Toyota Tundra vs. Chevrolet Silverado

1679111237

Comments

  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Yeah, they are Rhodesian Ridgebacks and while they are strong and beautiful dogs, they don't have a lot of hair to keep them warm.

    Rhodesian Ridgebacks, Those are like one of the tallest dogs in the world next to the Great Dane & Deer Hound. :)
    I have a Cane Corso which is a pretty big dog and a Rotweiller/pitbull mix. He is a baby and is a awesome dog.
    The Cane Corso is named "Sly" after Sylvester Stallone cuz my name is Rocky, after him. ROTFLMAO :blush: The Rot/Pit mix name is "Crawl" (long story) :confuse: Well that is what my Brother in-law named him and he had to give him to us because his wife joined the air force a few years ago and would be on the road a lot as you could imagine. Both like to ride in the car but here in the Tejas Panhandle for 7-8 months out of the year it's pretty warm so they will do fine in the bed of the truck because I don't do many outdoor activity's in the winter. ;)

    In other words, if I'm cold outside wearing shoes, pants and a long sleeve shirt, then chances are they will be too. Besides, they're jumpers so putting them in a bed without severely restricting their movement will mean that they may jump while the vehicle is in motion

    Yeah dogs can get cold if they are short-haired. I think their owner just spoils them. :P Well I can't say much because both of my dogs are pretty spoiled also. :blush:

    In the cab, they can be kept fairly content and aside from nose prints on the windows, they don't do much if any damage...

    Well just make sure you put some padding down on the leather so their sharp nails don't puncture the soft supple leather. ;)

    Rocky
  • KCRamKCRam Member Posts: 3,516
    ...but let's not turn this to CanineSpace instead of CarSpace :)

    kcram - Pickups Host
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    I'm not trying to push buttons, but instead find out more. I'm not currently a "truck guy" and am just trying to learn a little more about what is out there.

    thegraduate, that's cool. You make some good points ;)

    yes, but what about the real "truck" guys who want the biggest engine (6.2L for GM, 5.7L for Toyota) without all the whipped-cream options? What does GM offer to compete with a lesser-optioned Toyota?

    Well with Toyota, you can have it now. With GM, you will have to wait until late summer/early fall to get those options. I'm sure if you test drove a Silvy/Sierra you'd like it. My suggestion is go drive both and see what you like and compare deals by shopping at various dealers. ;)

    Just by searching dealer inventory, I have found multiple Tundras in the color I would want, with cloth (which I'd want), and with the 5.7L engine, for under $30,000.

    Is that with 4WD ? That certainly isn't a CrewMax is it but a double cab ?

    I guess the way I look at it is you can pay sticker or like I've been hearing $2-3K over because of demand for the Tundra 5.7 V8, or you can get less powertrain but still plenty with a 6.0 V8 with 367 hp. or if you don't need that much the 5.3 will work and have the nicer interior, plus ride not to mention 5 yr. 100K warranty and pay significantly less dough for the GM truck.

    It's as simple as that. It's a choice some will have to make. It all depends on what you want or need. The choice might be simpler this fall if people wait. Right now the Sierra Denali is GM's top real truck but yes it's whipped cream with options. :shades:

    Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    I agree but the dogs were important to our truck story's :P

    Rocky
  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    I edited my post to reflect that I was looking at a Double Cab, and it was a 2WD model.

    I'm not in the market for a vehicle right now, and if I were, I probably wouldn't be looking at the biggest engine offerings. I'm just amazed that, in the last two years, people have decided that 300 horsepower wasn't enough, and that sports-sedan acceleration and 10,000 pound hauling capacities (who buys a half-ton to actually do that?) Before I decided on getting my current car (yes, a CAR :)) I cross-shopped the old Silverado, and found an LS like I liked it that listed near $30k, but was quoted around $23,000 for. It was a 2WD and had the 4.8L, with the 5.3L going for about $900 more from that particular dealer.

    The main reason I wanted a truck was for the interior room (I'm 6'4") but found a car that gave me enough room at a slightly lower price than the trucks. Plus, it gets an average of 30 MPG in my daily drive (it's an Accord). Obviously, I'm not in need of loads of power (I'm a college student) and DO need something to last me a long time cheaply. I stumbled on this discussion when reading about the new Tundra and have found all of this info pretty astonishing. 380+ horsepower... I remember when I thought the Silverado had things wrapped up when its 5.3L offered 285hp a few years ago.

    My how quickly things change...
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    thegraduate, nice post.

    Well thankfully you are getting lots of choices from the big 3. I understand a few years ago why so many wanted to drive an accord. Next go around you will be able to cross shop cars like the 08' Malibu which BTW will have a hybrid option and a 6-speed auto. You can get a ecotec 4-cylinder in it with LTZ trim or can get a 3.6 "high feature" V6. The Saturn Aura, is a worthy accord alternative also and it will have a Greenline version with a hybrid. It seemed liked yesterday General Motors, Ford, Chrysler, didn't offer competitive high volume camcord alternatives and today all 3 have players in that segment are or have some on the way. Toyota's, real entry in the truck segment was a huge splash and they are looking to make a dent. Thankfully General Motors, had such a great trucks coming out it will make little impact on them. Ford and Dodge, now know where the bar is set and it's upt to them to raise it. General Motors, I gaurantee you has already started laying the groundwork for it's next full-size truck. They will have to remodel and refreshen more often with Toyota being in the market place. Nissan, isn't shying away either and has brought a gun to the gunfight. They refreshened their interior already because it was last generation already.

    The bottom line is truck buyers are going to benefit with fresher designs coming more often. The choices might be hard for some but in my eyes it's easy. General Motors, IMHO is the king of this segment and has been for a long time. They know how to do trucks and are learning how to do cars. Like many have said their are so many choices and it's hard to decide what to buy now days. I feel blessed GM, is finally not just making great exteriors on cars but have made some benchmark interiors over the last year. The future indeed looks brighter than ever with results instead of promises. :)

    Rocky
  • denali2denali2 Member Posts: 45
    Don't forget the 6.0. It is no slouch either.
  • denali2denali2 Member Posts: 45
    Here's a few more pics..Remember if you don't like tan, it's available in Ebony. The Denali also uses Nuance Leather front and rear.

    image

    image

    image

    image

    image

    image

    image

    image

    image

    image

    image

    image

    image

    image
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    I'm getting one exactly like you see in those pics. :blush:

    Black w/ Tan

    The Sierra Denali is flat-out :shades:

    Rocky
  • denali2denali2 Member Posts: 45
    lol...I'm trying to find pics of a White one like I ordered.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Good Luck !!!!! I haven't seen any on the net and I used yahoo, google, msn, search engines over the last few months looking for more pics. ;)

    Rocky
  • beliasbelias Member Posts: 316
    Do you know whent the Denali will be out? On the link that was posted it said sometime in the first quarter of 07. I will say that one thing I've always liked about GM over Chevy is the bullet-hole grill -- it is far more attractive than the bowtie in my opinion.
  • beliasbelias Member Posts: 316
    BTW, your dogs sound great! It is good that they can be in the bed and yes, I know I probably do spoil mine a bit, but I love them and they're pretty good (though they can be destructive if not exercised regularly). Still, they need to be considered when looking for a truck, because that is the vehicle they'll be in when we take them for any kind of trips.
  • denali2denali2 Member Posts: 45
    I'm expecting mine around April 16th. They'll be in Canada first I assume, since it's not on your website yet.Ordering started Friday here.
  • toykickstoykicks Member Posts: 95
    well i wouldnt call the 5.7 underpowered. The 6.2 only has 14 more ftlbs of torque then the 5.7 and 20 more hp Both are beasts but the 6.2 is a larger displacement engine with a higher compression ratio requiring 91+ octane most of the time to create that power but who cares if you have money to burn then its a perfect choice. I'm still thinking of getting the Tindra ;)
  • dreasdaddreasdad Member Posts: 276
    Back seat seems kind of small as well as the center console-
    I will still take a crew max any day, don't have to get nav to get the back up camera and has a lot more room as well, why pay more for the denali over a regular Silv?
  • framer_rubeframer_rube Member Posts: 28
    Do ya see that one? That one got that TV in it now!

    image

    That got to be the best one ever! Wait to Franklin hears this one now! Never heard of no TVs in no trucks before, that be that greatest idea ever now! What will that factory think up next now? I think we need one of them ones for sure now. Haulin tabacco and watchin TV! Good luck on this one now!
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484

    I guess the way I look at it is you can pay sticker or like I've been hearing $2-3K over because of demand for the Tundra 5.7 V8, or you can get less powertrain but still plenty with a 6.0 V8 with 367 hp. or if you don't need that much the 5.3 will work and have the nicer interior, plus ride not to mention 5 yr. 100K warranty and pay significantly less dough for the GM truck.

    It's as simple as that. It's a choice some will have to make. It all depends on what you want or need. The choice might be simpler this fall if people wait. Right now the Sierra Denali is GM's top real truck but yes it's whipped cream with options.


    How 'bout this. The Tundra 5.7 is the best $30k truck, and the GMC Denali is the best $40k truck?

    How 'bout them apples?

    DrFill :shades:
  • denali2denali2 Member Posts: 45
    Load up a reg Silv...Comes out to more then the Base Denali with the 6.2 L. Plus the Denali will show the Tundra it's taillights.lol Sorry man..GM wins..Maybe next time on Toyota's 4th attempt..haha.
  • toykickstoykicks Member Posts: 95
    Dont judge to quickly the denali hasnt even been tested yet ;)

    4th try would be in the diesel 3/4 ton truck market with the rumored 800ftlb torque diesel which might be out by mid 08 around summer
  • toykickstoykicks Member Posts: 95
    Good luck with your denali its a very nice looking truck.

    just dont kill yourself trying to race other people.
  • explorerx4explorerx4 Member Posts: 20,835
    these trucks are a long way from back when i had my f150. it had a 302 v8, 4 speed manual, 6200 gvw upgrade, bench seat(could fit 4 in a pinch), and do60 air. added some gold nugget rims and bfg tires. everyone loved it.
    2024 Ford F-150 STX, 2023 Ford Explorer ST, 91 Mustang GT vert
  • denali2denali2 Member Posts: 45
    The Toyota tested at what 14.8 in the 1/4? The Escalade EXT tested at 14.9. The Denali is I think 500lbs lighter..The Tundra is on par with the 6.0 367hp in the 1/4. The CrewCab Denali Classic runs 14.8-15.0 with the 345hp 6.0. Aftermarket for the 367hp 6.0 is huge. I predict the new Denali 6.2 is in the 14.3-14.5 range bone stock.

    I can see it now...Guy goes back to the Toyota dealer.."Excuse me sir..I think something is wrong we my new Tundra, Them Chevy boys show me their tailights all the time" lol ahh the good'ol horsepower wars..I'll admit though, that Toyota does has a nice setup though. Now a TRD version will be interesting for sure.
  • toykickstoykicks Member Posts: 95
    Truck Trends latest issue got different #s with the tundra DC 4x4 0-60 6.0 sec 1/4 mile in 14.6 seconds. They couldnt get good #s from the 4x2 tundras they tested due to all the wheel spin. They compared the 4x4 chevy silverado with the 6.0 and it got 0-60 in 7.7 seconds and 15.7 seconds 1/4 mile. The tundra they tested weighed 200 pounds more then the silverado. that denali better be in the high 13s or sub 14s :P

    4x4 tundra 5.7 5600+ pounds
    4x4 6.0 silverado & sierra 5300+ pounds
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Do you know whent the Denali will be out?

    Everywhere I've read they have said by the end of this month or the beginning of next month we will see the first ones become available. ;)

    Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    I was being a lil' sarcastic. :P

    Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Back seat seems kind of small as well as the center console-
    I will still take a crew max any day, don't have to get nav to get the back up camera and has a lot more room as well, why pay more for the denali over a regular Silv?


    How can you have a back up camera without a navigation system to display it on ? :confuse:

    There are lots of "Gadget" & "Luxury" reasons to buy the Sierra Denali over the Silverado. You get a lot more features on the Denali that you can't find on any other truck but the Escalade EXT. ;)

    Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    That sounds like a pretty fair assessment. However a lot of people would argue the Silvy is better than the Tundra, and that includes members of the press. ;)

    Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Well I've read that GM, is also working on a 800 lbs. Duramax engine. It's really heating up in the truck market !

    Last I new the Tundra Diesel was suppose to get 720ftlbs. of tq. I guess they have raised that bar already. :)

    Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    LOL.... :D

    Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Well I don't like to look snobbish. I think it is more bold than snobbish. :)

    Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    0-60 in six-flat ? Do you have a link to that test. :surprise:

    Rocky
  • beliasbelias Member Posts: 316
    Actually there is a lcd display that goes on the roof at the front of the console that can display the image from the backup camera. That is the first incarnation in any vehicle that I've heard of that offers this feature. All others require the Nav...
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Really.....That's interesting !

    Thanks, for the update. :)

    Rocky
  • denali2denali2 Member Posts: 45
    That time they got was putting in in 4X4 High."The result was an impressive 6.0 second 0-60 time, but unfortunately it was a risk to grenading the transfer case." Which raises the question "Why give it all that power if you're not not going to give the driver access to it?" The Silverado won the slalom and figure-eight tests. The comparo is the 5.3 Silverado with the 5.3 V8.

    I can't see the Denali doing 13's...If it does there is ABSOLUTELY no reason to even think of a Tundra. 13's is HAULING...lol
  • rorrrorr Member Posts: 3,630
    "That time they got was putting in in 4X4 High."The result was an impressive 6.0 second 0-60 time, but unfortunately it was a risk to grenading the transfer case." Which raises the question "Why give it all that power if you're not not going to give the driver access to it?"

    Maybe because most folks buying vehicles for drag racing aren't looking at 5000+ lb 4-dr 4x4 pickups. Instead, folks buying 5000+ lb 4-dr 4x4 pickups may want that extra power and torque for more adult reasons like safely accelerating to highway speeds while towing. Under which conditions you'll not be worried about 'grenading the transfer case'....
  • denali2denali2 Member Posts: 45
    That's a lot of customers that isn't going to buy a Tundra. You wouldn't believe how many trucks are at the track. There seems to be a trend of greater fascination getting a 5000lb plus truck into 12's & 13's. A sports car is expected to be fast, with a truck running down sportscars, is entertaining. My Denali will be at the track in the first week I have it. I ordered my truck from here but it was a GMC dealer. They had to get the truck from a Chevy dealer. On my way home we stopped at the track and ran it with the wrappers still on the truck..lol
  • kdhspyderkdhspyder Member Posts: 7,160
    An EC 4WD Sierra, non-Denali, with the same equipment as a DC 4WD Tundra lists for about $37,000 US while the Tundra lists for about $33,000.

    These are respectively, the 6.0L Sierra and the 5.7L Tundra. The 6.2L Denali is more...
  • kdhspyderkdhspyder Member Posts: 7,160
    This is purely regional Rocky. We are under MSRP from day one and some places are selling at $500 to $2000 under sticker from day one.

    Your Region May Vary.
  • kdhspyderkdhspyder Member Posts: 7,160
    Load up a reg Silv...Comes out to more then the Base Denali with the 6.2 L. Plus the Denali will show the Tundra it's taillights.lol Sorry man..GM wins..Maybe next time on Toyota's 4th attempt..haha.

    It's gonna be close with the GMC having more theoretical power and the new 6 speed which GM needs desperately.

    But now if GM also slips in the mysterious 4 second delay like in the Silverado then there's no way it comes within a truck length of the 5.7L Tundra.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    mysterious 4 second delay

    What is that ? Is that starting the truck shifting it into gear ?????

    Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    They will go over MSRP here I can promise you that. ;)

    Rocky
  • kdhspyderkdhspyder Member Posts: 7,160
    You read all about it in the Edmunds comparo of the Silverado and the Tundra. For some reason, fuel economy(?), GM has programmed a 4 sec closed loop into the fuel mapping of the 6.0L holding the at-the-wheels horsepower to the low 300's instead of 367 hp as listed.

    It essentially turns the 6.0 into a 5.3L at WOT at startup.
  • kdhspyderkdhspyder Member Posts: 7,160
    Still to be proven with the Denali, but for sure it won't be the Chevy boys smilin'. They are now until further notice relegated to second place behind the Tundra from jump street.
  • rorrrorr Member Posts: 3,630
    "You wouldn't believe how many trucks are at the track. There seems to be a trend of greater fascination getting a 5000lb plus truck into 12's & 13's."

    Hmmmm.

    I guess then you spiritually identify with folks taking modded Honda Civic's to the track; it's the same rationale. They also find great fascination with taking FWD econoboxes and running down sportscars....

    My point was that Toyota didn't build the truck to be a drag-race vehicle. Yes, I'm sure that some folks WILL want to race it.
  • jreaganjreagan Member Posts: 285
    You read all about it in the Edmunds comparo of the Silverado and the Tundra. For some reason, fuel economy(?), GM has programmed a 4 sec closed loop into the fuel mapping of the 6.0L holding the at-the-wheels horsepower to the low 300's instead of 367 hp as listed.

    It essentially turns the 6.0 into a 5.3L at WOT at startup.


    This makes no sense to me, what is a "4 sec closed loop"? and how does it reduce available HP? I would like further explanation please.
  • jreaganjreagan Member Posts: 285
    I think I found my answer...read on...

    As it turns out, the explanation boils down to an engine calibration strategy. GM calibrated the 367-hp 6.0-liter V8 to remain in stoichiometric "closed-loop" fuel delivery mode for 4 seconds after the throttle is floored. This fueling strategy helps keep emissions in check (and saves fuel) at the expense of reduced power — about 40 hp less at the peak. Once the driver lifts his right foot from the wide-open throttle position, the 4-second clock resets.

    This leads me to more questions: What can be done about this? Can it be reprogrammed? And will it void any warranties?
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    I just called Chevy's customer service and they couldn't give me an answer but would document my complaint. ;)

    Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    I would think one could use a programmer to reprogram it ?

    I hope others send hate mail to GM, over it. The 6.2 better not do this otherwise I'll be :mad:

    Rocky
  • jreaganjreagan Member Posts: 285
    I am also wondering...Does it go into this closed-loop mode ONLY when the throttle is "floored"? In other words, if I open the throttle say...90% for 4 secs and then punch it, will it not use that mode? Seems that would alleviate the problem since you can only feed an engine so much during ramped up acceleration anyway. Right? I am guessing reprogramming it would give GM an excuse to void your 5 yr/100K mile warranty. Also, they claim this is to improve emissions and mileage, but I am wondering if it is also meant to prevent beating your drivetrain to death by subjecting it to that much power and torque from a dead stop.

    Opinions welcome...facts are preferred.

    Jeff
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.