By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
- Mark
Having said that, I do agree that the braking and wet traction has much to be desired. I'm not an expert and don't know if its all about these tires although the poor wet traction is a good indicator.
One aspect to the Goodyears credit: I'm at 24K on my Pilot and the Tires still look new. That could be a good news bad news thing though. If I find they need to be replaced because of snow, I'll be buying new tires well before the tread life is used up.
Drew
I read in consumers report that the Pilot has 2 towing capacities - 4500 and 3500. According to CR - the boat towing capacity is 4500, all other is 3500.
Makes no sense to me. Has anyone towed with the Pilot. I've got a 3000# sailboat - I have a mooring so I would only tow 2x per year.
Thx.
Rick
Whether you want to press the 3500/4500 lb limit would depend on a lot of factors: length of trip, anticipated speeds, grades, road conditions, type of trailer, brakes on the trailer, how heavily the vehicle is loaded with other cargo, etc. For a short trip at low speeds, I'd feel fine pressing the limits, but I wouldn't want to drive across the country up against the limit.
Personally, if I was towing a 3K lb sailboat any significant distance (especially if this weight doesn't include the trailer), I'd look long/hard at a larger SUV.
- Mark
Honda is notoriously tight-lipped about model changes, especially this far in advance.
Honda has announced that eventually all of its vehicles, and all trims, will have ABS, VSA, and side curtains. But it won't happen all at once.
Since the MDX got side curtains for 2004, it's quite possible the Pilot will get them for 2005. But that's pure speculation.
Thx for the input. The tow distance would be less than 2-3 miles on local roads - towing from the ramp in town to my house for winter storage.
I'd rather not get a larger SUV - have had an expedition in the past - due to very poor gas mileage, poor handling, size, etc. Pilot seems to be just the right size - although I just have been reading about the Volvo XC90 - 268HP andd 5000# tow capacity. I'd opt for the Volvo but hear the 3rd row seat is extremely tight.
Rick.
For towing a few miles, the Pilot should be peachy, even if you're right up against (or even slightly exceed) the tow ratings. Go for it and take your family on a nice luxury vacation with all the money you'll save.
- Mark
I know the MDX isn't a pilot, but they are almost mechanical twins, so I would think the problems listed previously are one-offs.
I think this might be perception. With most ABS systems, once you've reached the point where the ABS system is cycling, pressing harder on the pedal does absolutely nothing as the ABS computer is regulating the brake pressure, not you.
- Mark
But I doubt it is actually doing any reverse pressure - the pedal kick is just the ABS system telling you that it is engaged. It is a driver's natural reaction to ease off the pedal when it is kicking back and I think this is what you're feeling you have to overcome. Driver's ed classes these days have to consciously train drivers to continue pressing. In any event, you're doing the right thing.
Perceptions are weird. Try going up a steep residential hill sometime with the cruise control engaged. You will absolutely swear that the car is accelerating up the hll even though the speedo will show the speed to be steady or slightly declining.
- Mark
Reading those posts made me concerned that the function on my MDX might not be up to par, however in my opinion it seemed to work great.
The more I read about the Pilot, the more I see it as a great combination for what I need in a car. Only one area I wanted to explore - transmission. Does the Pilot use same gearbox as the Odyssey? I've heard horror stories about the Odyssey transmission (and have heard from some friends of mine who are having problems with their Accord transmission).
Any long term updates from Pilot owners? Thanks in advance.
BTW - Mark - the $ i would save on Pilot v. XC90 would definitey pay for some nice boat upgrades!
Rick
For the most part, the 3K oil change interval is no longer a valid reference.
YMMV.
Does anyone know anything about this?
Grade logic, Yes. Its more for descending mountain roads rather then steep off road slopes.
If I had it to do over, I would have gone with the Nav sysytem for the money. I found an AWESOME after market Portable DVD system. You can find it in Sam's now. It's a completely self contained unit. The screen is larger and for the car.. its JUST a screen. The Disks go right into the top of the Screen. Then, it has a stand and snap on speakers so you can use it in your home as a desk top unit.
Check it out as an option to the factory unit. I think you'll be glad you did. BTW.. This unit will save you about $500 vs. Honda's factory DVD with a larger screen that hangs between the seats and more flexibility to use outside the car.
Good Luck
Drew
I drove the CRV and am sure the it is a fine car, but its
1) doors look paper-thin
2) tires are skinny
3) rollover assessment got only three-star (NHtSA)
I also drove the toyota highlander, its same perfect size as CRV but toyota wants an extra $10,000.
well, anyway, its easy to get any cars used if you are a dealer who goes to alot of auctions. even super rare vehicles can be had for the right price. And reasons for these cars showing up used can be widely varied. Maybe they weren't making their payments on their new vehicle. maybe they decided an odyssey would be better when they found out their 3rd kid was on the way. maybe the owner died in a horrible hair-cutting accident and the estate executor sold the pilot back to a dealer. maybe ...... fill in the blank.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
I am just comparing to my MDX buying experience...at the time, used MDXs with immediate availability were going for more than new. The Pilot has been very hot and to see several used sitting on a lot was surprising.
just for comparison, though, does anyone happen to know how many MDXs were produced the first year?
Of course, this won't tell us much because you also have to consider the fact that the Pilot has come to the market rather late in the SUV craze. Plus you need to factor in that it would be difficult for dealers to gouge on new ones because most shoppers would probably move up to the MDX if the Pilot price was market up beyond MSRP. So that keeps the new Pilot prices reasonable. That, in turn, keeps used prices reasonable. And Honda is making a pretty large number of Pilots as far as I know. Then again, that never affected the amazingly strong resale value of Odysseys. Maybe we should look at Odyssey production numbers, too?
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
But, as long as Honda doesn't flood the market with Pilots in much the same way Ford does with Exploders (for example), then resale should hold strong. And, based on Honda's history, they won't flood the market. I think, and correct me if I'm wrong, they are also shooting for 180K pilots this year.
OH, and just thought of something else I should have thought of before. What if those used Pilots you saw are from folks trading them to get the '04. I have read postings from a couple of people who have done that.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
While at dlr to test drive the Pilot, the one I wanted was crammed in the back of some others. The sale guy decided to back it up towards the woods, and muscle it over a snowbank to get it out. When he started to the snow, the underside of the front rubbed snow and was resisting, thus the two front tires were spinning in the snowbank. He had to back up and give it a few more "running" starts to get it to plow through. THe two back tires were on hard dirt ground, and the fronts were spinning in the snow. Does this seem odd? I would have thought that since the fronts were spinning the awd would have kicked in since the backs were on dry ground and push ahead. I am guessing if he put the truck in D1 or D2 and kept the speed slow and hit the VTC switch or whatever it is, that that might have forced it into AWD and plowed ahead, but I was baffled why it didnt do it itself. While the two fronts were sitting in the snowbank, he gassed it and they just spun wildly.
Am I missing something?
Although I was considering replacing the Integrity's, I have decided to stick with them for the time being. Since we have very moderate snow in our area and my snow driving will be pretty much confined to going up to the local ski resort, the Integritys should be more than sufficient.
I will also add that on our most recent 800 mile road trip over Thanksgiving, the ride was very quiet and smooth. Of course our 96 Oddysey was extremely noisy, so my point of reference may be skewed.
--jay
When a vehicle is shipped from the plant to the dealer, they often disable the electronics. I once test-drove a CR-V that didn't have dash lights and a radio because they hadn't finished prepping that particular vehicle. The VTM-4 system uses electronic sensors, so it is possible that the dealer simply hadn't hooked everything up.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
Thanks!!
Subaru AWD does not depend on gear selection or speed. Its more complicated and differs slightly from models, but basically:
Subaru automatic trannys are 90/10 under normal conditions. Power shifts to the rear wheels when needed at any speed or gear (electronically controlled). More than 50% or the power can be directed to the rear wheels.
Manual trannys are 50/50 and are mechanically controlled. Again power can shift more front or rear at any speed or any gear.
The Turbo and VDC models are slightly different but also are not speed or gear dependant.
Most models also have a limited slip rear differential.
Power shifts very smoothly front to rear and back. In extreme cases (hard acceleration on a icy spot) you will feel the rear get power when the front slips. Another cases of hard acceleration on gravel will not noticably spin the front tires and you can't feel power go to the rear except that the car accelerates well.
--Jay
Overall, which is better and why (can have dealer swap tires if need be)?
So the Pilot does this same thing, but with the push of a button instead. That's the only difference.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
I look at the interior and already see some minuses on the Pilot (or any SUV I guess) side: 1. the 3rd row is much smaller than Ody and frankly not for seating on hours kinda trips, 2. the trunk space when 3rd row seat is up is much more limited than Ody, and 3. the middle row is not movable.
Can someone tell me a few good practical reasons why should I pay more for a Pilot over an Ody.
I think most people buy the Pilot over the Odyssey simple because they like driving an SUV more than a minivan - either vehicle would do the job just fine and the price delta isn't terribly significant.
I recall this arose six-months or so ago, and a lot of Pilot owners stepped up to defend the car and weigh in that they thought the Pilot is a better all-around vehicle even discounting AWD and the extra towing capacity. (I disagree obviously.) You might want to page back and review these comments.
- Mark
Best of luck
Drew