2005 Mercedes-Benz CL65 AMG Long-Term Road Test

Edmunds.comEdmunds.com Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 10,316
edited September 2014 in Mercedes-Benz

Comments

  • adamb1adamb1 Member Posts: 122
    what does the engine look like with the cover off?
  • throwbackthrowback Member Posts: 445
    I can't disagree about the AMG engines. The 6.3 in particular sounds lovely.
  • reminderreminder Member Posts: 383
    It's habit of consuming oil isn't an endearing quality either. Complexity for the sake of complexity can be trouble. Lotta good 8 bangers out there.
  • quadricyclequadricycle Member Posts: 827
    The whole point of the V12 option is more refinement and smoother power delivery, since it will usually balance better than a V8. Considering what kind of car the CL is, I would say that a quiet, vibration free, smooth idle V12 option makes a lot of sense. You seem to expect things from the engine that it wasn't designed for. This is why Mercedes also offers a V8 if you want it (lighter, sounds better, but more vibration prone), and also why they put that 6.2 V8 into the SLS instead of a V12.
  • kevm14kevm14 Member Posts: 423
    All things considered, 90° V8s don't have much of a problem with vibration.
  • g_freakg_freak Member Posts: 1
    Ed Hellwig,
    Paper shmaper-- it is a monster on the asphalt.
    Not sure what you were looking for. If all you want is "deep rumbling" than get a CD and play that while you are driving. If you just want a good looking car get some sportsy thing with a convertible top. If you want it to sound quiet get a Caddy, but if you want that "suck you into the back seat sensation" go for the "65"
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.