess I'm just a big boy scout, expecting a company to act in a non hypocritical fashion.

    Yes, I know businesses are in the business of making money. However, they should try to take advantage of their competitors, not their customers. It makes for happier customers.

    And no, I wouldn't be upset. I would want smart happy customers, and stand behind my product. I would require a certification to ensure that the vehicle didn't get the odometer set back, requiring an authorized dealer of my product do any conversion at the price they set to keep the warranty in effect.

    I think it is reasonable to put reasonable conditions on the warranty, but to simply deny coverage because your customer understands math and exchange rates doesn't earn any customer satisfaction.

    If my production costs are the same, I do give up some profit margin to sell in a different country, or maybe I make more by selling in the country. But one would hope that I'm not selling at a loss in that country, because then it makes no sense to sell there at all in the long term.

    TB
  • landru2landru2 Posts: 638
    to take advantage of currency exchange rates for personal gain at the expense of other consumers (in this case Canadian consumers)! To heck with them right?

    Yeah, you sure wouldn't want those big companies acting like hyocrites.
  • alfoxalfox Posts: 716
    to take advantage of currency exchange rates for personal gain. Individuals and corporations have been doing that for centuries. That's how money traders make their money. And, it's ALWAYS been at the expense of other consumers. Any monetary gain is at the expense of someone else. That's called economics.

    When I vacation in Quebec I benefit from the advantageous exchange rate at the expense of US tourism locations who did not get my business. That's OK, right?

    :-)
  • Yes, it is ok for people to take advantage of exchange rates.

    Or would you have us believe that only Americans take advantage of exchange rates. You would have us believe that Canadians don't travel, or when they do, they make sure they don't take advantage if the exchange rate benefits them. Please sit down and get a firm grip on reality. Anyone will take an advantage as long as it is legal. And it is ok too.

    Or should I complain if I go to an auction and someone with more money out bids me? That's your argument in a nutshell. US consumers have more money than Canadian consumers, so they shouldn't be allowed to buy goods in Canada.

    So please make sure you don't travel to a nation where the Canadian's average income is higher, or your currency more valuable, than that of the nation you visit. Otherwise, you too will be taking advantage of your situation at the expense of those folks.

    Oh, and Canada isn't really selling toilets to US consumers who can't get anything but low flow units here. Shouldn't Canadian plumbing supply shops refuse to sell toilets to US citzens since they can't even buy that type of toilet in the US? I say no, they have an advantage, so capitalize on it.

    Puuleeeze. Businesses take advantage of these rates everyday when the have the chance.

    My problem is when these very same businesses then prevent their customers from doing so.

    Remember, free markets, that's my mantra. Let those who appear to be at a disadvantage find their areas of relative advantage.

    TB
  • rroyce10rroyce10 Posts: 9,359
    ..... You can't knock any (legal) market that takes advantage of their product and that demand for that product ..

    Canada has some great boat builders that are making some excellent products. Their retail prices are in line with most of ours (including Searay) .. the difference is, they pay about 1/2 the price in labor and materials .. plus they get a huge "tax" placement from the Canadian govt. So their profit margins are 30/40% higher than the American counterparts -- So should we trade them cars for boats ..?

    No, that's their advantage .. so instead of the average US boat dealer making around 30%, the Canadian builders and dealers are making well over a 50% profit .. .. so who do we punish .? The buyer has the decision to purchase a Canadian boat or a US manufactured name -- it's the buyers decision.

    Terry.
  • landru2landru2 Posts: 638
    The issue with cars is slightly different than with toilets or other products. If Americans were buying so many toilets that Canadians either couldn't buy them or would have to pay much higher prices for them, then yes, I think you'd see some backlash.

    As you know, I sell the things. My paycheck doesn't depend on who buys them. Your justifications need to be made to your fellow consumers, not to me.
  • or is it the US dealers/carmakers that don't want the warranty.

    I seriously doubt the Canadian consumers are lobbying the car makers based in the US and Japan to prevent US shoppers from crossing the borders to buy cars.

    Instead, it is probably US dealers who are doing this.

    Of course that is pure speculation, but I doubt it is far from the truth.

    So if my speculation is true, it is the businessmen who are against this sort of free trade and not the consumer.

    You probably don't see the backlash on the toilets because they probably are only made in Canada, so their are more jobs in the Canadian plumbing fixture industry ;)

    TB
    Who learned that even in Germany, plumbing is done on the "inch" system. Drives the Germans batty.
  • landru2landru2 Posts: 638
    But every one that comes in looking for an F-350 either knows already or knows by the time that they leave that they are paying higher prices because of U.S. exporters.

    Regarding the toilets, I could be wrong, but aren't they only available in Canada because it is illegal to sell them in the U.S.?
  • Canadian merchants are assisting US consumers who wish to skirt US law.

    Not a good story for either party in the transaction.

    TB
  • robr2robr2 BostonPosts: 8,863
    ...Ultimately it's the automobile manufacturers and those US dealers that can be easily hurt by cross border transactions ie those close to the Canadian border.

    First, the manufacturer makes less on a Canadian spec unit because it is sold at a lower invoice to a Canadian dealer as compared to a US spec unit sold to a US dealer. As discussed before, Canadian prices are lower due to their economy and yes US consumers essentially subsidize Canada consumers in the profit column.

    Second, the manufacturer wants/needs to protect dealers near the border who are most affected by the lower prices in Canada. Although dealers say that there is little money to be made on new car sales, they still have to sell them in order to keep their franchise. My understanding is the following:

    dealers are allocated vehicles by the manufacturer - ie they take what is given to them and they have to sell them - even at invoice - in order to keep from going out of business

    they have to sell them in order to keep their franchise - sales drop and the manufacturer can pull the franchise

    they must be an authorized dealer in order to do warranty repairs although the trend is that manufacturers are cutting the payment on this work and it is no longer a great profit center.

    So dealers along the border lose whatever profit from a sale, get flack from the manufacturer for drop in sales, and get to do warranty repairs that don't cover the rent. The dealer closes its doors and sends everyone home. Dealer complains to the manufacturer and they put in place the rules that limit warranty coverage on gray market units.

    I've said it before - it will stop only with an increase in Canadian prices to eliminate the advantage.

    It doesn't help that many dealers are also importers and are essentially cutting their own throats for short term profitability.
  • robr2robr2 BostonPosts: 8,863
    It is perfectly legal for someone to bring a WC into the US that uses more than 1.6 gallons - the installation of said WC is illegal based on today's plumbing codes.
  • raybearraybear Posts: 1,795
    I've said it before - it will stop only with an increase in Canadian prices to eliminate the advantage.

    What's wrong with pushing for a drop in US prices?
  • KCRamKCRam Mt. Arlington NJPosts: 3,516
    Excuse me while I flush the toilet talk

    kcram
    Host
    Smart Shopper and FWI Message Boards
  • Leave the boards for a few days and didn't know I was missing such a hot topic.

    Raybear--Exactly. Funny how the price always has to go up.

    royce--great example of the shoe on the other foot.

    tboner- outstanding as usual. I totally agree. Corporations always take advantage of favorable money or wage rates, etc, but heaven forbid that a consumer can do the exact same thing. Completely hypocritical in my opinon. Companies spend hundreds of thousands of dollars lobbying politicians in both countries for favorable laws for them, but an individual buyer does not have that same political power or clout.

    rob--I hated it in school when the whole class got punished for one person's behavior. It wasn't fair then and it still isn't fair now.

    landru--I can see where you are coming from in being so opposed to this subject, because it does impact your paycheck. If my company was closing my plant to move it to canada I am sure I would oppose it to. But this discussion needs to be about canadian and US consumers and car makers, not individual car salesmen. Also I do not see the canadian govt pushig away visitors and tourists to your country. I love coming to Vancouver and when I am there I buy many items to bring back home with me. Grey market has never been an issue with my purchases. But yes I am taking advantage of the exchange rate, I am getting a great trip at a great price, a win for me and a win for the merchants that I am buying from and a win for the canadians that are employed because I am coming there for a trip and spending money.

    kcram---With all due respect, can we get real? Its a car. Its a car when it rolls off the assembly line, its a car when it gets off the truck in Canada, its a car when someone buys it. Playing semantics about it is a product and the dealer is not the end user just clouds the subject. You said "Ford is "selling" the car to the dealership " and then the dealer sells it to me. I do not see any difference. If the govt wants to invent some red tape to say I have to title a car, but not my microwave, that doesn't make a car any less of a commodity.

    I have an analogy I like to apply to human behavior. We learned in chemsitry class in college that electrons orbiting the nucleus of an atom reside on different level energy shells each stacked one above another. Without an outside stimulus, each electron will try to seek its lowest energy level. This is its natural behavior. It is my opinion that all things in nature follow this same principle, humans included. Cheetahs do not run at 100 mph all day, only when they need to to eat. For all of our noble ideas of being hard workers and superior level creatures, we are all basically seeking that lowest energy level. I think most people if they could quit there job tomorrow and be financially well off for the rest of their lives to pursue their dreams or hobbies would do it. I know I would. This is exactly what this grey market is about. Without an outside stimulus, US buyers follow the path to the lowest price. Now manufacturers are providing that outside stimulus by not honoring their warranty promises.
  • robr2robr2 BostonPosts: 8,863
    Nothing wrong with pushing for a drop in prices but do you believe it to be a possibility?

    Can you image Bill Ford, Bob Lutz, and Dieter Zetsch telling their respective companies: "Let's see the public wants more features, greater saftey systems, longer warranty, etc. Maybe we should add all that stuff and drop our price in the largest auto market in the world. Oh and tell the dealer body we're gonna cut their profit as well."

    Um - in my world that never happens. :-)
  • Welcome to my world. The computer market is so competative that not only do you get more features, but you pay less money for the computer.

    So yes, I can easily see products with more features, better performance, and a lower price tag.

    I see them every day ;)

    TB
  • rroyce10rroyce10 Posts: 9,359
    .... Hey, what do you think of the Alienware computers ..?

    Terry.
  • I don't really know much about PCs anymore. I install and maintain midrange to highend systems that use anywhere from 1 to 106 processors.

    And not a one of them runs WinBloze.

    Sorry, don't have much to offer on that topic.

    TB
  • I forgot to mention, good post on #211. You and tboner are correct. I too believe the ultimate instigator of this no warranty policy is the US dealerships that are losing sells.

    Also, I agree with tbone, there are many products that offer better features for a lower price, just look at vcr's, dvd players and tv's. When these products were first introduced they were prohibitively expensive. Now they are so cheap they are almost throw away products. If it breaks in a few years, just get another.

    royce--I think I maybe able to give you some insight on Alienware PC's. I do computer support, down in the trenches, not at the God level like tbone (just kidding tbone..LOL). I mostly deal with compaqs, dells and gateways, however I also am a mid level gamer, not hardcore mind you.

    Alienware and Falcon Northwest make some awesome gaming rigs, however IMHO they are overpriced. You are paying full retail for the cutting edge components that will be obsolete in 3 to 6 months. Cutting edge parts are expensive, no matter where you buy them, compusa or joes computer shop. My philosophy has always been to buy the one generation old technology. It is much cheaper and works with 99% of games available. In fact most games available today run great on a geforce 2 video card. No games run the features in a geforce 4 and just a few run features in a geforce 3. Of course I built my rig, so I could pick and choose my parts.

    When coworkers ask me about pc's most do not want them for gaming so I recommend dell or gateway. You get a good pc with good support. The gaming rig companies make great products, and there support is said to be top notch, but you pay for that just like you pay alot more for a mercedes even though a focus will get you across town just the same.

    There is a good canadian company, just to try to stay on topic, called Voodoo that makes good pc's. Not sure about the warranty issue though, it may be void if you buy it in canada but plan to use it in the US (see how stupid that sounds).

    Your mileage may vary...
  • rroyce10rroyce10 Posts: 9,359
    .... I'm really not much of a "gamer" .. but, I think they look cool ..l.o.l.

    What about ABS ..?

    Terry.
Sign In or Register to comment.