Erin just posted there was ample torque at low rpm (?!). Maybe the discrepancy in reviews is how the drivetrain communicates - perhaps lackluster feedback?
I think the way the post was worded was a bit weird. 1st and 2nd have more torque but maybe Reed didn't actually rev it out, so he was stuck in the torque hole. Not to mention 1st and 2nd are so short you're not really moving that fast anyways and have to shift out of gear pretty quickly, which is sometimes annoying.
Typically when you're caning a Japanese compact through good roads you leave it in third gear and hit a 'sweetspot' where you're in the the upper chunk of the rev range (good power and engine braking), and yet the gearing isn't so short you're forced to shift out of it until you hit some straights. In some cars the trans is also less balky at high engine speeds.
Comments
Typically when you're caning a Japanese compact through good roads you leave it in third gear and hit a 'sweetspot' where you're in the the upper chunk of the rev range (good power and engine braking), and yet the gearing isn't so short you're forced to shift out of it until you hit some straights. In some cars the trans is also less balky at high engine speeds.